The holiday of Purim, which we recently celebrated, tells the classic tale of a Jewish queen, who, with the help of her relative, stops a genocide against her people. We often look at this story through the same lens we did as children, likely encouraged by the parties and costumes and cookies.
But when you really think about it, the Book of Esther has many elements that just don’t make sense. For example, Mordecai tells Esther that a decree has been issued to destroy the Jewish people and that now is the time to reveal her identity as a Jew and champion her nation. Esther responds that going to the king unbidden risks the death penalty unless the king holds out his gold scepter.
Esther hadn’t been called to her husband in the past thirty days, and she asks Mordecai to wait until he calls her next, but Mordecai tells her there’s no time to waste. Esther declares a three-day fast and tells her cousin, “If I perish, I perish” (Esther 4:16). We barely have time to fear for our heroine’s life before we are told that she has found favor in Achashverosh’s eyes, and he asks her, “What is your request? Ask even for half of my kingdom and I will give it to you,” (Esther 5:3).
Of course, we know the end of the story, so we don’t question Esther’s actions, but that line seems like the perfect opening to ask the king to spare the Jews’ lives and put Haman to death. Achashverosh just offered Esther half of the known world. Why does Esther delay her request until a dinner party?
In order to understand Esther’s decision, we must learn more about the king. Achashverosh was born to a poor family but worked his way up through the army until he was offered Vashti — the Babylonian king’s daughter — as a bride. That marriage, however, was famously dysfunctional. Vashti loved to remind Achashverosh that he was only king because of his marriage. Achashverosh became obsessed with solidifying his power over Persia and decided the best way to do this would be to get rid of his wife. But he couldn’t just kill the queen.
Persia had a law that a formal decree from the king cannot be reneged and that anyone who openly disobeyed the king should be put to death. On the final night of a one-hundred-and-eighty-day party, Achashverosh decreed “to bring Queen Vashti before the king wearing a royal crown and display her beauty” (Esther 1:11) to everyone present. This demand seems like the result of drunkenness and misogyny, but when you think about how Achashverosh came to power, his request makes a lot of sense. Either Vashti agrees, publicly submitting to his power, or she doesn’t, thereby securing death. Vashti, of course, refused and was killed, giving Achashverosh all the power.
In addition to his obsession with power, Achashverosh had an obsession with the Jewish people. The Me’am Lo’ez explains that while Achashverosh was still married to Vashti, an astrologer told him that a Jew would succeed him. He thought this meant that the Jews would rebel against him and usurp the throne, rather than the fact that his future son (with Esther) would become king. As a result of Achashverosh’s obsession, Esther conceals her identity to suggest that she has no allegiances to anyone but the king himself.
Esther faces the same dilemma that Diaspora Jews have faced throughout exile. How can she prove herself to be a good and loyal Persian while protecting her own people? That dilemma is why, instead of asking upfront for the king to spare her people, Esther feigns shyness and submission. She sets up a plot to make Haman’s death decree seem like an affront to the throne rather than to the Jewish people, arguing that Haman was trying to take away the king’s beloved wife as well as Mordecai, the man who saved Achashverosh from an assassination plot.
Haman’s accusation against the Jews also plays a role in Esther’s decision. When Haman asks Achashverosh for permission to destroy the Jews, instead of mentioning them by name, he says, “There is a certain nation, scattered and dispersed among the other nations in all the provinces of your kingdom, whose laws are different from any other nation and who do not obey the king’s laws and it is not in Your Majesty’s interest to tolerate them” (Esther 3:8). Haman’s covert accusation was that Jews’ loyalties lay with their own people, rather than with the government.
Haman’s plot comes directly after Mordecai refused to prostrate himself before Haman, in violation of Persian law. This rivalry actually predated the bowing incident; when Haman and Mordecai were both generals in the king’s army, Haman sold himself as a slave to Mordecai after he foolishly wasted all of his soldiers’ supplies. Simply put, Haman’s accusation of dual loyalty was a cover for his own insecurities.
Dual loyalty, unfortunately, is an anti-Semitic conspiracy that still persists to this day. The Anti-Defamation League found that 44% of Americans agree with the statement that Jews stick together more than other Americans, 24% agreed that they are more likely to be loyal to Israel than to America and 12% agreed that Jews do not care what happens to anyone but their own kind. Worldwide surveys produced an even more frightening response, with an estimated 41% of respondents believing that Jews hold more loyalty to Israel than to their own respective countries.
Dual loyalty, unfortunately, is an anti-Semitic conspiracy that still persists to this day.
