For more articles from The Media Line, click here.
“There is no precedent for regime change through an air campaign,” Brig. Gen. (res.) Eran Ortal told The Media Line.
As the joint US-Israel strike campaign against Iran moved deeper into a multiday fight, analysts said the central question is no longer whether airpower can wreck military infrastructure—it can—but whether leadership losses, communications breakdowns, and sustained pressure can crack Tehran’s hold enough to trigger collapse from within. The alternative end state is narrower but still consequential: a surviving government stripped of key military capabilities and coerced into a far weaker regional posture for years.
Air campaigns can shatter arsenals and paralyze command-and-control, but they rarely topple regimes unless political collapse follows inside the target state. Ortal said this war is now testing whether Iran is entering that kind of internal moment.
Since February 28, when Washington launched Operation Epic Fury and Israel began Operation Roaring Lion, US and Israeli forces have carried out waves of strikes aimed at Iranian command nodes, missile infrastructure, and other strategic targets.
“The goal is not for the regime to fall, but to create conditions that will enable the Iranian people to topple it,” Professor Danny Orbach, a military historian from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, told The Media Line. “If the Iranians don’t take advantage of the opportunity, the war might end with less ambitious goals achieved—the destruction of the Iranian navy, its missile arsenal, and the remnants of its nuclear program.”
CENTCOM described the opening phase as an attack package launched from air, land, and sea, involving cruise missiles and advanced fighter aircraft. US officials portrayed the initial strike package as one of the most concentrated deployments of American firepower in the region in a generation.
On social media, footage showed Iranians celebrating in the streets after confirmation was made public that Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei had been killed in an airstrike, as strikes and counterstrikes pushed the conflict beyond a conventional “degrade capabilities” campaign and into an uncertain political endgame.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and US President Donald Trump encouraged Iranians to seize the moment and overthrow the regime. The air campaign is intended to help set that chain of events in motion, though there is no guarantee it will happen.
“The duration of the operation depends on its goal,” Ortal said. “This goal could change as the success of the operation becomes apparent.”
Israeli officials said the opening days brought heavy strike volume, with hundreds of targets hit and more than 1,200 munitions dropped, a pace that officials said could indicate a prolonged campaign.
Ortal framed what comes next as two broad paths. In the first, he said, leadership losses and a communications breakdown combine with extreme public pressure to produce a rupture that ends the regime—an outcome he stressed airpower alone has not historically produced.
“Seeing Iranians celebrating the attack in the streets increases the optimism that this scenario could materialize,” Ortal explained. “This could create a domino effect that cannot be foreseen in which the disappearance of senior leadership, major communications disruption, and extreme public pressure destabilize the leadership, who then abandons their positions.”
If that cascade does not happen, Ortal said the likely endpoint may be a government that survives politically but is left strategically broken. “This will leave the regime without military capabilities, weak and neutralized and fully subordinate to American whims and future coercion,” he said.
For Orbach, the campaign’s political bet is tied to a target set that tends to receive less attention than missiles and nuclear facilities: Iran’s ability to project power at sea. “The navy is more important than what most people think,” he said. “The navy is the ability to project power, especially through the threat of blocking the Hormuz Strait. Its destruction will humiliate them and turn them into a country that cannot project power.”
The Strait of Hormuz remains a pressure point with global consequences, carrying roughly a fifth of the world’s traded oil. Even limited disruption can rattle energy markets, shipping schedules, and insurance costs for commercial traffic, and the loss of credible maritime leverage would narrow Tehran’s ability to coerce neighbors or threaten the global economy during crises.
The broader logic of the strikes is rooted in the structure Tehran built over decades: a regional proxy network paired with missiles and drones designed to deter direct attack and impose costs through escalation. Degrading those tools changes Iran’s bargaining power as much as its battlefield options.
“Iran’s ability to influence the Middle East is tied to two abilities—its proxies and its missiles,” Ortal said. “Iran no longer has air defense systems, and its missile launchers are gradually depleting. Iran has no ability to face this, leaving the regime subdued to American pressure it will not be able to withstand.”
