Fresh off the heels of their failed attempt to host convicted Palestinian terrorist Leila Khaled for an online event, the Arab and Muslim Ethnicities and Diasporas Studies Department (AMED) at San Francisco State University (SFSU) held a November 29 panel titled “From Colonization to Solidarity: Narratives of Defeat and Sumoud.” The event, led by AMED Professor Rabab Abdulhadi, included a panel of speakers promoting numerous falsehoods about Israel and tarnishing the integrity of academia.
Although this event did not feature any convicted terrorists, many of the panelists have deeply concerning affiliations with terrorism. First, Eyewitness Palestine, a cosponsor of the event, has been documented bringing American peace activists to Israel and housing them in the homes of members of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP), a U.S.-designated terrorist organization. Two of the panel’s speakers, Omar Barghouti and Dr. Haidar Eid, are members of the Palestinian BDS National Committee (BNC), whose members include the Council of National and Islamic Forces in Palestine, itself comprised of five U.S.-designated terrorist organizations. A third panelist, Mahmoud el-Ali, also has connections to the PFLP.
This is nothing new. For years, university campuses have opened their doors to a bevy of terrorists and terror supporters, including the PFLP’s Rasmeah Odeh, Khaled, Palestinian Islamic Jihad spokesperson Khader Adnan and scores of other individuals.
What was striking about this SFSU event, however, was the overt attempt to inject radicalism onto campuses under the patina of academia. There was no intellectual exchange of ideas nor exchange of facts; it was all narrative, no substance. Witness, for instance, when Eid boasted that he participated in the First Intifada. At the onset of the event, Professor Abdulhadi invited students to submit academic assignments based on the ensuing discussion. But when the discussion is presented without counterarguments, the assignment becomes a form of encouraging students to adopt the panel’s point of view.
The most recurring point raised by the panel was the insistence that Israel is an apartheid state. Yet, none of the panelists offered any evidence of this. Indeed, Barghouti’s claim that “apartheid is alive and kicking in Tel Aviv” did not address the Israeli Declaration of Independence’s guarantee of equality rights to “all its inhabitants irrespective of religion, race or sex,” the fact that the Joint Arab List is the third-largest party in Israel’s parliament and that Arabs, Christians and Druze serve in the military and judiciary. Likewise, Israel is not imposing an apartheid in the West Bank. While Palestinians certainly have a different status than Israeli-Arabs, the distinction is based on national lines, not racial ones; definitionally, this is not apartheid. Inaccurately labeling Israel an apartheid state belittles those who did suffer the horrors of apartheid, as was South Africa until the 1990s.
The panel eventually descended into anti-Semitism. Towards the end, co-moderator Saliem Shehadeh implied the anti-Semitic canard that Israel is somehow responsible for police brutality in the United States. Panelist Samia Khoury also veered into anti-Semitism when she alluded that Israel merely invokes the Holocaust in order to make its detractors feel guilty and deflect criticism. Barghouti accused Israel of promulgating a new version of anti-Semitism that allows hatred of Jews as long as people still love Israel.
This type of radicalism is not relegated to a single classroom; it spills over onto the rest of campus. At SFSU, Jewish students are demonized for their membership in Hillel, a Jewish campus organization with no affiliation to Israel. Moreover, in November 2020, SFSU’s student government passed a resolution demanding the university divest from more than 100 companies that operate in the West Bank.
Beyond her participation in the panel, Professor Abdulhadi has continued to promote this hatred. In 2018, she stated that Zionist students should not be permitted to study at SFSU. On December 8, 2020, she retweeted a post supporting the First Intifada, and on January 5, 2021, she retweeted the libel about Israel’s vaccine distribution. She took action beyond Twitter on December 21, when she filed a claim against the California State University system arguing that by not providing an alternative platform for her webinar with Khaled (which Zoom deplatformed), the CSU system was infringing on her academic freedom and right to free speech.
Professor Abdulhadi has continued to promote this hatred.
Of course, neither of these freedoms apply to supporting terrorism, which is why Zoom admirably nixed the event. Furthermore, Professor Abdulhadi routinely violates another type of academic freedom, one she seems to care far less about: the freedom of students from political indoctrination by their professors. Is it just a coincidence that one of the most notoriously anti-Israel campuses in the country is also home to one of the most notorious anti-Israel professors? Maybe, but not likely.
Oftentimes, these anti-Israel become radical professors themselves, as was displayed during SFSU’s panel by co-moderators Saliem Shehadeh and Omar Zahzah, both Ph.D. candidates who were active in groups like Students for Justice in Palestine and the Palestinian Youth Movement during their studies.
People have the sacred right to speak freely as individuals — that is nonnegotiable. But teachers also have a sacred duty to provide their students with the best education they can get, devoid of political prejudice. When public universities like SFSU allow professors to brainwash students by creating academic assignments based on their own political activism, they violate this sacred duty. The academic community must demand that Professor Abdulhadi and her department are held responsible for polluting their classrooms with such anti-academic activity and break their cycle of indoctrination.
