President Biden is planning to provide offensive weapons to a Middle Eastern regime that has been massacring innocent civilians, according to news reports. Yet no protest tents have been set up on college campuses, no members of the congressional “Squad” are making angry speeches, and no hecklers are calling him “Genocide Joe.”
How can this be? Aren’t the protesters who have captured our nation’s attention motivated by humanitarian principles, which apply no matter who the offender is? Aren’t they concerned about all human suffering? Don’t they want America to hold back weapons from every regime that might kill civilians?
According to news media reports, the Biden administration plans to resume providing offensive weapons to Saudi Arabia, after a four year-ban that the president imposed because the Saudis had used American munitions in airstrikes that killed some Yemeni civilians.
While campaigning for the presidency in 2018, Joe Biden vowed he would treat Saudi Arabia as a “pariah” because of its many human rights violations, including dismembering one of the regime’s prominent critics.
And last year, the Saudis gave the United States additional reason to hold back weapons: human rights groups revealed that Saudi Arabian border guards had slaughtered “hundreds, perhaps thousands” of unarmed African civilians.
The African migrants had approached the Saudi border in the hope of finding work or receiving asylum from persecution. The Saudis responded with gunfire, mutilations, and sexual atrocities.
Yet the Biden administration has been looking for ways to improve its relations with Riyadh. As early as the autumn of 2022, “American diplomats received grim news that border guards in Saudi Arabia, a close U.S. partner in the Middle East, were using lethal force against African migrants,” the Times revealed—yet throughout the entire year to follow, the Biden administration never criticized the Saudi massacres.
The most any U.S. official said, according to the Times, was “an oblique reference” to the issue: the deputy American representative to the United Nations said during a UN briefing in January 2023 that the Biden administration was “concerned” by “alleged abuses against migrants on the border with Saudi Arabia.” He called on “all parties” to permit an outside investigation. That was it.
It gets worse. During the past year, the Saudis have openly strengthened their relations with two of America’s worst enemies—yet the Biden administration has remained silent.
In March 2023, Saudi Arabia renewed diplomatic relations with Iran, after a seven year rift. Ambassadors were exchanged, embassies were re-opened, and then-Iranian president Ebrahim Raisi visited Riyadh.
Iran is not the only anti-American regime that Saudi Arabia is embracing. Last week, the Saudis sent an ambassador to Syria after a twelve year-break in relations with Damascus, and the Syrian embassy had reopened in Riyadh.
Syrian dictator Bashar Assad is a vehement enemy of the United States and Syria is a state sponsor of terrorism, against which the U.S. maintains sanctions. There are 900 American troops in Syria, fighting terrorists and supporting the autonomous Kurds, whom Assad opposes. The Saudis have chosen to side with Assad.
Yet neither Saudi massacres of black Africans nor Saudi friendliness toward Iran and Syria has moved the Biden administration to even verbally challenge Riyadh.
The only time President Biden has publicly criticized Saudi Arabia was in 2022—for cutting oil production. The president was worried that—as the New York Times put it—such cuts might “lead to a rise in global oil prices before the midterm elections.” The president even threatened there would be “consequences” for oil cuts. Apparently there are no consequences for mass murder, or for embracing anti-American regimes.
And none of this seems to bother those on campus and in Congress who have been so vocal about Gaza. They say they care about the deaths of civilians—but only when Israel can be blamed. They say they want America to refrain from sending weapons to countries that are engaged in Mideast wars—but only when the country is Israel and the war is against Hamas terrorists. And, of course, they say “black lives matter”—but not when blacks are being slaughtered by the Saudis.
Biden Arms Regime That Murders Civilians
Rafael Medoff
President Biden is planning to provide offensive weapons to a Middle Eastern regime that has been massacring innocent civilians, according to news reports. Yet no protest tents have been set up on college campuses, no members of the congressional “Squad” are making angry speeches, and no hecklers are calling him “Genocide Joe.”
How can this be? Aren’t the protesters who have captured our nation’s attention motivated by humanitarian principles, which apply no matter who the offender is? Aren’t they concerned about all human suffering? Don’t they want America to hold back weapons from every regime that might kill civilians?
Apparently not.
According to news media reports, the Biden administration plans to resume providing offensive weapons to Saudi Arabia, after a four year-ban that the president imposed because the Saudis had used American munitions in airstrikes that killed some Yemeni civilians.
While campaigning for the presidency in 2018, Joe Biden vowed he would treat Saudi Arabia as a “pariah” because of its many human rights violations, including dismembering one of the regime’s prominent critics.
And last year, the Saudis gave the United States additional reason to hold back weapons: human rights groups revealed that Saudi Arabian border guards had slaughtered “hundreds, perhaps thousands” of unarmed African civilians.
The African migrants had approached the Saudi border in the hope of finding work or receiving asylum from persecution. The Saudis responded with gunfire, mutilations, and sexual atrocities.
Yet the Biden administration has been looking for ways to improve its relations with Riyadh. As early as the autumn of 2022, “American diplomats received grim news that border guards in Saudi Arabia, a close U.S. partner in the Middle East, were using lethal force against African migrants,” the Times revealed—yet throughout the entire year to follow, the Biden administration never criticized the Saudi massacres.
The most any U.S. official said, according to the Times, was “an oblique reference” to the issue: the deputy American representative to the United Nations said during a UN briefing in January 2023 that the Biden administration was “concerned” by “alleged abuses against migrants on the border with Saudi Arabia.” He called on “all parties” to permit an outside investigation. That was it.
It gets worse. During the past year, the Saudis have openly strengthened their relations with two of America’s worst enemies—yet the Biden administration has remained silent.
