Discrimination against Jewish people is often a symptom of a broader social and moral malaise: Violations of human rights and civil rights that start with Jewish people are unlikely to end there.
At UC Berkeley, where the administration has failed to respect, protect and fulfill the civil and human rights of Jewish faculty, staff and students since the Oct. 7 Hamas massacres and well before then, an additional identity group with legally protected status has faced systemic exclusion and discrimination due to the university’s indifference to their rights: Physically and visually impaired students.
For over a month the university has allowed the obstruction of free passage through Sather Gate; approximately 70% of it has been blocked off by protesters of the war in Gaza. This forces anyone needing to pass through Sather Gate to use two narrow side entrances, creating bottlenecks and severely limiting freedom of movement.
This causes hardship to individuals who use wheelchairs and other ambulatory devices to enable mobility, individuals who are visually impaired, and individuals with other physical disabilities and limitations who require the normally wide space of Sather Gate to move with safety free of obstacles.
Some of these disabilities are not visible and there should be no expectation that students, faculty and staff need to disclose them to the university or others, or to make special requests, for the university to ensure full unimpeded access to Sather Gate. That is their right – one repeatedly denied over many weeks after UC Berkeley students, faculty, and staff expressed concern about this demeaning discriminatory denial of their freedom of movement.
By allowing the closure of the main portion of Sather Gate, the university is likely in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act and has been for a very extended and inexcusable period of time.
The violation is not an aberration; it is willful and continuous and its consequences are harmful to a large portion of our university community.
Students – such as Daniel Solomon, a legally blind doctoral candidate who contributed recently to the Jewish News of Northern California – report that the blocking of Sather Gate means disabled students like him “have been forced to traverse through dirt and puddles.”
As of the beginning of March the university has taken no meaningful action to reopen the gate for full and free access. The university is obstructing the freedom of movement of a protected class — including the legally blind — whose rights it is legally obligated to protect under federal civil rights law.
There is no moral or legal justification for this policy and the university is likely in violation not only of civil rights and human rights law but also of our UC Berkeley Principles of Community. These are principles university leadership repeatedly cite as fundamental to UC Berkeley and incumbent upon all of us – students, faculty and staff – to honor.
That obligation also includes the university’s administration and leadership.
The right to protest is protected by our Constitution and the university is obligated to respect it. It is well within its power to ensure that protesters have their rights respected without infringing on the rights of others – including particularly the disabled and physically and visually impaired. Protesters can use the space around Sather Gate to protest without blocking Sather Gate.
As discrimination deepens and becomes more diffuse and extensive at UC Berkeley, harming the rights and welfare of increasing numbers of individuals and minority groups who have legally protected status, all UC Berkeley students, faculty, and staff – whatever their identity, background, and physical and visual ability – suffer from a decline in safety, welfare and confidence in the integrity of the university’s commitment to protect and respect our rights.
The exclusion of valued members of our university community is unacceptable and an affront to our university’s mission, ethics and legal responsibilities.
The visually and mobility-impaired and physically disabled have the right to be treated with equity and equality, dignity and respect at UC Berkeley and to be included and valued as an integral part of our university.
Discrimination at UC Berkeley is not confined to attacks on Jewish people. It is growing, enabled by a university administration and leadership that insufficiently respects and protects civil rights and human rights.
Discrimination at UC Berkeley is not confined to attacks on Jewish people. It is growing, enabled by a university administration and leadership that insufficiently respects and protects civil rights and human rights.
The university-sanctioned and -enabled violations of these civil rights are part of a larger systemic failure of the UC Berkeley administration and its leadership to value and uphold human dignity, equality, diversity, inclusion and equity for all members of our university community without exception.
Such discrimination cannot continue. It demands immediate correction and reparative action.
Noam Schimmel is a Lecturer in Global Studies with an emphasis on human rights at University of California, Berkeley.
