Patrons enjoying an outdoor meal at Il Pastaio restaurant on March 4th in Beverly Hills were terrified, as it would be for any of us. A targeted attack during a quiet lunchtime in a peaceful community had taken place before their eyes. A man was robbed of his watch and a bystander woman was shot and seriously injured.
The City of Beverly Hills and Beverly Hills Police Department responded as citizens who care about public safety would hope. BHPD has been present, has addressed the community worries and fears, and has made a commitment to “take every possible measure to ensure (their) safety and security.”
This sounds positive, right? But, that’s not the only story. What’s at stake is far more frightening than the alarming armed robbery and shooting carried out in broad daylight.
Justice won’t feel so just if and when this case gets presented to George Gascón and his Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office. Why? Because Gascón’s policies command prosecutors to take every possible measure to avoid full prosecution, avoid holding criminals on bail, limit incarceration, minimize punishment, and of course, ignore the victims.
Gascón’s policies order prosecutors to pursue the lowest possible charges.
That recent armed robbery in Beverly Hills mirrors an alarming rising crime phenomenon taking place throughout Los Angeles county. According to Crosstown, a data-driven community news site, in the first two months of the year, police fielded reports of 570 shots fired, up 88% from the 303 at the same time in 2020. That has resulted in a corresponding surge of shooting victims. Through Feb. 27, according to Los Angeles Police Department data, 267 people had been hit by gunfire, up from 111 in the same period last year. That is a 141% increase.
When people hear about heinous crimes, they immediately want to know, “What will happen to these guys if and when they get caught?” People want to know that there is accountability, responsibility, and punishment. Gascón’s policies order prosecutors to pursue the lowest possible charges; prior convictions, and/or strike enhancements are likely off the table. Same for any gun enhancements. It’s unlikely anyone from the prosecutor’s office will meet with the victims to discuss what’s happening and why.
Let me break this down for you. The prosecutor assigned to the Beverly Hills case will focus on what charges can be proven based upon the evidence and state law. In this case, the facts suggest this is a robbery that should be charged with the enhancement for use of a gun. There may be several counts based on the number of victims or other factors, but let’s say for the sake of argument there is only one victim and one count of armed robbery. The DA could charge this as a simple robbery where the potential jail time would be a maximum of five years. Most prosecutors, wanting to make sure that the defendant would be held accountable, would include the special enhancement of using a gun, which gives a possible exposure of ten or twenty additional years in prison. And if the person is a repeat offender and this was a second or third strike offense, California law requires the possibility of additional prison time. In other words, this should be a prison case. And while it still might be under Gascon, it will be for the lowest possible result, begging the question, “How does this happen?”
there’s never been a better time to be a criminal. District Attorney George Gascón is sending the message that crime does indeed pay.
Here’s how:
The process by which prosecutors and defense attorneys resolve cases is through the exchange of information that warrants either a more aggravated sentence or a mitigated sentence. If the defendant deserves leniency there are many lawful and ethical ways to get there. If there is a mental health issue, full prosecution can ensure that the issue is considered. Prosecuting cases ethically allows for all circumstances to be considered and allows for justice to be served. It does not need to be all or nothing or a zero-sum game. There are cases where alternatives to incarceration must and should be considered but there are also cases where incarceration must and should happen. This robbery with seriously injured and shooting victims is clearly one of those.
Sadly, Gascón’s policies have stripped prosecutors of their ability to do their job according to the law and have forced them to pursue unethical arguments that they genuinely do not believe serves justice. By not filing enhancements, the potential exposure (prison time) is off the table. Uncharged enhancements greatly reduce any potential penalty. This means the starting point of settling cases will be significantly less than the starting point if there were gun enhancements and/or strikes. Under Gascón’s directives (with no gun charges and no strikes), the Beverly Hills case looks like one ripe for probation. Does that seem fair?
Gascón’s policies are wreaking havoc on the criminal justice system that will be felt by the citizens of Los Angeles long after he is no longer District Attorney.
People ask me all the time, “How is this possible? This is not what I thought when I voted for progress and reform.” Many people, myself included, believe criminal justice reform is necessary. Thoughtful, meaningful reform. Reform based on real science and the reality of crime in Los Angeles County, not fake science that Gascón and his cronies loosely toss around to justify their positions. Gascón’s policies are wreaking havoc on the criminal justice system that will be felt by the citizens of Los Angeles long after he is no longer District Attorney.
