fbpx

September 17, 2026

Listen — A poem for Parsha Ha’Azinu

Ha’Azinu — listen (Deuteronomy 32:1-52)

Listen –
Moses is about to sing a song
and up ’til now, he’s just been talking.
The times are changing and
all the kids are listening to music
so you’ll understand his format change.

Listen –
Moses is going out like a rock star.
Pay attention to the phrase going out.
It’s his last day on Earth.
It’s not an exaggeration.

Listen – closely …
It’s not a sing-along, but he is
expecting us to repeat after him.
He wants us to repeat these words
forever.

Listen –
All mistakes and triumphs are in these words.
Learn what you can because when he’s done
he’s exiting stage mountain.
There will be no encore.

Listen –
He really wants you to listen.
And so does the One with the
Unpronounceable Name.
The Source of all the words.
The One who gave you ears.
The one who invented the word
listen.


Rick Lupert, a poet, songleader and graphic designer, is the author of 30 books including “Begin the Beget” and “God Wrestler: A Poem for Every Torah Portion.” Visit him at www.JewishPoetry.net

Listen — A poem for Parsha Ha’Azinu Read More »

When Celebrities Endorsed a Different “Free Palestine”

The rapper Macklemore is not the first cultural celebrity to champion the cause of “Free Palestine.” But when many of America’s leading celebrities called for a “Free Palestine” eighty years ago this week, they were talking about freeing Palestine from British occupation, in order to establish a Jewish state.

The pro-Zionist play “A Flag is Born” debuted on Broadway in September 1946, starring a sensational young actor named Marlon Brando. The play was organized by the American League for a Free Palestine (AFLP), a political action committee better known as the Bergson Group.

Hundreds of thousands of Holocaust survivors were languishing in postwar Europe in the autumn of 1946, and the British were preventing them from reaching the Holy Land. Academy Award-winning screen writer Ben Hecht authored “A Flag is Born” to promote the cause of Jewish immigration and statehood.

The story centers on two survivors who, in a Jewish cemetery in Europe, encounter a young Zionist on his way to fight for a free Palestine—a free Jewish Palestine. In a series of emotional conversations, they talk about the biblical Jewish kingdoms, the ages-old Jewish yearning to return to the Holy Land, and the British suppression of Jewish freedom.

Brando, 22, played David, the young man. Paul Muni and Celia Adler, stars of the Yiddish theater, played the elderly couple, Tevya and Zelda. Stella Adler, the statuesque actress and acting coach, was the narrator.

In the stirring final scene, Tevya collapses and dies. David takes the prayer shawl covering his body and fashions it into a Zionist flag, symbolizing the rebirth of Jewish nationhood after the Holocaust.

“When the Zionist flag was raised in the final scene, with Kurt Weill’s music in the background, it sent a chill through the audience,” the late Miriam Chaikin, author and Bergson Group activist, told me. “It sounded a note of hope, it stirred feelings of pride and strength that had lain dormant in Jewish hearts for too long.”

Chaikin said her brother Joseph, later the founder of New York City’s famous Open Theater, was inspired to go into acting and directing after accompanying her to a performance of “Flag.”

As a gesture of solidarity, Brando and his colleagues performed in “A Flag is Born” for the minimum Actors’ Guild wage. Brando championed the Jewish cause offstage, too. He became, as he put it, “a kind of traveling salesman” for the ALFP, giving speeches around the country about the international community’s abandonment of the Jews during the Holocaust and the need for a Jewish state.

Brando was just one of many stars of stage and screen who were active in the American League for a Free Palestine. Among those whose names appeared on the many full-page newspaper ads that the AFLP sponsored, or who took part in the group’s other activities, were:

— comedians Harpo Marx, Carl Reiner, Jerry Lewis, Sid Caesar and Phil Silvers;

— actors Vincent Price, Jimmy Durante, Charles Blackmer (“The Great Gatsby”), Cedric Hardwicke(“The Ten Commandments”), Canada Lee (“Cry, the Beloved Country”), Harry Davenport (“Gone With the Wind”), and Katherine Warren (“The Big Sleep”);

— singers Frank Sinatra and Dean Martin, pianist Vladimir Horowitz, and conductor Leonard Bernstein;

— David O. Selznick, producer of “Gone With the Wind”; Edward Buzzell, director of the Marx Brothers movies; and famed Broadway producer Max Gordon.

