fbpx

Human Rights Legal Group Alleges That 9/11 Webinar Could Put SFSU, Rutgers in Violation of Anti-Terror Laws

Russell Shalev, an advocate at the ILF, wrote in the letter to the universities that the event, titled “Whose Narrative? 20 Years Since 9/11/2001,” is being co-sponsored by SFSU’s Arab and Muslim Ethnicities and Diaspora (AMED) Studies Department as well as by Rutgers’ Center for Security, Race and Rights.
[additional-authors]
September 10, 2021
Sundry Photography / Getty Images

The International Legal Forum (ILF), an Israel-based legal group, alleged in a September 9 letter that a September 11 webinar is featuring speakers that would put San Francisco State University (SFSU) and Rutgers University in violation of federal anti-terror laws.

Russell Shalev, an advocate at the ILF, wrote in the letter to the universities that the event, titled “Whose Narrative? 20 Years Since 9/11/2001,” is being co-sponsored by SFSU’s Arab and Muslim Ethnicities and Diaspora (AMED) Studies Department as well as by Rutgers’ Center for Security, Race and Rights. The virtual event “includes speakers who have been convicted of terror and /or are affiliated with U.S. designated terror groups, as well as organizations who have incited violence and racial hatred,” Shalev wrote. He cited Dr. Sami Al-Arian as one example, noting that Al-Arian was deported from the United States to Turkey in 2015 after being convicted of having ties to the Palestinian Islamic Jihad terror group. Al-Arian also heads Istanbul Zaim University’s Center for Islam and Global Affairs (CIGA), which held a conference featuring speakers with ties to Hamas, according Shalev.

Shalev also noted that the event will feature UC Berkeley Professor Hatem Bazian, the co-founder of Students for Justice in Palestine and American Muslims for Palestine who has once called for an intifada, or armed uprising, in the United States. Additionally, one of the co-sponsors of the event is the Palestinian Youth Movement, which calls “for the liberation of Palestine through armed resistance, violence, and terror,” Shalev wrote.

He added that moving forward with this event could put the universities in violation of anti-terror laws prohibiting “material support” for terror, arguing that the Supreme Court has defined “material support” as “advocacy performed in coordination with, or at the direction of, a foreign terrorist organization.”

“It is simply inconceivable, outrageous and inexcusable that your universities would in any way be associated with the forthcoming event this Saturday, especially on the 20th anniversary of 9-11, with individuals who have inextricable ties to terrorist organizations that have carried out attacks against American citizens and civilians around the world,” Shalev wrote. “Furthermore, both SFSU and Rutgers have among its students those who have been affected directly by terrorism in the United States and worldwide, or have lost loved ones in September 11. Such an event puts their safety and wellbeing in danger.”

Kent Bravo, SFSU Media Relations Specialist, said in a statement to the Journal that the event “is not being hosted by SF State. The University supports the academic freedom of our faculty to engage in intellectual debate and express individual viewpoints without fear of retaliation or censorship.” Rutgers and AMED did not respond to the Journal’s requests for comment.

In September 2020, SFSU AMED was scheduled to host a webinar featuring Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) member Leila Khaled until Zoom, Facebook and YouTube deplatformed it. Khaled, now 76, was among the terrorists who hijacked commercial jetliners in 1969 and ’70. Her attempt to detonate grenades on the 1970 flight were thwarted and no one was injured or killed in either incident. A spokesperson for Zoom had announced at the time that they determined the Khaled event did not comply with their terms of service, citing Khaled’s “reported affiliation or membership in a U.S. designated foreign terrorist organization.”

Other speakers scheduled for the September 11 webinar include SFSU AMED Professor Rabab Abdulhadi, Rutgers Journalism Professor Dr. Deepa Kumar, Desis Rising Up and Moving Executive Director Fahd Ahmed, Wilfrid Laurie University Sociology and Muslim Studies Professor Dr. Jasmin Zine, UC Santa Barbara Sociology Professor Dr. Lisa Hajjar, Lebanese American University Lecturer Rania Masri, former South African Intelligence Minister Ronnie Kasrils and Palestinian Youth Movement Women’s Committee Chair Yazan Zahzah. The webinar will be moderated by UCLA’s Gary B. Nash and Endowed Chair in U.S. History Dr. Robin D.G. Kelley.

Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.

Editor's Picks

Latest Articles

A Bisl Torah — All Over Again

Repenting includes examining and admitting our mistakes. Seeking forgiveness. Determining to do better. Being better. Every single day.

Hanging Out at the Jewish American Summit

Among the speakers, Adam Milstein, a real estate investor, philanthropist and co-founder of the fast-growing Impact Forum, urged attendees to frame antisemitism as an American issue and not just a Jewish issue.

A Festive French Roast

One of my favorite things to cook for the Jewish holidays is a beautiful French roast. It’s so very festive and is perfect to feed a hungry crowd.

The Genius of the Marx Brothers

Like the greatest satirists, such as Jonathan Swift and Mark Twain, they chose comedy over accusation to mock the folly of society and add levity to dark times. But their aim was not levity alone.

AKLA Rises

From a Local Experiment to a National Program: AKLA Expands Its Vision for Jewish Teens

Better Kisser Than a Cook

Sometimes love arrives ahead of you, in spite of you. Cooking slowly became a way of being there for the people I love. A wordless language that says: I see you. I hear you. You’re worth the onion-chopping.

Israel’s Brain-Drain Debate Is Asking the Wrong Question

If an experienced professional with rare expertise leaves Israel, the impact cannot be understood simply by adding another person to a brain-drain statistic. The more relevant question is how many people with comparable experience remain, how essential that expertise is and how easily it can be rebuilt.

More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.