President Franklin D. Roosevelt is widely remembered as a strong leader who boldly led America out of the Great Depression and to the brink of victory in World War II. Yet when it comes to the Holocaust, some defenders of FDR’s record would like us to believe he was not responsible for keeping Jewish refugees out of America — that it was all the handiwork of the State Department, which supposedly ran U.S. immigration and foreign policy independently of the president’s wishes.
This is a disingenuous framing of FDR’s legacy. Especially in a time like today, when immigration policy is a topic of so much interest, it’s important to recognize that it is the president who makes the final decisions, not his appointees.
Yet, in a recent speech at the University of Oklahoma, Professor Daniel Greene continued to perpetuate the implausible notion that President Roosevelt was too hapless to make his own foreign policy. Remarkably, Greene spoke for nearly an hour about America’s response to Nazism and the Holocaust yet barely mentioned the president.
Greene’s tendentious approach is consistent with the theme of the controversial exhibit on “Americans and the Holocaust” at the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum (for which Greene was senior curator). Many scholars have criticized the exhibit for downplaying President Roosevelt’s abandonment of European Jewry.
Greene told his Oklahoma audience that the reason so few German Jews were admitted to the United States in the 1930s was because of “bureaucratic walls put in place by the State Department” — as if the White House had no occupant.
What actually happened is that the State Department implemented Roosevelt’s policy of restricting immigration far below what the existing law allowed. The annual quota of German immigrants — about 26,000 — was filled only once in FDR’s twelve years in office; in most of those years, it was less than 25% filled.
There are letters from the president himself at the time, in which he acknowledged and defended the fact that visas were, as he put it, “considerably under-issued.” There are documents showing that State Department officials briefed the president on their efforts to keep refugees out in accordance with his policies.
Equally troubling was Greene’s deeply flawed description of the American response to the Nazis’ Kristallnacht pogrom in 1938. Greene omitted any mention of the offer the governor of the U.S. Virgin Islands made to open his territory to Jewish refugees after the pogrom — which FDRrejected. The exhibit at the museum likewise fails to mention the Virgin Islands as a possible haven for refugees.
The sad truth about FDR and Nazi Germany in the 1930s — which Greene and the U.S. HolocaustMuseum never mention — is that FDR consistently sought to maintain good relations with the Hitler regime prior to the war.
FDR consistently sought to maintain good relations with the Hitler regime prior to the war.
Under President Roosevelt, the U.S. government warmly welcomed the swastika-bedecked German warships Karlsruhe and Emden, which Hitler sent to American ports in 1934–1936 to promote goodwill between the Third Reich and the United States. The warships visited American Atlantic, Pacific, and Gulf Coast ports at a time when Nazi Germany was emerging as a major military power. High-level U.S. military officials openly fraternized with the warships’ officers, helping to legitimize Hitler’s rearmament program, which put all of European Jewry in extreme danger. With the assistance of Roosevelt’s State Department, the U.S. Navy even helped the Nazi warships improve their combat readiness.
In numerous speeches to American business and civic groups, the German warships’ officers aggressively promoted Nazism and Hitler’s expansionist policies. The Roosevelt administration ignored fierce protests by American Jews and trade unionists against the Nazi warships’ visits. The administration’s policy helped Nazi Germany present itself as a respectable member of the community of nations, with many legitimate grievances. Greene mentioned none of this, nor can it be found in the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum’s exhibit.
Hosting the Nazi warships was consistent with President Roosevelt’s policy of maintaining cordial, sometimes even friendly, relations with the Nazi regime. From 1933 until the end of 1938, FDR never publicly criticized Hitler’s persecution of German Jews. He never suspended diplomatic or trade relations with Nazi Germany before World War II. And at the same time that many Americans were boycotting German goods in the 1930s, the Roosevelt administration was helping the Hitler regime evade the boycott by allowing it to use deceptive labeling on their goods so that American consumers would not recognize their country of origin.
Toward the end of his talk in Oklahoma, Greene described how the Holocaust Museum’s exhibit was intended especially for younger audiences, so he and his colleagues polled high school students in advance. Greene said he was surprised when “high school students didn’t do well on the question of who was president in World War II.”
Sadly, neither the exhibit nor its roving spokesman is doing much to improve the situation. So long as they depict Roosevelt as the amazing vanishing president — who suddenly goes missing when the embarrassing abandonment of the Jews is discussed — how could high schoolers be expected to know any better?
Dr. Rafael Medoff is founding director of The David S. Wyman Institute for Holocaust Studies; his most recent book is “The Jews Should Keep Quiet: Franklin D. Roosevelt, Rabbi Stephen S. Wise, and the Holocaust.”
Dr. Stephen Norwood is Professor of History and Judaic Studies at the University of Oklahoma; his latest book, which is in press, is “Prologue to Annihilation: Ordinary American and British Jews Challenge the Third Reich.”