The British hated “A Flag is Born.” The London Evening Standard  called it “the most virulent anti-British play ever staged in the United States.” American audiences felt differently. Due to popular demand, the four-week opening run at Manhattan’s Alvin Theater (today known as the Neil Simon Theater) was extended to ten weeks.

“Flag” then hit the road for performances in Philadelphia, Boston, Chicago, and Baltimore. The latter became the subject of controversy when the theater tried to restrict African-Americans to the balcony. The ALFP and the local NAACP teamed up to force the Baltimore theater management to drop its discriminatory policy.

Exuberant NAACP leaders hailed that “tradition-shattering victory” and used it facilitate the desegregation of other Baltimore theaters in the years to follow. Hecht said the fact that it was a pro-Zionist play which dealt a blow to racism in America proved that “to fight injustice to one group of human beings affords protection to every other group.”

There was a time when America’s leading cultural luminaries understood that Jews should be included among the minorities who deserve justice. Today, sadly, too many celebrities seem to believe that fighting injustice requires annihilating the one, tiny Jewish state and replacing it with a twenty-third Arab dictatorship.


Dr. Medoff is founding director of The David S. Wyman Institute for Holocaust Studies and author of more than 20 books about Jewish history and the Holocaust. Follow him on Facebook to read his daily commentaries on the news.

When Celebrities Endorsed a Different “Free Palestine” Read More »

A Bisl Yom Kippur~ Plenty of Regrets

We have grown accustomed to the guidance, “Live with no regrets.” But I’m not sure that is possible or even advisable. Throughout our personal and communal journeys, we disappoint, we hurt, we make mistakes. Sometimes, apologies are easy to extend, some much harder. We look back and wonder how we might have done things differently, and often, that is when regret finds room within our hearts to settle in.

However, this isn’t necessarily a negative thing.

Daniel Pink, author of “The Power of Regret,” believes having regrets leads us on a more positive pathway forward.  He writes, “Leaning into regret improves our decision-making process—because the stab of negativity slows us down.” Meaning, if we regret the way we spoke with someone, we will take more time in the future to weigh out our words. If we regret a financial decision, we will be more careful with the ways we spend our money. If we regret spending time in one area of life versus another, we will meticulously plan out our days with a sense of meaning and precision. Having regrets, if utilized wisely, may lead us to make better, kinder, more productive connections, commitments, and choices.

Rabbi Mordecai Finley writes, “Defending ourselves by saying ‘I know I’m no angel’ and ‘I’m not saying I’m perfect’ are ways to avoid saying, simply, ‘I did something wrong.’” He continues, “I think if we do teshuvah correctly, we can feel distinctly uncomfortable in our own skins for a period of time.” In other words, it can be the discomfort of regret which leads us to spend more time with those we love, examine our purpose and how we are making a positive impact, or determine a different path to walk upon.

Yom Kippur isn’t about having no regrets. Yom Kippur is admitting our plentiful regrets and summoning and building our inner determination and drive to be better people, regrets, and all.

G’mar chatimah tovah


Rabbi Nicole Guzik is senior rabbi at Sinai Temple. She can be reached at her Facebook page at Rabbi Nicole Guzik or on Instagram @rabbiguzik. For more writings, visit Rabbi Guzik’s blog section from Sinai Temple’s website.

A Bisl Yom Kippur~ Plenty of Regrets Read More »

A Moment in Time: The Sound of Now

Dear all,

Maya and Eli joined me on the bimah during our Shofar Service on Rosh Hashanah. As Jerry sounded the ancient call, we experienced a layered combination of awe, inspiration, and a little giddiness. There is something about the sound of the ram’s horn that both transports us back to Sinai and carries us forward toward new possibilities.

That is why the shofar is such a powerful symbol of this time of year. We reach back to reflect on the choices we have made. We look ahead and commit ourselves to doing better tomorrow.

But perhaps most important, the shofar wakes us up today.

