President Joe Biden surely didn’t intend to wade into the public debate over how to define antisemitism, but he has just done so—in a big way.
In a June 14 post on X (Twitter), the president condemned what he called “the horrific acts of Antisemitism this week.” Those acts were “abhorrent,” he wrote. They didn’t “just threaten Jewish Americans,” but “all Americans.” And they “threaten our fundamental democratic values,” too.
What were the incidents that President Biden defined as antisemitic? He cited four types: “vandalism targeting Jewish homes,” “attacks on Jewish faculty at college campuses,” “harassment of subway riders” and—most notably—“a demonstration celebrating the 10/7 attack.”
He was referring to the demonstration by thousands of Hamas supporters outside the White House on June 8. How do we know that they were, in the president’s words, “celebrating the 10/7 attack”? The evidence was their clothing, their placards, and their slogans:
— Some demonstrators wore green Hamas headbands. Others wore the headband of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, which also took part in the October 7 massacres.
— A huge banner read: “Jihad of Victory or Martyrdom – Al Qassam.” (The latter is the armed wing of Hamas.) Another banner declared: “Long Live October 7th,” in English and Arabic. Other demonstrators held signs urging “Intifada Now” and “F*** Israel / Stand with Hamas.”
— Protesters chanted slogans urging Hamas: “Kill another soldier now!” They also chanted, “There is only one solution: intifada, revolution,” and “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free,” echoing the Hamas goal of replacing all of Israel with a State of Palestine.
— The protesters unspooled a lengthy paper scroll on which, according to the New York Times, they wrote “names of the more than 36,000 Palestinians who had been killed during the war.” The number 36,000, which is the exaggerated figure Hamas circulates, includes both civilians and terrorists. By including all of the names, the demonstrators were memorializing and honoring approximately 15,000 dead terrorists.
The fact that the president considers those words and actions to be antisemitic has enormous implications, because almost all of the pro-Hamas rallies that have been held since last October have included one or more of those elements.
Whether they have been shutting down bridges, invading museums, blocking traffic, or pitching tents on college campuses, the protesters have, again and again, celebrated the October 7 pogrom in their chants, speeches, and signs.
They have openly cheered the attack as “resistance.” They have hailed dead terrorists as “our martyrs.” They have called for the “liberation of Palestine by any means necessary.” They have sported Hamas headbands or waved Hamas flags. They have circulated cartoons glorifying the killers who crossed into Israel on paragliders.
Now President Biden has, in effect, said that all of those actions were antisemitic, just as the rally outside the White House was antisemitic. He is saying that supporting the mass murder, rape and torture of Israeli Jews is antisemitic.
It’s antisemitic even if the protesters aren’t saying the words “We are against Jewish people” (which is how Rep. Ilhan Omar has defined antisemitism). It’s antisemitic even if demonstrators are not calling for the murder of every Jew in the world.
President Biden’s position is consistent with the definition of antisemitism that has been adopted by the 33 countries belonging to the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance, a definition used by the U.S. State Department since 2010. That definition includes eleven specific examples of antisemitism. The first one states: “Calling for, aiding, or justifying the killing or harming of Jews in the name of a radical ideology or an extremist view of religion.”
President Biden, in his tweet, has affirmed what many people have been pointing out for a long time. Now we need a serious discussion about how to address the fact that so many antisemites—not just “critics of Israel” or “critics of Zionism,” but antisemites—are wreaking havoc throughout the country.
The Antisemitism Behind the Celebration of Oct. 7
Rafael Medoff
President Joe Biden surely didn’t intend to wade into the public debate over how to define antisemitism, but he has just done so—in a big way.
In a June 14 post on X (Twitter), the president condemned what he called “the horrific acts of Antisemitism this week.” Those acts were “abhorrent,” he wrote. They didn’t “just threaten Jewish Americans,” but “all Americans.” And they “threaten our fundamental democratic values,” too.
What were the incidents that President Biden defined as antisemitic? He cited four types: “vandalism targeting Jewish homes,” “attacks on Jewish faculty at college campuses,” “harassment of subway riders” and—most notably—“a demonstration celebrating the 10/7 attack.”
He was referring to the demonstration by thousands of Hamas supporters outside the White House on June 8. How do we know that they were, in the president’s words, “celebrating the 10/7 attack”? The evidence was their clothing, their placards, and their slogans:
— Some demonstrators wore green Hamas headbands. Others wore the headband of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, which also took part in the October 7 massacres.
— A huge banner read: “Jihad of Victory or Martyrdom – Al Qassam.” (The latter is the armed wing of Hamas.) Another banner declared: “Long Live October 7th,” in English and Arabic. Other demonstrators held signs urging “Intifada Now” and “F*** Israel / Stand with Hamas.”
— Protesters chanted slogans urging Hamas: “Kill another soldier now!” They also chanted, “There is only one solution: intifada, revolution,” and “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free,” echoing the Hamas goal of replacing all of Israel with a State of Palestine.
— The protesters unspooled a lengthy paper scroll on which, according to the New York Times, they wrote “names of the more than 36,000 Palestinians who had been killed during the war.” The number 36,000, which is the exaggerated figure Hamas circulates, includes both civilians and terrorists. By including all of the names, the demonstrators were memorializing and honoring approximately 15,000 dead terrorists.
The fact that the president considers those words and actions to be antisemitic has enormous implications, because almost all of the pro-Hamas rallies that have been held since last October have included one or more of those elements.
