President Franklin D. Roosevelt is widely remembered as a strong leader who boldly led America out of the Great Depression and to the brink of victory in World War II. Yet when it comes to the Holocaust, some defenders of FDR’s record would like us to believe he was not responsible for keeping Jewish refugees out of America — that it was all the handiwork of the State Department, which supposedly ran U.S. immigration and foreign policy independently of the president’s wishes.
This is a disingenuous framing of FDR’s legacy. Especially in a time like today, when immigration policy is a topic of so much interest, it’s important to recognize that it is the president who makes the final decisions, not his appointees.
Yet, in a recent speech at the University of Oklahoma, Professor Daniel Greene continued to perpetuate the implausible notion that President Roosevelt was too hapless to make his own foreign policy. Remarkably, Greene spoke for nearly an hour about America’s response to Nazism and the Holocaust yet barely mentioned the president.
Greene’s tendentious approach is consistent with the theme of the controversial exhibit on “Americans and the Holocaust” at the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum (for which Greene was senior curator). Many scholars have criticized the exhibit for downplaying President Roosevelt’s abandonment of European Jewry.
Greene told his Oklahoma audience that the reason so few German Jews were admitted to the United States in the 1930s was because of “bureaucratic walls put in place by the State Department” — as if the White House had no occupant.
What actually happened is that the State Department implemented Roosevelt’s policy of restricting immigration far below what the existing law allowed. The annual quota of German immigrants — about 26,000 — was filled only once in FDR’s twelve years in office; in most of those years, it was less than 25% filled.
There are letters from the president himself at the time, in which he acknowledged and defended the fact that visas were, as he put it, “considerably under-issued.” There are documents showing that State Department officials briefed the president on their efforts to keep refugees out in accordance with his policies.
Equally troubling was Greene’s deeply flawed description of the American response to the Nazis’ Kristallnacht pogrom in 1938. Greene omitted any mention of the offer the governor of the U.S. Virgin Islands made to open his territory to Jewish refugees after the pogrom — which FDRrejected. The exhibit at the museum likewise fails to mention the Virgin Islands as a possible haven for refugees.
The sad truth about FDR and Nazi Germany in the 1930s — which Greene and the U.S. HolocaustMuseum never mention — is that FDR consistently sought to maintain good relations with the Hitler regime prior to the war.
FDR consistently sought to maintain good relations with the Hitler regime prior to the war.
Under President Roosevelt, the U.S. government warmly welcomed the swastika-bedecked German warships Karlsruhe and Emden, which Hitler sent to American ports in 1934–1936 to promote goodwill between the Third Reich and the United States. The warships visited American Atlantic, Pacific, and Gulf Coast ports at a time when Nazi Germany was emerging as a major military power. High-level U.S. military officials openly fraternized with the warships’ officers, helping to legitimize Hitler’s rearmament program, which put all of European Jewry in extreme danger. With the assistance of Roosevelt’s State Department, the U.S. Navy even helped the Nazi warships improve their combat readiness.
In numerous speeches to American business and civic groups, the German warships’ officers aggressively promoted Nazism and Hitler’s expansionist policies. The Roosevelt administration ignored fierce protests by American Jews and trade unionists against the Nazi warships’ visits. The administration’s policy helped Nazi Germany present itself as a respectable member of the community of nations, with many legitimate grievances. Greene mentioned none of this, nor can it be found in the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum’s exhibit.
Hosting the Nazi warships was consistent with President Roosevelt’s policy of maintaining cordial, sometimes even friendly, relations with the Nazi regime. From 1933 until the end of 1938, FDR never publicly criticized Hitler’s persecution of German Jews. He never suspended diplomatic or trade relations with Nazi Germany before World War II. And at the same time that many Americans were boycotting German goods in the 1930s, the Roosevelt administration was helping the Hitler regime evade the boycott by allowing it to use deceptive labeling on their goods so that American consumers would not recognize their country of origin.
Toward the end of his talk in Oklahoma, Greene described how the Holocaust Museum’s exhibit was intended especially for younger audiences, so he and his colleagues polled high school students in advance. Greene said he was surprised when “high school students didn’t do well on the question of who was president in World War II.”
Sadly, neither the exhibit nor its roving spokesman is doing much to improve the situation. So long as they depict Roosevelt as the amazing vanishing president — who suddenly goes missing when the embarrassing abandonment of the Jews is discussed — how could high schoolers be expected to know any better?
Dr. Rafael Medoff is founding director of The David S. Wyman Institute for Holocaust Studies; his most recent book is “The Jews Should Keep Quiet: Franklin D. Roosevelt, Rabbi Stephen S. Wise, and the Holocaust.”
