And so, Netanyahu is out. Finally out. He was ousted as Prime Minister a few weeks ago, but on Saturday night the act of vacating the PM’s House was completed. The residence on Jerusalem’s Balfour Street is waiting for its new occupant (one that has no intention to live there— Bennett keeps his home in Raanana, not wishing to uproot his family from where they reside). For some Israelis, this symbolic act was akin to a king vacating his palace following a dethrone. For others, it merited barely a shrug. Netanyahu lost, Netanyahu must leave, Netanyahu leaves—what’s the big deal?
He left after midnight, and still, a few demonstrators were there to cheer his departure. It is probably hard for him to detach himself from a position he occupied for a dozen years, but often it seems as if his rivals have similar difficulty. They cannot detach themselves from the long battle to oust Netanyahu. They cannot just go home and relax. Like soldiers who refuse to believe that the fight is over, and remain in the jungles, preparing for their next attack, Netanyahu’s most committed foes are on the watch for his return.
Like soldiers who refuse to believe that the fight is over, and remain in the jungles, preparing for their next attack, Netanyahu’s most committed foes are on the watch for his return.
He certainly plans on returning, and certainly hasn’t lost his chance of returning. As the opposition leader, Netanyahu dedicated his first few weeks to causing as much trouble as he could to the coalition, and had a few legislative successes. On the other hand, his unrelenting presence is also the most effective glue for those wanting to keep the coalition together. He is the one whose presence legitimizes a vote by an Arab party for a law that Arab Israelis abhor, a silence of a leftist party amid a compromise with the settlers, a rightwing acquiescence when ideology prevent the coalition from passing what the right deem crucial legislation. He, Netanyahu, makes all these compromises and concessions possible.
He could withdraw and let the coalition begin its inevitable process of erosion. But he does not do it, because of internal political calculation. As long as he is active, as long as he is engaged in a fierce fight, it is difficult for his Likud rivals, who patiently awaited their turn, to mount an effective coup against him. For him, that’s the real challenge. Neither Bennett, nor Lapid nor Gantz could be the ones who steal his voters away. If Israel goes into another round of election, in a year, or two, or three, Netanyahu’s challenge is to still be there, as head of Likud. Surely, a personal triumph in another round is far from guaranteed, but it is possible. It is possible—as long as Netanyahu is there.
In the meantime, Israelis begin to get used to the title “Prime Minister” attached to a different person. After such a long time, this is not easy. There are grown-ups in Israel who have no memory of a PM other than “PM Netanyahu.” They are also getting used to the title being attached to a person without much political power, and without an ability to make decisions on his own. Netanyahu was revered and feared by his partners, and could fly solo when he felt a need to do such thing. Bennett has to be the cooperator in chief, and conductor of an orchestra of many soloists, each having an ego as large as his, each having an instrument without which no melody can be played. Thus, there is a constant need for everybody to forget, forgive and accept their limited ability to control the other players. Bennett decided to demolish a house of a terrorist without telling Foreign Minister Lapid in advance. Lapid was not happy with this decision, but what can he do? Finance Minister Lieberman revoked the eligibility of Haredis studying full-time in yeshiva for childcare subsidies. Bennett and Saar weren’t pleased with this decision. But what can they do?
A government of constant compromise looks like this: when possible, the ministers compromise. When impossible, the boldest and most invested leader makes a decision, and the others must accept it. In other words: the less one worries about the government falling, the more leverage one has over his partners. Lieberman does not seem to worry much—he has a stable constituency and a winning agenda (anti-Haredi) on which to rely. So, he is very powerful. Bennett must worry, as he is left with few voters and no natural constituency. So, even though he carries around the title of “Prime Minister” he is less powerful.
Still, everybody within the coalition is careful not to overplay his or her hand. Courtesy of Netanyahu, the coalition has a tank filled with fuel to burn. On Saturday, Netanyahu evacuated the Balfour Street residence, but not yet the consciences of Israelis. He still resides in our minds. He still occupies a space in the minds of the Ministers and the Knesset Members who together constitute one of the most bizarre coalitions ever to materialize. Netanyahu is no longer on Balfour Street. But Netanyahu is still in our heads.