The Diffusion of Discrimination at UC Berkeley
Noam Schimmel
Discrimination against Jewish people is often a symptom of a broader social and moral malaise: Violations of human rights and civil rights that start with Jewish people are unlikely to end there.
At UC Berkeley, where the administration has failed to respect, protect and fulfill the civil and human rights of Jewish faculty, staff and students since the Oct. 7 Hamas massacres and well before then, an additional identity group with legally protected status has faced systemic exclusion and discrimination due to the university’s indifference to their rights: Physically and visually impaired students.
For over a month the university has allowed the obstruction of free passage through Sather Gate; approximately 70% of it has been blocked off by protesters of the war in Gaza. This forces anyone needing to pass through Sather Gate to use two narrow side entrances, creating bottlenecks and severely limiting freedom of movement.
This causes hardship to individuals who use wheelchairs and other ambulatory devices to enable mobility, individuals who are visually impaired, and individuals with other physical disabilities and limitations who require the normally wide space of Sather Gate to move with safety free of obstacles.
Some of these disabilities are not visible and there should be no expectation that students, faculty and staff need to disclose them to the university or others, or to make special requests, for the university to ensure full unimpeded access to Sather Gate. That is their right – one repeatedly denied over many weeks after UC Berkeley students, faculty, and staff expressed concern about this demeaning discriminatory denial of their freedom of movement.
By allowing the closure of the main portion of Sather Gate, the university is likely in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act and has been for a very extended and inexcusable period of time.
The violation is not an aberration; it is willful and continuous and its consequences are harmful to a large portion of our university community.
Students – such as Daniel Solomon, a legally blind doctoral candidate who contributed recently to the Jewish News of Northern California – report that the blocking of Sather Gate means disabled students like him “have been forced to traverse through dirt and puddles.”
As of the beginning of March the university has taken no meaningful action to reopen the gate for full and free access. The university is obstructing the freedom of movement of a protected class — including the legally blind — whose rights it is legally obligated to protect under federal civil rights law.
There is no moral or legal justification for this policy and the university is likely in violation not only of civil rights and human rights law but also of our UC Berkeley Principles of Community. These are principles university leadership repeatedly cite as fundamental to UC Berkeley and incumbent upon all of us – students, faculty and staff – to honor.
That obligation also includes the university’s administration and leadership.
The right to protest is protected by our Constitution and the university is obligated to respect it. It is well within its power to ensure that protesters have their rights respected without infringing on the rights of others – including particularly the disabled and physically and visually impaired. Protesters can use the space around Sather Gate to protest without blocking Sather Gate.
As discrimination deepens and becomes more diffuse and extensive at UC Berkeley, harming the rights and welfare of increasing numbers of individuals and minority groups who have legally protected status, all UC Berkeley students, faculty, and staff – whatever their identity, background, and physical and visual ability – suffer from a decline in safety, welfare and confidence in the integrity of the university’s commitment to protect and respect our rights.
The exclusion of valued members of our university community is unacceptable and an affront to our university’s mission, ethics and legal responsibilities.
The visually and mobility-impaired and physically disabled have the right to be treated with equity and equality, dignity and respect at UC Berkeley and to be included and valued as an integral part of our university.
Discrimination at UC Berkeley is not confined to attacks on Jewish people. It is growing, enabled by a university administration and leadership that insufficiently respects and protects civil rights and human rights.
The university-sanctioned and -enabled violations of these civil rights are part of a larger systemic failure of the UC Berkeley administration and its leadership to value and uphold human dignity, equality, diversity, inclusion and equity for all members of our university community without exception.
Such discrimination cannot continue. It demands immediate correction and reparative action.
Noam Schimmel is a Lecturer in Global Studies with an emphasis on human rights at University of California, Berkeley.
Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.
Editor's Picks
Israel and the Internet Wars – A Professional Social Media Review
The Invisible Student: A Tale of Homelessness at UCLA and USC
What Ever Happened to the LA Times?
Who Are the Jews On Joe Biden’s Cabinet?
