And so, Netanyahu is out. Finally out. He was ousted as Prime Minister a few weeks ago, but on Saturday night the act of vacating the PM’s House was completed. The residence on Jerusalem’s Balfour Street is waiting for its new occupant (one that has no intention to live there— Bennett keeps his home in Raanana, not wishing to uproot his family from where they reside). For some Israelis, this symbolic act was akin to a king vacating his palace following a dethrone. For others, it merited barely a shrug. Netanyahu lost, Netanyahu must leave, Netanyahu leaves—what’s the big deal?
He left after midnight, and still, a few demonstrators were there to cheer his departure. It is probably hard for him to detach himself from a position he occupied for a dozen years, but often it seems as if his rivals have similar difficulty. They cannot detach themselves from the long battle to oust Netanyahu. They cannot just go home and relax. Like soldiers who refuse to believe that the fight is over, and remain in the jungles, preparing for their next attack, Netanyahu’s most committed foes are on the watch for his return.
Like soldiers who refuse to believe that the fight is over, and remain in the jungles, preparing for their next attack, Netanyahu’s most committed foes are on the watch for his return.
He certainly plans on returning, and certainly hasn’t lost his chance of returning. As the opposition leader, Netanyahu dedicated his first few weeks to causing as much trouble as he could to the coalition, and had a few legislative successes. On the other hand, his unrelenting presence is also the most effective glue for those wanting to keep the coalition together. He is the one whose presence legitimizes a vote by an Arab party for a law that Arab Israelis abhor, a silence of a leftist party amid a compromise with the settlers, a rightwing acquiescence when ideology prevent the coalition from passing what the right deem crucial legislation. He, Netanyahu, makes all these compromises and concessions possible.
He could withdraw and let the coalition begin its inevitable process of erosion. But he does not do it, because of internal political calculation. As long as he is active, as long as he is engaged in a fierce fight, it is difficult for his Likud rivals, who patiently awaited their turn, to mount an effective coup against him. For him, that’s the real challenge. Neither Bennett, nor Lapid nor Gantz could be the ones who steal his voters away. If Israel goes into another round of election, in a year, or two, or three, Netanyahu’s challenge is to still be there, as head of Likud. Surely, a personal triumph in another round is far from guaranteed, but it is possible. It is possible—as long as Netanyahu is there.
In the meantime, Israelis begin to get used to the title “Prime Minister” attached to a different person. After such a long time, this is not easy. There are grown-ups in Israel who have no memory of a PM other than “PM Netanyahu.” They are also getting used to the title being attached to a person without much political power, and without an ability to make decisions on his own. Netanyahu was revered and feared by his partners, and could fly solo when he felt a need to do such thing. Bennett has to be the cooperator in chief, and conductor of an orchestra of many soloists, each having an ego as large as his, each having an instrument without which no melody can be played. Thus, there is a constant need for everybody to forget, forgive and accept their limited ability to control the other players. Bennett decided to demolish a house of a terrorist without telling Foreign Minister Lapid in advance. Lapid was not happy with this decision, but what can he do? Finance Minister Lieberman revoked the eligibility of Haredis studying full-time in yeshiva for childcare subsidies. Bennett and Saar weren’t pleased with this decision. But what can they do?
A government of constant compromise looks like this: when possible, the ministers compromise. When impossible, the boldest and most invested leader makes a decision, and the others must accept it. In other words: the less one worries about the government falling, the more leverage one has over his partners. Lieberman does not seem to worry much—he has a stable constituency and a winning agenda (anti-Haredi) on which to rely. So, he is very powerful. Bennett must worry, as he is left with few voters and no natural constituency. So, even though he carries around the title of “Prime Minister” he is less powerful.
Still, everybody within the coalition is careful not to overplay his or her hand. Courtesy of Netanyahu, the coalition has a tank filled with fuel to burn. On Saturday, Netanyahu evacuated the Balfour Street residence, but not yet the consciences of Israelis. He still resides in our minds. He still occupies a space in the minds of the Ministers and the Knesset Members who together constitute one of the most bizarre coalitions ever to materialize. Netanyahu is no longer on Balfour Street. But Netanyahu is still in our heads.
Shmuel Rosner is an Israeli columnist, editor, and researcher. He is the editor of the research and data-journalism website themadad.com, and is the political editor of the Jewish Journal.
