Rashida Tlaib, meet Samuel Pennypacker.
The Michigan congresswoman is furious about an editorial cartoon poking fun at her record on Arab terrorism. She says it’s “racist.” Pennypacker, the governor of Pennsylvania in the early 1900s, had a solution to the problem of nettlesome cartoons: Ban ‘em!
Irritated by a series of caricatures in the Philadelphia North American in 1912 that portrayed him as a parrot, Governor Pennypacker promoted legislation in 1903 that outlawed the depiction of a person as “a beast, bird, fish, insect, or other inhuman animal.”
Cartoonists responded by depicting the governor in non-animal forms, including trees, turnips, and beer steins. The law was repealed four years later by Pennypacker’s successor.
The episode illustrated the power of a cartoon and helps explain why politicians sometimes respond so hysterically to them. An editorial cartoon in the New York World is believed to have played a decisive role in the 1884 presidential election. Thomas Nast’s biting cartoons in Harper’s Weekly helped bring down “Boss” Tweed, the corrupt 19th-century New York City politician. (Dispatching his goons to lean on Nast, Tweed reportedly told them, “My constituents can’t read. But they can’t help seeing them damned pictures!”) During World War One, the U.S. government regarded cartoonists as so influential that it created a Bureau of Cartoons to mobilize them in support of the war effort.
Terrorists and dictators take cartoons seriously, too. An editorial cartoon in the Baltimore Sun in 1931, challenging the lynching of a local African-American man, triggered riots by racist mobs outside the Sun’s offices. Islamist terrorists angry over a cartoon massacred twelve staffers at the French magazine Charlie Hebdo in 2015.
Syria’s most famous editorial cartoonist, Ali Ferzat, now lives in exile in Kuwait, to which he fled after he was brutally beaten because of a caricature he drew of Syrian dictator Bashar Assad. Palestinian Authority chairman Mahmoud Abbas has suspended cartoonists from the staff of the official PA newspaper, Al-Hayat Al-Jadida, when he has disapproved of their views. Algerian political cartoonist Ali Dilem has been prosecuted so many times for his satirical drawings that there is now a law on the books, known as the Dilem Amendment, which mandates a year in jail for insulting Algeria’s president.
The cartoon that’s bothering Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib, drawn by Henry Payne in National Review, portrayed her as the owner of an exploding pager similar to those used by Hezbollah terrorists in Lebanon.
Tlaib said it was “disgraceful” that National Review published “this racism.” She predicted it “will incite more hate + violence against our Arab & Muslim communities, and it makes everyone less safe.”
If a politician or a columnist falsely accused a U.S. congresswoman of being associated with an anti-American terrorist group such as Hezbollah, it would be perfectly understandable that she would denounce the publication of such libel as disgraceful. But an editorial cartoon is satire. The entire premise of that art form is to use exaggeration and absurdity to make a humorous point. The Payne cartoon about Tlaib is no more “disgraceful” than skits satirizing politicians on Saturday Night Live.
An editorial cartoon is satire. The entire premise of that art form is to use exaggeration and absurdity to make a humorous point. The Payne cartoon about Tlaib is no more “disgraceful” than skits satirizing politicians on Saturday Night Live.
Moreover, Tlaib herself has provided plenty of ammunition to inspire cartoons such as Payne’s.
She responded to October 7 with a statement that in effect justified the massacres, calling them a response to “the violent reality of living under siege, occupation, and apartheid.” Her statement did not even mention Hamas. The Union for Reform Judaism denounced Tlaib’s statement as “shameful” and urged her to retract it. She ignored the request.
Soon after that, Rep. Tlaib publicly invoked the phrase “From the river to the sea” (advocating the destruction of Israel), a popular slogan among Arab terrorist groups. That earned her an official censure by the House of Representatives.
Tlaib voted against a bill preventing perpetrators of the October 7 atrocities from entering the United States. She voted “present” on a resolution condemning the Hamas gang-rapes.
A prominent American supporter of Hezbollah, Abbas Hamideh, was invited by Tlaib to her 2019 dinner celebrating her election to Congress, and she posed for photos with him. This past summer, Rep. Tlaib said it was “genocidal” for Israel to strike at senior Hezbollah leader Fuad Shukr, in Lebanon.
It’s not as if Payne created his cartoon from thin air. His satirical comment was anchored in years of Tlaib rationalizing Arab terrorism , identifying with the goals of Arab terrorists and opposing anti-terrorist congressional resolutions.
So it’s not as if Henry Payne created his cartoon from thin air. His satirical comment was anchored in years of Tlaib rationalizing Arab terrorism, identifying with the goals of Arab terrorists, opposing anti-terrorist congressional resolutions, and even posing for photo-ops with an unabashed supporter of a terrorist group. If you do that sort of thing, eventually some astute cartoonist is bound to notice.
