Anyone paying attention to the Arab-Israeli conflict over the last 20 years knows how those who regularly propagandize on behalf of the Palestinian Arab cause try to hijack every cause or crisis in the world and make it about Israel and the Palestinians. Given this penchant, that so many notorious haters of Israel from Shaun King to Rashida Tlaib to Huwaida Arraf have tried to claim that Ukrainians fighting against the Russian invasion are the same as Hamas and Fatah terrorists trying to murder Israelis is not surprising.
But since before Russia invaded Ukraine, no Ukrainian militias were indiscriminately firing thousands of rockets into Russia targeting Russian civilians. And no Ukrainian leaders were claiming Russia has no right to exist, falsely claiming Russians don’t have any history in Russia, or inciting their people to kill random Russians, while offering Ukrainians “pay to slay” incentive compensation packages that pays them eight times what the average teacher makes in Ukraine if they murder Russians. Most people understand that these false comparisons are specious.
What is surprising, however, is how few people understand the strong connection between the Russification ideology and history, which animates Putin and Russia’s latest effort to conquer and colonize Ukraine, and the Arabization ideology and history, which has animated, for over a century, the continuous violent rejection of Jewish nationhood and sovereignty in the Middle East.
In Putin’s February 21 speech in which he announce Russia’s unprovoked invasion of Ukraine, he said:
“I would like to emphasize again that Ukraine is not just a neighboring country for us. It is an inalienable part of our own history, culture and spiritual space. The first is really the main one: why was it necessary to appease the nationalists, to satisfy the ceaselessly growing nationalist ambitions on the outskirts of the former empire? What was the point of transferring to the newly, often arbitrarily formed administrative units—the union republics—vast territories that had nothing to do with them? Let me repeat that these territories were transferred along with the population of what was historically Russia.”
Putin previously made similar ahistorical claims about Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia, claiming they too had no business being independent countries because they really were just part of the greater Russian nation.
But the Russification of these separate nations and peoples started far earlier in Russian history and dates as far back as the 1500s
Most people in both Ukraine and the Baltic states speak Russian. They do so because it was the state language of the Soviet Union, mandated everywhere and forced on these countries in a broad Russification campaign during the Soviet era. But the Russification of these separate nations and peoples started far earlier in Russian history and dates as far back as the 1500s. And it became an official part of the Russian Empire’s imperialist policies under Czar Alexander III in the 1880s. What both unofficial and official Russification meant in practice was the coerced use of the Russian language as well as the repression of all other nationalities and cultures.
It is this policy of Russification, under both the Czars and Soviet dictators like Stalin, which was meant to destroy all aspects of the separate cultural, linguistic and national identities of the peoples and nations the Russians conquered, including in Ukraine. It is why during a March 3, 2022 meeting with the Russian Security Council Putin said: “I will never give up my conviction that Russians and Ukrainians are one nation.” Putin meant this statement as a justification for Russian imperialism and for once again turning Ukraine into a vassal state of Russia without any regard for the right of the Ukrainian people to sovereignty and self-determination.
By the same token, Arabization, including of Judea/Palestine, which began in the 7th century, was also implemented to destroy the separate ethnic identities, languages and cultures of the various tribes and peoples conquered during the Arab Empire’s imperial conquests throughout the Middle East and North Africa (MENA).
Arabization has been such a powerful force behind the almost complete Arab hegemony and control of the MENA that until 2014 it was illegal in relatively moderate Morocco for parents to simply give their children non-Arabic names, even though Morocco was originally Amazigh (Berber) for centuries before the Arab conquest of North Africa and a large percentage of its population to this day (despite centuries of institutional and systemic Arabization) still identifies as Amazigh.
And while Putin has repeatedly given voice over the past two weeks to the Russian imperialist and eliminationist idea that Ukraine has no legitimacy as an independent country, that same mantra has been regularly preached by Arab supremacists in connection with movements for greater sovereignty, independence, or even equality in parts of their indigenous lands by Kurds, Copts, Amazigh and Jews.
It is plain that the history of Russification and Soviet control of Ukraine has deeply influenced Putin’s view of Ukraine, such that he admittedly “will never give up his conviction” that Ukraine has no business being an independent country. Similarly, Arab dictators and theocrats, since the start of the Jewish independence and indigenous rights movement (Zionism) gaining momentum in the 20th century, have been adamant—due to the history of systemic Arabization and Islamization in the MENA—that the Jewish people have no right to an independent country, and that any such country, no matter how small, is illegitimate and must be destroyed.
Regarding Jewish independence and sovereignty in the Jewish people’s indigenous, historical and religious homeland one can find statements remarkably similar to Putin’s conviction (about the alleged illegitimacy of Ukrainian independence) in Article 15 of the Hamas Charter and Article 20 of the PLO Charter.
While Article 15 of the Hamas Charter focuses on the idea that once land has become (through conquest) “Islamic lands” that it can never revert back (“[w]hen our enemies usurp some Islamic lands, Jihad becomes a duty binding on all Muslims”), Article 20 of the PLO Charter (also known as the Palestinian National Covenant) expressly denies the Jewish people their agency, their peoplehood and their legitimacy as a nation.