Dr. Stephen Norwood is Professor of History and Judaic Studies at the University of Oklahoma; his latest book, which is in press, is “Prologue to Annihilation: Ordinary American and British Jews Challenge the Third Reich.”
Whitewashing FDR’s Abandonment of the Jews
Rafael Medoff and Stephen H. Norwood
President Franklin D. Roosevelt is widely remembered as a strong leader who boldly led America out of the Great Depression and to the brink of victory in World War II. Yet when it comes to the Holocaust, some defenders of FDR’s record would like us to believe he was not responsible for keeping Jewish refugees out of America — that it was all the handiwork of the State Department, which supposedly ran U.S. immigration and foreign policy independently of the president’s wishes.
This is a disingenuous framing of FDR’s legacy. Especially in a time like today, when immigration policy is a topic of so much interest, it’s important to recognize that it is the president who makes the final decisions, not his appointees.
Yet, in a recent speech at the University of Oklahoma, Professor Daniel Greene continued to perpetuate the implausible notion that President Roosevelt was too hapless to make his own foreign policy. Remarkably, Greene spoke for nearly an hour about America’s response to Nazism and the Holocaust yet barely mentioned the president.
Greene’s tendentious approach is consistent with the theme of the controversial exhibit on “Americans and the Holocaust” at the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum (for which Greene was senior curator). Many scholars have criticized the exhibit for downplaying President Roosevelt’s abandonment of European Jewry.
Greene told his Oklahoma audience that the reason so few German Jews were admitted to the United States in the 1930s was because of “bureaucratic walls put in place by the State Department” — as if the White House had no occupant.
What actually happened is that the State Department implemented Roosevelt’s policy of restricting immigration far below what the existing law allowed. The annual quota of German immigrants — about 26,000 — was filled only once in FDR’s twelve years in office; in most of those years, it was less than 25% filled.
There are letters from the president himself at the time, in which he acknowledged and defended the fact that visas were, as he put it, “considerably under-issued.” There are documents showing that State Department officials briefed the president on their efforts to keep refugees out in accordance with his policies.
Equally troubling was Greene’s deeply flawed description of the American response to the Nazis’ Kristallnacht pogrom in 1938. Greene omitted any mention of the offer the governor of the U.S. Virgin Islands made to open his territory to Jewish refugees after the pogrom — which FDRrejected. The exhibit at the museum likewise fails to mention the Virgin Islands as a possible haven for refugees.
The sad truth about FDR and Nazi Germany in the 1930s — which Greene and the U.S. HolocaustMuseum never mention — is that FDR consistently sought to maintain good relations with the Hitler regime prior to the war.
Under President Roosevelt, the U.S. government warmly welcomed the swastika-bedecked German warships Karlsruhe and Emden, which Hitler sent to American ports in 1934–1936 to promote goodwill between the Third Reich and the United States. The warships visited American Atlantic, Pacific, and Gulf Coast ports at a time when Nazi Germany was emerging as a major military power. High-level U.S. military officials openly fraternized with the warships’ officers, helping to legitimize Hitler’s rearmament program, which put all of European Jewry in extreme danger. With the assistance of Roosevelt’s State Department, the U.S. Navy even helped the Nazi warships improve their combat readiness.
In numerous speeches to American business and civic groups, the German warships’ officers aggressively promoted Nazism and Hitler’s expansionist policies. The Roosevelt administration ignored fierce protests by American Jews and trade unionists against the Nazi warships’ visits. The administration’s policy helped Nazi Germany present itself as a respectable member of the community of nations, with many legitimate grievances. Greene mentioned none of this, nor can it be found in the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum’s exhibit.
Hosting the Nazi warships was consistent with President Roosevelt’s policy of maintaining cordial, sometimes even friendly, relations with the Nazi regime. From 1933 until the end of 1938, FDR never publicly criticized Hitler’s persecution of German Jews. He never suspended diplomatic or trade relations with Nazi Germany before World War II. And at the same time that many Americans were boycotting German goods in the 1930s, the Roosevelt administration was helping the Hitler regime evade the boycott by allowing it to use deceptive labeling on their goods so that American consumers would not recognize their country of origin.
Toward the end of his talk in Oklahoma, Greene described how the Holocaust Museum’s exhibit was intended especially for younger audiences, so he and his colleagues polled high school students in advance. Greene said he was surprised when “high school students didn’t do well on the question of who was president in World War II.”
Sadly, neither the exhibit nor its roving spokesman is doing much to improve the situation. So long as they depict Roosevelt as the amazing vanishing president — who suddenly goes missing when the embarrassing abandonment of the Jews is discussed — how could high schoolers be expected to know any better?
