Who knew barbarism as a career path pays so well? With the ostensible objective of bringing the war in Gaza to an end—and the moral perversity of punishing Israel for the continued endangerment of Gazans at the hands of Hamas—the leaders of France, the U.K. and Canada have announced their nominal recognition of a Palestinian state. (Germany, for now, is merely halting the shipment of weapons to Israel.)
Israel’s immediate answer was to extend its sovereignty by occupying all of Gaza—thus prolonging the war until Hamas is finally vanquished and the hostages returned. This is what you get when you trivialize a crime like what occurred on October 7, by rewarding savages with a state instead of allowing Israel to finish the job.
Emmanuel Macron, Keir Starmer, Friedrich Merz and Mark Carney are absolute geniuses at international diplomacy.
A Palestinian state! Now? There’s no better example of the Western world’s groveling capitulation to Islamic extremism. Given the jackpot of statehood, what incentive does Hamas now have to release hostages, agree to a ceasefire and surrender?
A Palestinian state! Now? There’s no better example of the Western world’s groveling capitulation to Islamic extremism.
As a parting gift for its savagery and continued intransigence, Hamas manages to preserve whatever of its ranks remain, and graduate from outlawed terrorists to legitimate state actors. Not a bad deal: welcomed into the family of nations to kill off one of the others—the explicitly Jewish one.
The world is already flush with nations that bring little benefit to humankind—and that fail all measurable standards of democratic liberalism: their treatment of women, homosexuals, artists and intellectuals; and the absence of free speech, religious tolerance and the rule of law.
There are 22 Arab-Muslim states that specialize in oil, Sharia law, terrorism and antisemitism—and not necessarily in that order. For 20 years the West has guilelessly imported these pathologies of the Middle East. Alleged asylum seekers were actually making inroads into anti-infidel mischief. And now we can look forward to Palestine, which has all the accouterments of a terrorist state—natural resources in instability, bloodthirstiness, and Jew-hating aplenty, without the oil.
After rejecting five offers of statehood that required direct negotiations with Israel and reassurances that they would renounce terrorism and live within peaceable borders, European leaders of democratic nations—held hostage by violent Islamists to whom they have granted citizenship—took it upon themselves to say, “Abracadabra! Presto Chango!” here we have Palestine.
If Hamas is deserving of such a reward, can ISIS, al Qaeda and Boko Haram be far behind? Macron, Starmer and Carney are now de facto benefactors of rogue states, the Oprahs of Gaza: “You get a state! And you get a state, too!”
But can they even do this, legally—serve as state-makers for a people who have never shown an appetite for nation-building?
Some reference to international law might prove instructive. Pursuant to Article 1 of the 1933 Montevideo Conference on the Rights and Duties of States, nationhood demands a stable population, defined territorial boundaries, a government capable of governance, the willingness to live in peace with its neighbors and an aptitude to engage in diplomatic affairs.
“Palestine” fails on all accounts.
Palestinians presently live in non-contiguous regions: the West Bank and Gaza. And they are governed by two different entities that despise one another: Fatah, which directs the Palestinian Authority in the West Bank, and Hamas in Gaza. The former is an anti-democratic kleptocracy that can’t even deliver the mail; the latter is a jihadist death cult. Hamas murdered Fatah leaders soon after they defeated them at the ballot box in 2007.
Unity exists nowhere within these regions. The West Bank towns of Jenin and Nablus might as well be in Gaza given the population’s sympathies for Hamas.
Neither Fatah nor Hamas has held elections since each took power; and neither has demonstrated any capacity for self-governance, or desire to live in peace with neighboring Jews—or Christians, for that matter.
What’s more, no recognized international boundaries for a Palestinian state exist on any map. Perhaps that’s because no Arab state named Palestine has ever existed in human history. Neither the United Nations nor Israel, for that matter, has a clue as to where the lines for a Palestinian state should be drawn. This has never bothered Palestinians because the only state they have ever wanted goes by the name Israel.
