Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) called an anti-Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) bill “unconstitutional” in a July 10 tweet.
Responding to a tweet stating that Israeli guards were blocking a Palestinian mother and her child from a park, Tlaib, an avowed BDS supporter, wrote, “.@HouseForeign wants to move forward w/ #HR246 #AntiBDS bill to silence opposition of Israel’s blatantly racist policies that demonize both Palestinians & Ethiopians. Our 1st [Amendment] right to free speech allows boycott of inhumane policies. This bill is unconstitutional.”
.@HouseForeign wants to move forward w/ #HR246 #AntiBDS bill to silence opposition of Israel's blatantly racist policies ⬇️ that demonize both Palestinians & Ethiopians.
Our 1st Amd. right to free speech allows boycott of inhumane policies. This bill is unconstitutional. https://t.co/6VJUtBbogy
— Rashida Tlaib (@RashidaTlaib) July 10, 2019
Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) responded to Tlaib’s tweet, writing, “This is a 100% false characterization of the bill. It doesn’t ban the #BDS movement. All it does it protect states & local governments that decide not to give contracts to companies participating in that anti-Semitic movement.”
This is a 100% false characterization of the bill.
It doesn’t ban the #BDS movement. All it does it protect states & local governments that decide not to give contracts to companies participating in that anti-Semitic movement. https://t.co/Hu9yXD1uuw
— Marco Rubio (@marcorubio) July 11, 2019
The bill, House Resolution 246, condemns the BDS movement; it has 338 co-sponsors from members of both political parties, including Reps. Lee Zeldin (R-N.Y.) and Brad Schneider (D-Ill.).
Lawfare Project Executive Director Brooke Goldstein told the Journal in December that anti-BDS legislation typically focuses on commercial activity, “which is not afforded the same degree of constitutional protection.”