It reminds us that we cannot change the past, and we cannot know what tomorrow will bring. But this moment—this magnificent moment in our lives—is ours. And we have the opportunity, right now, to make a difference.

So as the echoes of the shofar fade, perhaps the question is simply:

What will you do with this moment in time?

Gamar Chatima Tova, may you be sealed with goodness in the Book of Life!

Rabbi Zachary R. Shapiro

A Moment in Time: The Sound of Now Read More »

Enigmatic End: the Penultimate Song in the Torah

When from enigmas we make variations
we wrap them into mysteries
unsolved by exegetic explanations
based on the various histories
of those who by enigmas have been wired,
because our variations change
enigmas into mysteries inspired
by sounds of the familiar made strange.
A dog’s bark hardly loses its enigma
when Elgar proves he can embellish
the noise, but does not turn into kerygma
by sounding musical, not hellish,

but Israel is described poetically in a Deuteronomic  verse
as a nation whose spilt blood will be by God atoned
by His inheritance, this land, avenging, in a line obscure and terse,
blood shed by Israel’s foes who  for ages have their right to live in peace disowned.

In “Haazinu: The Song’s Enigmatic Climax,” thetorah.com, Zev Farber discusses the puzzling last line of Haazinu, the penultimate poem in Deuteronomy:

The final phrase of Haazinu (Deut 32:43) in the MT, וכפר אדמתו עמו, “and he will atone for his land, his people,” is difficult to parse. The textual variants from Qumran, the Samaritan Pentateuch, and the Septuagint offer a clearer, if more dismal, understanding of the phrase. Before Moses goes up the mountain to die, he is told to teach the people a song, Haazinu (Deut 32:1-43), presented as a record of YHWH predicting what would happen to Israel in the future. As a poem written in archaic Hebrew, Haazinu is very difficult. Its difficulty is reflected in the many textual variants of Haazinu found between the Masoretic Text (MT), the Samaritan Pentateuch (SP), the Septuagint (LXX), and several Qumran fragments that preserve additional textual variants not found in any of the three standard versions.

Deut. 32:43 states:

הַרְנִינוּ גוֹיִם עַמּוֹ,  {ס}  כִּי דַם-עֲבָדָיו יִקּוֹם;  {ר}  וְנָקָם יָשִׁיב לְצָרָיו,  {ס}  וְכִפֶּר אַדְמָתוֹ עַמּוֹ.  32;43 Sing aloud, O ye nations, of His people; for He doth avenge the blood of His servants, and doth render vengeance to His adversaries, vekhiper admato amo, and doth make expiation for the land of His people.

I suggest that the last three Hebrew words of this poem identify the people of Israel as God’s chosen land that He bestowed to them. This suggestion is supported by my interpretation of Deut. 32:9:

כִּ֛י חֵ֥לֶק יְהֹוָ֖ה עַמּ֑וֹ  יַעֲקֹ֖ב חֶ֥בֶל נַחֲלָתֽוֹ׃
For the ETERNAL’s portion is his people; Jacob, God’s own hevel, Jacob the lot of His inheritance.

I interpret this verse as a declaration that the people of Israel who dwelt in the land but shed their blood in its defense should be regarded as the land that YHWH has chosen to bestow on Israel, as their inheritance. The words hevel nahalato identify the nation of Israel as the victim of destruction, — a meaning of the word haval in Mic. 2:10 — and applied to the territory of death in the Psalms, Ps. 116:3, and the territory of sheol in Ps.18:6.

Midrashically, I add here that the word hevel can be read as “alas,” anachronistically synonymous with the meaning of the modern Hebrew word haval, “alas.”


Gershon Hepner is a poet who has written over 25,000 poems on subjects ranging from music to literature, politics to Torah. He grew up in England and moved to Los Angeles in 1976. Using his varied interests and experiences, he has authored dozens of papers in medical and academic journals, and authored “Legal Friction: Law, Narrative, and Identity Politics in Biblical Israel.” He can be reached at gershonhepner@gmail.com.