Dr. Rafael Medoff is founding director of The David S. Wyman Institute for Holocaust Studies; his most recent book is “The Jews Should Keep Quiet: Franklin D. Roosevelt, Rabbi Stephen S. Wise, and the Holocaust.”
Dr. Stephen Norwood is Professor of History and Judaic Studies at the University of Oklahoma; his latest book, which is in press, is “Prologue to Annihilation: Ordinary American and British Jews Challenge the Third Reich.”
Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.
Editor's Picks
Israel and the Internet Wars – A Professional Social Media Review
The Invisible Student: A Tale of Homelessness at UCLA and USC
What Ever Happened to the LA Times?
Who Are the Jews On Joe Biden’s Cabinet?
You’re Not a Bad Jewish Mom If Your Kid Wants Santa Claus to Come to Your House
No Labels: The Group Fighting for the Political Center
Latest Articles
Holocaust Museum LA Unveils Major Expansion for Future Generations
Jewish Power and Other Myths
The New Antisemitism Doesn’t Deny Jewish Suffering, It Weaponizes It
To Love Israel Is to Demand More of It
Prayer in Times of Illness
Jewish and Christian Zionists Must Stand Together
The Philanthropic Pivot to Jewish Joy Is Misguided
The problem is not Jewish joy itself. The problem is the growing belief that Jewish joy can replace the difficult work of protecting the conditions that make Jewish flourishing possible in the first place.
More Than a Trip: A Lesson in Jewish Identity
While disappointment over not being in Israel was real, the experience quickly evolved into something deeper: an exploration of what it means to be a Jew in America.
Rosner’s Domain | Accepting an Unacceptable Dictate
Can Israel’s dependency on the U.S. be reduced? Yes, but it is a lengthy, costly process.
Zionism and the Bones of Ezekiel
Nothing about the Jewish story—with its revolutionary insistence that there is one God, its history of relentless suffering, its triumphant return to the land it was expelled from millennia ago—is normal, and we shouldn’t try claiming it is.
Democracy, Divinity and the Inherent Challenge of the Image of God
Tomer Persico’s “In God’s Image: How Western Civilization Was Shaped by a Revolutionary Idea” is a tour de force — with a twist. Tracing the history of the concept, he suggests the Deity perhaps planted the seeds for His own modern demise.
Papa, Thank You
There are moments in my own life that I would not have overcome without what my father gave me. His resilience became mine. His mindset became my foundation.
The Two-State Conundrum
While I continue to personally believe that a two-state solution is preferable to sacrificing Israel’s Jewish or democratic foundations, I would never attempt to impose my priorities from 7,500 miles away.
Jewish Agency’s Israeli Emissaries from the U.S. March in New York’s Israel Day Parade
Jewish Angelenos and our Allies Deserve Better
Los Angeles City Council member Nithya Raman wants to be mayor of Los Angeles, but after her actions earlier this month, many Jewish Angelenos are left wondering whether her vision for the city truly includes all of us.
As California Primary Elections Arrive, Community Grapples with Choices
Whether backing long-shot candidates, weighing strategic votes or sitting races out altogether, many said they were still searching for leaders who reflected both their values and their concerns.
Let’s Fight Antisemitism by Reclaiming Our Americanism
Maybe it’s because our 250th birthday is right around the corner. Or maybe it’s a statement of defiance, a way of telling Jew-haters I’m giving them the very opposite of what they want.
When Hippies Hate
The one community that should have shown unwavering solidarity with Israel after October 7 was the Park Slope Food Coop. Unless they were tripping out on antisemitism last week, what could possibly have drawn them to the side of carnivorous barbarians?
Israel in Three Words
Israelis seem to have a special affinity for that electric energy of the here and now. Maybe that is how the country has made it this far— millions and millions of “What do we do now?”
TEBH Gala, Jews of Color Initiative
Notable people and events in the Jewish LA community.
Boring, Very Boring
AI is accelerating our decline into a monoculture, where everything sounds the same, a culture that is dull and unoriginal.
Does This Count? – A poem for Parsha Nasso
I wish I knew about this in the 90s when I had the confidence to strut around in a mullet.
A Bisl Torah — Keep Searching
As you search, God will likely find you.
Ruth, Naomi, Mara, Maror, Meir and Elisha ben Abuyah
A Moment in Time: “Hmm, That Isn’t Right”
Print Issue: The Rise of Magen Am | May 22, 2026
How a Chabad rabbi built a community security movement in Los Angeles.
More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.