Eitan Fischberger is a campus adviser at the Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting and Analysis (CAMERA) and veteran of the Israeli Air Force. Follow him on Twitter @EFischberger.
Anti-Academia at San Francisco State University
Eitan Fischberger
Fresh off the heels of their failed attempt to host convicted Palestinian terrorist Leila Khaled for an online event, the Arab and Muslim Ethnicities and Diasporas Studies Department (AMED) at San Francisco State University (SFSU) held a November 29 panel titled “From Colonization to Solidarity: Narratives of Defeat and Sumoud.” The event, led by AMED Professor Rabab Abdulhadi, included a panel of speakers promoting numerous falsehoods about Israel and tarnishing the integrity of academia.
Although this event did not feature any convicted terrorists, many of the panelists have deeply concerning affiliations with terrorism. First, Eyewitness Palestine, a cosponsor of the event, has been documented bringing American peace activists to Israel and housing them in the homes of members of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP), a U.S.-designated terrorist organization. Two of the panel’s speakers, Omar Barghouti and Dr. Haidar Eid, are members of the Palestinian BDS National Committee (BNC), whose members include the Council of National and Islamic Forces in Palestine, itself comprised of five U.S.-designated terrorist organizations. A third panelist, Mahmoud el-Ali, also has connections to the PFLP.
This is nothing new. For years, university campuses have opened their doors to a bevy of terrorists and terror supporters, including the PFLP’s Rasmeah Odeh, Khaled, Palestinian Islamic Jihad spokesperson Khader Adnan and scores of other individuals.
What was striking about this SFSU event, however, was the overt attempt to inject radicalism onto campuses under the patina of academia. There was no intellectual exchange of ideas nor exchange of facts; it was all narrative, no substance. Witness, for instance, when Eid boasted that he participated in the First Intifada. At the onset of the event, Professor Abdulhadi invited students to submit academic assignments based on the ensuing discussion. But when the discussion is presented without counterarguments, the assignment becomes a form of encouraging students to adopt the panel’s point of view.
The most recurring point raised by the panel was the insistence that Israel is an apartheid state. Yet, none of the panelists offered any evidence of this. Indeed, Barghouti’s claim that “apartheid is alive and kicking in Tel Aviv” did not address the Israeli Declaration of Independence’s guarantee of equality rights to “all its inhabitants irrespective of religion, race or sex,” the fact that the Joint Arab List is the third-largest party in Israel’s parliament and that Arabs, Christians and Druze serve in the military and judiciary. Likewise, Israel is not imposing an apartheid in the West Bank. While Palestinians certainly have a different status than Israeli-Arabs, the distinction is based on national lines, not racial ones; definitionally, this is not apartheid. Inaccurately labeling Israel an apartheid state belittles those who did suffer the horrors of apartheid, as was South Africa until the 1990s.
The panel eventually descended into anti-Semitism. Towards the end, co-moderator Saliem Shehadeh implied the anti-Semitic canard that Israel is somehow responsible for police brutality in the United States. Panelist Samia Khoury also veered into anti-Semitism when she alluded that Israel merely invokes the Holocaust in order to make its detractors feel guilty and deflect criticism. Barghouti accused Israel of promulgating a new version of anti-Semitism that allows hatred of Jews as long as people still love Israel.
This type of radicalism is not relegated to a single classroom; it spills over onto the rest of campus. At SFSU, Jewish students are demonized for their membership in Hillel, a Jewish campus organization with no affiliation to Israel. Moreover, in November 2020, SFSU’s student government passed a resolution demanding the university divest from more than 100 companies that operate in the West Bank.
Beyond her participation in the panel, Professor Abdulhadi has continued to promote this hatred. In 2018, she stated that Zionist students should not be permitted to study at SFSU. On December 8, 2020, she retweeted a post supporting the First Intifada, and on January 5, 2021, she retweeted the libel about Israel’s vaccine distribution. She took action beyond Twitter on December 21, when she filed a claim against the California State University system arguing that by not providing an alternative platform for her webinar with Khaled (which Zoom deplatformed), the CSU system was infringing on her academic freedom and right to free speech.
Of course, neither of these freedoms apply to supporting terrorism, which is why Zoom admirably nixed the event. Furthermore, Professor Abdulhadi routinely violates another type of academic freedom, one she seems to care far less about: the freedom of students from political indoctrination by their professors. Is it just a coincidence that one of the most notoriously anti-Israel campuses in the country is also home to one of the most notorious anti-Israel professors? Maybe, but not likely.
Oftentimes, these anti-Israel become radical professors themselves, as was displayed during SFSU’s panel by co-moderators Saliem Shehadeh and Omar Zahzah, both Ph.D. candidates who were active in groups like Students for Justice in Palestine and the Palestinian Youth Movement during their studies.