Whitewashing FDR’s Abandonment of the Jews
Rafael Medoff and Stephen H. Norwood
President Franklin D. Roosevelt is widely remembered as a strong leader who boldly led America out of the Great Depression and to the brink of victory in World War II. Yet when it comes to the Holocaust, some defenders of FDR’s record would like us to believe he was not responsible for keeping Jewish refugees out of America — that it was all the handiwork of the State Department, which supposedly ran U.S. immigration and foreign policy independently of the president’s wishes.
This is a disingenuous framing of FDR’s legacy. Especially in a time like today, when immigration policy is a topic of so much interest, it’s important to recognize that it is the president who makes the final decisions, not his appointees.
Yet, in a recent speech at the University of Oklahoma, Professor Daniel Greene continued to perpetuate the implausible notion that President Roosevelt was too hapless to make his own foreign policy. Remarkably, Greene spoke for nearly an hour about America’s response to Nazism and the Holocaust yet barely mentioned the president.
Greene’s tendentious approach is consistent with the theme of the controversial exhibit on “Americans and the Holocaust” at the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum (for which Greene was senior curator). Many scholars have criticized the exhibit for downplaying President Roosevelt’s abandonment of European Jewry.
Greene told his Oklahoma audience that the reason so few German Jews were admitted to the United States in the 1930s was because of “bureaucratic walls put in place by the State Department” — as if the White House had no occupant.
What actually happened is that the State Department implemented Roosevelt’s policy of restricting immigration far below what the existing law allowed. The annual quota of German immigrants — about 26,000 — was filled only once in FDR’s twelve years in office; in most of those years, it was less than 25% filled.
There are letters from the president himself at the time, in which he acknowledged and defended the fact that visas were, as he put it, “considerably under-issued.” There are documents showing that State Department officials briefed the president on their efforts to keep refugees out in accordance with his policies.
Equally troubling was Greene’s deeply flawed description of the American response to the Nazis’ Kristallnacht pogrom in 1938. Greene omitted any mention of the offer the governor of the U.S. Virgin Islands made to open his territory to Jewish refugees after the pogrom — which FDRrejected. The exhibit at the museum likewise fails to mention the Virgin Islands as a possible haven for refugees.
The sad truth about FDR and Nazi Germany in the 1930s — which Greene and the U.S. HolocaustMuseum never mention — is that FDR consistently sought to maintain good relations with the Hitler regime prior to the war.
Under President Roosevelt, the U.S. government warmly welcomed the swastika-bedecked German warships Karlsruhe and Emden, which Hitler sent to American ports in 1934–1936 to promote goodwill between the Third Reich and the United States. The warships visited American Atlantic, Pacific, and Gulf Coast ports at a time when Nazi Germany was emerging as a major military power. High-level U.S. military officials openly fraternized with the warships’ officers, helping to legitimize Hitler’s rearmament program, which put all of European Jewry in extreme danger. With the assistance of Roosevelt’s State Department, the U.S. Navy even helped the Nazi warships improve their combat readiness.
In numerous speeches to American business and civic groups, the German warships’ officers aggressively promoted Nazism and Hitler’s expansionist policies. The Roosevelt administration ignored fierce protests by American Jews and trade unionists against the Nazi warships’ visits. The administration’s policy helped Nazi Germany present itself as a respectable member of the community of nations, with many legitimate grievances. Greene mentioned none of this, nor can it be found in the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum’s exhibit.
Hosting the Nazi warships was consistent with President Roosevelt’s policy of maintaining cordial, sometimes even friendly, relations with the Nazi regime. From 1933 until the end of 1938, FDR never publicly criticized Hitler’s persecution of German Jews. He never suspended diplomatic or trade relations with Nazi Germany before World War II. And at the same time that many Americans were boycotting German goods in the 1930s, the Roosevelt administration was helping the Hitler regime evade the boycott by allowing it to use deceptive labeling on their goods so that American consumers would not recognize their country of origin.
Toward the end of his talk in Oklahoma, Greene described how the Holocaust Museum’s exhibit was intended especially for younger audiences, so he and his colleagues polled high school students in advance. Greene said he was surprised when “high school students didn’t do well on the question of who was president in World War II.”
Sadly, neither the exhibit nor its roving spokesman is doing much to improve the situation. So long as they depict Roosevelt as the amazing vanishing president — who suddenly goes missing when the embarrassing abandonment of the Jews is discussed — how could high schoolers be expected to know any better?
Dr. Rafael Medoff is founding director of The David S. Wyman Institute for Holocaust Studies; his most recent book is “The Jews Should Keep Quiet: Franklin D. Roosevelt, Rabbi Stephen S. Wise, and the Holocaust.”