Netanyahu Evacuated “Balfour,” But is Still in Our Heads
Shmuel Rosner
And so, Netanyahu is out. Finally out. He was ousted as Prime Minister a few weeks ago, but on Saturday night the act of vacating the PM’s House was completed. The residence on Jerusalem’s Balfour Street is waiting for its new occupant (one that has no intention to live there— Bennett keeps his home in Raanana, not wishing to uproot his family from where they reside). For some Israelis, this symbolic act was akin to a king vacating his palace following a dethrone. For others, it merited barely a shrug. Netanyahu lost, Netanyahu must leave, Netanyahu leaves—what’s the big deal?
He left after midnight, and still, a few demonstrators were there to cheer his departure. It is probably hard for him to detach himself from a position he occupied for a dozen years, but often it seems as if his rivals have similar difficulty. They cannot detach themselves from the long battle to oust Netanyahu. They cannot just go home and relax. Like soldiers who refuse to believe that the fight is over, and remain in the jungles, preparing for their next attack, Netanyahu’s most committed foes are on the watch for his return.
He certainly plans on returning, and certainly hasn’t lost his chance of returning. As the opposition leader, Netanyahu dedicated his first few weeks to causing as much trouble as he could to the coalition, and had a few legislative successes. On the other hand, his unrelenting presence is also the most effective glue for those wanting to keep the coalition together. He is the one whose presence legitimizes a vote by an Arab party for a law that Arab Israelis abhor, a silence of a leftist party amid a compromise with the settlers, a rightwing acquiescence when ideology prevent the coalition from passing what the right deem crucial legislation. He, Netanyahu, makes all these compromises and concessions possible.
He could withdraw and let the coalition begin its inevitable process of erosion. But he does not do it, because of internal political calculation. As long as he is active, as long as he is engaged in a fierce fight, it is difficult for his Likud rivals, who patiently awaited their turn, to mount an effective coup against him. For him, that’s the real challenge. Neither Bennett, nor Lapid nor Gantz could be the ones who steal his voters away. If Israel goes into another round of election, in a year, or two, or three, Netanyahu’s challenge is to still be there, as head of Likud. Surely, a personal triumph in another round is far from guaranteed, but it is possible. It is possible—as long as Netanyahu is there.
In the meantime, Israelis begin to get used to the title “Prime Minister” attached to a different person. After such a long time, this is not easy. There are grown-ups in Israel who have no memory of a PM other than “PM Netanyahu.” They are also getting used to the title being attached to a person without much political power, and without an ability to make decisions on his own. Netanyahu was revered and feared by his partners, and could fly solo when he felt a need to do such thing. Bennett has to be the cooperator in chief, and conductor of an orchestra of many soloists, each having an ego as large as his, each having an instrument without which no melody can be played. Thus, there is a constant need for everybody to forget, forgive and accept their limited ability to control the other players. Bennett decided to demolish a house of a terrorist without telling Foreign Minister Lapid in advance. Lapid was not happy with this decision, but what can he do? Finance Minister Lieberman revoked the eligibility of Haredis studying full-time in yeshiva for childcare subsidies. Bennett and Saar weren’t pleased with this decision. But what can they do?
A government of constant compromise looks like this: when possible, the ministers compromise. When impossible, the boldest and most invested leader makes a decision, and the others must accept it. In other words: the less one worries about the government falling, the more leverage one has over his partners. Lieberman does not seem to worry much—he has a stable constituency and a winning agenda (anti-Haredi) on which to rely. So, he is very powerful. Bennett must worry, as he is left with few voters and no natural constituency. So, even though he carries around the title of “Prime Minister” he is less powerful.
Still, everybody within the coalition is careful not to overplay his or her hand. Courtesy of Netanyahu, the coalition has a tank filled with fuel to burn. On Saturday, Netanyahu evacuated the Balfour Street residence, but not yet the consciences of Israelis. He still resides in our minds. He still occupies a space in the minds of the Ministers and the Knesset Members who together constitute one of the most bizarre coalitions ever to materialize. Netanyahu is no longer on Balfour Street. But Netanyahu is still in our heads.
Shmuel Rosner is an Israeli columnist, editor, and researcher. He is the editor of the research and data-journalism website themadad.com, and is the political editor of the Jewish Journal.
Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.
Editor's Picks
Israel and the Internet Wars – A Professional Social Media Review
The Invisible Student: A Tale of Homelessness at UCLA and USC
What Ever Happened to the LA Times?
Who Are the Jews On Joe Biden’s Cabinet?