In American politics, we find Haman reaching out of his grave to reaffirm his disgusting theories. In 2019, when senators worked to combat the anti-Semitic Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement, Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib wrote, “they forgot what country they represent.” When President Joe Biden appointed Anthony Blinken, a Jewish man, as secretary of state, Tlaib rushed to tweet, “So long as he doesn’t suppress my First Amendment right to speak out against Netanyahu’s racist and inhumane policies. The Palestinian people deserve equality and justice.” Apparently she forgot what country she represents, considering she couldn’t stand to see a Jewish man appointed to office without immediately making it about Palestine.
Similarly, in 2019, we saw Congresswoman Ilhan Omar’s famous “It’s all about the Benjamins, baby” tweet, which caused outrage in the Jewish community for its charge of dual loyalty and for reaffirming the trope that all Jews control the world’s finances. One cannot help but be reminded of Haman’s accusation against the Jewish people to Achashverosh.
Before the story in the Megillah, Haman had worked to prevent the rebuilding of the Beit HaMikdash (The Holy Temple) — which would signal the Jews’ ability to return to the Land of Israel — because, he alleged, they would rebel and refuse to pay taxes (Ezra 4:7-16). There is an obvious parallel between the Biblical anti-Semites preventing Jews from returning to their homeland and the ones within our government who aim to do the same.
Haman’s death decree instructed the people of the Persian empire “to destroy, massacre, and exterminate all the Jews… and to plunder their possessions” (Esther 3:13). Rather than the concentration camps of the Holocaust or torture chambers of the Inquisition, Haman knew the best way to get rid of the Jews would be to allow the general population to do it themselves. Jew-haters were given permission to come out of the shadows and act upon their bigotry from the day the decree was issued until the day it went into effect eleven months later. Without access to their homeland and their Temple, Jews were perceived as a weak, easy target. Fortunately, we proved them wrong, but the lesson stands: Anti-Zionism provides a cover and a means for people to express their anti-Semitic views.
Anti-Semitism is a nonsensical monster that is born out of insecurity and baseless hatred. It shapeshifts from generation to generation, but its root never changes. The Megillah allows us to identify this beast and teaches us how to destroy it: through Jewish unity. Haman’s allegation of our being dispersed and scattered was negated as soon as the Jews came together in fast, prayer and self-defense.
We can fight the Hamans of today by coming together in the same way. Remember what Amalek did to you on the way, when you were leaving Egypt. You shall blot out the memory of Amalek from under Heaven. Do not forget.
Hila Oz moved to Israel 7 months ago from Los Angeles after graduating from UCLA, and she’s currently an activist and educator. Follow on her Twitter @toteskosh.
Dual Loyalty: A Tale As Old As Esther
Hila Oz
The holiday of Purim, which we recently celebrated, tells the classic tale of a Jewish queen, who, with the help of her relative, stops a genocide against her people. We often look at this story through the same lens we did as children, likely encouraged by the parties and costumes and cookies.
But when you really think about it, the Book of Esther has many elements that just don’t make sense. For example, Mordecai tells Esther that a decree has been issued to destroy the Jewish people and that now is the time to reveal her identity as a Jew and champion her nation. Esther responds that going to the king unbidden risks the death penalty unless the king holds out his gold scepter.
Esther hadn’t been called to her husband in the past thirty days, and she asks Mordecai to wait until he calls her next, but Mordecai tells her there’s no time to waste. Esther declares a three-day fast and tells her cousin, “If I perish, I perish” (Esther 4:16). We barely have time to fear for our heroine’s life before we are told that she has found favor in Achashverosh’s eyes, and he asks her, “What is your request? Ask even for half of my kingdom and I will give it to you,” (Esther 5:3).
Of course, we know the end of the story, so we don’t question Esther’s actions, but that line seems like the perfect opening to ask the king to spare the Jews’ lives and put Haman to death. Achashverosh just offered Esther half of the known world. Why does Esther delay her request until a dinner party?
In order to understand Esther’s decision, we must learn more about the king. Achashverosh was born to a poor family but worked his way up through the army until he was offered Vashti — the Babylonian king’s daughter — as a bride. That marriage, however, was famously dysfunctional. Vashti loved to remind Achashverosh that he was only king because of his marriage. Achashverosh became obsessed with solidifying his power over Persia and decided the best way to do this would be to get rid of his wife. But he couldn’t just kill the queen.