Dr. Medoff is founding director of The David S. Wyman Institute for Holocaust Studies and author of more than 20 books about Jewish history and the Holocaust. His latest is Cartoonists Against Racism: The Secret Jewish War on Bigotry, coauthored with Craig Yoe.
Why Rashida Tlaib Couldn’t Take This Joke
Rafael Medoff
Rashida Tlaib, meet Samuel Pennypacker.
The Michigan congresswoman is furious about an editorial cartoon poking fun at her record on Arab terrorism. She says it’s “racist.” Pennypacker, the governor of Pennsylvania in the early 1900s, had a solution to the problem of nettlesome cartoons: Ban ‘em!
Irritated by a series of caricatures in the Philadelphia North American in 1912 that portrayed him as a parrot, Governor Pennypacker promoted legislation in 1903 that outlawed the depiction of a person as “a beast, bird, fish, insect, or other inhuman animal.”
Cartoonists responded by depicting the governor in non-animal forms, including trees, turnips, and beer steins. The law was repealed four years later by Pennypacker’s successor.
The episode illustrated the power of a cartoon and helps explain why politicians sometimes respond so hysterically to them. An editorial cartoon in the New York World is believed to have played a decisive role in the 1884 presidential election. Thomas Nast’s biting cartoons in Harper’s Weekly helped bring down “Boss” Tweed, the corrupt 19th-century New York City politician. (Dispatching his goons to lean on Nast, Tweed reportedly told them, “My constituents can’t read. But they can’t help seeing them damned pictures!”) During World War One, the U.S. government regarded cartoonists as so influential that it created a Bureau of Cartoons to mobilize them in support of the war effort.
Terrorists and dictators take cartoons seriously, too. An editorial cartoon in the Baltimore Sun in 1931, challenging the lynching of a local African-American man, triggered riots by racist mobs outside the Sun’s offices. Islamist terrorists angry over a cartoon massacred twelve staffers at the French magazine Charlie Hebdo in 2015.
Syria’s most famous editorial cartoonist, Ali Ferzat, now lives in exile in Kuwait, to which he fled after he was brutally beaten because of a caricature he drew of Syrian dictator Bashar Assad. Palestinian Authority chairman Mahmoud Abbas has suspended cartoonists from the staff of the official PA newspaper, Al-Hayat Al-Jadida, when he has disapproved of their views. Algerian political cartoonist Ali Dilem has been prosecuted so many times for his satirical drawings that there is now a law on the books, known as the Dilem Amendment, which mandates a year in jail for insulting Algeria’s president.
The cartoon that’s bothering Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib, drawn by Henry Payne in National Review, portrayed her as the owner of an exploding pager similar to those used by Hezbollah terrorists in Lebanon.
Tlaib said it was “disgraceful” that National Review published “this racism.” She predicted it “will incite more hate + violence against our Arab & Muslim communities, and it makes everyone less safe.”
If a politician or a columnist falsely accused a U.S. congresswoman of being associated with an anti-American terrorist group such as Hezbollah, it would be perfectly understandable that she would denounce the publication of such libel as disgraceful. But an editorial cartoon is satire. The entire premise of that art form is to use exaggeration and absurdity to make a humorous point. The Payne cartoon about Tlaib is no more “disgraceful” than skits satirizing politicians on Saturday Night Live.
Moreover, Tlaib herself has provided plenty of ammunition to inspire cartoons such as Payne’s.
She responded to October 7 with a statement that in effect justified the massacres, calling them a response to “the violent reality of living under siege, occupation, and apartheid.” Her statement did not even mention Hamas. The Union for Reform Judaism denounced Tlaib’s statement as “shameful” and urged her to retract it. She ignored the request.
Soon after that, Rep. Tlaib publicly invoked the phrase “From the river to the sea” (advocating the destruction of Israel), a popular slogan among Arab terrorist groups. That earned her an official censure by the House of Representatives.
Tlaib voted against a bill preventing perpetrators of the October 7 atrocities from entering the United States. She voted “present” on a resolution condemning the Hamas gang-rapes.
A prominent American supporter of Hezbollah, Abbas Hamideh, was invited by Tlaib to her 2019 dinner celebrating her election to Congress, and she posed for photos with him. This past summer, Rep. Tlaib said it was “genocidal” for Israel to strike at senior Hezbollah leader Fuad Shukr, in Lebanon.
So it’s not as if Henry Payne created his cartoon from thin air. His satirical comment was anchored in years of Tlaib rationalizing Arab terrorism, identifying with the goals of Arab terrorists, opposing anti-terrorist congressional resolutions, and even posing for photo-ops with an unabashed supporter of a terrorist group. If you do that sort of thing, eventually some astute cartoonist is bound to notice.