Iran’s nuclear program remains the central backdrop. The 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action temporarily restricted aspects of Tehran’s enrichment program in exchange for sanctions relief, but after the US withdrawal in 2018, Iran expanded enrichment and reduced international monitoring, raising tensions that set the stage for the current confrontation.
Orbach argued that if Washington and Jerusalem want more than a military rollback—and instead aim for collapse from within—they would need to sustain pressure and widen the target set beyond headline military assets to the regime’s internal enforcement apparatus, including the institutions used to suppress protests and enforce control.
“The way to increase the odds of toppling the regime is to eliminate its leader and his heirs, in several rounds, rendering them weak and scared,” Orbach said, estimating the chances of the regime surviving are slim. “In addition, the oppression mechanisms of the regime also need to be hit. The question is how long Israel and the US will persist in this effort.”
Iran’s internal condition may matter as much as the strike count. Years of sanctions, corruption, and heavy security spending have strained the economy, while inflation, infrastructure decay, electricity shortages, and water crises have deepened public frustration—factors that could magnify political aftershocks if the leadership and control systems continue to falter.
“Iran’s economy is in a catastrophic state and deteriorating further,” Orbach said. “This will only worsen after the war, including raging inflation and the water crisis. Add to this a succession struggle and popular unrest, and it is hard to see the regime surviving in the long run.”
Even if the campaign’s political ambition narrows over time, Ortal said the military impact alone could reshape the region for years. “Even if the goals of the operation will be downgraded, still Iran will be rendered extremely weak and subdued for a substantial number of years,” he said.
In the near term, analysts said four indicators will show which direction the campaign is taking. One is whether strikes expand beyond military assets to the regime’s internal enforcement apparatus. Another is whether Iran’s naval leverage in and around the Strait of Hormuz is neutralized. A third is whether internal unrest grows beyond scattered signals into sustained pressure. The fourth is whether Washington and Jerusalem begin describing success in narrower terms tied to long-term military degradation.
What remains uncertain is the central fact Ortal pointed to: airpower can decapitate, disrupt, and degrade, but it cannot vote, march, or govern. The coming days may determine whether the strikes merely dismantle Iran’s security apparatus—or whether they open a path for Iranians themselves to dismantle the system that wields it, defying the history Ortal says has held for air campaigns.
2 Endgames Emerge as US-Israel Strikes Reshape Iran’s Military Posture
Keren Setton, The Media Line
For more articles from The Media Line, click here.
“There is no precedent for regime change through an air campaign,” Brig. Gen. (res.) Eran Ortal told The Media Line.
As the joint US-Israel strike campaign against Iran moved deeper into a multiday fight, analysts said the central question is no longer whether airpower can wreck military infrastructure—it can—but whether leadership losses, communications breakdowns, and sustained pressure can crack Tehran’s hold enough to trigger collapse from within. The alternative end state is narrower but still consequential: a surviving government stripped of key military capabilities and coerced into a far weaker regional posture for years.
Air campaigns can shatter arsenals and paralyze command-and-control, but they rarely topple regimes unless political collapse follows inside the target state. Ortal said this war is now testing whether Iran is entering that kind of internal moment.
Since February 28, when Washington launched Operation Epic Fury and Israel began Operation Roaring Lion, US and Israeli forces have carried out waves of strikes aimed at Iranian command nodes, missile infrastructure, and other strategic targets.
“The goal is not for the regime to fall, but to create conditions that will enable the Iranian people to topple it,” Professor Danny Orbach, a military historian from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, told The Media Line. “If the Iranians don’t take advantage of the opportunity, the war might end with less ambitious goals achieved—the destruction of the Iranian navy, its missile arsenal, and the remnants of its nuclear program.”
CENTCOM described the opening phase as an attack package launched from air, land, and sea, involving cruise missiles and advanced fighter aircraft. US officials portrayed the initial strike package as one of the most concentrated deployments of American firepower in the region in a generation.
On social media, footage showed Iranians celebrating in the streets after confirmation was made public that Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei had been killed in an airstrike, as strikes and counterstrikes pushed the conflict beyond a conventional “degrade capabilities” campaign and into an uncertain political endgame.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and US President Donald Trump encouraged Iranians to seize the moment and overthrow the regime. The air campaign is intended to help set that chain of events in motion, though there is no guarantee it will happen.