Yes, there’s never been a better time to be a criminal. District Attorney George Gascón is sending the message that crime does indeed pay. The systematic dismantling of the criminal justice system means that, eventually, police departments may stop responding to some crimes, and worried calls to hard-working detectives will be met with a response of “Sorry there’s nothing we can do. The DA is not going to do anything anyway.”
The armed robbery and shooting at Il Pastaio was a terrible crime. The policies of Los Angeles County District Attorney George Gascón are worse.
Robin Sax is former LA County Deputy District Attorney, mental health coach and an author and mediator.
A Horrible Crime in Beverly Hills Is Made Worse By George Gascón’s Policies
Robin Sax
Patrons enjoying an outdoor meal at Il Pastaio restaurant on March 4th in Beverly Hills were terrified, as it would be for any of us. A targeted attack during a quiet lunchtime in a peaceful community had taken place before their eyes. A man was robbed of his watch and a bystander woman was shot and seriously injured.
The City of Beverly Hills and Beverly Hills Police Department responded as citizens who care about public safety would hope. BHPD has been present, has addressed the community worries and fears, and has made a commitment to “take every possible measure to ensure (their) safety and security.”
This sounds positive, right? But, that’s not the only story. What’s at stake is far more frightening than the alarming armed robbery and shooting carried out in broad daylight.
Justice won’t feel so just if and when this case gets presented to George Gascón and his Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office. Why? Because Gascón’s policies command prosecutors to take every possible measure to avoid full prosecution, avoid holding criminals on bail, limit incarceration, minimize punishment, and of course, ignore the victims.
That recent armed robbery in Beverly Hills mirrors an alarming rising crime phenomenon taking place throughout Los Angeles county. According to Crosstown, a data-driven community news site, in the first two months of the year, police fielded reports of 570 shots fired, up 88% from the 303 at the same time in 2020. That has resulted in a corresponding surge of shooting victims. Through Feb. 27, according to Los Angeles Police Department data, 267 people had been hit by gunfire, up from 111 in the same period last year. That is a 141% increase.
When people hear about heinous crimes, they immediately want to know, “What will happen to these guys if and when they get caught?” People want to know that there is accountability, responsibility, and punishment. Gascón’s policies order prosecutors to pursue the lowest possible charges; prior convictions, and/or strike enhancements are likely off the table. Same for any gun enhancements. It’s unlikely anyone from the prosecutor’s office will meet with the victims to discuss what’s happening and why.
Let me break this down for you. The prosecutor assigned to the Beverly Hills case will focus on what charges can be proven based upon the evidence and state law. In this case, the facts suggest this is a robbery that should be charged with the enhancement for use of a gun. There may be several counts based on the number of victims or other factors, but let’s say for the sake of argument there is only one victim and one count of armed robbery. The DA could charge this as a simple robbery where the potential jail time would be a maximum of five years. Most prosecutors, wanting to make sure that the defendant would be held accountable, would include the special enhancement of using a gun, which gives a possible exposure of ten or twenty additional years in prison. And if the person is a repeat offender and this was a second or third strike offense, California law requires the possibility of additional prison time. In other words, this should be a prison case. And while it still might be under Gascon, it will be for the lowest possible result, begging the question, “How does this happen?”
Here’s how:
The process by which prosecutors and defense attorneys resolve cases is through the exchange of information that warrants either a more aggravated sentence or a mitigated sentence. If the defendant deserves leniency there are many lawful and ethical ways to get there. If there is a mental health issue, full prosecution can ensure that the issue is considered. Prosecuting cases ethically allows for all circumstances to be considered and allows for justice to be served. It does not need to be all or nothing or a zero-sum game. There are cases where alternatives to incarceration must and should be considered but there are also cases where incarceration must and should happen. This robbery with seriously injured and shooting victims is clearly one of those.
Sadly, Gascón’s policies have stripped prosecutors of their ability to do their job according to the law and have forced them to pursue unethical arguments that they genuinely do not believe serves justice. By not filing enhancements, the potential exposure (prison time) is off the table. Uncharged enhancements greatly reduce any potential penalty. This means the starting point of settling cases will be significantly less than the starting point if there were gun enhancements and/or strikes. Under Gascón’s directives (with no gun charges and no strikes), the Beverly Hills case looks like one ripe for probation. Does that seem fair?
People ask me all the time, “How is this possible? This is not what I thought when I voted for progress and reform.” Many people, myself included, believe criminal justice reform is necessary. Thoughtful, meaningful reform. Reform based on real science and the reality of crime in Los Angeles County, not fake science that Gascón and his cronies loosely toss around to justify their positions. Gascón’s policies are wreaking havoc on the criminal justice system that will be felt by the citizens of Los Angeles long after he is no longer District Attorney.