Persia had a law that a formal decree from the king cannot be reneged and that anyone who openly disobeyed the king should be put to death. On the final night of a one-hundred-and-eighty-day party, Achashverosh decreed “to bring Queen Vashti before the king wearing a royal crown and display her beauty” (Esther 1:11) to everyone present. This demand seems like the result of drunkenness and misogyny, but when you think about how Achashverosh came to power, his request makes a lot of sense. Either Vashti agrees, publicly submitting to his power, or she doesn’t, thereby securing death. Vashti, of course, refused and was killed, giving Achashverosh all the power.
In addition to his obsession with power, Achashverosh had an obsession with the Jewish people. The Me’am Lo’ez explains that while Achashverosh was still married to Vashti, an astrologer told him that a Jew would succeed him. He thought this meant that the Jews would rebel against him and usurp the throne, rather than the fact that his future son (with Esther) would become king. As a result of Achashverosh’s obsession, Esther conceals her identity to suggest that she has no allegiances to anyone but the king himself.
Esther faces the same dilemma that Diaspora Jews have faced throughout exile. How can she prove herself to be a good and loyal Persian while protecting her own people? That dilemma is why, instead of asking upfront for the king to spare her people, Esther feigns shyness and submission. She sets up a plot to make Haman’s death decree seem like an affront to the throne rather than to the Jewish people, arguing that Haman was trying to take away the king’s beloved wife as well as Mordecai, the man who saved Achashverosh from an assassination plot.
Haman’s accusation against the Jews also plays a role in Esther’s decision. When Haman asks Achashverosh for permission to destroy the Jews, instead of mentioning them by name, he says, “There is a certain nation, scattered and dispersed among the other nations in all the provinces of your kingdom, whose laws are different from any other nation and who do not obey the king’s laws and it is not in Your Majesty’s interest to tolerate them” (Esther 3:8). Haman’s covert accusation was that Jews’ loyalties lay with their own people, rather than with the government.
Haman’s plot comes directly after Mordecai refused to prostrate himself before Haman, in violation of Persian law. This rivalry actually predated the bowing incident; when Haman and Mordecai were both generals in the king’s army, Haman sold himself as a slave to Mordecai after he foolishly wasted all of his soldiers’ supplies. Simply put, Haman’s accusation of dual loyalty was a cover for his own insecurities.
Dual loyalty, unfortunately, is an anti-Semitic conspiracy that still persists to this day. The Anti-Defamation League found that 44% of Americans agree with the statement that Jews stick together more than other Americans, 24% agreed that they are more likely to be loyal to Israel than to America and 12% agreed that Jews do not care what happens to anyone but their own kind. Worldwide surveys produced an even more frightening response, with an estimated 41% of respondents believing that Jews hold more loyalty to Israel than to their own respective countries.
In American politics, we find Haman reaching out of his grave to reaffirm his disgusting theories. In 2019, when senators worked to combat the anti-Semitic Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement, Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib wrote, “they forgot what country they represent.” When President Joe Biden appointed Anthony Blinken, a Jewish man, as secretary of state, Tlaib rushed to tweet, “So long as he doesn’t suppress my First Amendment right to speak out against Netanyahu’s racist and inhumane policies. The Palestinian people deserve equality and justice.” Apparently she forgot what country she represents, considering she couldn’t stand to see a Jewish man appointed to office without immediately making it about Palestine.
Similarly, in 2019, we saw Congresswoman Ilhan Omar’s famous “It’s all about the Benjamins, baby” tweet, which caused outrage in the Jewish community for its charge of dual loyalty and for reaffirming the trope that all Jews control the world’s finances. One cannot help but be reminded of Haman’s accusation against the Jewish people to Achashverosh.
Before the story in the Megillah, Haman had worked to prevent the rebuilding of the Beit HaMikdash (The Holy Temple) — which would signal the Jews’ ability to return to the Land of Israel — because, he alleged, they would rebel and refuse to pay taxes (Ezra 4:7-16). There is an obvious parallel between the Biblical anti-Semites preventing Jews from returning to their homeland and the ones within our government who aim to do the same.
Haman’s death decree instructed the people of the Persian empire “to destroy, massacre, and exterminate all the Jews… and to plunder their possessions” (Esther 3:13). Rather than the concentration camps of the Holocaust or torture chambers of the Inquisition, Haman knew the best way to get rid of the Jews would be to allow the general population to do it themselves. Jew-haters were given permission to come out of the shadows and act upon their bigotry from the day the decree was issued until the day it went into effect eleven months later. Without access to their homeland and their Temple, Jews were perceived as a weak, easy target. Fortunately, we proved them wrong, but the lesson stands: Anti-Zionism provides a cover and a means for people to express their anti-Semitic views.
