Rashida Tlaib, meet Samuel Pennypacker.
The Michigan congresswoman is furious about an editorial cartoon poking fun at her record on Arab terrorism. She says it’s “racist.” Pennypacker, the governor of Pennsylvania in the early 1900s, had a solution to the problem of nettlesome cartoons: Ban ‘em!
Irritated by a series of caricatures in the Philadelphia North American in 1912 that portrayed him as a parrot, Governor Pennypacker promoted legislation in 1903 that outlawed the depiction of a person as “a beast, bird, fish, insect, or other inhuman animal.”
Cartoonists responded by depicting the governor in non-animal forms, including trees, turnips, and beer steins. The law was repealed four years later by Pennypacker’s successor.
The episode illustrated the power of a cartoon and helps explain why politicians sometimes respond so hysterically to them. An editorial cartoon in the New York World is believed to have played a decisive role in the 1884 presidential election. Thomas Nast’s biting cartoons in Harper’s Weekly helped bring down “Boss” Tweed, the corrupt 19th-century New York City politician. (Dispatching his goons to lean on Nast, Tweed reportedly told them, “My constituents can’t read. But they can’t help seeing them damned pictures!”) During World War One, the U.S. government regarded cartoonists as so influential that it created a Bureau of Cartoons to mobilize them in support of the war effort.
Terrorists and dictators take cartoons seriously, too. An editorial cartoon in the Baltimore Sun in 1931, challenging the lynching of a local African-American man, triggered riots by racist mobs outside the Sun’s offices. Islamist terrorists angry over a cartoon massacred twelve staffers at the French magazine Charlie Hebdo in 2015.
Syria’s most famous editorial cartoonist, Ali Ferzat, now lives in exile in Kuwait, to which he fled after he was brutally beaten because of a caricature he drew of Syrian dictator Bashar Assad. Palestinian Authority chairman Mahmoud Abbas has suspended cartoonists from the staff of the official PA newspaper, Al-Hayat Al-Jadida, when he has disapproved of their views. Algerian political cartoonist Ali Dilem has been prosecuted so many times for his satirical drawings that there is now a law on the books, known as the Dilem Amendment, which mandates a year in jail for insulting Algeria’s president.
The cartoon that’s bothering Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib, drawn by Henry Payne in National Review, portrayed her as the owner of an exploding pager similar to those used by Hezbollah terrorists in Lebanon.
Tlaib said it was “disgraceful” that National Review published “this racism.” She predicted it “will incite more hate + violence against our Arab & Muslim communities, and it makes everyone less safe.”
If a politician or a columnist falsely accused a U.S. congresswoman of being associated with an anti-American terrorist group such as Hezbollah, it would be perfectly understandable that she would denounce the publication of such libel as disgraceful. But an editorial cartoon is satire. The entire premise of that art form is to use exaggeration and absurdity to make a humorous point. The Payne cartoon about Tlaib is no more “disgraceful” than skits satirizing politicians on Saturday Night Live.
An editorial cartoon is satire. The entire premise of that art form is to use exaggeration and absurdity to make a humorous point. The Payne cartoon about Tlaib is no more “disgraceful” than skits satirizing politicians on Saturday Night Live.
Moreover, Tlaib herself has provided plenty of ammunition to inspire cartoons such as Payne’s.
She responded to October 7 with a statement that in effect justified the massacres, calling them a response to “the violent reality of living under siege, occupation, and apartheid.” Her statement did not even mention Hamas. The Union for Reform Judaism denounced Tlaib’s statement as “shameful” and urged her to retract it. She ignored the request.
Soon after that, Rep. Tlaib publicly invoked the phrase “From the river to the sea” (advocating the destruction of Israel), a popular slogan among Arab terrorist groups. That earned her an official censure by the House of Representatives.
Tlaib voted against a bill preventing perpetrators of the October 7 atrocities from entering the United States. She voted “present” on a resolution condemning the Hamas gang-rapes.
A prominent American supporter of Hezbollah, Abbas Hamideh, was invited by Tlaib to her 2019 dinner celebrating her election to Congress, and she posed for photos with him. This past summer, Rep. Tlaib said it was “genocidal” for Israel to strike at senior Hezbollah leader Fuad Shukr, in Lebanon.
It’s not as if Payne created his cartoon from thin air. His satirical comment was anchored in years of Tlaib rationalizing Arab terrorism , identifying with the goals of Arab terrorists and opposing anti-terrorist congressional resolutions.
