fbpx

Distortions and Israel’s Dilemma

There’s a long history of playing fast and loose with footage and forensics when it comes to describing events that take place in the Holy Land.
[additional-authors]
May 23, 2022
A demonstrator speaks during the Free Palestine, End Apartheid protest outside BBC Broadcasting House May 14, 2022 in London, England. (Photo by Hollie Adams/Getty Images)

Tragically, a female reporter for Al Jazeera was killed in a crossfire skirmish between Israeli troops and Palestinian terrorists in one of the most dangerous regions of the West Bank. Almost instantly, Israel was blamed for the continuing spread of COVID-19 and gasoline price-gouging.

Responsibility for the dead broadcast journalist was a given.

In any instance in which a Palestinian life is taken, a guilty verdict against Israel is swift even though the charge may be patently false and libelous. With the damage already done and public attention directed elsewhere, the accusation sometimes gets walked back. A full retraction is a rarity.

Meanwhile, millions of Arabs have been killed in wars by their co-religionists (over 500,000 in Syria, another 500,000 in Iraq and Iran, 15,000 in Yemen, and counting), but “bloody murder” is scarcely heard. Resolutions condemning Muslim countries for such massive death tolls do not multiply in the United Nations (hardly any are ever drafted).

The lives of Arabs are, apparently, more valuable if Israel is the cause of ending them. And any Israeli reprisal or preemptive strike in self-defense, regardless of the circumstance, is routinely prejudged a war crime.

Because the demise of the Al Jazeera reporter, Shireen Abu Akleh, took place in Jenin where the Palestinian Authority is responsible for security, the bullet that killed her was removed from her head and remains in the custody of Palestinian police.

The crime scene was immediately contaminated with bias. Israel called for a joint forensic investigation. The Palestinians refused, and won’t show investigators the caliber and condition of the bullet.

For its part, Israel has already identified the IDF soldier and weapon that may have caused the death. No surprise there. Israel has a long history of accepting responsibility for actions that violate IDF protocols.

Indeed, whenever Israeli soldiers use excessive force or violate the rules of engagement, they are prosecuted and punished in military tribunals. For instance, after a terrorist in the West Bank stabbed an Israeli soldier, he was shot in the head by an Israeli medic, despite being injured and disarmed. Such unlawful actions violate the IDF’s Code of Ethics.

In a more infamous case in 2014, three settlers from the West Bank (an adult and two minors), retaliating for the kidnapping and murder of three Jewish teenagers, kidnapped and torched to death a Palestinian teenager. Two were given life sentences, and a third will serve 21 years in prison.

This is quite different from what happens to Arabs who murder Jews. The Palestinian Authority doesn’t punish but rather incentivizes the killing of Jews with monthly lifetime stipends and assorted other benefits. The more serious the crime, the more lavish the payout and benefits.

For a press corps that congenitally demonizes Israel and finds Palestinians blameless, such disparities in how each society upholds the rule of law receives scant attention. Unflattering tales of Palestinian moral failure are not newsworthy. The journalistic mission is to spill ink only when Israel draws blood.

The journalistic mission is to spill ink only when Israel draws blood.

And exaggerating the scope of the libel itself is primary. For instance, Israel is now being accused of intentionally assassinating Abu Akleh. That makes a lot of sense. Israel needs to kill a female Palestinian-American journalist like it needs a hole in its own head. Isn’t there already enough revulsion directed at the Jewish state?

Apparently not. If you listen to congressional “Squad” leader, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Israel deserves even more derision, along with the scrapping of America’s military aid.

Just listen to this. Me thinks the bartender dost protest too much. And she’s defaming Israel from Queens, New York, not Bismarck, North Dakota! Jewish Democrats seem incapable of reading the tea leaves brewing in this Progressive Tea Party.

There’s a long history of playing fast and loose with footage and forensics when it comes to describing events that take place in the Holy Land. Terrorists who participated in the knife-stabbing intifada were often depicted in photos with their knives magically severed from the chalk outline. Remove the knife, and now Israel becomes the aggressor.

Remember the notorious video from 2000 of the clash between Israeli troops and Hamas operatives in Gaza where a little Palestinian boy is cowering behind his father against the wall of a building? The film suggested that the boy was killed and the father severely injured.

Israel accepted full responsibility. Over the next 13 years, however, other journalists came forward and asked questions about the veracity of the edited video. Meanwhile, Israel conducted its own inquiry. The raw footage showed that the deadly bullets most likely came from Palestinian attackers, and they weren’t “deadly” bullets at all. The boy was never actually killed and the injuries to his father apparently took place at an entirely different location, at the hands of Hamas! What the world saw was staged for the deliberate purpose of slandering Israel.

Don’t be surprised if a similar finding one day emerges from the death of this Al Jazeera reporter.

And let’s not forget the Goldstone Report, a U.N. fact-finding mission following the 2008-2009 war between Israel and Hamas. The inquiry concluded that Israel targeted Palestinian civilians. By 2011, however, the judge who chaired the investigation disavowed his own findings and wanted the Report retracted, to no avail. Even more self-condemning, he acknowledged that it was actually Hamas that targeted Israeli civilians.

Outlandish claims persist that Israel violates civilized norms. To prove the point, the ancient blood libel has returned, but not without refinements. Making matzoh or eating children is no longer the indictment.

Today, Israel harvests the organs of Palestinians. Yes, despite all evidence to the contrary, the Jewish state is interested not in racking up Nobel Prizes for its medical breakthroughs, but rather in furthering the diabolical work of Dr. Josef Mengele. These charges emanate not from the ignorant Arab street, but from more eminent authorities: the Palestinian Representative to the U.N. and professors from American universities.

Armed with ignorance and fortified by toxic antisemitism, Israel’s enemies spout AOC-inanities that get retweeted into talking points and recited on college campuses where students disseminate doctored memes rather than read books.

Among the tragic consequences in this age of endangered free speech and an agenda-driven press is that our Founding Fathers envisioned these rights as a way to ensure a well-informed public. What we are left with is sketchy truths and history served up as trivialized kitsch. That’s all well and good for Israel’s detractors, who depend on vaguely skewed impressions of the Middle East.

And that’s precisely the array of distortions we’re receiving.


Thane Rosenbaum is a novelist, essayist, law professor and Distinguished University Professor at Touro University, where he directs the Forum on Life, Culture & Society. He is the legal analyst for CBS News Radio. His most recent book is titled “Saving Free Speech … From Itself.”

Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.

Editor's Picks

Latest Articles

From a Jewish Nightmare to an American Dream

But in the spirit of resilience, I’d like to suggest that we dare add something more hopeful to our Seders this year, something more American, something about transforming nightmares into dreams

Six Months

Six months of feeling united as Jews, no matter our backgrounds or religious affiliation.

More news and opinions than at a
Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.

More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.

More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.