People have the sacred right to speak freely as individuals — that is nonnegotiable. But teachers also have a sacred duty to provide their students with the best education they can get, devoid of political prejudice. When public universities like SFSU allow professors to brainwash students by creating academic assignments based on their own political activism, they violate this sacred duty. The academic community must demand that Professor Abdulhadi and her department are held responsible for polluting their classrooms with such anti-academic activity and break their cycle of indoctrination.
Eitan Fischberger is a campus adviser at the Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting and Analysis (CAMERA) and veteran of the Israeli Air Force. Follow him on Twitter @EFischberger.
Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.
Editor's Picks
Israel and the Internet Wars – A Professional Social Media Review
The Invisible Student: A Tale of Homelessness at UCLA and USC
What Ever Happened to the LA Times?
Who Are the Jews On Joe Biden’s Cabinet?
You’re Not a Bad Jewish Mom If Your Kid Wants Santa Claus to Come to Your House
No Labels: The Group Fighting for the Political Center
Latest Articles
Who is Going to Disarm Them?
How Zionism Strengthens My Judaism
Don’t Book Family Trips, Build Legacies Instead.
All My Journeys — A poem for Parsha Matot-Masei
A Bisl Torah — Confidence in Them, Trust in Yourself
The Young Investors Redefining What It Means to Support Israel
Print Issue: Remember Who You Are | July 10, 2026
An Open Letter to My Fellow Jews on Peoplehood, Memory, and Israel
A Moment in Time: Israel – Coming Home Again
Psalm 35:8 United the First Congress of the United States and the State of Israel
Rabbis of LA | Rabbi Geller Is Still Making History
First of three parts
Hebrew University-UCLA Exchange, New Staff at BJE, Repair the World Volunteer Day
Notable people and events in the Jewish LA community.
Arab Citizens of Israel: Between Integration and Separation
Arab citizens are an integral part of Israeli society. They serve as physicians, nurses, lawyers, engineers, pharmacists, entrepreneurs, professors and judges.
‘Floaters’ Brings the Joy and Heart of Jewish Summer Camp to the Big Screen
“The Floaters” opens at Laemmle locations in West L.A. and Encino on July 17.
Alan Rothenberg Brought the World Cup to America in 1994. Now He’s Bringing Soccer’s Jewish History to L.A.
The man behind the 1994 FIFA World Cup is chairing The Beautiful Game: The Untold Story as the Holocaust Museum L.A.’s Goldrich Cultural Center prepares to open in mid-August.
More Than a Game: How the Equalizer Is Bridging Israel’s Divides One Child at a Time
Through The Equalizer (Sha’ar Shivion), children from Jewish, Arab, Druze, Bedouin, religious and secular communities meet through soccer – not only to compete, but also to build friendships and break down barriers that often keep their communities apart.
NYBD & Bakery in Mar Vista Features Hamantaschen?
It’s important to the owners, Lenny and Adaeze Rosenberg – and the neighborhood – to stay true to its longtime recipes.
A Ka’ak By Any Other Name
A symbol of hospitality, families bake batches for holidays, family celebrations and visits with friends and relatives.
Table for Five: Matot-Masei
Keeping Your Word
From Roadmap to Reality: UCLA Must Move Beyond Aspirational Commitments in Combating Antisemitism
UCLA has an opportunity to become a national model for confronting antisemitism through principled leadership, transparent accountability, and meaningful action.
Emanuel Gives Israel Some Love Tough Rather Than Tough Love
I can imagine many Israelis rolling their eyes: OK, where’s he going with this? When is he telling us what he really came here to say?
The Story That Never Goes Away
Rachel Goldberg-Polin, mother of slain hostage Hersh Goldberg-Polin, can’t stop speaking about her pain and the public love her body cannot always receive. She talks to the Journal about her son’s legacy and her new book.
Remembering Who You Are
An Open Letter to My Fellow Jews on Peoplehood, Memory and Israel
Rosner’s Domain | A Dime-Store Abe: The Karhi Crisis
This week’s “Constitutional Crisis” is typical of the way the government operates. It issues a statement, or a tweet and then walks it back. Oops, we did not mean it. Or rather, we did, but we also meant to deny that we did.
“Believe All Women” Should Not Be Political
Moral consistency is not a Republican value or a Democratic value. It is an American value.
Why Can’t We Be Friends?
If we want to see a less polarized society, both internally and beyond, we must emphatically reject the idea that political alignment is the predominant commonality for friendship.
Ruth-less, the Enigma of a Name
Jews spoke in two voices about Ruth, a kind of national schizophrenia, one with joyous chanting on Shavuos as the Book of Ruth was read; the other, removing her name from the chain-link of repeated names throughout the generations.
More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.