Dr. Stephen Norwood is Professor of History and Judaic Studies at the University of Oklahoma; his latest book, which is in press, is “Prologue to Annihilation: Ordinary American and British Jews Challenge the Third Reich.”
Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.
Editor's Picks
Israel and the Internet Wars – A Professional Social Media Review
The Invisible Student: A Tale of Homelessness at UCLA and USC
What Ever Happened to the LA Times?
Who Are the Jews On Joe Biden’s Cabinet?
You’re Not a Bad Jewish Mom If Your Kid Wants Santa Claus to Come to Your House
No Labels: The Group Fighting for the Political Center
Latest Articles
Songs of Freedom Concert, Lone Soldier Center Gathering, Women of Iron Awards, Nir Oz Fundraiser
Sailing Tahiti on The Jet Set TV: Why Windstar Cruises Delivers Small Ships, Big Experiences
Print Issue: Reflections | April 3, 2026
The Fourth Son in the Haggadah Echoes Kafka’s Investigative Dog
A Bisl Torah — Dayeinu: Enough or More than Enough
Order, Please – A poem for Passover
Why the Seder Is the Oldest Classroom in Human History
We are the people who said, three thousand years ago, that no human ruler is God. And tyrants have never forgiven us for it.
Rabbis of LA | Rabbi Shapiro Wants Music in All Aspects of Temple Life
Second of two parts
Antisemitism, Deicide, and Revolution
The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops did a remarkable thing: It issued a memorandum to all American Catholic bishops urging them to prepare their teachings carefully during this Easter period and ensure that they accurately present the Church’s positive teachings about Jews.
Ruth Wisse Challenges Americans to Live American, Jewish and Zionist Values
On March 25, Professor Ruth Wisse, the legendary Yiddish literature and Jewish culture scholar, used an all-American platform to inspire Americans with Jewish, Zionist and quintessentially American, lessons.
Shuk-style Mazal Market Returns with Pre-Passover ‘Renewal’
“Mazal Market will exist as long as there is a need for it. It’s a place where everyone feels like they’re Jewish enough together.”
Israeli Entrepreneurs Fuel California’s Economy with High-Paying Jobs
California has long been home to Israeli entrepreneurs and companies spanning tech, cybersecurity, custom software, financial services and full-service restaurants. These businesses generate jobs and strengthen the state economy.
Israel Bachar on Antisemitism, Hollywood and Mobilizing Global Support for Israel
While some voices on the far left and far right attempt to portray Israel as dragging the U.S. into war, Bachar stressed that this is not the reality, noting that the United States is acting based on its own strategic interests.
Chametz Is More than Crumbs in the Corners of our Homes
Chametz is also something that gathers in the corners of our being, the spiritual chametz that, like the physical particles we gather the night before Passover, can infect, wither, influence and sabotage us as we engage with others.
Kugel Kugel Everywhere
At Passover time, all kugels are welcome.
Joan Nathan’s Passover Favorites
Nathan’s family holidays go back 46 years with rotating guests and a community that forms around her ever-changing table.
Magic of Mimouna and a Walnut Cookie Recipe
They are perfect for a Mimouna table because they are flourless and can be baked during Passover, before Mimouna.
Alpine Flavors—a Crunchy Granola Recipe
Every Passover, I prepare a truly delicious gluten-free granola. I use lots of nuts and seeds (pistachios, walnuts, almonds and pumpkin seeds) and dried fruits (apricots, dates and cranberries).
Table for Five: Passover
The Our Ongoing Exodus
From Late-Night Vacuuming to Transcendence: A Passover Meditation
Passover itself denotes transcendence. Leaving one’s limitations. Leaping beyond the ordinary.
Pesach Reflections
How does the Exodus story, Judaism’s foundational narrative of freedom, speak to the present? We asked local leaders, including rabbis, educators and podcasters, to weigh in.
Rosner’s Domain | Be Skeptical of Skeptics, Too
Whoever risks a decisive or semi-decisive prediction of the campaign’s end (and there is a long list of such figures on the Israeli side as well as the American side) is not demonstrating wisdom but rather a lack of seriousness.
When We Can No Longer Agree on Who Is Pharaoh
The Seder asks us to remain present to the tension between competing fears and obligations. It does not require choosing one lesson over the other, but rather, it creates space for us to articulate our concerns and listen to the fears and hopes that shape others’ views.
The Battle for Zionism Will Be Won — or Lost — at the Seder Table
The Haggadah’s original purpose is not to soothe. It is to mobilize.
Pesach at War. Leaving Fast, Leaving Slow.
Freedom, it would seem, is erratic; it happens in fits and starts, three steps forward and two steps back. Freedom is a leap into the unknown, driven by a dream. We will figure it out in time.
A Moment in Time: “Passover – Bedikat Chametz”
More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.