As I write, the western world is unusually supportive of Israel in its fight against Hamas – the outcome of horrifying scenes of over 1,000 innocents brutally raped, mutilated and murdered. But on social media, it is a steady regime of “Free Palestine” or far less innocuous slogans that we see. And many of us are worried, regardless of what world leaders may say and what friendly warships may signal.
The ability of TikTok, YouTube and Instagram to glue us to our phones and to a constant slew of anti-Israel content can make even a diehard optimist feel unsafe. It is scary to see so much hatred, a mere three weeks after a massacre whose medieval goriness normal people cannot grasp. While there are many untenable comparisons to the Holocaust floating about in the wake of October 7th, social media content algorithms can make those comparisons feel apt. Because feelings will always trump fact, world support seems to recede into irrelevance. What people experience will always overpower what can be explained. And that is also why so many have gravitated to the Palestinian side.
“People arrive at their beliefs not on the basis of proof … but on the basis of what they find attractive,” said Blaise Pascal, 300 years before the reemergence of Israel. We have yet to grasp it. As a result, abhorrent assertions about Israel have steadily morphed into common sense, especially among the young. It is high time that we move past our faulty assumptions – that we need to educate the world, and that where abstract argument and moralization fail, antisemitism must be the cause — and accept that public support can only be earned by understanding how the mind actually works.
Public opinion is rooted firmly in a bedrock of emotion, of evolved irrationality, and only later decorated with fact. Marketers get this. The anti-Israel invective spouted on university campuses does not derive from false historical understanding, from ideology, or even, as we dismissively like to believe, from antisemitism. Those are largely outcomes of anti-Israel attitudes, not their cause. Anti-Israel sentiment is popular because it is made pleasant, in key psychological ways, to its target audience.
Anti-Israel propaganda has for decades engineered mass emotional identification with Palestinians. It has done so by brazenly appropriating every culture’s sacred narratives and struggles: To black Americans, it presents itself as a fight against racism; to Mexican Americans, it frames Palestinians as barred from ancestral lands by a fence; to Natives, it reinvents Arab Palestinians as indigenous people uprooted from their peaceful shires by white colonialists. I could go on. The objective of this unrestrained theft of identity is to seduce, not to educate — it is to compel sympathy by providing counterfeit solidarity. Minorities fighting real struggles need friends and anti-Israel propaganda exploits that.
Next, anti-Israel propaganda targets the powerful evolutionary reflex that is compassion: It systematically subjects audiences to pain by showing them suffering and dying children, far too often (but not, by any means, always) placed in danger by Hamas precisely for that purpose. None of us remains indifferent at the sight of Palestinian children suffering — nor should we. Outrage ought to eclipse reason when seeing children suffer. And anti-Israel propagandists exploit that innate compassion to skew our moral judgments.
Anti-Israel propaganda makes its messaging exceedingly easy to absorb, visual, short, rhythmical. It turns its weaponized content into junk food for our brains.
Finally, and critically, anti-Israel propaganda makes its messaging exceedingly easy to absorb — visual, short, rhythmical. It turns its weaponized content into junk food for our brains.
If we wish to garner justified sympathy among western publics, we must drop our failed approach and remember these rules:
1 – Target the middle. Target those whose identity and passion are not tied up with the Palestinian struggle. Speak instead to people in neutral, nonpolitical discussions.
2 – It’s not a debate. Proving we are smarter or more knowledgeable than others will not work. If we want to make friends, we must be friendly.
3 – Don’t vent. Far too many advocates of Israel act as if saying what we want to hear from others or insulting our target audience is smart communication. Think Naftali Bennett. It most certainly is not.
4 – It’s not about “what,” it’s about “who.” This is perhaps the most important rule and should form 80% of our strategy. Israelis have been dehumanized. They need to be humanized. Share and create posts that rebrand Israelis accurately: as similar in every way to the target audiences we seek to reach: Western, peace-loving children and families. Israelis hold the same values, experience the same struggles and have the same interests as young Americans. Stay away from soldiers and religious people – they are hard to relate to. If we can reclaim the “who” in people’s minds when they think of Israelis, the “what” (Israelis do and why) will flow automatically.
5 – Similarly, we must expose and brand Hamas for who they are. Use their own words. Use the most gruesome videos they proudly shared. If people are made to feel due commonality with Israelis then experience the evil of Hamas, there will be a tipping point. Also, underline endlessly to the world that anti-Israel propaganda is fake news.
6 – Don’t speak in abstracts, statistics and facts. Tell personal stories that convey the same information instead. Use your words to paint. Make it visualizable. Share a bit of the victims’ souls.
7 – Keep it simple. Do NOT presume to teach history. Tell personal stories. Better yet, give your testimony. Tell people the emotions you are experiencing and why.
8 – Be confident by being authentic.
9 – Do not be forced into a corner. Ignore the attacks, do not be made to dance to the tune of accusations. Win others over instead. Make your own accusations.
10 – Be repetitive. The brain learns from repetition. What is familiar is safe and easy to recall. So don’t indulge in the temptation to move to a new point after you’ve tired of the above. Stick to the plan. Remember the objective and how we, too, form opinions.
