fbpx

U.S. Leaves U.N. Human Rights Council

[additional-authors]
June 19, 2018
REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz

The United States has officially left the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC).

In a press conference in Washington D.C., U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Nikki Haley explained that they had warned the UNHRC that unless reforms were implemented, they would leave the council. The reforms never went into place, therefore the U.S. will leave.

“We take this step because our commitment does not allow us to remain part of a hypocritical and self-serving organization that makes a mockery of human rights,” Haley said.

Haley pointed out that in the past year, the UNHRC elected the Democratic Republic of the Congo to a seat in the council despite the country’s record of human rights abuses. The UNHRC also refused to examine human rights abuses conducted by the Venezuelan government as well as by the Iranian regime in cracking down on the anti-government protests, yet has passed five resolutions condemning Israel.

“This council is motivated by political bias, not human rights,” Haley said.

Haley concluded the announcement by stating that if the council is reformed, the U.S. would be open to re-joining it.

The Simon Wiesenthal Center’s Rabbis Marvin Hier and Abraham Cooper praised the move in a statement.

“The UNHRC has perverted its stated mandate by serially abusing Israel, while horrific human rights abuses around the world receive scant attention, if at all,” Hier and Cooper said. “It consistently makes a mockery of its own mandate by serving as a rubber-stamping anti-Israel kangaroo court while providing diplomatic safe haven for state sponsors of terrorism and human rights abuse. Like its disgraced and defunct predecessor, the UN Human Rights Commission, the UN Human Rights Council in 2018 represents all that is wrong with global human rights.”

The U.S. withdrawing on the council comes on the heels of UK Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs Boris Johnson criticizing Agenda Item 7 on June 18, which enables the UNHRC to criticize Israel every week for alleged human rights violations against the Palestinians.

“We share the view that the dedicated Agenda Item 7 focused solely on Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories is disproportionate and damaging to the cause of peace, and unless things change we shall vote next year against all resolutions introduced under Item 7,” Johnson said.

Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.

Editor's Picks

Latest Articles

Rabbis of LA | Rabbi Denise Eger: Retired … Only More Active

In addition to writing, Eger’s focus has been her executive coaching practice: tutoring rabbis, ministers and non-profit executives – on Zoom – all over the U.S. and Canada. Since March, she has also been the interim executive director for A Wider Bridge.

She’s 13. She’s Jewish. And This Is What Found Her

When my 13-year-old daughter forwarded me a number of posts she’d seen on Instagram—accusing Israel of genocide, twisting history into propaganda, and riddled with the same tired antisemitic tropes—I was shaken.

Tisha b’Av: Birthday of Grief and Truth

Anyone touched by the Holocaust or the events of Oct. 7 has had their hearts broken apart. Tisha b’Av is but another opportunity to allow the tears of our inner Mikveh (Divine spiritual bath) to flow once again, releasing all that fills our souls.

A Bisl Torah — Detours

As we meet each curve in the road, God’s gentle guidance will lead us to where we are meant to go.

Print Issue: Bringing Back the Young Zionists | July 25, 2025

The end goal isn’t just to make Zionism defensible — it’s to make it compelling. To make it something young people want to own, not inherit. And that means answering the question that has haunted this entire conversation: What is the value proposition?

More news and opinions than at a
Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.

More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.