Finally, and most damningly, Hamas and the PLO never amended their respective charters calling for the destruction of Israel and the murder of Jews wherever they may be found.
These are the statesmen France, the U.K. and Canada have in mind?
Immediately after October 7, 2023, one Hamas leader, Ghazi Hamad, appearing on Lebanese television channel LBC, pledged a repeat performance, “again and again. . . . [T]here will be a second, a third, a fourth [until the] annihilation of Israel.”
Not once has anyone from Hamas or Islamic Jihad withdrawn those genocidal commitments. And the world is expecting Israel to withdraw from Gaza and welcome a Palestinian state?
Meanwhile, the U.N. High-Level International Conference on the Two-State Solution recently “condemn[ed] the attacks committed by Hamas against civilians on the 7th of October,” and declared that “Hamas must free all hostages, . . . end its rule in Gaza and hand over its weapons.”
France, the U.K. and Canada all participated in that conference! How is this reconcilable, especially when Hamad told Al Jazeera: “The powerful blow that was delivered to Israel on Oct. 7 has yielded … historic achievements. … Why are all these countries recognizing Palestine now?”
These political and moral contradictions are easily explainable. Macron, Starmer and Carney are terrified of rampaging Muslims and see their Jewish minority as easily expendable. Rarely are survival instincts so cynically dependent upon brass knuckles and mind-numbing politics.
Europe’s Enlightenment has been thrown into moral darkness. Western culture, as we have come to know it, has surrendered to those who glorify death and see beauty in extinguishing life. Sleeper cells are suddenly wide awake. Insomniac jihadists have become a fitting fifth column.
Western culture, as we have come to know it, has surrendered to those who glorify death and see beauty in extinguishing life. Sleeper cells are suddenly wide awake. Insomniac jihadists have become a fitting fifth column.
Over the weekend, a Jewish man in Montreal was brutally beaten in front of his children, who pleaded for their father’s life. The culprit was a Canadian Muslim waiting impatiently for the next caliphate. Maybe he just got overly excited by the prospect of a Palestinian state.
The Oprahs of Gaza
Thane Rosenbaum
Who knew barbarism as a career path pays so well? With the ostensible objective of bringing the war in Gaza to an end—and the moral perversity of punishing Israel for the continued endangerment of Gazans at the hands of Hamas—the leaders of France, the U.K. and Canada have announced their nominal recognition of a Palestinian state. (Germany, for now, is merely halting the shipment of weapons to Israel.)
Israel’s immediate answer was to extend its sovereignty by occupying all of Gaza—thus prolonging the war until Hamas is finally vanquished and the hostages returned. This is what you get when you trivialize a crime like what occurred on October 7, by rewarding savages with a state instead of allowing Israel to finish the job.
Emmanuel Macron, Keir Starmer, Friedrich Merz and Mark Carney are absolute geniuses at international diplomacy.
A Palestinian state! Now? There’s no better example of the Western world’s groveling capitulation to Islamic extremism. Given the jackpot of statehood, what incentive does Hamas now have to release hostages, agree to a ceasefire and surrender?
As a parting gift for its savagery and continued intransigence, Hamas manages to preserve whatever of its ranks remain, and graduate from outlawed terrorists to legitimate state actors. Not a bad deal: welcomed into the family of nations to kill off one of the others—the explicitly Jewish one.
The world is already flush with nations that bring little benefit to humankind—and that fail all measurable standards of democratic liberalism: their treatment of women, homosexuals, artists and intellectuals; and the absence of free speech, religious tolerance and the rule of law.
There are 22 Arab-Muslim states that specialize in oil, Sharia law, terrorism and antisemitism—and not necessarily in that order. For 20 years the West has guilelessly imported these pathologies of the Middle East. Alleged asylum seekers were actually making inroads into anti-infidel mischief. And now we can look forward to Palestine, which has all the accouterments of a terrorist state—natural resources in instability, bloodthirstiness, and Jew-hating aplenty, without the oil.
