Discrimination against Jewish people is often a symptom of a broader social and moral malaise: Violations of human rights and civil rights that start with Jewish people are unlikely to end there.
At UC Berkeley, where the administration has failed to respect, protect and fulfill the civil and human rights of Jewish faculty, staff and students since the Oct. 7 Hamas massacres and well before then, an additional identity group with legally protected status has faced systemic exclusion and discrimination due to the university’s indifference to their rights: Physically and visually impaired students.
For over a month the university has allowed the obstruction of free passage through Sather Gate; approximately 70% of it has been blocked off by protesters of the war in Gaza. This forces anyone needing to pass through Sather Gate to use two narrow side entrances, creating bottlenecks and severely limiting freedom of movement.
This causes hardship to individuals who use wheelchairs and other ambulatory devices to enable mobility, individuals who are visually impaired, and individuals with other physical disabilities and limitations who require the normally wide space of Sather Gate to move with safety free of obstacles.
Some of these disabilities are not visible and there should be no expectation that students, faculty and staff need to disclose them to the university or others, or to make special requests, for the university to ensure full unimpeded access to Sather Gate. That is their right – one repeatedly denied over many weeks after UC Berkeley students, faculty, and staff expressed concern about this demeaning discriminatory denial of their freedom of movement.
By allowing the closure of the main portion of Sather Gate, the university is likely in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act and has been for a very extended and inexcusable period of time.
The violation is not an aberration; it is willful and continuous and its consequences are harmful to a large portion of our university community.
Students – such as Daniel Solomon, a legally blind doctoral candidate who contributed recently to the Jewish News of Northern California – report that the blocking of Sather Gate means disabled students like him “have been forced to traverse through dirt and puddles.”
As of the beginning of March the university has taken no meaningful action to reopen the gate for full and free access. The university is obstructing the freedom of movement of a protected class — including the legally blind — whose rights it is legally obligated to protect under federal civil rights law.
There is no moral or legal justification for this policy and the university is likely in violation not only of civil rights and human rights law but also of our UC Berkeley Principles of Community. These are principles university leadership repeatedly cite as fundamental to UC Berkeley and incumbent upon all of us – students, faculty and staff – to honor.
That obligation also includes the university’s administration and leadership.
The right to protest is protected by our Constitution and the university is obligated to respect it. It is well within its power to ensure that protesters have their rights respected without infringing on the rights of others – including particularly the disabled and physically and visually impaired. Protesters can use the space around Sather Gate to protest without blocking Sather Gate.
As discrimination deepens and becomes more diffuse and extensive at UC Berkeley, harming the rights and welfare of increasing numbers of individuals and minority groups who have legally protected status, all UC Berkeley students, faculty, and staff – whatever their identity, background, and physical and visual ability – suffer from a decline in safety, welfare and confidence in the integrity of the university’s commitment to protect and respect our rights.
The exclusion of valued members of our university community is unacceptable and an affront to our university’s mission, ethics and legal responsibilities.
The visually and mobility-impaired and physically disabled have the right to be treated with equity and equality, dignity and respect at UC Berkeley and to be included and valued as an integral part of our university.
Discrimination at UC Berkeley is not confined to attacks on Jewish people. It is growing, enabled by a university administration and leadership that insufficiently respects and protects civil rights and human rights.
Discrimination at UC Berkeley is not confined to attacks on Jewish people. It is growing, enabled by a university administration and leadership that insufficiently respects and protects civil rights and human rights.
The university-sanctioned and -enabled violations of these civil rights are part of a larger systemic failure of the UC Berkeley administration and its leadership to value and uphold human dignity, equality, diversity, inclusion and equity for all members of our university community without exception.
Such discrimination cannot continue. It demands immediate correction and reparative action.
Noam Schimmel is a Lecturer in Global Studies with an emphasis on human rights at University of California, Berkeley.
The Diffusion of Discrimination at UC Berkeley
Noam Schimmel
Discrimination against Jewish people is often a symptom of a broader social and moral malaise: Violations of human rights and civil rights that start with Jewish people are unlikely to end there.
At UC Berkeley, where the administration has failed to respect, protect and fulfill the civil and human rights of Jewish faculty, staff and students since the Oct. 7 Hamas massacres and well before then, an additional identity group with legally protected status has faced systemic exclusion and discrimination due to the university’s indifference to their rights: Physically and visually impaired students.
For over a month the university has allowed the obstruction of free passage through Sather Gate; approximately 70% of it has been blocked off by protesters of the war in Gaza. This forces anyone needing to pass through Sather Gate to use two narrow side entrances, creating bottlenecks and severely limiting freedom of movement.
This causes hardship to individuals who use wheelchairs and other ambulatory devices to enable mobility, individuals who are visually impaired, and individuals with other physical disabilities and limitations who require the normally wide space of Sather Gate to move with safety free of obstacles.
Some of these disabilities are not visible and there should be no expectation that students, faculty and staff need to disclose them to the university or others, or to make special requests, for the university to ensure full unimpeded access to Sather Gate. That is their right – one repeatedly denied over many weeks after UC Berkeley students, faculty, and staff expressed concern about this demeaning discriminatory denial of their freedom of movement.