So it’s not as if Henry Payne created his cartoon from thin air. His satirical comment was anchored in years of Tlaib rationalizing Arab terrorism, identifying with the goals of Arab terrorists, opposing anti-terrorist congressional resolutions, and even posing for photo-ops with an unabashed supporter of a terrorist group. If you do that sort of thing, eventually some astute cartoonist is bound to notice.
Dr. Medoff is founding director of The David S. Wyman Institute for Holocaust Studies and author of more than 20 books about Jewish history and the Holocaust. His latest is Cartoonists Against Racism: The Secret Jewish War on Bigotry, coauthored with Craig Yoe.
Why Rashida Tlaib Couldn’t Take This Joke
Rafael Medoff
Rashida Tlaib, meet Samuel Pennypacker.
The Michigan congresswoman is furious about an editorial cartoon poking fun at her record on Arab terrorism. She says it’s “racist.” Pennypacker, the governor of Pennsylvania in the early 1900s, had a solution to the problem of nettlesome cartoons: Ban ‘em!
Irritated by a series of caricatures in the Philadelphia North American in 1912 that portrayed him as a parrot, Governor Pennypacker promoted legislation in 1903 that outlawed the depiction of a person as “a beast, bird, fish, insect, or other inhuman animal.”
Cartoonists responded by depicting the governor in non-animal forms, including trees, turnips, and beer steins. The law was repealed four years later by Pennypacker’s successor.
The episode illustrated the power of a cartoon and helps explain why politicians sometimes respond so hysterically to them. An editorial cartoon in the New York World is believed to have played a decisive role in the 1884 presidential election. Thomas Nast’s biting cartoons in Harper’s Weekly helped bring down “Boss” Tweed, the corrupt 19th-century New York City politician. (Dispatching his goons to lean on Nast, Tweed reportedly told them, “My constituents can’t read. But they can’t help seeing them damned pictures!”) During World War One, the U.S. government regarded cartoonists as so influential that it created a Bureau of Cartoons to mobilize them in support of the war effort.
Terrorists and dictators take cartoons seriously, too. An editorial cartoon in the Baltimore Sun in 1931, challenging the lynching of a local African-American man, triggered riots by racist mobs outside the Sun’s offices. Islamist terrorists angry over a cartoon massacred twelve staffers at the French magazine Charlie Hebdo in 2015.
Syria’s most famous editorial cartoonist, Ali Ferzat, now lives in exile in Kuwait, to which he fled after he was brutally beaten because of a caricature he drew of Syrian dictator Bashar Assad. Palestinian Authority chairman Mahmoud Abbas has suspended cartoonists from the staff of the official PA newspaper, Al-Hayat Al-Jadida, when he has disapproved of their views. Algerian political cartoonist Ali Dilem has been prosecuted so many times for his satirical drawings that there is now a law on the books, known as the Dilem Amendment, which mandates a year in jail for insulting Algeria’s president.
The cartoon that’s bothering Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib, drawn by Henry Payne in National Review, portrayed her as the owner of an exploding pager similar to those used by Hezbollah terrorists in Lebanon.
Tlaib said it was “disgraceful” that National Review published “this racism.” She predicted it “will incite more hate + violence against our Arab & Muslim communities, and it makes everyone less safe.”
If a politician or a columnist falsely accused a U.S. congresswoman of being associated with an anti-American terrorist group such as Hezbollah, it would be perfectly understandable that she would denounce the publication of such libel as disgraceful. But an editorial cartoon is satire. The entire premise of that art form is to use exaggeration and absurdity to make a humorous point. The Payne cartoon about Tlaib is no more “disgraceful” than skits satirizing politicians on Saturday Night Live.
Moreover, Tlaib herself has provided plenty of ammunition to inspire cartoons such as Payne’s.
She responded to October 7 with a statement that in effect justified the massacres, calling them a response to “the violent reality of living under siege, occupation, and apartheid.” Her statement did not even mention Hamas. The Union for Reform Judaism denounced Tlaib’s statement as “shameful” and urged her to retract it. She ignored the request.
Soon after that, Rep. Tlaib publicly invoked the phrase “From the river to the sea” (advocating the destruction of Israel), a popular slogan among Arab terrorist groups. That earned her an official censure by the House of Representatives.
Tlaib voted against a bill preventing perpetrators of the October 7 atrocities from entering the United States. She voted “present” on a resolution condemning the Hamas gang-rapes.
A prominent American supporter of Hezbollah, Abbas Hamideh, was invited by Tlaib to her 2019 dinner celebrating her election to Congress, and she posed for photos with him. This past summer, Rep. Tlaib said it was “genocidal” for Israel to strike at senior Hezbollah leader Fuad Shukr, in Lebanon.