Enigmatic End: the Penultimate Song in the Torah Read More »

Print Issue: Renewing American Jewry | September 18, 2026

CLICK HERE FOR FULLSCREEN VERSION

Print Issue: Renewing American Jewry | September 18, 2026 Read More »

Expanding the Soul

In my Rosh HaShanah column last week, I taught that suffering often compels us to change. If you have a conscience, you want to change because you cause suffering in others. If you have a soul, you will want to reduce the suffering others cause you and also reduce your own self-inflicted inner suffering. Many people have both conscience and a soul.

No spiritual tradition addresses suffering as directly as Buddhism. My paraphrase of Buddhism’s Four Noble Truths is: Life involves suffering. We suffer because we want some intractable reality to change. There is a way out of suffering. Here is the path (the Eightfold Path)

The key word is “want.”

We know that some difficult realities will not change. But when the difficult reality is a person who matters to us, there usually remains at least an ember of hope that they might change. We often feel qualified to effect that change in others. 

Let us assume that your desire for this person to change has some validity — that an impartial observer would agree that change is necessary. Often people refuse to change because they do not want to endure the painful path of transformation, or even the discomfort of apologizing. They are avoiding suffering. They will let you suffer so that they will not have to.  

A key feature of the Jewish Eightfold Path is the Days of Awe. Rosh Hashanah tells us to stop the suffering you cause others. The journey though the Days of Awe is a major guilt trip. Words such as “sin” abound. This is a guilt trip in a good sense. We might call the Days of Awe a journey of accountability. If we take these days seriously, especially as reflected in the liturgy, we must at least face ourselves.

Have I been unable to change? Stubborn? Thoughtless? Perhaps even mean?

The liturgy tells us that God knows and that we will not get away with it. I have my doubts about that last part, but who knows?

Who by fire, and who by water?

We are at Shabbat Shuva, the fulcrum between Rosh HaShanah and Yom Kippur, the movement from morality to spirituality. 

I do not think the desire for reality to be different is the sole cause of inner suffering. The desire to suffer less is certainly present, but it is not necessarily the root of the pain.

I once compiled a list of 20 ego states associated with inner suffering: anger, resentment, guilt, shame, victimhood, fear, lack of meaning, lack of fulfillment, the compulsion to accommodate others and the desperate need to be understood.

Some of these states are forms of defense. Sometimes they are ways of defending our hearts.

This suffering should not be understood merely as something that happens to us, like a painful tooth that sends us to the dentist. At a certain point, suffering can begin to organize our character. It becomes symbolic of something deeper taking place within us.

Often, that deeper reality is grief.

We can learn adaptive skills that help us cope, and those skills have real value. Yet beneath them, the suffering may continue to simmer.

Here is an image that has been useful to me: the expansion of the soul.

An unhealed wound can produce pain that spreads throughout the entire system of our inner life. We may not be able to remove the wound. We may not even fully understand it. But we can enlarge the life surrounding it.

When we expand the soul, the size of the wound is proportionately diminished.

Insight alone rarely produces change, at least not quickly. Understanding the source of our suffering is important, but understanding is not transformation. More durable change requires growth of character — the gradual expansion of the soul around the wound.

You have heard me say, perhaps many times, that personality is roughly what we were born with. Character is what we do with it.

How, then, do we expand the soul?

Here is a starting place:  Clown around. Have a good time. Look forward to something every day. Don’t take yourself and your suffering too seriously. Give your own needs a rightful place, at least for part of the day.

If you cannot be a comic, watch comedy. Memorize jokes.

In a phrase: lighten up.

Do this in spite of suffering — or, more pointedly, to spite the suffering.

Clowning does not deny the wound. It refuses to let the wound become the entire soul.

There is a struggle within us between constriction and expansion, between despair and vitality. Good humor can be a powerful ally against the constriction that suffering creates.

When I look back upon my life from the vantage point of my casket, I do not think I will regret the time I spent clowning around.

The things I regret, I am working on. Perhaps more intensely than usual, because I must admit that I really do not know, who by fire, and who by water?

Poetry, liturgy, holy texts are the flip side of humor. As we move toward Yom Kippur, with our souls sufficient lightened, we will study poetry and texts that sear our expanded soul and propels us toward transformation. 


Rabbi Mordecai Finley is Rabbi of Ohr HaTorah Synagogue.

