fbpx

Jewish Agency to hold Kiev meeting despite qualms by some local Jews

The Jewish Agency and a chief rabbi of Ukraine have disputed claims that Kiev is ill-suited for hosting a Jewish Agency event due to rising xenophobia and civil liberties issues.
[additional-authors]
March 14, 2013

The Jewish Agency and a chief rabbi of Ukraine have disputed claims that Kiev is ill-suited for hosting a Jewish Agency event due to rising xenophobia and civil liberties issues.

The allegations came in a letter to the Jewish Agency co-signed by 14 people, including Euro-Asian Jewish Congress President Vadim Shulman and Josef Zissels, chairman of Ukraine’s Vaad Association of Jewish Organizations.

Holding the Jewish Agency Board of Governers meeting in June in Kiev would “threaten the reputation of JAFI itself and Ukrainian Jewish community” and “provoke an increase in anti-Semitic attitudes,” read the letter obtained by JTA, which was sent last month to Natan Sharansky, chairman of the Board of Governors of the Jewish Agency for Israel.

The authors wrote that “over the last three years, a great decline in the human rights situation has been recorded in Ukraine,” and that last year’s elections “are not indicative of the true choice of the Ukrainian electorate.” Gains by the ultra-nationalist Svoboda party with its anti-Semitic overtones have been an “indirect consequence” of this, they wrote.

But their claims have been disputed by Sharansky and Rabbi Yaakov Dov Bleich, a chief rabbi of Ukraine and president of the Jewish Confederation of Ukraine, an organization which, along with Zissels’s Vaad, is an affiliate of European Jewish Congress.

“We believe it to be both wrong and irresponsible to politicize the upcoming meeting by relating it to issues of Ukrainian political discourse,” Bleich wrote in a statement.

Sharansky and Jewish Agency Board of Governors Chair James Tisch wrote: “It is important for the Board of Governors to demonstrate that the Jewish Agency is invested in the continued success of the Ukraine’s Jewish community.”

The agency’s statement also said the board would be hosted not by the government but by the Jewish community and that board members would meet with opposition as well as government figures and express their concern about “manifestations of anti-Semitism in the public and political spheres.”

Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.

Editor's Picks

Latest Articles

Abraham Lincoln’s Akedah

Though Lincoln himself was not Jewish, his words of support drawn from the faith of history’s first Jew continue to serve as a chord of comfort in the American consciousness.

The Law and Culture of Civil Same-Sex Marriage

The Obergefell litigation and its aftermath is a perfect illustration of how the legal theory of cultural analysis can move us beyond the endless spiral of polarization and strife we now face.

Jews Getting It from Both Sides

As long as either the Republicans or Democrats are willing to harbor the haters, they should no longer be rewarded with knee-jerk loyalty from our community.

They’re Trying to Muzzle the Jews—Again

There’s nothing objectively controversial about the ADL’s plan to set up a website and a hotline to keep an eye on the Mamdani administration. There is good reason to monitor Mamdani.

New York State OUT of Mind

If looming bankruptcy, social unrest and violent crime are part of Mamdani’s prescription for a more progressive New York, people will leave—not just the wealthy looking for safer tax havens, but everyone if they discover that the New York City of 2026 is as unlivable as it was in 1976.

More news and opinions than at a
Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.

More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.