If we start to have this empathy for our audiences, understanding how we all actually adopt attitudes, we can transform the discourse on Israel.
If we start to have this empathy for our audiences, understanding how we all actually adopt attitudes, we can transform the discourse on Israel. In fact, we can even make peace a more realistic prospect. I have seen it in my work, all over the world.
Philippe Assouline is an opinion researcher and communication strategist who has led both political and election campaigns around the world. He is the CEO & Founder of PropellorIQ.
Winning Hearts Then Minds
Philippe Assouline
As I write, the western world is unusually supportive of Israel in its fight against Hamas – the outcome of horrifying scenes of over 1,000 innocents brutally raped, mutilated and murdered. But on social media, it is a steady regime of “Free Palestine” or far less innocuous slogans that we see. And many of us are worried, regardless of what world leaders may say and what friendly warships may signal.
The ability of TikTok, YouTube and Instagram to glue us to our phones and to a constant slew of anti-Israel content can make even a diehard optimist feel unsafe. It is scary to see so much hatred, a mere three weeks after a massacre whose medieval goriness normal people cannot grasp. While there are many untenable comparisons to the Holocaust floating about in the wake of October 7th, social media content algorithms can make those comparisons feel apt. Because feelings will always trump fact, world support seems to recede into irrelevance. What people experience will always overpower what can be explained. And that is also why so many have gravitated to the Palestinian side.
“People arrive at their beliefs not on the basis of proof … but on the basis of what they find attractive,” said Blaise Pascal, 300 years before the reemergence of Israel. We have yet to grasp it. As a result, abhorrent assertions about Israel have steadily morphed into common sense, especially among the young. It is high time that we move past our faulty assumptions – that we need to educate the world, and that where abstract argument and moralization fail, antisemitism must be the cause — and accept that public support can only be earned by understanding how the mind actually works.
Public opinion is rooted firmly in a bedrock of emotion, of evolved irrationality, and only later decorated with fact. Marketers get this. The anti-Israel invective spouted on university campuses does not derive from false historical understanding, from ideology, or even, as we dismissively like to believe, from antisemitism. Those are largely outcomes of anti-Israel attitudes, not their cause. Anti-Israel sentiment is popular because it is made pleasant, in key psychological ways, to its target audience.
Anti-Israel propaganda has for decades engineered mass emotional identification with Palestinians. It has done so by brazenly appropriating every culture’s sacred narratives and struggles: To black Americans, it presents itself as a fight against racism; to Mexican Americans, it frames Palestinians as barred from ancestral lands by a fence; to Natives, it reinvents Arab Palestinians as indigenous people uprooted from their peaceful shires by white colonialists. I could go on. The objective of this unrestrained theft of identity is to seduce, not to educate — it is to compel sympathy by providing counterfeit solidarity. Minorities fighting real struggles need friends and anti-Israel propaganda exploits that.
Next, anti-Israel propaganda targets the powerful evolutionary reflex that is compassion: It systematically subjects audiences to pain by showing them suffering and dying children, far too often (but not, by any means, always) placed in danger by Hamas precisely for that purpose. None of us remains indifferent at the sight of Palestinian children suffering — nor should we. Outrage ought to eclipse reason when seeing children suffer. And anti-Israel propagandists exploit that innate compassion to skew our moral judgments.
Finally, and critically, anti-Israel propaganda makes its messaging exceedingly easy to absorb — visual, short, rhythmical. It turns its weaponized content into junk food for our brains.
If we wish to garner justified sympathy among western publics, we must drop our failed approach and remember these rules:
1 – Target the middle. Target those whose identity and passion are not tied up with the Palestinian struggle. Speak instead to people in neutral, nonpolitical discussions.
2 – It’s not a debate. Proving we are smarter or more knowledgeable than others will not work. If we want to make friends, we must be friendly.
3 – Don’t vent. Far too many advocates of Israel act as if saying what we want to hear from others or insulting our target audience is smart communication. Think Naftali Bennett. It most certainly is not.
4 – It’s not about “what,” it’s about “who.” This is perhaps the most important rule and should form 80% of our strategy. Israelis have been dehumanized. They need to be humanized. Share and create posts that rebrand Israelis accurately: as similar in every way to the target audiences we seek to reach: Western, peace-loving children and families. Israelis hold the same values, experience the same struggles and have the same interests as young Americans. Stay away from soldiers and religious people – they are hard to relate to. If we can reclaim the “who” in people’s minds when they think of Israelis, the “what” (Israelis do and why) will flow automatically.
5 – Similarly, we must expose and brand Hamas for who they are. Use their own words. Use the most gruesome videos they proudly shared. If people are made to feel due commonality with Israelis then experience the evil of Hamas, there will be a tipping point. Also, underline endlessly to the world that anti-Israel propaganda is fake news.
6 – Don’t speak in abstracts, statistics and facts. Tell personal stories that convey the same information instead. Use your words to paint. Make it visualizable. Share a bit of the victims’ souls.