Yes, there’s never been a better time to be a criminal. District Attorney George Gascón is sending the message that crime does indeed pay. The systematic dismantling of the criminal justice system means that, eventually, police departments may stop responding to some crimes, and worried calls to hard-working detectives will be met with a response of “Sorry there’s nothing we can do. The DA is not going to do anything anyway.”
The armed robbery and shooting at Il Pastaio was a terrible crime. The policies of Los Angeles County District Attorney George Gascón are worse.
Robin Sax is former LA County Deputy District Attorney, mental health coach and an author and mediator.
Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.
Editor's Picks
Israel and the Internet Wars – A Professional Social Media Review
The Invisible Student: A Tale of Homelessness at UCLA and USC
What Ever Happened to the LA Times?
Who Are the Jews On Joe Biden’s Cabinet?
You’re Not a Bad Jewish Mom If Your Kid Wants Santa Claus to Come to Your House
No Labels: The Group Fighting for the Political Center
Latest Articles
One Book, Two Sisters, and the Fight to Keep the Holocaust Real
Warriors of Israel Advocates for Israel’s Heroes in California and Abroad
How My Mother’s Childhood Doodle Wound Up in the Venice Biennale and Why I Removed It
Israeli Journalist at VBS, 2026 Jewish Educator Awards Recipients
Superstitions and the Training Wheels of Faith
At Israel’s Low Point, Montreal Federation Throws a Wild Party
Rabbis of LA | The Rembaums’ Happy Life Together
Second of two parts
Some LA Business Owners and Residents Taking Safety Into Their Own Hands
Several business owners interviewed by The Journal for this article said they had purchased firearms to protect their businesses and homes.
‘The Israeli in Me Came Out’: At 81, Howard Rosenman Fought His Attackers
“I did a film with Barbra Streisand, ‘The Main Event,’ in 1979. Nothing can scare me.”
Jewish Activist Says She Won’t Be Silenced After Being Attacked at the University of Michigan
Benichou hopes to see more people speaking up.
A Popular Skewer Recipe
There is a benefit of roasting food on skewers, à la shish kebab. By cutting meat and vegetables into smaller uniform pieces, the marinade coats more and the food cooks evenly.
Table for Five: Chayei Sarah
Commitment To Love
Settling on the Outskirts – A poem for Parsha Chayei Sara
The life of Sara ends with death.
A Moment in Time: Beyond Politics
A Bisl Torah ~ Love at First Hearing
Is attraction based solely on the physical? Or is chemistry based on something deeper?
Why Moses’ Name Is Changed to Menasseh in Judges
Why Israel’s Messy Election Should Worry Washington
The tight relationship between Trump and Netanyahu masks the real debate over Israel churning in the Republican Party, and Israel’s standing among Democrats has never been lower.
Jewish Community Weighs Implications of Democrats’ Midterm Election Victories
Some emphasized the importance of combating antisemitism and protecting Jewish safety, while others called for political engagement and cooperation across party lines.
Print Issue: Election Fever | November 6, 2026
What comes next?
Rosner’s Domain: Weeks of Known Unknowns
So here we are, stuck with just a few bad options to consider. And that’s just the political superposition of undetermined future – alongside it there’s also the possible – probable? – war with Iran.
The Switched Passport: A Lesson in Seeing the Other
That is my hope: that by finding things we can do together, by recognizing each other’s humanity, we might come to see each other more fully.
After the Last Out, Collect a Different Kind of Card
At a time when Jewish education is competing for attention in a world dominated by screens, sports, short-form videos and endless streams of content, these easily collectable cards offer a different kind of engagement.
6 Jewish Takeaways from the Midterm Elections
There is little chance that the combination of a weakened Trump and an emboldened Democratic Congress produces similar levels of support for aggressive action against Iran and its proxies, and other policies that a wide spectrum of Israelis see as crucial to their security.
Israel Drives Them Crazy
In the diaspora and in Israel, we cannot turn back the clock and undo the harm that was done to us. But we can shape our own future. Israel is strong and resolute. So must we be.
A Democratic-Run Congress Will Target Israel as Well as Trump
Democrats who were long considered “moderates” or even pro-Israel have been signaling over the course of the last year that they can no longer be relied upon to back a Jewish state under assault by Iran and its terrorist proxies.
Why Jewish Unity Is So Difficult
When each dispute seems existential, an error is a catastrophe and disagreement seems like betrayal.
More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.