Whether they have been shutting down bridges, invading museums, blocking traffic, or pitching tents on college campuses, the protesters have, again and again, celebrated the October 7 pogrom in their chants, speeches, and signs.
They have openly cheered the attack as “resistance.” They have hailed dead terrorists as “our martyrs.” They have called for the “liberation of Palestine by any means necessary.” They have sported Hamas headbands or waved Hamas flags. They have circulated cartoons glorifying the killers who crossed into Israel on paragliders.
Now President Biden has, in effect, said that all of those actions were antisemitic, just as the rally outside the White House was antisemitic. He is saying that supporting the mass murder, rape and torture of Israeli Jews is antisemitic.
It’s antisemitic even if the protesters aren’t saying the words “We are against Jewish people” (which is how Rep. Ilhan Omar has defined antisemitism). It’s antisemitic even if demonstrators are not calling for the murder of every Jew in the world.
President Biden’s position is consistent with the definition of antisemitism that has been adopted by the 33 countries belonging to the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance, a definition used by the U.S. State Department since 2010. That definition includes eleven specific examples of antisemitism. The first one states: “Calling for, aiding, or justifying the killing or harming of Jews in the name of a radical ideology or an extremist view of religion.”
President Biden, in his tweet, has affirmed what many people have been pointing out for a long time. Now we need a serious discussion about how to address the fact that so many antisemites—not just “critics of Israel” or “critics of Zionism,” but antisemites—are wreaking havoc throughout the country.
Dr. Medoff is founding director of The David S. Wyman Institute for Holocaust Studies and author of more than 20 books about Jewish history and the Holocaust. His latest is Whistleblowers: Four Who Fought to Expose the Holocaust to America, a nonfiction graphic novel with artist Dean Motter, published by Dark Horse / Yoe Books.
Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.
Editor's Picks
Israel and the Internet Wars – A Professional Social Media Review
The Invisible Student: A Tale of Homelessness at UCLA and USC
What Ever Happened to the LA Times?
Who Are the Jews On Joe Biden’s Cabinet?
You’re Not a Bad Jewish Mom If Your Kid Wants Santa Claus to Come to Your House
No Labels: The Group Fighting for the Political Center
Latest Articles
Zevi Samet Leads YU B-Ball to a Round 1 Victory in NCAA Tourney Nailbiter
The ‘Scream’ Franchise Is Back—Sans Antisemites.
Holiness in the Heart of Hollywood: From Modeling to Meaning
Rabbis of LA | Plans for a New Yeshiva High School
Rabbis of LA | Rabbi Shoff and Birth of a New Dream
The Evolution of Fear – From the USSR to College Campuses
Milken Teacher Wins National Milken Educator Award, JFSLA Homelessness Panel
Notable people and events in the Jewish LA community.
The Sweet Song of Survival
There is a second form of sacred survival: to survive as a nation. And that too takes precedence over everything.
A Big Bear Getaway: Nature, Luxury, and Restoration.
A Moment in Time: God’s Birthday
A Bisl Torah — Spiritual Enslavement
Spiritual enslavement is not confined to the Egypt in the Torah.
On That Day – A poem for Parsha Ki Tisa
When all of the people are counted – All of them, not just the ones who look like us.
Purim and the Ten Commandments
Gavin Newsom Is No Jack Kennedy
Ambition over principle. Political gain over integrity. That is his legacy — a legacy stained in shame.
Print Issue: Iran | March 5, 2026
Success in the war against Iran – which every American and Israeli should hope for – will only strengthen the tendency of both leaders to highlight their dominant personalities as the state axis, at the expense of the boring institutions that serve them.
Diving, Luxury and Wild Discoveries in Central Florida on The Jet Set TV
In a Pickle– A Turshi Recipe
Tangy, bright and filled with irresistible umami flavor, turshi is the perfect complement to burgers, kebabs and chicken, as well as the perfect foil for eggs and salads.
Sweet Kugel Recipes for National Noodle Month
Nothing says Jewish comfort food like sweet noodle kugel.
Table for Five: Ki Tisa
Understanding The Divine
Re-Reading Persia: Thoughts on an Ancient Text in a Modern Moment
On Purim, re-reading Persia, we stand at the intersection of the past and this very moment. May we merit not merely a temporary cessation of war, but true peace — the ultimate end of all conflict.
The War in Iran: Revolution, Assassination, Reconstruction
As Israel is learning in Gaza, achieving regime change from the outside, without a commitment to deep and continuous involvement, is a difficult task.
Who Knows?
When future generations tell your story and mine, which parts will look obvious in hindsight? What opportunities will we have leveraged — and decisions made — that define our legacy?
Nostalgia for the ‘80s and ‘90s and the Lost World of Third Spaces
The nostalgia attached to the ’80s and ’90s often comes from a world where public hanging-out was built into daily life.
You Heard It Here First, Folks!
For over half a decade, I had seen how the slow drip of antisemitism, carefully enveloped in the language of social justice and human rights, had steadily poisoned people whom I had previously considered perfectly reasonable.
Bringing the Best of Diaspora Jewry to Israel
Today, amid rising global antisemitism and uncertainty in the Diaspora, many Anglos considering aliyah are searching not only for housing but for belonging.
Trump’s Critics Have a Lot Riding on the Iran Conflict
Their assumptions about the attack on Iran are based on a belief in the resilience of an evil terrorist regime, coupled with a conviction that Trump’s belief in the importance of the U.S.-Israel alliance is inherently wrong.
More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.