After rejecting five offers of statehood that required direct negotiations with Israel and reassurances that they would renounce terrorism and live within peaceable borders, European leaders of democratic nations—held hostage by violent Islamists to whom they have granted citizenship—took it upon themselves to say, “Abracadabra! Presto Chango!” here we have Palestine.
If Hamas is deserving of such a reward, can ISIS, al Qaeda and Boko Haram be far behind? Macron, Starmer and Carney are now de facto benefactors of rogue states, the Oprahs of Gaza: “You get a state! And you get a state, too!”
But can they even do this, legally—serve as state-makers for a people who have never shown an appetite for nation-building?
Some reference to international law might prove instructive. Pursuant to Article 1 of the 1933 Montevideo Conference on the Rights and Duties of States, nationhood demands a stable population, defined territorial boundaries, a government capable of governance, the willingness to live in peace with its neighbors and an aptitude to engage in diplomatic affairs.
“Palestine” fails on all accounts.
Palestinians presently live in non-contiguous regions: the West Bank and Gaza. And they are governed by two different entities that despise one another: Fatah, which directs the Palestinian Authority in the West Bank, and Hamas in Gaza. The former is an anti-democratic kleptocracy that can’t even deliver the mail; the latter is a jihadist death cult. Hamas murdered Fatah leaders soon after they defeated them at the ballot box in 2007.
Unity exists nowhere within these regions. The West Bank towns of Jenin and Nablus might as well be in Gaza given the population’s sympathies for Hamas.
Neither Fatah nor Hamas has held elections since each took power; and neither has demonstrated any capacity for self-governance, or desire to live in peace with neighboring Jews—or Christians, for that matter.
What’s more, no recognized international boundaries for a Palestinian state exist on any map. Perhaps that’s because no Arab state named Palestine has ever existed in human history. Neither the United Nations nor Israel, for that matter, has a clue as to where the lines for a Palestinian state should be drawn. This has never bothered Palestinians because the only state they have ever wanted goes by the name Israel.
Finally, and most damningly, Hamas and the PLO never amended their respective charters calling for the destruction of Israel and the murder of Jews wherever they may be found.
These are the statesmen France, the U.K. and Canada have in mind?
Immediately after October 7, 2023, one Hamas leader, Ghazi Hamad, appearing on Lebanese television channel LBC, pledged a repeat performance, “again and again. . . . [T]here will be a second, a third, a fourth [until the] annihilation of Israel.”
Not once has anyone from Hamas or Islamic Jihad withdrawn those genocidal commitments. And the world is expecting Israel to withdraw from Gaza and welcome a Palestinian state?
Meanwhile, the U.N. High-Level International Conference on the Two-State Solution recently “condemn[ed] the attacks committed by Hamas against civilians on the 7th of October,” and declared that “Hamas must free all hostages, . . . end its rule in Gaza and hand over its weapons.”
France, the U.K. and Canada all participated in that conference! How is this reconcilable, especially when Hamad told Al Jazeera: “The powerful blow that was delivered to Israel on Oct. 7 has yielded … historic achievements. … Why are all these countries recognizing Palestine now?”
These political and moral contradictions are easily explainable. Macron, Starmer and Carney are terrified of rampaging Muslims and see their Jewish minority as easily expendable. Rarely are survival instincts so cynically dependent upon brass knuckles and mind-numbing politics.
Europe’s Enlightenment has been thrown into moral darkness. Western culture, as we have come to know it, has surrendered to those who glorify death and see beauty in extinguishing life. Sleeper cells are suddenly wide awake. Insomniac jihadists have become a fitting fifth column.
Over the weekend, a Jewish man in Montreal was brutally beaten in front of his children, who pleaded for their father’s life. The culprit was a Canadian Muslim waiting impatiently for the next caliphate. Maybe he just got overly excited by the prospect of a Palestinian state.