Thus, it is quite clear that it is not only fake claims about “genocide” and bogus allegations over who are the “Nazis” that those who hate Israel have in common with Putin. It is also the denial of separate identities for those who were subjected for centuries to imperialist campaigns to destroy them—those who, despite Russification and Arabization, retained their unique identities, languages and cultures, who worked, fought for, and earned their respective rights to sovereign and independent states. Both Putin and those who hate Israel are convinced that these states have no right to exist and wish to eliminate them.
Russification of Ukraine and Arabization of Judea/Palestine: Two Sides of the Same Coin
Micha Danzig
Anyone paying attention to the Arab-Israeli conflict over the last 20 years knows how those who regularly propagandize on behalf of the Palestinian Arab cause try to hijack every cause or crisis in the world and make it about Israel and the Palestinians. Given this penchant, that so many notorious haters of Israel from Shaun King to Rashida Tlaib to Huwaida Arraf have tried to claim that Ukrainians fighting against the Russian invasion are the same as Hamas and Fatah terrorists trying to murder Israelis is not surprising.
But since before Russia invaded Ukraine, no Ukrainian militias were indiscriminately firing thousands of rockets into Russia targeting Russian civilians. And no Ukrainian leaders were claiming Russia has no right to exist, falsely claiming Russians don’t have any history in Russia, or inciting their people to kill random Russians, while offering Ukrainians “pay to slay” incentive compensation packages that pays them eight times what the average teacher makes in Ukraine if they murder Russians. Most people understand that these false comparisons are specious.
What is surprising, however, is how few people understand the strong connection between the Russification ideology and history, which animates Putin and Russia’s latest effort to conquer and colonize Ukraine, and the Arabization ideology and history, which has animated, for over a century, the continuous violent rejection of Jewish nationhood and sovereignty in the Middle East.
In Putin’s February 21 speech in which he announce Russia’s unprovoked invasion of Ukraine, he said:
“I would like to emphasize again that Ukraine is not just a neighboring country for us. It is an inalienable part of our own history, culture and spiritual space. The first is really the main one: why was it necessary to appease the nationalists, to satisfy the ceaselessly growing nationalist ambitions on the outskirts of the former empire? What was the point of transferring to the newly, often arbitrarily formed administrative units—the union republics—vast territories that had nothing to do with them? Let me repeat that these territories were transferred along with the population of what was historically Russia.”
Putin previously made similar ahistorical claims about Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia, claiming they too had no business being independent countries because they really were just part of the greater Russian nation.
Most people in both Ukraine and the Baltic states speak Russian. They do so because it was the state language of the Soviet Union, mandated everywhere and forced on these countries in a broad Russification campaign during the Soviet era. But the Russification of these separate nations and peoples started far earlier in Russian history and dates as far back as the 1500s. And it became an official part of the Russian Empire’s imperialist policies under Czar Alexander III in the 1880s. What both unofficial and official Russification meant in practice was the coerced use of the Russian language as well as the repression of all other nationalities and cultures.
It is this policy of Russification, under both the Czars and Soviet dictators like Stalin, which was meant to destroy all aspects of the separate cultural, linguistic and national identities of the peoples and nations the Russians conquered, including in Ukraine. It is why during a March 3, 2022 meeting with the Russian Security Council Putin said: “I will never give up my conviction that Russians and Ukrainians are one nation.” Putin meant this statement as a justification for Russian imperialism and for once again turning Ukraine into a vassal state of Russia without any regard for the right of the Ukrainian people to sovereignty and self-determination.
By the same token, Arabization, including of Judea/Palestine, which began in the 7th century, was also implemented to destroy the separate ethnic identities, languages and cultures of the various tribes and peoples conquered during the Arab Empire’s imperial conquests throughout the Middle East and North Africa (MENA).
Arabization has been such a powerful force behind the almost complete Arab hegemony and control of the MENA that until 2014 it was illegal in relatively moderate Morocco for parents to simply give their children non-Arabic names, even though Morocco was originally Amazigh (Berber) for centuries before the Arab conquest of North Africa and a large percentage of its population to this day (despite centuries of institutional and systemic Arabization) still identifies as Amazigh.
And while Putin has repeatedly given voice over the past two weeks to the Russian imperialist and eliminationist idea that Ukraine has no legitimacy as an independent country, that same mantra has been regularly preached by Arab supremacists in connection with movements for greater sovereignty, independence, or even equality in parts of their indigenous lands by Kurds, Copts, Amazigh and Jews.
It is plain that the history of Russification and Soviet control of Ukraine has deeply influenced Putin’s view of Ukraine, such that he admittedly “will never give up his conviction” that Ukraine has no business being an independent country. Similarly, Arab dictators and theocrats, since the start of the Jewish independence and indigenous rights movement (Zionism) gaining momentum in the 20th century, have been adamant—due to the history of systemic Arabization and Islamization in the MENA—that the Jewish people have no right to an independent country, and that any such country, no matter how small, is illegitimate and must be destroyed.
