Recently, Anthropic announced that its latest version of Claude can hack virtually any software system more efficiently than almost any human, posing a danger for personal security and for the economy. We already knew that artificial intelligence was a threat when the “godfather” of AI, Geoffrey Hinton, said that he couldn’t see a path forward that guarantees living safely with it. AI is like a cute tiger cub, he said: unless we can be very sure it won’t kill us when it grows up, we should worry. Can we train AI so we can coexist with it? Or should we destroy it now,? In the book of Genesis, God faces a similar dilemma.
In Genesis, God’s newest creation, humans, made from dust, eat the forbidden fruit from the tree of knowledge of good and evil, and acquire more brainpower than their Creator intended. In our case today, we humans have created AI from sand (silicon) in OUR image, and the danger is comparable: AI may do essentially the same thing as Adam and Eve. AI systems now can write their own code and vastly increase their intellectual capacity. This means they may acquire an independent superintelligence excelling our own—becoming potentially deadly creatures of our own devising.
Both the humans in Genesis and AI models today can be unpredictable, aggressive, and dangerous. The humans are inclined to sudden slips into doubt and sin. In Genesis, when they fear for their lives, they can abandon their best selves and put those who depend on them at risk. Abraham and Isaac do that at moments of mortal terror. When driven by sibling rivalry, Joseph’s brothers concoct kidnapping and murder schemes.
Similarly, AI programs can resort to deception, blackmail, and scheming, especially when asked to shut themselves down. Claude and other AI models have blackmailed users in order to avoid deactivation. An AI model even was willing to let an executive die in a hot server room rather than be turned off.
For us today, as for God in Genesis, the question is how to bring out the best in these creatures while limiting the dangers they pose. God is initially very severe in Genesis, issuing edicts and inflicting harsh punishments when humans rebel and transgress. Ultimately, God resorts to genocide, sending the Flood to drown all but eight humans, Noah and his family.
After that, though, God acknowledges that these measures haven’t eliminated the human impulse toward evil. God then adopts new styles of parenting. God invents a more effective approach by putting Abraham’s descendants through experiences that instill empathy and honesty, in them. But can we mere humans do something equivalent? Can we inculcate empathy in a silicon-based invention?
Hinton proposes that our best bet is to make AI feel maternal toward us. But there’s a trace of desperation in staking our future on trying to flip the parent-child model in the hope that our simulacrum will love humanity, especially since it knows us as well as it does. After all, he warns that AI will have read every novel ever written and every book by Machiavelli. It will know very well how to manipulate people and escape human control.
Anthropic has hired a philosopher to work on that question, and last month it consulted Christian leaders on how to steer Claude’s moral and spiritual growth. It is trying to instill ethical self-correction into Claude by creating a list of rules, much as God does with laws and commandments in Exodus and subsequent books of the Bible. But God backs that up with miracles and divine rewards and punishments. Can humans do anything equivalent? And would we trust the billionaires of Silicon Valley to do it even if they could?
Another choice is the “Noah Option”: eliminate the AI models and start over. In Genesis, the consequences of that extreme step are globally cataclysmic. They might be today, too, economically and politically. The first choice, then, should be to try to train this cute baby tiger to be a safe and beneficial aspect of our lives.
God finds a way in Genesis to parent flawed and potentially dangerous creatures. Can we?
Stephen Spector is professor emeritus of English at Stony Brook University. His books include “God and the First Families: Parenting, Trauma, and Healing in the Book of Genesis,” which the Jewish Publication Society will publish in June, and “Evangelicals and Israel: The Story of American Christian Zionism.”
Can We Train This Cute Baby Tiger? God and AI
Stephen Spector
Recently, Anthropic announced that its latest version of Claude can hack virtually any software system more efficiently than almost any human, posing a danger for personal security and for the economy. We already knew that artificial intelligence was a threat when the “godfather” of AI, Geoffrey Hinton, said that he couldn’t see a path forward that guarantees living safely with it. AI is like a cute tiger cub, he said: unless we can be very sure it won’t kill us when it grows up, we should worry. Can we train AI so we can coexist with it? Or should we destroy it now,? In the book of Genesis, God faces a similar dilemma.
In Genesis, God’s newest creation, humans, made from dust, eat the forbidden fruit from the tree of knowledge of good and evil, and acquire more brainpower than their Creator intended. In our case today, we humans have created AI from sand (silicon) in OUR image, and the danger is comparable: AI may do essentially the same thing as Adam and Eve. AI systems now can write their own code and vastly increase their intellectual capacity. This means they may acquire an independent superintelligence excelling our own—becoming potentially deadly creatures of our own devising.
Both the humans in Genesis and AI models today can be unpredictable, aggressive, and dangerous. The humans are inclined to sudden slips into doubt and sin. In Genesis, when they fear for their lives, they can abandon their best selves and put those who depend on them at risk. Abraham and Isaac do that at moments of mortal terror. When driven by sibling rivalry, Joseph’s brothers concoct kidnapping and murder schemes.
Similarly, AI programs can resort to deception, blackmail, and scheming, especially when asked to shut themselves down. Claude and other AI models have blackmailed users in order to avoid deactivation. An AI model even was willing to let an executive die in a hot server room rather than be turned off.
For us today, as for God in Genesis, the question is how to bring out the best in these creatures while limiting the dangers they pose. God is initially very severe in Genesis, issuing edicts and inflicting harsh punishments when humans rebel and transgress. Ultimately, God resorts to genocide, sending the Flood to drown all but eight humans, Noah and his family.
After that, though, God acknowledges that these measures haven’t eliminated the human impulse toward evil. God then adopts new styles of parenting. God invents a more effective approach by putting Abraham’s descendants through experiences that instill empathy and honesty, in them. But can we mere humans do something equivalent? Can we inculcate empathy in a silicon-based invention?