Shmuel Rosner is an Israeli columnist, editor, and researcher. He is the editor of the research and data-journalism website themadad.com, and is the political editor of the Jewish Journal.
Netanyahu Evacuated “Balfour,” But is Still in Our Heads
Shmuel Rosner
And so, Netanyahu is out. Finally out. He was ousted as Prime Minister a few weeks ago, but on Saturday night the act of vacating the PM’s House was completed. The residence on Jerusalem’s Balfour Street is waiting for its new occupant (one that has no intention to live there— Bennett keeps his home in Raanana, not wishing to uproot his family from where they reside). For some Israelis, this symbolic act was akin to a king vacating his palace following a dethrone. For others, it merited barely a shrug. Netanyahu lost, Netanyahu must leave, Netanyahu leaves—what’s the big deal?
He left after midnight, and still, a few demonstrators were there to cheer his departure. It is probably hard for him to detach himself from a position he occupied for a dozen years, but often it seems as if his rivals have similar difficulty. They cannot detach themselves from the long battle to oust Netanyahu. They cannot just go home and relax. Like soldiers who refuse to believe that the fight is over, and remain in the jungles, preparing for their next attack, Netanyahu’s most committed foes are on the watch for his return.
He certainly plans on returning, and certainly hasn’t lost his chance of returning. As the opposition leader, Netanyahu dedicated his first few weeks to causing as much trouble as he could to the coalition, and had a few legislative successes. On the other hand, his unrelenting presence is also the most effective glue for those wanting to keep the coalition together. He is the one whose presence legitimizes a vote by an Arab party for a law that Arab Israelis abhor, a silence of a leftist party amid a compromise with the settlers, a rightwing acquiescence when ideology prevent the coalition from passing what the right deem crucial legislation. He, Netanyahu, makes all these compromises and concessions possible.
He could withdraw and let the coalition begin its inevitable process of erosion. But he does not do it, because of internal political calculation. As long as he is active, as long as he is engaged in a fierce fight, it is difficult for his Likud rivals, who patiently awaited their turn, to mount an effective coup against him. For him, that’s the real challenge. Neither Bennett, nor Lapid nor Gantz could be the ones who steal his voters away. If Israel goes into another round of election, in a year, or two, or three, Netanyahu’s challenge is to still be there, as head of Likud. Surely, a personal triumph in another round is far from guaranteed, but it is possible. It is possible—as long as Netanyahu is there.
In the meantime, Israelis begin to get used to the title “Prime Minister” attached to a different person. After such a long time, this is not easy. There are grown-ups in Israel who have no memory of a PM other than “PM Netanyahu.” They are also getting used to the title being attached to a person without much political power, and without an ability to make decisions on his own. Netanyahu was revered and feared by his partners, and could fly solo when he felt a need to do such thing. Bennett has to be the cooperator in chief, and conductor of an orchestra of many soloists, each having an ego as large as his, each having an instrument without which no melody can be played. Thus, there is a constant need for everybody to forget, forgive and accept their limited ability to control the other players. Bennett decided to demolish a house of a terrorist without telling Foreign Minister Lapid in advance. Lapid was not happy with this decision, but what can he do? Finance Minister Lieberman revoked the eligibility of Haredis studying full-time in yeshiva for childcare subsidies. Bennett and Saar weren’t pleased with this decision. But what can they do?
A government of constant compromise looks like this: when possible, the ministers compromise. When impossible, the boldest and most invested leader makes a decision, and the others must accept it. In other words: the less one worries about the government falling, the more leverage one has over his partners. Lieberman does not seem to worry much—he has a stable constituency and a winning agenda (anti-Haredi) on which to rely. So, he is very powerful. Bennett must worry, as he is left with few voters and no natural constituency. So, even though he carries around the title of “Prime Minister” he is less powerful.
Still, everybody within the coalition is careful not to overplay his or her hand. Courtesy of Netanyahu, the coalition has a tank filled with fuel to burn. On Saturday, Netanyahu evacuated the Balfour Street residence, but not yet the consciences of Israelis. He still resides in our minds. He still occupies a space in the minds of the Ministers and the Knesset Members who together constitute one of the most bizarre coalitions ever to materialize. Netanyahu is no longer on Balfour Street. But Netanyahu is still in our heads.
