CCAR Files Brief in Support of LGBTQ Rights

The Central Conference of American Rabbis (CCAR), the Reform Rabbinic leadership organization, along with other religious organizations and clergy of different religions, participated in the filing of a brief amicus curiae (“friend of the court”) in the United States Supreme Court on July 3 to support LGBTQ rights in three pending cases.
“The three cases all deal with whether Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects individuals from employment discrimination based on their status as gay, lesbian or transgender,” CCAR said in a statement to the Journal. “The brief argues that unequal treatment of LGBTQ individuals constitutes sex discrimination under Title VII, as severe lower courts have held.”
The amicus curiae will provide the justices with new information they might not have otherwise had. This specific case explains that many religious individuals consider equal treatment of the LGBTQ community as a religious imperative. In contrast, other faith communities believe their religions require them to discriminate against LGBTQ people. The brief that the CCAR joined argues that by allowing such discrimination, certain religions are being prioritized at the expense of others.
The three cases are Altitude Express, Inc. v. Zarda, R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes, Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and Bostock v. Clayton County. Decisions are expected to be made in the Supreme Court’s 2019 – 2020 term.

Did you enjoy this article?

You'll love our roundtable.

Enjoyed this article?

You'll love our roundtable.

By submitting this form, you are consenting to receive marketing emails from: Jewish Journal, 1880 Century Park East, Los Angeles, CA, 90067, https://www.jewishjournal.com. You can revoke your consent to receive emails at any time by using the SafeUnsubscribe® link, found at the bottom of every email. Emails are serviced by Constant Contact

Editor's Picks

Latest Articles


Latest Articles

Exclusive: Pro-Israel Groups Release a Statement on Berkeley Controversy

As a first step, the nine student organizations should rescind the new, discriminatory provisions from their bylaws or face appropriate sanctions for their failure to do so.

Rabbis and Jewish Leaders Who Wrongly Banned Me Should Seek Teshuvah

Our religion and heritage commands that Jews who wronged other Jews should seek Teshuvah from the person they wronged. I’m waiting to hear from...

The Great Order – Comments on Shabbat Shuva

  The Great Order Comment on Shabbat Shuvah – coinciding with Torah portion Va-Yeilekh   The tension between order and chaos is core to every facet of the...

The Appeal of Lies

Aquinas, who equated truth with joy, may not have realized the quite treacherously troubling fact that lies appeal to nearly all the hoi polloi, since passion for...

Letter to Dean Chemerinsky on Behalf of American Association of Jewish Lawyers and Jurists

To read a related op-ed by Kenneth Marcus and response by Erwin Chemerinsky, click here. The American Association of Jewish Lawyers & Jurists (AAJLJ) is...



More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.

Copy link
Powered by Social Snap