Thane Rosenbaum is a novelist, essayist, law professor and Distinguished University Professor at Touro University, where he directs the Forum on Life, Culture & Society. He is the legal analyst for CBS News Radio. His most recent book is titled, “Beyond Proportionality: Israel’s Just War in Gaza.”
Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.
Editor's Picks
Israel and the Internet Wars – A Professional Social Media Review
The Invisible Student: A Tale of Homelessness at UCLA and USC
What Ever Happened to the LA Times?
Who Are the Jews On Joe Biden’s Cabinet?
You’re Not a Bad Jewish Mom If Your Kid Wants Santa Claus to Come to Your House
No Labels: The Group Fighting for the Political Center
Latest Articles
To Begin Again
Abraham’s God in the Age of Atheism
AJU Reopens Ziegler School Admissions, Seeks to Reimagine Rabbinic Education
Show Us How It’s Done – A poem for Parsha Lech Lecha
Weinberg: The Secret German Life of a Jewish Last Name
The Anti-Zionist Agenda at the Heart of UC Ethnic Studies
The Beauty of the Slow and Steady
What could our lives look like if we embraced the infinitesimal as infinite?
Ziegler School Welcomes Prominent Rabbi, O.C. Federation Names CEO, Pico-Robertson Cleanup
Notable people and events in the Jewish LA community.
A Moment in Time: Beyond the Chuppah
A Bisl Torah ~ The Company You Keep
Does the company we keep enable our name to be a blessing? Are we doing enough to make our name as great as God intends?
Because We Can
Print Issue: The View From Israel | October 23, 2026
Three years after Oct. 7, a country trying to heal is still waiting for a full accounting of what went wrong.
Rabbis of LA | Rabbi Taff’s Daughter Follows Her Father’s Footsteps
Second of two parts
‘The Nuremberg Women’: The Untold Stories of Eight Women Who Witnessed History
“These women were pivotal to both the process and the outcome of the trial. Yet they were marginalized on many occasions, literally reduced to footnotes.“
A Very Jewish Stew: Toscano Hamin
This Hamin Toscano recipe reminded us of a Tuscan wedding soup.
Table for Five: Lech Lecha
Shield Of Abraham
The View from Israel
Three years after Oct. 7, Israel is still waiting for a full accounting of what went wrong.
Albie Selznick’s Unlikely Connection to David Bowie Inspires New Solo Show
Selznick saw his idol David Bowie perform live when he was 15 and made up his mind that he wanted to create a show of his own and work with Bowie.
Is the New Facebook Film Equal to the Original?
“The Social Reckoning” isn’t about a power struggle, but shows that powerful companies are reluctant to change unless there is pain.
Larry David Is Spot-on in His Satire of the DSA
In his article about his proposals for the Democratic Socialists of America, he jokes that “The DSA has great respect for religious traditions.”
Remember and Be Grateful
Memory is the mother of gratitude. If we do not remember our past, it is difficult to improve our present or build a better future.
Michael Broukhim’s Journey to a Deeper Judaism
What began as a personal exploration of Judaism eventually became intertwined with Broukhim’s professional life.
Rosner’s Domain | No Surprise Is Also an Election Surprise
It’s worth paying attention to what is – or isn’t – happening to our “large” parties. They are quite small, or at least that’s how they appear in the polls even as Election Day draws near.
Lech Lecha: The Journey of Growth and the Process of Becoming
We need not know where every decision will lead before taking the first step. Sometimes acting upon our deepest convictions is itself the beginning of wisdom.
From Atop the Pulpit
New opportunities and challenges have always come and gone. But pulpit clergy with their years of training, education and perspective on life, generated from atop the pulpit, are especially well suited for whatever lies ahead.
Abraham’s Lessons in Leadership on the Eve of Israel’s Elections
Anyone who votes, or leads, would be wise to study the story of Abraham and David.
More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.