President Joe Biden surely didn’t intend to wade into the public debate over how to define antisemitism, but he has just done so—in a big way.
In a June 14 post on X (Twitter), the president condemned what he called “the horrific acts of Antisemitism this week.” Those acts were “abhorrent,” he wrote. They didn’t “just threaten Jewish Americans,” but “all Americans.” And they “threaten our fundamental democratic values,” too.
What were the incidents that President Biden defined as antisemitic? He cited four types: “vandalism targeting Jewish homes,” “attacks on Jewish faculty at college campuses,” “harassment of subway riders” and—most notably—“a demonstration celebrating the 10/7 attack.”
He was referring to the demonstration by thousands of Hamas supporters outside the White House on June 8. How do we know that they were, in the president’s words, “celebrating the 10/7 attack”? The evidence was their clothing, their placards, and their slogans:
— Some demonstrators wore green Hamas headbands. Others wore the headband of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, which also took part in the October 7 massacres.
— A huge banner read: “Jihad of Victory or Martyrdom – Al Qassam.” (The latter is the armed wing of Hamas.) Another banner declared: “Long Live October 7th,” in English and Arabic. Other demonstrators held signs urging “Intifada Now” and “F*** Israel / Stand with Hamas.”
— Protesters chanted slogans urging Hamas: “Kill another soldier now!” They also chanted, “There is only one solution: intifada, revolution,” and “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free,” echoing the Hamas goal of replacing all of Israel with a State of Palestine.
— The protesters unspooled a lengthy paper scroll on which, according to the New York Times, they wrote “names of the more than 36,000 Palestinians who had been killed during the war.” The number 36,000, which is the exaggerated figure Hamas circulates, includes both civilians and terrorists. By including all of the names, the demonstrators were memorializing and honoring approximately 15,000 dead terrorists.
The fact that the president considers those words and actions to be antisemitic has enormous implications, because almost all of the pro-Hamas rallies that have been held since last October have included one or more of those elements.
Whether they have been shutting down bridges, invading museums, blocking traffic, or pitching tents on college campuses, the protesters have, again and again, celebrated the October 7 pogrom in their chants, speeches, and signs.
They have openly cheered the attack as “resistance.” They have hailed dead terrorists as “our martyrs.” They have called for the “liberation of Palestine by any means necessary.” They have sported Hamas headbands or waved Hamas flags. They have circulated cartoons glorifying the killers who crossed into Israel on paragliders.
Now President Biden has, in effect, said that all of those actions were antisemitic, just as the rally outside the White House was antisemitic. He is saying that supporting the mass murder, rape and torture of Israeli Jews is antisemitic.
It’s antisemitic even if the protesters aren’t saying the words “We are against Jewish people” (which is how Rep. Ilhan Omar has defined antisemitism). It’s antisemitic even if demonstrators are not calling for the murder of every Jew in the world.
President Biden’s position is consistent with the definition of antisemitism that has been adopted by the 33 countries belonging to the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance, a definition used by the U.S. State Department since 2010. That definition includes eleven specific examples of antisemitism. The first one states: “Calling for, aiding, or justifying the killing or harming of Jews in the name of a radical ideology or an extremist view of religion.”
President Biden, in his tweet, has affirmed what many people have been pointing out for a long time. Now we need a serious discussion about how to address the fact that so many antisemites—not just “critics of Israel” or “critics of Zionism,” but antisemites—are wreaking havoc throughout the country.
The Antisemitism Behind the Celebration of Oct. 7
Rafael Medoff
President Joe Biden surely didn’t intend to wade into the public debate over how to define antisemitism, but he has just done so—in a big way.
In a June 14 post on X (Twitter), the president condemned what he called “the horrific acts of Antisemitism this week.” Those acts were “abhorrent,” he wrote. They didn’t “just threaten Jewish Americans,” but “all Americans.” And they “threaten our fundamental democratic values,” too.
What were the incidents that President Biden defined as antisemitic? He cited four types: “vandalism targeting Jewish homes,” “attacks on Jewish faculty at college campuses,” “harassment of subway riders” and—most notably—“a demonstration celebrating the 10/7 attack.”
He was referring to the demonstration by thousands of Hamas supporters outside the White House on June 8. How do we know that they were, in the president’s words, “celebrating the 10/7 attack”? The evidence was their clothing, their placards, and their slogans:
— Some demonstrators wore green Hamas headbands. Others wore the headband of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, which also took part in the October 7 massacres.
— A huge banner read: “Jihad of Victory or Martyrdom – Al Qassam.” (The latter is the armed wing of Hamas.) Another banner declared: “Long Live October 7th,” in English and Arabic. Other demonstrators held signs urging “Intifada Now” and “F*** Israel / Stand with Hamas.”
— Protesters chanted slogans urging Hamas: “Kill another soldier now!” They also chanted, “There is only one solution: intifada, revolution,” and “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free,” echoing the Hamas goal of replacing all of Israel with a State of Palestine.
— The protesters unspooled a lengthy paper scroll on which, according to the New York Times, they wrote “names of the more than 36,000 Palestinians who had been killed during the war.” The number 36,000, which is the exaggerated figure Hamas circulates, includes both civilians and terrorists. By including all of the names, the demonstrators were memorializing and honoring approximately 15,000 dead terrorists.
The fact that the president considers those words and actions to be antisemitic has enormous implications, because almost all of the pro-Hamas rallies that have been held since last October have included one or more of those elements.
Whether they have been shutting down bridges, invading museums, blocking traffic, or pitching tents on college campuses, the protesters have, again and again, celebrated the October 7 pogrom in their chants, speeches, and signs.