Dr. Medoff is founding director of The David S. Wyman Institute for Holocaust Studies and author of more than 20 books about Jewish history and the Holocaust. His latest is Cartoonists Against Racism: The Secret Jewish War on Bigotry, coauthored with Craig Yoe.
Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.
Editor's Picks
Israel and the Internet Wars – A Professional Social Media Review
The Invisible Student: A Tale of Homelessness at UCLA and USC
What Ever Happened to the LA Times?
Who Are the Jews On Joe Biden’s Cabinet?
You’re Not a Bad Jewish Mom If Your Kid Wants Santa Claus to Come to Your House
No Labels: The Group Fighting for the Political Center
Latest Articles
A Bisl Torah — All Over Again
Print Issue: AKLA Rises | September 4, 2026
New Book, ‘Digital Warrior,’ Goes Inside Israel’s Message War
Love, Drugs and Prison: The True Story Behind ‘10 Kilos’
Hanging Out at the Jewish American Summit
Eyal Shani’s Recipe for Kosher Cuisine: Wild, Bold and Full of Life
A Festive French Roast
One of my favorite things to cook for the Jewish holidays is a beautiful French roast. It’s so very festive and is perfect to feed a hungry crowd.
Table for Five: Nitzavim-Vayelech
Hidden and Revealed
The Genius of the Marx Brothers
Like the greatest satirists, such as Jonathan Swift and Mark Twain, they chose comedy over accusation to mock the folly of society and add levity to dark times. But their aim was not levity alone.
AKLA Rises
From a Local Experiment to a National Program: AKLA Expands Its Vision for Jewish Teens
Rosner’s Domain | What Do You ‘Know’ About Altalena?
The Altalena was a munitions ship fired upon and sunk by the newly formed Israel Defense Forces in 1948.
“The Star on the Grave”
Better Kisser Than a Cook
Sometimes love arrives ahead of you, in spite of you. Cooking slowly became a way of being there for the people I love. A wordless language that says: I see you. I hear you. You’re worth the onion-chopping.
Israel’s Brain-Drain Debate Is Asking the Wrong Question
If an experienced professional with rare expertise leaves Israel, the impact cannot be understood simply by adding another person to a brain-drain statistic. The more relevant question is how many people with comparable experience remain, how essential that expertise is and how easily it can be rebuilt.
Conspiracy Theories Have Never Been Good for the Jews; They Won’t Be Good for Israel
Conspiracy theories and antisemitism do have an affinity and important features in common, including the tendency to frame accusations in such a way that refutation does not affect the accuser. Having suffered from this for centuries, do we really want it in our public life?
I Am an American, a Jew, and a Progressive Democrat. Can I Still Be All Three?
Any Democrat seeking to lead the party in 2028 should embrace the politics of addition by subtraction and reject any movement seeking to end all aid to Israel and replace America’s constitutional order.
Apprenticeship in Mystery: Working the Infinite into the Ordinary
We live in an age with zero patience for uncertainty. We have answers for everything, almost magically. And somehow, we still seem to know nothing about what it means to be here.
Deuteronomy’s Directions for America
Moses’ speech was addressed to people standing on the threshold of a new chapter. The American story is similarly turning a new page.
A New Borscht Belt?
If renewed exclusion teaches us only to become more protective of Jewish work, we will have learned the wrong lesson from the original Borscht Belt.
Judaism as a Covenant for the Ages
Given the realities of our current time, we are more in need than ever of the depth, wisdom, and joy that Jewish tradition offers.
A Summit to Remember
Our shared stories of hatred, humiliation, oppression and slavery obligate us to show up for one another.
Old-Guard Dems Pushing Back
While it’s indisputable that younger and progressive voters are driving the party away from its historic support for Israel, the old-guard Zionist Democrats have made it clear that they will not surrender without a fight.
What Will Life Ask of Us This New Year?
A High Holy Day Reflection
Why I Write
The column went from being about a neighborhood to being all over the map. Now, I can’t attend any event, watch any movie, read any essay, discover any story, hear any conversation, see any news item without thinking, “this might be a column.”
Assassinating Reinhard Heydrich Was the Bravest Act of World War II
Operation Anthropoid, the destruction of Lidice, and why Jan Kubiš and Jozef Gabčík belong among the greatest heroes of the Second World War
Tovah Feldshuh on Israel’s Critics, Her Career and ‘Tovah,’ a New Documentary
Feldshuh said the documentary has provided an opportunity to look back on a career she has never been particularly interested in viewing as finished.
More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.