fbpx

EU Human Rights Court Fines France for Convicting Boycott Israel Activists of Hate Crime

[additional-authors]
June 11, 2020
BLACKTOWN, AUSTRALIA – FEBRUARY 14: An auctioneer’s gavel is seen prior to the home auction for a four-bedroom house at 230 Blacktown Road on February 14, 2015 in Blacktown, Australia. The Blacktown home sold for AUD$565,000 at auction today, smashing the reserve set at AUD$1. The Sydney home auction clearance rate is expected to remain high following the Reserve Bank’s interest rate cut to 2.25 per cent last week. (Photo by Mark Metcalfe/Getty Images)

(JTA) — A European court for human rights issues fined French authorities for their penal action against demonstrators who called for a boycott against Israel.

The binding ruling Thursday by the European Court of Human Rights was a rebuke of a French law from 2003 and subsequent judicial policy that treats calling for a boycott of Israel, or any other nation, as hate speech because it incites to discrimination.

The case brought before the European court concerns about a dozen protesters who called for a boycott of Israel outside a supermarket on two occasions in 2009 and 2010 in Mulhouse, in eastern France.

Eleven members of the group Collectif Palestine 68 were convicted of inciting hate or discrimination and fined. They appealed the conviction nt the European court, which fined the French government $8,383 per demonstrator convicted and another $22,720 collectively for their legal fees, AFP reported.

The demonstrators initially were cleared of the charges after they argued they had a right to call to boycott Israel as part of the freedom of speech. But prosecutors appealed that acquittal and an appeals court found the demonstrators guilty, prompting them to appeal to the European court in 2010.

The Strasbourg-based European court ruled the demonstrators cannot be accused of hate speech because “the applicants had not been convicted of making racist or antisemitic remarks or of inciting hatred or violence.”

The 2003 law known as the Lellouche Law, after Pierre Lellouche, the Jewish lawmaker who submitted it, states that inciting to boycott any country is a form of incitement to hate or discrimination.

CRIF, the umbrella group of French Jewish communities, wrote in a statement that it “regrets” the ruling.

“I fear this ruling’s consequence will be a major increase in hateful speech against French Jews,” CRIF President Francis Kalifat wrote.

Marco Perolini of Amnesty France praised the ruling.

“Today’s landmark decision sets a significant precedent that should stop the misuse of anti-discrimination laws to target activists campaigning against human rights violations perpetrated by Israel against Palestinians,” Perolini said in a statement.

Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.

Editor's Picks

Latest Articles

The False Arguments Against Israel

At a time when antisemitism is on the rise, greater precision, nuance and responsibility in public discourse are not only warranted — they are essential.

Why Jews Fly into a War Zone

The counterintuitive pull that has drawn Jews to Israel over the past two and a half years is a curious phenomenon.

The Clock Is Ticking in Iran

By avoiding the difficult choices he now confronts, Trump has managed to delay a commitment that may ultimately define the war’s trajectory and outcome.

Gavin’s New Jewish Groove

Newsom’s newfound sensitivity to Jewish concerns and reclaiming of the moderate mantle is commendable. Now all he needs is for the Angel of Death to “pass over” the Democratic Party.

Harvard’s New Jewish Problem

The university is so worried that the dean of admissions and financial aid, William Fitzsimmons, announced that he will be making a special effort to target potential students in Jewish day schools.

More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.