They have openly cheered the attack as “resistance.” They have hailed dead terrorists as “our martyrs.” They have called for the “liberation of Palestine by any means necessary.” They have sported Hamas headbands or waved Hamas flags. They have circulated cartoons glorifying the killers who crossed into Israel on paragliders.
Now President Biden has, in effect, said that all of those actions were antisemitic, just as the rally outside the White House was antisemitic. He is saying that supporting the mass murder, rape and torture of Israeli Jews is antisemitic.
It’s antisemitic even if the protesters aren’t saying the words “We are against Jewish people” (which is how Rep. Ilhan Omar has defined antisemitism). It’s antisemitic even if demonstrators are not calling for the murder of every Jew in the world.
President Biden’s position is consistent with the definition of antisemitism that has been adopted by the 33 countries belonging to the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance, a definition used by the U.S. State Department since 2010. That definition includes eleven specific examples of antisemitism. The first one states: “Calling for, aiding, or justifying the killing or harming of Jews in the name of a radical ideology or an extremist view of religion.”
President Biden, in his tweet, has affirmed what many people have been pointing out for a long time. Now we need a serious discussion about how to address the fact that so many antisemites—not just “critics of Israel” or “critics of Zionism,” but antisemites—are wreaking havoc throughout the country.
Dr. Medoff is founding director of The David S. Wyman Institute for Holocaust Studies and author of more than 20 books about Jewish history and the Holocaust. His latest is Whistleblowers: Four Who Fought to Expose the Holocaust to America, a nonfiction graphic novel with artist Dean Motter, published by Dark Horse / Yoe Books.
Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.
Editor's Picks
Israel and the Internet Wars – A Professional Social Media Review
The Invisible Student: A Tale of Homelessness at UCLA and USC
What Ever Happened to the LA Times?
Who Are the Jews On Joe Biden’s Cabinet?
You’re Not a Bad Jewish Mom If Your Kid Wants Santa Claus to Come to Your House
No Labels: The Group Fighting for the Political Center
Latest Articles
Raising Jewish Children
Mamdani’s OK Corral
When Jews Are Told We Don’t Belong
The Rabbinical School of Chicken Soup
The Faculty Member Who Could Not Be Named
No Sleep ’til Brooklyn – A poem for Shavuot
A Bisl Torah — God’s Emergent Voice
With Torah as our guide, God’s voice emerges as we turn towards each other.
A Moment in Time: “Shavuot (and Chess) – Between Moves we Choose who we Become”
Greek Figs, Jewish Limes
Fighting With a Winning Attitude
I was no longer on my laptop writing about Israel-hatred. I was on a street corner confronting that hatred. If I could write in my columns about the need for a winning attitude, this was now my chance to show it.
Print Issue: Smart Fighting | May 22, 2026
A new book by Melanie Phillips challenges the conventional wisdom and offers innovative ideas and practical tools to fight the global surge of antisemitism.
Luxury Travel in 2026 Is Not What You Think.
Lev Livitsky’s Very Complicated Second Act
“Out From Under” is filled with strong, dynamic women who all have something to teach Lev, but the author resists framing the novel as a feminist project.
Amid Surge in Antisemitism, Spanish Jewish Leader Builds Landmark Museum in Madrid
Hatchwell believes the most powerful response is not silence or retreat, but education.
Cantor Chayim Frenkel: Fulfilling the Promise of L’dor V’dor
Forty years mark a full biblical generation — a measure of time often associated with transformation, endurance and renewal. Few people embody that idea more fully than Cantor Chayim Frenkel.
Laura Stein Elected Chair of Israel Bonds’ National Campaign Advisory Council
Since its founding in 1951, Israel Bonds has focused on one mission: to generate financial support for the building and development of Israel’s economy.
The Boyle Heights Lessons Behind Villaraigosa’s Run for Governor
Villaraigosa is running for governor by arguing that California needs the lessons he says he learned there: dignity for working families, better schools, public safety, second chances, coalition building and transparent government that works.
Gatekeeping Our Future: How Sky-High Cost of Jewish Education Mirrors LA’s Housing Affordability Trap
Treating education costs and housing as parallel crises reveals a unified threat to demographic and cultural vitality.
It’s Getting Hot– Moroccan Chicken Skewers
With Memorial Day here and the official start of the summer grilling season, we offer you a recipe for delicious for Moroccan-spiced chicken skewers.
Fire Up the Grill for Memorial Day Weekend
There’s nothing like gathering outdoors, firing up the grill and trying some new, delicious dishes. While traditional cookout fare always has its place, there are plenty of ways to mix things up.
A Trio of Dairy Desserts from Pati Jinich for Shavuot
Given the prominence of dairy in Mexican cuisines, Jinich loves embracing dairy for Shavuot, which is one of her favorite parts of the holiday.
Table for Five: Shavuot
The Tenth Commandment
Duck Arithmetic : Contradiction, Certainty, and the Jewish State
The strangest thing is the instability of standards — the peculiar way arithmetic shifts, the speed with which contradictions become irrelevant, the confidence with which certainty arrives before inquiry.
Fighting Smart
A new book by Melanie Phillips challenges the conventional wisdom and offers innovative ideas and practical tools to fight the global surge of antisemitism.
Rosner’s Domain | Analysis as Substitute for Panic
Was there a plan for bringing about a revolution, or more a hope than a plan?
We’ve Seen This Movie Before. Don’t Sit Through It Twice.
We are being manipulated, by the same people, with the same playbook.
More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.