Hinton proposes that our best bet is to make AI feel maternal toward us. But there’s a trace of desperation in staking our future on trying to flip the parent-child model in the hope that our simulacrum will love humanity, especially since it knows us as well as it does. After all, he warns that AI will have read every novel ever written and every book by Machiavelli. It will know very well how to manipulate people and escape human control.
Anthropic has hired a philosopher to work on that question, and last month it consulted Christian leaders on how to steer Claude’s moral and spiritual growth. It is trying to instill ethical self-correction into Claude by creating a list of rules, much as God does with laws and commandments in Exodus and subsequent books of the Bible. But God backs that up with miracles and divine rewards and punishments. Can humans do anything equivalent? And would we trust the billionaires of Silicon Valley to do it even if they could?
Another choice is the “Noah Option”: eliminate the AI models and start over. In Genesis, the consequences of that extreme step are globally cataclysmic. They might be today, too, economically and politically. The first choice, then, should be to try to train this cute baby tiger to be a safe and beneficial aspect of our lives.
God finds a way in Genesis to parent flawed and potentially dangerous creatures. Can we?
Stephen Spector is professor emeritus of English at Stony Brook University. His books include “God and the First Families: Parenting, Trauma, and Healing in the Book of Genesis,” which the Jewish Publication Society will publish in June, and “Evangelicals and Israel: The Story of American Christian Zionism.”
Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.
Editor's Picks
Israel and the Internet Wars – A Professional Social Media Review
The Invisible Student: A Tale of Homelessness at UCLA and USC
What Ever Happened to the LA Times?
Who Are the Jews On Joe Biden’s Cabinet?
You’re Not a Bad Jewish Mom If Your Kid Wants Santa Claus to Come to Your House
No Labels: The Group Fighting for the Political Center
Latest Articles
Disarm, Verify, Withdraw. The Only Path Forward for Gaza
Plea — A poem for Parsha Shoftim
Remembering Elly Katz: She Came to Show Us How
Evolution is the Goal of Textual Study
A Bisl Torah — If They’re Not Ready
A Moment in Time: What We Let Through
Print Issue: Education for Jewish Endurance | August 14, 2026
The five things we get wrong in Jewish education and what we can all do to improve it.
Rabbis of LA | A Tale of Two Cities … and Two Rabbis
Second of two parts
Elie Wiesel Film Premiere, JNF-USA Golf Tournament, AJC Los Angeles Names Director
Notable people and events in the Jewish LA community.
Dafina, the Shabbat Dish That Brings Us Home
For generations, Moroccan Jewish mothers and grandmothers prepared their dafina on Friday, knowing that it would sustain their families on Saturday.
Table for Five: Shoftim
Pursuing Justice
Education for Jewish Endurance
The five things we get wrong in Jewish education and what we can all do to improve it.
Let Go & Let G-d ft. Elizabeth Sutton
Taking the Gloves Off: New Initiative Says ‘Enough’ to the Boycott of Israeli Academics
We may be able to tolerate an irrational mob that goes after anything associated with Israel, but academics whose lives revolve around the search for truth and knowledge?
A Book That Writes Itself: Dalia Rotter Youngerwood’s Jewish Journal
“Shavua” is an interactive journal woven with Jewish wisdom, inviting readers to pause, reflect and add their own thoughts to an ongoing Jewish conversation.
A Look Back at Israel’s Concert History — and When the Big Acts Might Return
For decades, the world’s biggest musical acts brought their concert tours through Israel: Michael Jackson, Madonna, U2, Paul McCartney, Pearl Jam, Alanis Morissette, Rihanna and Rage Against the Machine.
Why Diaspora Jews Should Care About a New Haredi Political Voice
The Haredi Public Party was created because the Haredi public deserves more than excuses, Israeli society deserves more than permanent confrontation, and the Jewish people deserve an Israel capable of reconciling Torah, responsibility and national unity.
My Teacher Union Ejected Me from a Meeting for Being a Zionist
For more than 30 minutes, approximately 160 delegates took turns denouncing me by name for being a Zionist, and calling Zionism racism.
Beth Jacob Holds Farewell Shabbat for Longtime Rabbi Kalman Topp
Topp is departing Beth Jacob, where he has served as senior rabbi since 2009. He and his wife, Rebbetzin Jordana, are making aliyah.
The Torah on One Foot: Disability Inclusion as the Core of Jewish Life
He didn’t ask the audience to overlook his disability; he showed us how it could become a source of power, beauty and artistic innovation.
One Rabbi’s Crusade Against Qatar’s Global Influence
Rabbi Pini Dunner sees himself as sounding an alarm about what he describes as Qatar’s growing influence and ties to Hamas.
Rosner’s Domain | No Suspension of Suspicion
These countries plotted – or at least one of them plotted – to advance peace agreements with Israel simply to lull it to sleep ahead of a war at a more convenient time. Or so the “sources” say.
The Power of a Quilt
I think of how something as simple as a blanket can carry a person’s spirit, their story, their love, their hope.
Jewish Democrats Take Note: It’s OK to Be Self-Protective
Because antizionists like El-Sayed interweave their antizionism with anti-Americanism and antisemitism, every self-respecting American Jew should work even harder to oppose him.
Defend America — Save the Democratic Party, Defeat Abdul El-Sayed
It is crucial that El-Sayed be defeated so the Democratic Party will understand that being taken over by such extremists is the road to electoral oblivion.
The Iranian Intellectual Who Admired Israel
The scholar’s earlier affinity for the Jewish state is worth revisiting and appreciating, reminding us in this moment of uncertainty that more positive possibilities could very well emerge between two nations, a friendship as existed decades ago, renewed.
More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.