Anti-Semitism is a nonsensical monster that is born out of insecurity and baseless hatred. It shapeshifts from generation to generation, but its root never changes. The Megillah allows us to identify this beast and teaches us how to destroy it: through Jewish unity. Haman’s allegation of our being dispersed and scattered was negated as soon as the Jews came together in fast, prayer and self-defense.
We can fight the Hamans of today by coming together in the same way. Remember what Amalek did to you on the way, when you were leaving Egypt. You shall blot out the memory of Amalek from under Heaven. Do not forget.
Hila Oz moved to Israel 7 months ago from Los Angeles after graduating from UCLA, and she’s currently an activist and educator. Follow on her Twitter @toteskosh.
Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.
Editor's Picks
Israel and the Internet Wars – A Professional Social Media Review
The Invisible Student: A Tale of Homelessness at UCLA and USC
What Ever Happened to the LA Times?
Who Are the Jews On Joe Biden’s Cabinet?
You’re Not a Bad Jewish Mom If Your Kid Wants Santa Claus to Come to Your House
No Labels: The Group Fighting for the Political Center
Latest Articles
Table for Five: Vayera
Route 66 Turns 100: Fall in Chicago, the Mother Road and the Great American Road Trip
Israel Bonds Ceremony, CCFP’s ‘Ambassadors of Peace,’ ‘Letters, Light and Love’
“Art Over Hate”
Everyone by Name – A poem for Parsha Vayera
Hagar’s Oppression is the Source of the Hegira
Print Issue: A Jewish Victory | October 30, 2026
In the face of growing anti-Israel and antisemitic conduct in public schools, the L.A. Unified School District has delivered an important victory for our community.
A Bisl Torah ~ Are You Paying Attention?
Why are we less likely to notice those who are most important?
A Moment in Time: The Israeli Election – Counting Votes, Building Bridges
Rabbis of LA | Rabbi Rembaum on Life Without Fredi
First of two parts
‘You Can See Everything’: Holmes on the Range
In 2026, you don’t expect an American movie – even a documentary – to include an almost Talmudic discussion focusing on the meaning of the word “can.”
Ruby Red Beet Kubbah
If you can’t get to Jerusalem, make a pot of this incredible red kubbah.
A Jewish Victory
In the face of growing anti-Israel and antisemitic conduct in public schools, the Los Angeles Unified School District has delivered an important victory for our community.
Trusting G-d’s Plan ft. Elaine Chaya
Zion Ozeri’s Photographs Reveal the Many Faces of Jewish Identity
His photographs portray Jews shaped by different cultures, histories and traditions while revealing the connections that unite them.
Milken School Opens Jan Koum Campus in Bel Air
The site is now home to Milken’s Upper School, serving students in grades 9 through 12, and expands the school’s footprint across its three campuses to 28 acres.
For Teens, Israel Travel Is Not the End Goal. Jewish Peoplehood Is.
A well-designed Israel experience cannot resolve every question. But it can give young people context, relationships, language, and a sense that they belong to a people and a story larger than themselves.
El-Sayed, Mélenchon, and the Future They Portend
Some have accused me of anti-Muslim bias. Let me answer that plainly: I have none. My issues with El-Sayed would be the same whether he were Jewish, Christian, Hindu or Baha’i.
Unbreakable Blue Thread: Reclaiming Our Past and Our Future
I write to you, all you first and second generations, and I assure you from generations five, six and seven that if we keep doing what we need to do, if we stand together, keep our traditions, educate ourselves in our ancient wisdom, keep Hebrew spoken and sung in our midst, we will not only endure. We Jews will thrive.
Unstuck in the Middle with You
Kwall, the Raymond P. Niro Law Professor at DePaul University College of Law, argues for a center defined by enough common commitments to make communal life possible.
Sewage Without Borders
Israel’s water security depends on what flows into the sea on the other side of all of them, and our water policy should start from that reality.
Torah Portion: Vayera
The parsha ends with the binding of Isaac, the Akeida, probably the darkest chapter in the entire Torah.
Gene Lichtenstein, August 15, 1930-October 18, 2026
Mr. Lichtenstein edited the Jewish Journal of Los Angeles from 1986 until 2000.
Let Them Talk
If we want our younger generations to love our faith, our culture, and our peoplehood, we need to be welcoming when they show interest and have a spark of curiosity.
A Wild and Improbable Story Hits Israel
It turns out that claim about Israel being a democracy wasn’t just propaganda. The two million Arabs who live in the world’s only Jewish state really do have the power to vote.
Why I Came to Vote in Israel
My journey to the ballot box was circuitous. The path I hope Israel will follow is derech Adonai: the way of righteousness and justice.
More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.