So it’s not as if Henry Payne created his cartoon from thin air. His satirical comment was anchored in years of Tlaib rationalizing Arab terrorism, identifying with the goals of Arab terrorists, opposing anti-terrorist congressional resolutions, and even posing for photo-ops with an unabashed supporter of a terrorist group. If you do that sort of thing, eventually some astute cartoonist is bound to notice.
Dr. Medoff is founding director of The David S. Wyman Institute for Holocaust Studies and author of more than 20 books about Jewish history and the Holocaust. His latest is Cartoonists Against Racism: The Secret Jewish War on Bigotry, coauthored with Craig Yoe.
Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.
Editor's Picks
Israel and the Internet Wars – A Professional Social Media Review
The Invisible Student: A Tale of Homelessness at UCLA and USC
What Ever Happened to the LA Times?
Who Are the Jews On Joe Biden’s Cabinet?
You’re Not a Bad Jewish Mom If Your Kid Wants Santa Claus to Come to Your House
No Labels: The Group Fighting for the Political Center
Latest Articles
The Crisis in Jewish Education Is Not About Screens
Theodor Herzl’s Liberal Nationalist Leap of Hope – and America’s
Nation of Laws – A poem for Parsha Mishpatim
Borrowed Spotlight Art Exhibit Pairs Holocaust Survivors with Celebrities
A Bisl Torah — Holy Selfishness
A Moment in Time: “Choosing our Move”
Waiting for Religious Intelligence as for AI and Godot
Award-Winning Travel Author Lisa Niver Interviews Churchill Wild Guide Terry Elliott
Print Issue: One Man’s Show | February 6, 2026
How Meir Fenigstein Brings Israeli Stories to the American Screen
Does Tucker Carlson Have His Eye on The White House?
Jason Zengerle, a contributing writer for The New York Times Magazine, and staff writer at the New Yorker wrote a new book about Carlson, “Hated By All The Right People: Tucker Carlson and The Unraveling of The Conservative Mind.”
Michelle Heston: Valentine’s Day, Cake Love & Chocolate Ganache
Taste Buds with Deb – Episode 142
Love Stories – A Persian Love Cake
Love is precious and this Persian Love Cake is the perfect way to show a little love to your friends and family.
Table for Five: Mishpatim
Empathy for Strangers
Meir Fenigstein: One Man’s Show
How Meir Fenigstein Brings Israeli Stories to the American Screen
Rosner’s Domain | In 2026, It’s Right vs. Right
The elections of 2026 will not be “right vs. center-left.” They will be “right vs. right.”
Bret Stephens Has Kicked Off a Long Overdue Debate: Are Jews Fighting the Right Way?
Why is it that despite the enormous resources and money we spend fighting antisemitism, it just keeps getting worse?
Why “More Jewish Education” Keeps Making Things Worse
If we want a different future, we must be willing to examine what already exists, what has failed, and what is quietly working.
Cain and Abel Today
The story of Cain and Abel constitutes a critical and fundamental lesson – we are all children of the covenant with the opportunity to serve each other and to serve God. We are, indeed, each other’s keeper.
Belonging Matters. And Mattering Matters Too.
A society that maximizes belonging while severing it from standards produces conformity, not freedom. A society that encourages mattering divorced from truth produces fanaticism, not dignity. Life and liberty depend on holding the two together.
The Chief Rabbi and the Commander in Chief: A Presidents’ Day Reflection
Both the Chief Rabbi and America’s Commander in Chief understood that America and Israel were bonded by the Bible, allies in a faith guided by God’s ancient promise of freedom centuries ago.
The Writing on Jerusalem’s Walls: A Sober Glimpse at Israel’s Future
The Israeli public may look at Jerusalem with nostalgic longing, but it misses the glaring warning sign the city is raising. The current Jerusalem model is not sustainable at the national level.
Theology and the Absence of Moral Agency in Gaza
Fear alone cannot explain Gaza’s moral void after Oct. 7.
In Combatting K–12 Antisemitism, You Can’t Educate Haters Out of Power
The hostility we’re seeing today in K–12 schools has very little to do with education and everything to do with power.
What the Jewish People Can Learn from Bad Bunny
It was a masterclass in moral confidence. He met a moment of anger with dignity, and a moment of division with cultural self-assurance. He reminded America who Latinos are, without begging for permission or absolution.
The Antidote to Antisemitism
We are in command of our own destiny—and it’s not wrong to defend our sovereignty.
Thou Shall Not Covet: A Mantra for Mental Health
Envy is a completely unproductive, and even self-destructive, emotion.
More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.