In many contemporary editions of the Torah, the name of the skin condition which concerns Parashat Tazria-Metzora is transliterated but not translated. The word, Tzara’at, is thus unfamiliar to the ears and stripped of associations. We cannot know for certain what it is.
Faced with this uncertainty, we have two choices. We can, as many physicians have, medicalize the text, attempting to apply a modern scientific framework to the Biblical description. Perhaps the most famous suggestion is leprosy, though there have been many others, including psoriasis, scabies, syphilis and ringworm.
We can also, as many sages have, spiritualize the text, understanding Tzara’at as a condition caused by sinful speech acts — hateful words or careless gossip. That it manifested on the skin was a sign of our spiritual sensitivity in those early days of our peoplehood. While today, like Dorian Gray, we have mostly succeeded in severing the connection between our bodies and souls, back then, our sins showed.
Even more mysterious is the Torah’s description of Tzara’at of the clothing, found in the warp and weft of fabric, and Tzara’at of structures, which afflicts the building blocks of one’s home.
As readers, we are again faced with a choice. We can concern ourselves with the question of what the Biblical author was seeing (perhaps mold or dry rot or fungus), thereby coming to understand that thing in our own conceptual language. Or we can concern ourselves with the question of how the Biblical author was seeing, thereby coming to see our own world through a new lens.
We can concern ourselves with the question of how the Biblical author was seeing.
Were we to make this second choice, what would we see through our new lens? We would see a world in which the barrier that separates the spiritual from the physical is but a thin and semipermeable filigree — easily bent, torn and bumped into. We would see a world in which the body is a symptom of the soul, and a world in which health is considered the purview of the priest. We would see a world in which the borders of the body are more expansive than those we conceive for ourselves, stretching to encompass the garments we wear and the homes we dwell in — no longer regarded as inanimate matter but rather as living tissue, capable of health and susceptible to disease.
Whichever choice we make, however, will yield new questions, new answers and new insights, leaving us with a richer understanding of the Torah and of the world around us.
It may be of some interest to note that the rabbis of the Talmud didn’t believe that any house had ever actually become afflicted by Tzara’at. As written in the Tosefta: “There never was and never will be an afflicted house. So why were these laws written? So that you may study them and receive a reward” (Negaim 6:1).
There are a few other laws in the Torah that the sages suggest are purely theoretical, and the justification is always the same: They are there for us to study, to puzzle over, to interpret. They are there so that we may merit the reward, each generation anew, of being transported through our study of Torah to the strange and fertile grounds of our shared history and transformed by what we discover there.
Matthew Schultz is the author of the essay collection “What Came Before” (2020). He is a rabbinical student at Hebrew College in Newton, Massachusetts.
Jewish Journal
Unscrolled, Parashat Tazria-Metzora: A Pox Upon Your House
Matthew Schultz
In many contemporary editions of the Torah, the name of the skin condition which concerns Parashat Tazria-Metzora is transliterated but not translated. The word, Tzara’at, is thus unfamiliar to the ears and stripped of associations. We cannot know for certain what it is.
Faced with this uncertainty, we have two choices. We can, as many physicians have, medicalize the text, attempting to apply a modern scientific framework to the Biblical description. Perhaps the most famous suggestion is leprosy, though there have been many others, including psoriasis, scabies, syphilis and ringworm.
We can also, as many sages have, spiritualize the text, understanding Tzara’at as a condition caused by sinful speech acts — hateful words or careless gossip. That it manifested on the skin was a sign of our spiritual sensitivity in those early days of our peoplehood. While today, like Dorian Gray, we have mostly succeeded in severing the connection between our bodies and souls, back then, our sins showed.
Even more mysterious is the Torah’s description of Tzara’at of the clothing, found in the warp and weft of fabric, and Tzara’at of structures, which afflicts the building blocks of one’s home.
As readers, we are again faced with a choice. We can concern ourselves with the question of what the Biblical author was seeing (perhaps mold or dry rot or fungus), thereby coming to understand that thing in our own conceptual language. Or we can concern ourselves with the question of how the Biblical author was seeing, thereby coming to see our own world through a new lens.
Were we to make this second choice, what would we see through our new lens? We would see a world in which the barrier that separates the spiritual from the physical is but a thin and semipermeable filigree — easily bent, torn and bumped into. We would see a world in which the body is a symptom of the soul, and a world in which health is considered the purview of the priest. We would see a world in which the borders of the body are more expansive than those we conceive for ourselves, stretching to encompass the garments we wear and the homes we dwell in — no longer regarded as inanimate matter but rather as living tissue, capable of health and susceptible to disease.
Whichever choice we make, however, will yield new questions, new answers and new insights, leaving us with a richer understanding of the Torah and of the world around us.
It may be of some interest to note that the rabbis of the Talmud didn’t believe that any house had ever actually become afflicted by Tzara’at. As written in the Tosefta: “There never was and never will be an afflicted house. So why were these laws written? So that you may study them and receive a reward” (Negaim 6:1).
There are a few other laws in the Torah that the sages suggest are purely theoretical, and the justification is always the same: They are there for us to study, to puzzle over, to interpret. They are there so that we may merit the reward, each generation anew, of being transported through our study of Torah to the strange and fertile grounds of our shared history and transformed by what we discover there.
Matthew Schultz is the author of the essay collection “What Came Before” (2020). He is a rabbinical student at Hebrew College in Newton, Massachusetts.
Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.
Editor's Picks
Israel and the Internet Wars – A Professional Social Media Review
The Invisible Student: A Tale of Homelessness at UCLA and USC
What Ever Happened to the LA Times?
Who Are the Jews On Joe Biden’s Cabinet?
You’re Not a Bad Jewish Mom If Your Kid Wants Santa Claus to Come to Your House
No Labels: The Group Fighting for the Political Center
Latest Articles
PURIM 2024 – All The World’s a Shpiel
Homemade Treats for Mishloach Manot
Pro-Palestinian Protesters Disrupt Pro-Israel Speaker at University of Kentucky
Chosen Links – March 17, 2024
The Skin I’m In
A Jewish Mother Paints the Daughter She Never Had
Culture
A Jewish Mother Paints the Daughter She Never Had
Just In Time for Purim, YIVO Will Launch Free Online Comedy Course
Israeli UFC Fighter Natan Levy Taps Out in His First UFC Fight Since October 7th Attacks
Israeli Musicians Heal from October 7 at Rock ‘n’ Roll Fantasy Camp
By Undermining Israel’s War Against Hamas, Chuck Schumer is Making American Jews Unsafe
While Schumer in America is worried about obstacles to peace, Israelis are more worried about obstacles to victory against a cunning foe sworn to its destruction.
Beware of Dangerous Advice: An Urgent Letter to President Biden
They’re giving Hamas, Hezbollah and Iran propaganda victories they don’t deserve, weakening Israel and America, and holding Israel to standards America and other democracies never meet.
Reflections on My Israel Solidarity Mission
Lawsuit: MIT Failed to Take Action Against Antisemitism
Among the charges are two anti-Israel mass emails sent to all MIT students
The Day After
“Every day is Oct. 8.”
Hollywood
Spielberg Says Antisemitism Is “No Longer Lurking, But Standing Proud” Like 1930s Germany
Young Actress Juju Brener on Her “Hocus Pocus 2” Role
Behind the Scenes of “Jeopardy!” with Mayim Bialik
Podcasts
Micah Siva: “Nosh,” Plant-Based Snacking and Halvah Granola
Phil and Lily Rosenthal: “Just Try It,” Food Adventures and the Joy of Eating
More news and opinions than at a
Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.
More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.