By allowing the closure of the main portion of Sather Gate, the university is likely in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act and has been for a very extended and inexcusable period of time.
The violation is not an aberration; it is willful and continuous and its consequences are harmful to a large portion of our university community.
Students – such as Daniel Solomon, a legally blind doctoral candidate who contributed recently to the Jewish News of Northern California – report that the blocking of Sather Gate means disabled students like him “have been forced to traverse through dirt and puddles.”
As of the beginning of March the university has taken no meaningful action to reopen the gate for full and free access. The university is obstructing the freedom of movement of a protected class — including the legally blind — whose rights it is legally obligated to protect under federal civil rights law.
There is no moral or legal justification for this policy and the university is likely in violation not only of civil rights and human rights law but also of our UC Berkeley Principles of Community. These are principles university leadership repeatedly cite as fundamental to UC Berkeley and incumbent upon all of us – students, faculty and staff – to honor.
That obligation also includes the university’s administration and leadership.
The right to protest is protected by our Constitution and the university is obligated to respect it. It is well within its power to ensure that protesters have their rights respected without infringing on the rights of others – including particularly the disabled and physically and visually impaired. Protesters can use the space around Sather Gate to protest without blocking Sather Gate.
As discrimination deepens and becomes more diffuse and extensive at UC Berkeley, harming the rights and welfare of increasing numbers of individuals and minority groups who have legally protected status, all UC Berkeley students, faculty, and staff – whatever their identity, background, and physical and visual ability – suffer from a decline in safety, welfare and confidence in the integrity of the university’s commitment to protect and respect our rights.
The exclusion of valued members of our university community is unacceptable and an affront to our university’s mission, ethics and legal responsibilities.
The visually and mobility-impaired and physically disabled have the right to be treated with equity and equality, dignity and respect at UC Berkeley and to be included and valued as an integral part of our university.
Discrimination at UC Berkeley is not confined to attacks on Jewish people. It is growing, enabled by a university administration and leadership that insufficiently respects and protects civil rights and human rights.
The university-sanctioned and -enabled violations of these civil rights are part of a larger systemic failure of the UC Berkeley administration and its leadership to value and uphold human dignity, equality, diversity, inclusion and equity for all members of our university community without exception.
Such discrimination cannot continue. It demands immediate correction and reparative action.
Noam Schimmel is a Lecturer in Global Studies with an emphasis on human rights at University of California, Berkeley.
Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.
Editor's Picks
Israel and the Internet Wars – A Professional Social Media Review
The Invisible Student: A Tale of Homelessness at UCLA and USC
What Ever Happened to the LA Times?
Who Are the Jews On Joe Biden’s Cabinet?
You’re Not a Bad Jewish Mom If Your Kid Wants Santa Claus to Come to Your House
No Labels: The Group Fighting for the Political Center
Latest Articles
The Ayatollah’s Addled Allies
‘Parade’ Comes to Los Angeles
Israelis Stranded in LA
Iranian Payback, Long Overdue
TV, Podcasts & Passion Projects: I’m a 5-Time Finalist!
3 Israelis Killed in Iranian Missile Strikes; Iran, Israel Vow Further Escalation
Culture
Marcus Freed Has a Loose Screw in His Head — And He Calls It a Blessing
“Chutzpah”: The Story of a Haredi, Queer Role Model
Hollywood Film Producer and Philanthropist Peter Samuelson on ‘Finding Happy’
A Memoir for Fathers, Sons, and Anyone Trying to Break the Cycle
Maybe Israelis Simply Got Tired of Walking on Eggshells
Israel is effectively telling the mullahs that their attempts to terrorize Israelis with their genocidal threats will no longer be tolerated. Israel isn’t just fighting against a nuclear bomb—it’s fighting against the human bomb of emotional terror.
The Satan Series: Chaos Erupts in Hell After Sudden Iranian Influx
The following is a work of satire, and the fifth part in “The Satan Series.”
On the Broken Path
The broken Book of Bamidbar is the teacher for when we walk on the broken path of life.
Calling All Jews: This is Your Moment
Americans must understand that, sometimes, especially when facing maniacal Jihadi dictators, a little bit of short-term war is the best way to get a whole lot of long-term peace.
Why Did Israel Suddenly Attack?
It is not a change in their belief that Iran must be stopped from acquiring a nuclear weapon. It is a change in their belief about Israel’s ability to achieve that goal. That belief is the genuine shift.
Hollywood
Spielberg Says Antisemitism Is “No Longer Lurking, But Standing Proud” Like 1930s Germany
Young Actress Juju Brener on Her “Hocus Pocus 2” Role
Behind the Scenes of “Jeopardy!” with Mayim Bialik
Podcasts
Sam E. Goldberg: Respect the Chain, Restaurants and Ratatouille
Happie Hoffman: Music, Emotion and Gluten-Free Cinnamon Challah
More news and opinions than at a
Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.
More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.