Shmuel Rosner is an Israeli columnist, editor, and researcher. He is the editor of the research and data-journalism website themadad.com, and is the political editor of the Jewish Journal.
Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.
Editor's Picks
Israel and the Internet Wars – A Professional Social Media Review
The Invisible Student: A Tale of Homelessness at UCLA and USC
What Ever Happened to the LA Times?
Who Are the Jews On Joe Biden’s Cabinet?
You’re Not a Bad Jewish Mom If Your Kid Wants Santa Claus to Come to Your House
No Labels: The Group Fighting for the Political Center
Latest Articles
How the World Cup Makes Boredom Look Good
No Wars for Jews
One Wedding, a Heatwave, Fireworks and a Eulogy
In His Fourth of July Speech, Mamdani Asks Everything of America and Nothing of Americans
What Jews Can Celebrate About America, and What America Can Celebrate About Jews
Rabbis of LA | Rabbis Camras and Vogel Will Not Go Quietly
Mem Global Participant’s Jewish Journey, Hebrew Union College Program Honored
Notable people and events in the Jewish LA community.
Archbishop of Canterbury Embraces Supporters of Killers of Christians
To judge by the photos and remarks she posted on her website, she spent a good deal of time in the company of two supporters of a terrorist group—and had only praise for them.
Grateful Are We
An American Jewish Declaration for America’s 250th
Shabbat Shalom, America
In the midst of our parties and barbeques, Shabbat is God’s birthday present to America to remind us that we still live in the greatest country on earth.
The Pinchas Vigilante Roll Call — A poem for Parsha Pinchas
I’m a rule follower. So when the Book says find an unblemished red cow that’s all I want to do.
A Moment in Time: What We Cannot See
Why Is it that the Better We Diagnose Anti-Semitism, the Worse it Gets?
For a people obsessed with fixing problems, it’s disheartening to think that our tireless efforts at diagnosing and understanding the biggest threats against Jews are not making a difference.
A Bisl Torah — Go Out Before Them
No matter if we assign ourselves the title of leader, we each lead in some respect, whether it’s leading as a parent, a supervisor, a friend, or a member of our neighborhoods.
Balaam’s Metaphorical Ass
For America’s 250th Birthday, Jewish Journal Launches E-book “250 Reasons to Thank America”
In our newly-released e-book, we express our gratitude again and again and again, for big ideas and small touches.
Print Issue: What Happened to Loving Our Country? | July 3, 2026
What a gangbuster quarter millennium of a résumé America has assembled. Much to be proud of, and, yet… far too few Americans are lining up to blow out the candles.
From Los Angeles to Jerusalem: Dorraine Weiss Built a New Life in Israel at 62
Today, with several of her grandsons serving in the IDF, she believes there is no other place she would rather be.
A Baharat Scented T’bit
This recipe is traditional and personal at the same time, which feels fitting.
Red, White and Blue Dairy Treats for Your Fourth of July Celebration
These delicious red, white and blue dairy desserts make it worth going parve for your Independence Day barbecue or picnic.
Table for Five: Pinchas
Women’s Rights
Mel Brooks Turns 100, AFI Bumps ‘Blazing Saddles’ to Top of Comedy List
Brooks has spent his career making large targets look small: Nazis, tyrants, bigots, Hollywood annoyances, studio logic, bad taste, good taste and, now, age.
The Limitations of a Housing Act and Two Practical Solutions
America’s housing crisis demands more than incremental turns. By doubling capital gains relief and launching the T.E.A.C.H. Homes Program, policymakers can inject immediate momentum into a market desperately needing it.
What Does the Rise of Democratic Socialists Mean for Jews and Democrats?
The DSA has shown that being anti-Israel, even if a candidate lacks experience, is enough to win.
Remembering Little Big Horn 150 Years Later as Historians, not Prosecutors or Priests
Today, for Americans and Jews, the Battle of Little Big Horn has relevance and resonance.
Rosner’s Domain | Savior No More
The greater the expectation, the sharper the disappointment.
More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.