Regarding Jewish independence and sovereignty in the Jewish people’s indigenous, historical and religious homeland one can find statements remarkably similar to Putin’s conviction (about the alleged illegitimacy of Ukrainian independence) in Article 15 of the Hamas Charter and Article 20 of the PLO Charter.
While Article 15 of the Hamas Charter focuses on the idea that once land has become (through conquest) “Islamic lands” that it can never revert back (“[w]hen our enemies usurp some Islamic lands, Jihad becomes a duty binding on all Muslims”), Article 20 of the PLO Charter (also known as the Palestinian National Covenant) expressly denies the Jewish people their agency, their peoplehood and their legitimacy as a nation.
Thus, it is quite clear that it is not only fake claims about “genocide” and bogus allegations over who are the “Nazis” that those who hate Israel have in common with Putin. It is also the denial of separate identities for those who were subjected for centuries to imperialist campaigns to destroy them—those who, despite Russification and Arabization, retained their unique identities, languages and cultures, who worked, fought for, and earned their respective rights to sovereign and independent states. Both Putin and those who hate Israel are convinced that these states have no right to exist and wish to eliminate them.
Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.
Editor's Picks
Israel and the Internet Wars – A Professional Social Media Review
The Invisible Student: A Tale of Homelessness at UCLA and USC
What Ever Happened to the LA Times?
Who Are the Jews On Joe Biden’s Cabinet?
You’re Not a Bad Jewish Mom If Your Kid Wants Santa Claus to Come to Your House
No Labels: The Group Fighting for the Political Center
Latest Articles
Iran’s Leadership Needs Money, Not War. The People Is Another Story.
Tucker Carlson’s Selective Pacifism and Theater of Moral Clarity
When Ambition Clashes With Love: Why I Can’t Stop Watching La La Land
Faith, Policy and Cultural Leaders Convene in Nashville for First Judeo-Christian Zionist Congress
Rabbis of LA | Rabbi Ratner Tried ‘Everything’ First
Rabbis of LA | Rabbi Kahn on the Changes in Israel Since Oct. 7, 2023
Beit Issie Shapiro, ‘Borrowed Spotlight’ Exhibit, Mayor Nazarian Appears at Temple Emanuel
Notable people and events in the Jewish LA community.
From Fighting Antisemitism to Rebuilding Jewish Strength
History proves that organized Jewish action can reshape institutions and strengthen security. The question is whether we are willing to place our efforts in the right fight.
The Way Back to the Garden of Eden
The comparison between the Garden of Eden and the Mishkan offers a message about humanity’s ability to recover from sin and failure.
What I Have is For You – A poem for Parsha Terumah
What I have is for you. Everything…
A Bisl Torah — Feeling Motivated?
We cannot ignore the extra soul God offers each week.
A Moment in Time: “Both/ And”
Improvise As Did the Covenant Code
In His New Book, Josh Shapiro Reveals a Secret of Possible Sabotage
Known as an excellent speaker, perhaps the best on his side of the aisle, Shapiro proves he has a flair for writing.
Clashing American Traditions
Antisemitism is a deep and enduring American tradition. And yet America is also exceptional. American Jews live in the clash of those two realities.
A Nation on the Court: Deni Avdija Sparks Pride Across Israel at NBA All-Star Game
Not only Israelis visiting from Israel arrived at the Intuit Dome — many local Israelis were there as well.
Print Issue: His Last Stop | February 20, 2026
The late conservative activist Charlie Kirk pens a love letter to the Jewish Sabbath, and invites the world to reclaim its humanity.
Sports and Faith Unite at Sinai Temple Summit
As the NBA All-Star Game brought the world’s top basketball players to Los Angeles, Sinai Temple and Fabric, a direct-to-fan mixed-media platform, teamed up to host a summit exploring how sports and faith can bridge divides, combat extremism and fight hate.
A Bridge-Building Dinner for College Students
The feel-good gathering, held at the Renaissance Hotel near LAX Airport, drew approximately 130 students.
A Purim Bread to Gladden the Heart
For Purim, the Jewish communities of North Africa bake a special Purim bread roll called Ojos de Haman (eyes of Haman), with a whole egg cradled in the bread, with two strips of dough on top forming an X.
Elaine Hall: Jewish Disability Awareness and Inclusion Month, “A Different Spirit” and Papaya Boats
Taste Buds with Deb – Episode 143
Table for Five: Terumah
A Home For God
Sparking the Soul of Sacred Practice
Wildes’ book presents, in a warm and accessible manner, the core beliefs and practices of Judaism.
Charlie Kirk’s Last Stop: Shabbat
The late conservative activist pens a love letter to the Jewish Sabbath, and invites the world to reclaim its humanity.
Rosner’s Domain | Undecided – on Priorities Too
Israel’s 2026 election will not be decided by the shouting matches on television or the megaphones at protests. It will be decided by a quieter group, one large enough to swing a dozen seats yet ideologically flexible enough to be wooed by competing camps.
Amid Security Concerns, Bari Weiss’ UCLA Daniel Pearl Memorial Lecture Has Been Canceled
A UCLA spokesperson told the Journal that Weiss’ team “withdrew” from the event.
More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.