“The duration of the operation depends on its goal,” Ortal said. “This goal could change as the success of the operation becomes apparent.”
Israeli officials said the opening days brought heavy strike volume, with hundreds of targets hit and more than 1,200 munitions dropped, a pace that officials said could indicate a prolonged campaign.
Ortal framed what comes next as two broad paths. In the first, he said, leadership losses and a communications breakdown combine with extreme public pressure to produce a rupture that ends the regime—an outcome he stressed airpower alone has not historically produced.
“Seeing Iranians celebrating the attack in the streets increases the optimism that this scenario could materialize,” Ortal explained. “This could create a domino effect that cannot be foreseen in which the disappearance of senior leadership, major communications disruption, and extreme public pressure destabilize the leadership, who then abandons their positions.”
If that cascade does not happen, Ortal said the likely endpoint may be a government that survives politically but is left strategically broken. “This will leave the regime without military capabilities, weak and neutralized and fully subordinate to American whims and future coercion,” he said.
For Orbach, the campaign’s political bet is tied to a target set that tends to receive less attention than missiles and nuclear facilities: Iran’s ability to project power at sea. “The navy is more important than what most people think,” he said. “The navy is the ability to project power, especially through the threat of blocking the Hormuz Strait. Its destruction will humiliate them and turn them into a country that cannot project power.”
The Strait of Hormuz remains a pressure point with global consequences, carrying roughly a fifth of the world’s traded oil. Even limited disruption can rattle energy markets, shipping schedules, and insurance costs for commercial traffic, and the loss of credible maritime leverage would narrow Tehran’s ability to coerce neighbors or threaten the global economy during crises.
The broader logic of the strikes is rooted in the structure Tehran built over decades: a regional proxy network paired with missiles and drones designed to deter direct attack and impose costs through escalation. Degrading those tools changes Iran’s bargaining power as much as its battlefield options.
“Iran’s ability to influence the Middle East is tied to two abilities—its proxies and its missiles,” Ortal said. “Iran no longer has air defense systems, and its missile launchers are gradually depleting. Iran has no ability to face this, leaving the regime subdued to American pressure it will not be able to withstand.”
Iran’s nuclear program remains the central backdrop. The 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action temporarily restricted aspects of Tehran’s enrichment program in exchange for sanctions relief, but after the US withdrawal in 2018, Iran expanded enrichment and reduced international monitoring, raising tensions that set the stage for the current confrontation.
Orbach argued that if Washington and Jerusalem want more than a military rollback—and instead aim for collapse from within—they would need to sustain pressure and widen the target set beyond headline military assets to the regime’s internal enforcement apparatus, including the institutions used to suppress protests and enforce control.
“The way to increase the odds of toppling the regime is to eliminate its leader and his heirs, in several rounds, rendering them weak and scared,” Orbach said, estimating the chances of the regime surviving are slim. “In addition, the oppression mechanisms of the regime also need to be hit. The question is how long Israel and the US will persist in this effort.”
Iran’s internal condition may matter as much as the strike count. Years of sanctions, corruption, and heavy security spending have strained the economy, while inflation, infrastructure decay, electricity shortages, and water crises have deepened public frustration—factors that could magnify political aftershocks if the leadership and control systems continue to falter.
“Iran’s economy is in a catastrophic state and deteriorating further,” Orbach said. “This will only worsen after the war, including raging inflation and the water crisis. Add to this a succession struggle and popular unrest, and it is hard to see the regime surviving in the long run.”
Even if the campaign’s political ambition narrows over time, Ortal said the military impact alone could reshape the region for years. “Even if the goals of the operation will be downgraded, still Iran will be rendered extremely weak and subdued for a substantial number of years,” he said.
In the near term, analysts said four indicators will show which direction the campaign is taking. One is whether strikes expand beyond military assets to the regime’s internal enforcement apparatus. Another is whether Iran’s naval leverage in and around the Strait of Hormuz is neutralized. A third is whether internal unrest grows beyond scattered signals into sustained pressure. The fourth is whether Washington and Jerusalem begin describing success in narrower terms tied to long-term military degradation.