7 – Keep it simple. Do NOT presume to teach history. Tell personal stories. Better yet, give your testimony. Tell people the emotions you are experiencing and why.
8 – Be confident by being authentic.
9 – Do not be forced into a corner. Ignore the attacks, do not be made to dance to the tune of accusations. Win others over instead. Make your own accusations.
10 – Be repetitive. The brain learns from repetition. What is familiar is safe and easy to recall. So don’t indulge in the temptation to move to a new point after you’ve tired of the above. Stick to the plan. Remember the objective and how we, too, form opinions.
If we start to have this empathy for our audiences, understanding how we all actually adopt attitudes, we can transform the discourse on Israel. In fact, we can even make peace a more realistic prospect. I have seen it in my work, all over the world.
Philippe Assouline is an opinion researcher and communication strategist who has led both political and election campaigns around the world. He is the CEO & Founder of PropellorIQ.
Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.
Editor's Picks
Israel and the Internet Wars – A Professional Social Media Review
The Invisible Student: A Tale of Homelessness at UCLA and USC
What Ever Happened to the LA Times?
Who Are the Jews On Joe Biden’s Cabinet?
You’re Not a Bad Jewish Mom If Your Kid Wants Santa Claus to Come to Your House
No Labels: The Group Fighting for the Political Center
Latest Articles
Mamdani Needs to Pay a Price for Harming Jews
Rabbis of LA | Rabbi Geller’s Feminist Education
Rabbi Artson Honored by WLCJ, Mem Global’s Embark Names Executive Director
I Can’t Always — A poem for Parsha Va’etchanan
A Bisl Torah — Senseless versus Sensible
Moment in Time: Tisha B’Av – A Time to Comfort
Poussin’s Menorah Chimes Without Jews at Midnight
Print Issue: Haredim at War | July 24, 2026
The Haredim who break out of their bubbles to join the IDF are often caught between faith, family and country. Here are some of their stories.
The Inversion of History
Molly Crabapple has written a work of great inversion and of ultimate betrayal.
From ‘The Chosen’ to ‘Imaging Torah’: Jeremy Kagan’s Journey to Bring Torah to Life
For the director/artist, creating images inspired by Torah is a way of engaging with the stories, ideas and interpretations that have shaped Jewish life for thousands of years.
Three Dates to Dataland
I took three different dates, ages 6, 72 and 35, to see Dataland, the unusual digital art experience in downtown Los Angeles.
Hakol Shalom, All Is Shalom
This is the transcript of the speech Rabbi Dr. Bradley Shavit Artson gave at the 2026 AJU Gala on May 19, 2026.
A Slice of Aussie Heaven for the Jewish Day of Love
A classic Australian dessert chocolate coconut slice features a rich, dense, fudgy chocolate base packed with dried coconut, finished with a thick cocoa frosting and generously dusted with even more coconut.
Recipes that Celebrate Love for Tu b’Av
This roundup has recipes from two matchmakers: one is perfect for a special date night, the other is the perfect representative of lasting love.
Table for Five: Va’etchanan
Secret Sauce
The Haredi Soldiers Caught Between Faith, Family and Country
For decades, the question of Haredi enlistment has remained one of Israel’s most sensitive and unresolved conflicts.
Why Are Jews Not Suing Mamdani for Slander and Defamation?
At the very least, the case would provide a global stage to debunk the genocide lie that is devastating world Jewry.
The Empty Plaza and the Eternal Bond
This Tisha b’Av, as we mourn over the Temple once more, it is an occasion to consider what resonance the remnants of the Temple structure hold for us today.
Rosner’s Domain | A Leftist (Not) by Choice?
Coalition supporters want to define Eisenkot as a leftist because leftist is a title most Israelis do not want their Prime Minister to hold. But this definition has inherent limitations.
Love for the Sake of Love: A Lesson from Tisha b’Av
Last week, I moderated a panel of interfaith leaders fighting antisemtism and supporting Israel as part of the American Muslim and Multifaith Women’s Empowerment Council’s conference.
Life, Love and Tisha b’Av
As if life needed one more complication, my anniversary with life, my birthday, usually falls somewhere inside the Three Weeks, that narrow corridor of Jewish time when celebration starts to feel suspicious.
Accidental Pilgrim: My Moroccan Adventure
Does Morocco have genuine warmth toward Jews, or is it a way to reignite lucrative Jewish tourism? Does it even matter?
The Hits Just Keep Coming
What the Changing Narrative Around Israel Reveals About the Fragmentation of the West
Anti-Israelism has become a kind of cultural and political loyalty test that has almost nothing to do with the actual policy questions at stake. If the postwar liberal order is fragmenting, the story of Israel is a symptom of that fragmentation, not its cause.
Echoes of Oct. 7 in ‘The Odyssey’
The film reminded me that an ancient poet could write about massacres but also about moral courage, while terrorists who dream of killing Jews can only think of going right to the massacre.
Censoring Global Jewry
This tale of censorship is bad for books and portends a death knell for literature.
More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.