You’re Not a Bad Jewish Mom If Your Kid Wants Santa Claus to Come to Your House
No Labels: The Group Fighting for the Political Center
Latest Articles
“Just a Few Sleeps Away” by Mike Nichols
Rabbi Kaplan Named JCC Camps Senior VP; Maman Events, JFSLA, Temple of the Arts
Controversial Far-Left Streamer Hasan Piker Scheduled to Speak at Cornell, UT Austin
Listen — A poem for Parsha Ha’Azinu
When Celebrities Endorsed a Different “Free Palestine”
A Bisl Yom Kippur~ Plenty of Regrets
A Moment in Time: The Sound of Now
Enigmatic End: the Penultimate Song in the Torah
Print Issue: Renewing American Jewry | September 18, 2026
In this time of introspection and rising adversity, let us resolve as American Jews to write our new chapter by better understanding our history.
Expanding the Soul
There is a struggle within us between constriction and expansion, between despair and vitality. Good humor can be a powerful ally against the constriction that suffering creates.
Making Torah More Accessible
The 402-page book is organized around 36 life lessons related to the Book of Genesis, with thoughtful study questions and dozens of responses from respected sources in Jewish thought.
Avi Nesher Fights the Boycott with a Human Story
Making Israeli films is not easy. Budgets are generally small by American standards, and international financing has become increasingly difficult to secure amid the cultural boycott of Israeli cinema.
Combating Antisemitism Through Education in Beverly Hills
For Judith, her family’s experience as refugees from Iran is part of what drives her commitment to speaking out against antisemitism and never staying silent.
From Israel’s Farms to Los Angeles: The Etrog with a Purpose
Mickey Katzburg, founder of the World Center for Jewish Education, is trying to give Los Angeles Jews another option: an etrog grown in Israel, while at the same time helping support farmers in the country’s Gaza border region.
What’s in a Name: Peanut Butter Date Bark
Dates are a perfect way to add natural caramelized sweetness to desserts.
Table for Five: Yom Kippur
Elevating the Physical
ACF Report Reveals the Strongest – and Most Concerning – Campuses for Jewish and Pro-Israel Students
The report, which can be found on CampusFairness.org, took into consideration five criteria: incident record, institutional response, anti-Israel organizing, Jewish life on campus, and the legal and structural environment.
Jason Arday, Donald Trump, and the Post-Truth World
For both MAGA and Arday’s defenders, truth doesn’t matter, lies are accepted as facts, and tribe matters above all.
How Yom Kippur’s Afternoon Prophet Inspires America
When Jonah makes his appearance on the holiest day of the year, he is meant to remind Jews across the globe of the remarkable grace of repentance.
Knowing Our History
In this time of introspection and rising adversity, let us resolve as American Jews to write our new chapter by better understanding our history.
Macklemore Dropped from Ed Sheeran Tour After ‘Free Palestine’ Remarks at MetLife Stadium
Among the most high-profile artists to criticize Macklemore’s MetLife Stadium rant was P!NK. Born Alecia Moore, P!NK is a Jewish Grammy-winning pop star who has been increasingly public about her Judaism and antisemitism since Oct. 7.
Noah Wyle, Rob Reiner, and the Jewish Winners at the 78th Emmys
Wyle won Outstanding Lead Actor in a Drama Series for playing Dr. Michael “Robby” Robinavitch on HBO Max’s “The Pitt.”
Rosner’s Domain | Choosing the Next Government
Are you better off than you were four years ago?
My Choice for Essay of the Year
The collective assault against Israel has been so broad and deep it’s been hard finding anyone in the mainstream media who will dare go after the Hamas murderers whose biggest victims are the Palestinians.
More Time to Dream
Israel’s Clinical Trial Illusion: Testing Drugs Is Not the Same as Capturing Economic Value
Clinical trial statistics tell us where investigational drugs are tested. They do not tell us who owns the assets, who uses the evidence to obtain regulatory approvals or who captures the economic value when those drugs succeed.
More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.