What remains uncertain is the central fact Ortal pointed to: airpower can decapitate, disrupt, and degrade, but it cannot vote, march, or govern. The coming days may determine whether the strikes merely dismantle Iran’s security apparatus—or whether they open a path for Iranians themselves to dismantle the system that wields it, defying the history Ortal says has held for air campaigns.
Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.
Editor's Picks
Israel and the Internet Wars – A Professional Social Media Review
The Invisible Student: A Tale of Homelessness at UCLA and USC
What Ever Happened to the LA Times?
Who Are the Jews On Joe Biden’s Cabinet?
You’re Not a Bad Jewish Mom If Your Kid Wants Santa Claus to Come to Your House
No Labels: The Group Fighting for the Political Center
Latest Articles
Hope in Faith, Faith in Hope
Finding Communal Comfort
Leaving Behind a Better World
Boy George Releases Song Calling Out Israel’s Critics
Was Our Golden Age Fool’s Gold?
Genocide Shmenocide
Bibi’s Visit: Spin in the Air, Facts on the Ground
From Trump’s standpoint, the nuclear issue has been overtaken by the bedeviling problem of the Strait of Hormuz. What Trump sees now in Iran is a mess, not a victory.
The Obsession with Israel Is Becoming Creepy
The world’s fanatical fixation with a group that is less that 0.2 percent of the world’s population has crossed the boundaries of moral vocabulary and into creepiness.
What Will It Take?
An open revolt for Jewish rights and protections is going to have to come from Jews finally making demands and fighting back—or not at all.
Mamdani Needs to Pay a Price for Harming Jews
It’d be one thing if Mamdani were a lowly Israelophobe with a few hundred followers. But he’s not. He’s mayor of the city with the world’s largest Jewish population.
Rabbis of LA | Rabbi Geller’s Feminist Education
Third of three parts
Rabbi Artson Honored by WLCJ, Mem Global’s Embark Names Executive Director
Notable people and events in the Jewish LA community.
I Can’t Always — A poem for Parsha Va’etchanan
You Can’t Always Get What You Want came out the year after I was born.
A Bisl Torah — Senseless versus Sensible
The 9th of Av is an annual reminder to look inward and ask if any hatred has taken root within our hearts.
Moment in Time: Tisha B’Av – A Time to Comfort
Poussin’s Menorah Chimes Without Jews at Midnight
Print Issue: Haredim at War | July 24, 2026
The Haredim who break out of their bubbles to join the IDF are often caught between faith, family and country. Here are some of their stories.
The Inversion of History
Molly Crabapple has written a work of great inversion and of ultimate betrayal.
From ‘The Chosen’ to ‘Imaging Torah’: Jeremy Kagan’s Journey to Bring Torah to Life
For the director/artist, creating images inspired by Torah is a way of engaging with the stories, ideas and interpretations that have shaped Jewish life for thousands of years.
Three Dates to Dataland
I took three different dates, ages 6, 72 and 35, to see Dataland, the unusual digital art experience in downtown Los Angeles.
Hakol Shalom, All Is Shalom
This is the transcript of the speech Rabbi Dr. Bradley Shavit Artson gave at the 2026 AJU Gala on May 19, 2026.
A Slice of Aussie Heaven for the Jewish Day of Love
A classic Australian dessert chocolate coconut slice features a rich, dense, fudgy chocolate base packed with dried coconut, finished with a thick cocoa frosting and generously dusted with even more coconut.
Recipes that Celebrate Love for Tu b’Av
This roundup has recipes from two matchmakers: one is perfect for a special date night, the other is the perfect representative of lasting love.
Table for Five: Va’etchanan
Secret Sauce
The Haredi Soldiers Caught Between Faith, Family and Country
For decades, the question of Haredi enlistment has remained one of Israel’s most sensitive and unresolved conflicts.
Why Are Jews Not Suing Mamdani for Slander and Defamation?
At the very least, the case would provide a global stage to debunk the genocide lie that is devastating world Jewry.
More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.