Expanding the Soul Read More »

Making Torah More Accessible

When someone says they’ve spent the past four years writing a book on Torah, it’s unlikely that an 85-year-old former math teacher, Dr. Judy Freier, would come to mind. But Judy, also known as “The Torah Lady” by her chavurah, lives to subvert expectations.

“Growing up, I had no idea what Judaism was all about,” she admitted. Though she attended a majority-Jewish school in New York City and felt connected to her Jewish identity, she received a primarily secular education. Even when Judy married her first husband — a Holocaust survivor with an Orthodox background — she was content to let him handle the religious aspect of their daughters’ schooling.

“I felt teaching [about religion] was not for me, it was for the person who has a religious background,” she said. But that changed when she moved to California 20 years ago and joined the now-defunct Ohr Ha Torah, where she joined her first lay-led Torah study group. When she moved synagogues to Valley Beth Shalom five years later, she asked Rabbi Edward Feinstein if they would include a similar lay-led study group after services.

When he suggested she lead it herself, her first instinct was shock.

“Me? Secular me? But by that point, I had begun to build a little bit of a library, a little bit of knowledge and I was just captivated by Torah. It spoke to me.”

“A little bit of a library” is an understatement. Over the years, Judy has amassed thousands of articles and dozens of books on Jewish thought and commentaries, which she spent 10 to 12 hours a week researching in preparation for facilitating her Torah study group. And over the nine years she facilitated it, it became a huge hit. Every week, anywhere between 15 to 30 people would attend — many of whom did not even belong to Valley Beth Shalom but had heard of Judy’s group through word of mouth.

“They were hungry for learning,” Judy recalled. “They were looking for some connection to something bigger than themselves, and they didn’t know where to reach for it. My group evidently satisfied that.”

But when Judy first got the impulse to write “Talking Torah for Today: 36 Life Lessons from The Book of Genesis,” she stopped facilitating the study group to dedicate herself to the task. The 402-page book is organized around 36 life lessons related to the Book of Genesis, with thoughtful study questions and dozens of responses from respected sources in Jewish thought. Each Parsha in Genesis is accompanied by three life lessons, ranging in theme from “Be Aware That Jews Live as Both Citizens and Strangers” to “Practice Loving-Kindness as God Does.”

Often there would be nights when Judy didn’t sleep a wink, poring over sources from contemporary to ancient rabbis, Pirkei Avot, the Talmud and much more. But why this sudden burst of energy, at a time when most of her peers have long settled into retirement?

It’s twofold, according to Judy. She imagines that “Talking Torah for Today” will resonate with anyone, from Christians to secular Jews like her former self.

“I know what that’s like, when you feel like an outsider, and so my mission is to make everyone understand that they’re not an outsider. They’re an insider, and they’re an insider to something beautiful,” she said.

But not only does she want to make Judaic thought accessible — she wants people to connect with one another.

“I see my book as a source for people meeting each other,” she said. “I see it as a singles thing. I propose that we have a session for different ages where people come together in groups of four and discuss my Torah questions. And they get to know how somebody really thinks.”

After losing her first husband to a heart attack at an early age, Judy found love again five years ago. It is to both her late husband and her partner that she dedicates “Talking Torah for Today”: the man who first helped sow the seed of faith and identity, and the man who helped sustain it.

In Judy’s eyes, connection, and feeling a part of something bigger than oneself—especially in a time of great divisiveness and grief — is vital. “So many people are seeking meaning and not getting it,” she said. “But we need to give meaning. It goes back to Viktor Frankl. How did people survive the Holocaust? Because they had something that was meaningful to keep them going. And I’m hopeful that my book can give them that. I’m 85 —my legacy is to get this message out and see more people fall in love with Torah the way I have.”

Making Torah More Accessible Read More »

Avi Nesher Fights the Boycott with a Human Story

Years of making films and giving interviews have helped director Avi Nesher become something of an expert at dodging annoying questions. During an interview prior to the opening of his film “Our Loves” at the Toronto International Film Festival (TIFF) on Sept. 13, a reporter started asking him about politics. 