You’re Not a Bad Jewish Mom If Your Kid Wants Santa Claus to Come to Your House
No Labels: The Group Fighting for the Political Center
Latest Articles
A Moment in Time: Israel – Coming Home Again
Psalm 35:8 United the First Congress of the United States and the State of Israel
Rabbis of LA | Rabbi Geller Is Still Making History
Hebrew University-UCLA Exchange, New Staff at BJE, Repair the World Volunteer Day
Arab Citizens of Israel: Between Integration and Separation
‘Floaters’ Brings the Joy and Heart of Jewish Summer Camp to the Big Screen
Alan Rothenberg Brought the World Cup to America in 1994. Now He’s Bringing Soccer’s Jewish History to L.A.
The man behind the 1994 FIFA World Cup is chairing The Beautiful Game: The Untold Story as the Holocaust Museum L.A.’s Goldrich Cultural Center prepares to open in mid-August.
More Than a Game: How the Equalizer Is Bridging Israel’s Divides One Child at a Time
Through The Equalizer (Sha’ar Shivion), children from Jewish, Arab, Druze, Bedouin, religious and secular communities meet through soccer – not only to compete, but also to build friendships and break down barriers that often keep their communities apart.
NYBD & Bakery in Mar Vista Features Hamantaschen?
It’s important to the owners, Lenny and Adaeze Rosenberg – and the neighborhood – to stay true to its longtime recipes.
A Ka’ak By Any Other Name
A symbol of hospitality, families bake batches for holidays, family celebrations and visits with friends and relatives.
Table for Five: Matot-Masei
Keeping Your Word
From Roadmap to Reality: UCLA Must Move Beyond Aspirational Commitments in Combating Antisemitism
UCLA has an opportunity to become a national model for confronting antisemitism through principled leadership, transparent accountability, and meaningful action.
Emanuel Gives Israel Some Love Tough Rather Than Tough Love
I can imagine many Israelis rolling their eyes: OK, where’s he going with this? When is he telling us what he really came here to say?
The Story That Never Goes Away
Rachel Goldberg-Polin, mother of slain hostage Hersh Goldberg-Polin, can’t stop speaking about her pain and the public love her body cannot always receive. She talks to the Journal about her son’s legacy and her new book.
Remembering Who You Are
An Open Letter to My Fellow Jews on Peoplehood, Memory and Israel
Rosner’s Domain | A Dime-Store Abe: The Karhi Crisis
This week’s “Constitutional Crisis” is typical of the way the government operates. It issues a statement, or a tweet and then walks it back. Oops, we did not mean it. Or rather, we did, but we also meant to deny that we did.
“Believe All Women” Should Not Be Political
Moral consistency is not a Republican value or a Democratic value. It is an American value.
Why Can’t We Be Friends?
If we want to see a less polarized society, both internally and beyond, we must emphatically reject the idea that political alignment is the predominant commonality for friendship.
Ruth-less, the Enigma of a Name
Jews spoke in two voices about Ruth, a kind of national schizophrenia, one with joyous chanting on Shavuos as the Book of Ruth was read; the other, removing her name from the chain-link of repeated names throughout the generations.
Honoring My Father: Saying Kaddish with Men
Saying kaddish every day tested my faith and commitment. It made me realize that there is no room for excuses. It taught me how to show up. It taught me that my voice can be heard, even when not expected.
The Life and Times of Zeda Max – Part 3
A manufacturer of olives, pasta and tomato sauce, agreed to give my grandfather a job.
The ‘Citation Cascade’ Targeting Israel — and How It Shapes Public Perception
Accountability worthy of a democratic society begins with evidentiary discipline: corroboration, transparency, context and standards proportional to the gravity of the accusation.
The Yiddish Letter of American Liberty
Phillips’ letter – with its faith in Congress’ Declaration – now sits in display not far from the Liberty Bell and its inscription from the biblical book of Leviticus.
Searching for the Red Heifer
While there’s nothing wrong with keeping your eyes on the horizon for that magical heifer to appear, be sure to appreciate what you already have.
Thomas Paine and Haym Salomon and the Power of Words to Shape Destiny
In the wake of celebrating the 250th anniversary of American independence, we should also consider the role of lesser-known revolutionaries, like Thomas Paine and the great Jewish patriot Haym Salomon.
Broadening the Fight
If we agree that antisemitism is only one example of a widespread and pernicious instinct toward division and “other-ization,” then it becomes clear that we can only eradicate these animosities as part of a far broader effort.
More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.