In March 2023, Saudi Arabia renewed diplomatic relations with Iran, after a seven year rift. Ambassadors were exchanged, embassies were re-opened, and then-Iranian president Ebrahim Raisi visited Riyadh.
Iran is not the only anti-American regime that Saudi Arabia is embracing. Last week, the Saudis sent an ambassador to Syria after a twelve year-break in relations with Damascus, and the Syrian embassy had reopened in Riyadh.
Syrian dictator Bashar Assad is a vehement enemy of the United States and Syria is a state sponsor of terrorism, against which the U.S. maintains sanctions. There are 900 American troops in Syria, fighting terrorists and supporting the autonomous Kurds, whom Assad opposes. The Saudis have chosen to side with Assad.
Yet neither Saudi massacres of black Africans nor Saudi friendliness toward Iran and Syria has moved the Biden administration to even verbally challenge Riyadh.
The only time President Biden has publicly criticized Saudi Arabia was in 2022—for cutting oil production. The president was worried that—as the New York Times put it—such cuts might “lead to a rise in global oil prices before the midterm elections.” The president even threatened there would be “consequences” for oil cuts. Apparently there are no consequences for mass murder, or for embracing anti-American regimes.
And none of this seems to bother those on campus and in Congress who have been so vocal about Gaza. They say they care about the deaths of civilians—but only when Israel can be blamed. They say they want America to refrain from sending weapons to countries that are engaged in Mideast wars—but only when the country is Israel and the war is against Hamas terrorists. And, of course, they say “black lives matter”—but not when blacks are being slaughtered by the Saudis.
Dr. Medoff is founding director of The David S. Wyman Institute for Holocaust Studies and author of more than 20 books about Jewish history and the Holocaust. His latest is Whistleblowers: Four Who Fought to Expose the Holocaust to America, a nonfiction graphic novel with artist Dean Motter, published by Dark Horse / Yoe Books.
Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.
Editor's Picks
Israel and the Internet Wars – A Professional Social Media Review
The Invisible Student: A Tale of Homelessness at UCLA and USC
What Ever Happened to the LA Times?
Who Are the Jews On Joe Biden’s Cabinet?
You’re Not a Bad Jewish Mom If Your Kid Wants Santa Claus to Come to Your House
No Labels: The Group Fighting for the Political Center
Latest Articles
Holiness in the Heart of Hollywood: From Modeling to Meaning
Rabbis of LA | Plans for a New Yeshiva High School
Rabbis of LA | Rabbi Shoff and Birth of a New Dream
The Evolution of Fear – From the USSR to College Campuses
Milken Teacher Wins National Milken Educator Award, JFSLA Homelessness Panel
The Sweet Song of Survival
A Big Bear Getaway: Nature, Luxury, and Restoration.
A Moment in Time: God’s Birthday
A Bisl Torah — Spiritual Enslavement
Spiritual enslavement is not confined to the Egypt in the Torah.
On That Day – A poem for Parsha Ki Tisa
When all of the people are counted – All of them, not just the ones who look like us.
Purim and the Ten Commandments
Gavin Newsom Is No Jack Kennedy
Ambition over principle. Political gain over integrity. That is his legacy — a legacy stained in shame.
Print Issue: Iran | March 5, 2026
Success in the war against Iran – which every American and Israeli should hope for – will only strengthen the tendency of both leaders to highlight their dominant personalities as the state axis, at the expense of the boring institutions that serve them.
Diving, Luxury and Wild Discoveries in Central Florida on The Jet Set TV
In a Pickle– A Turshi Recipe
Tangy, bright and filled with irresistible umami flavor, turshi is the perfect complement to burgers, kebabs and chicken, as well as the perfect foil for eggs and salads.
Sweet Kugel Recipes for National Noodle Month
Nothing says Jewish comfort food like sweet noodle kugel.
Table for Five: Ki Tisa
Understanding The Divine
Re-Reading Persia: Thoughts on an Ancient Text in a Modern Moment
On Purim, re-reading Persia, we stand at the intersection of the past and this very moment. May we merit not merely a temporary cessation of war, but true peace — the ultimate end of all conflict.
The War in Iran: Revolution, Assassination, Reconstruction
As Israel is learning in Gaza, achieving regime change from the outside, without a commitment to deep and continuous involvement, is a difficult task.
Who Knows?
When future generations tell your story and mine, which parts will look obvious in hindsight? What opportunities will we have leveraged — and decisions made — that define our legacy?
Nostalgia for the ‘80s and ‘90s and the Lost World of Third Spaces
The nostalgia attached to the ’80s and ’90s often comes from a world where public hanging-out was built into daily life.
You Heard It Here First, Folks!
For over half a decade, I had seen how the slow drip of antisemitism, carefully enveloped in the language of social justice and human rights, had steadily poisoned people whom I had previously considered perfectly reasonable.
Bringing the Best of Diaspora Jewry to Israel
Today, amid rising global antisemitism and uncertainty in the Diaspora, many Anglos considering aliyah are searching not only for housing but for belonging.
Trump’s Critics Have a Lot Riding on the Iran Conflict
Their assumptions about the attack on Iran are based on a belief in the resilience of an evil terrorist regime, coupled with a conviction that Trump’s belief in the importance of the U.S.-Israel alliance is inherently wrong.
The Snake, the Shepherd’s Crook, and the Eye of the Sun: Uncovering the Haggadah’s Hidden Meaning
As Bar Ilan University professor Joshua Berman engagingly and convincingly demonstrates in his “Echoes of Egypt” Haggadah, the process by which the Passover story took shape was as a polemic against the belief system and symbols of authority of Pharaoh and his people.
The Night Watch: How Hundreds of U.S. Volunteers Support Israel Through the Night
We may never know each other’s names. We may never meet. Yet for those minutes, across oceans, time zones, and screens, we share something deeply human.
More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.