“And as I took apart every question he asked patiently, I was just amazed at how he could ask such illogical questions. How can he talk about the boycott of art?” 

Nesher, who is considered to be one of Israel’s most respected directors, didn’t lose his cool. He told the reporter that when he lived in New York with his parents in the 1960s, he witnessed many protests against the government and the military because of the Vietnam War, but nobody boycotted Hollywood films or American literature. “That would have been ridiculous.”

He pointed to Iran, where he said tens of thousands of protesters had been killed within days, yet Iranian cinema was not being boycotted. “How can you boycott artists?” Nesher asked. “You can be angry at a government or a military, but the people? Half the population in Israel is against this government and wants to replace it. You should support that half.”

The reporter kept quiet, maybe rethinking his question, and Nesher continued: “It makes Israelis think that maybe there is something medieval behind it — the old accusations that Jews kill Christian babies and use their blood to make matzah.”

Nesher just said what many Israeli filmmakers probably wanted to tell the world: What does art have to do with politics? And why are Israeli and Palestinian films treated so differently? Palestinian films are welcomed to festivals with open arms and often praised, while Israeli films seem to be welcomed only when they criticize Israel, as was the case with “No Other Land,” which was made by both Israeli and Palestinian filmmakers.

Of course, being accepted to TIFF with a film centered on Oct. 7, 2023 is a welcome change. “It’s wonderful that they broke the boycott. I’m sure it wasn’t easy,” said Nesher. “I’m filled with respect and appreciation for them for doing it.”

Nesher received dozens of interview requests following the announcement, and was relieved to discover that most of them focused not on politics but on the film itself. “Our Loves” follows five ordinary Israelis whose personal problems and troubled relationships on Oct. 6, 2023 suddenly become secondary when the Oct. 7 attack begins. You don’t have to be Israeli to understand the anguish and pain of the characters or what they are going through. Their stories are universal: a divorced father trying to repair his relationship with his teenage daughter, who is angry at him for leaving the family; a police officer who has to tell her conservative mother that she is in a relationship with a woman; and a religious woman who decides to attend the Nova festival, among others.

“They need to understand how they had reached that point in their lives and what they would do if they survived the day,” said Nesher. “It’s about change and hope. I thought it would be interesting to make a film that could offer some kind of healing to a country that is so divided and wounded and has gone through such terrible trauma.”

Nesher was, like the rest of the country, devastated when the Hamas attack happened. As a bereaved father whose 17-year-old son died in an accident five years earlier, he understood very well the pain and suffering of the many parents in Israel who lost their children that day. “I felt frightened and angry and hurt, also because of the specific experience we had as bereaved parents. I felt a great deal of empathy for people who had lost the people closest to them,” Nesher said.

When he was approached by some people who suggested he make a film about that tragic day, he rejected the idea at first. “I said there was no point in making a film about Oct. 7 itself. That is something that should be dealt with in a documentary. I don’t want to analyze that day. I’m telling stories of people, that’s what interests me.”

Then one day, he received a phone call from a man from Kibbutz Be’eri, which suffered heavy losses during the attack. He invited Nesher to visit members of the kibbutz who, along with residents of other communities in the area, had been evacuated to a hotel in Ein Gedi.

He asked the director to screen his latest film, “Gan Kofim” (“The Monkey House”), which was released in September 2023 and received excellent reviews from both critics and audiences. But shortly after its release, the entire country went into lockdown and not many people saw it.

Nesher hesitated. He felt uncomfortable talking about his films to people who had just experienced such devastating trauma, but the man was persistent. “So I went, and it was such an insane experience. There were 500 people there. They loved the film and were nothing like you expected them to be. You think of them as victims, but they are human, and still have a sense of humor,” Nesher said.

The experience also changed the way he thought about telling the story of Oct. 7. Rather than focusing on the atrocities themselves, he wanted to tell personal stories of people caught in the middle of them. “Benigni did it so well in ‘Life Is Beautiful.’ In the midst of the Holocaust, other things are happening as well. If you allow yourself to tell those stories, you can convey the horror without showing rape and murder,” said Nesher. “You tell a side of the story that people don’t know about, and to a large extent, it intensifies the experience because you can put yourself in their place. It also makes it accessible to anyone in the world who may be anti-Israel, because you simply cannot help but fall in love with these people.”

Nesher has made 22 films, many of them highly regarded. Five of them were also screened at TIFF. But making Israeli films is not easy. Budgets are generally small by American standards, and international financing has become increasingly difficult to secure amid the cultural boycott of Israeli cinema.

To those wondering whether the Israeli government helped finance the film about the deadliest attack in Israel’s history, the answer is no. “One of the biggest mistakes Israel has made was shutting down the department within the Foreign Ministry that helped Israeli cinema be shown around the world,” Nesher said. “For many years, I attended numerous festivals where I spoke not only about my films but also about Israel. Today, that has almost disappeared because of very unwise government cuts.”

Nesher is hopeful about the future of Israeli cinema and the way it is received around the world. He believes the Israeli government shouldn’t be afraid of its filmmakers and what they have to say. “Artists have great power, which unfortunately hasn’t been used in Israel in recent years,” he said. “They are regarded as enemies of the state, and that is a terrible mistake. Even if an artist disagrees with one policy or another, artists represent the country, and that in itself is powerful.”

Avi Nesher Fights the Boycott with a Human Story Read More »

Combating Antisemitism Through Education in Beverly Hills

When Judith (Judy) Manouchehri  was two years old, her family fled Iran in the middle of the night.

Her father had been arrested by Iran’s new Islamic regime after serving alcohol – which had been banned – at a gathering in their Tehran home. After his release, the family left the country, traveling by horse-drawn carriage through Pakistan. They spent several weeks in Spain before arriving in the United States as refugees in 1982.

In Los Angeles, they joined relatives and a growing Iranian Jewish community that started taking shape after the 1979 Islamic Revolution. For families who had arrived as refugees, there was probably no better city in the United States than Beverly Hills to be an Iranian Jew. It offered them the chance to rebuild among people who shared a similar history and understood the challenges of starting over. Judith grew up in that environment, where community and mutual support were part of everyday life.

Judith and her brother Jonathan, only a year older than she, attended Horace Mann, where Judith was elected eighth-grade class president and later, Beverly Hills High School, where in her senior year she became the Associated Student Body president.

“That’s my origin and the reason for who I am,” she said. “And I am so grateful to be living in Los Angeles, and very grateful for the opportunities that the United States has provided my family.”

Even after graduating and becoming a real estate attorney, Judith remained involved with the Beverly Hills school system, a way of giving back to the community that had given her so much. Her three children also attend Beverly Hills Unified School District (BHUSD) schools, which was one of the reasons she decided to run for a seat in 2023. Two years after joining the board, her fellow board members selected her as president of the Beverly Hills Unified School District Board of Education.

Although Judith said her own children have never reported experiencing antisemitism at BHUSD, she believes the district should be vigilant to the rise in antisemitism elsewhere in the country. For her, education is an important way to raise awareness among students and help Jewish students feel supported and confident in their schools.

“Following Oct. 7 [2023], it became very clear to me that what had happened was not only concerning and traumatizing, but that it could also be very divisive. The way to deal with that division is to talk about the issue based on facts, and what it means when we say, ‘Never again,’” she said.

In August 2025, Judith supported a BHUSD resolution titled “Combating Antisemitism through Education, Awareness, Remembrance and Support,” which outlined specific steps for the district to take. The resolution calls for May to be recognized as Jewish American Heritage Month, annual Holocaust Remembrance Day programming, and Oct. 7 to be designated as a day of remembrance for victims of antisemitic terrorism.

It also calls for age-appropriate education about Jewish history and culture, professional development for teachers and staff, and instruction to help students recognize and respond to antisemitism and hate. The resolution also adopted the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s working definition of antisemitism for educational and professional-development purposes, while stating that it would be applied consistent with the First Amendment, California Constitution and Education Code.

“Beverly Hills has a strong and vibrant Jewish and Israeli-American community, and I believe our school district has a responsibility to stand with that community, educate our students about antisemitism and its consequences, and ensure that hatred and discrimination have no place in our schools,” she said.

This resolution followed an earlier one adopted by BHUSD in October 2023, shortly after Hamas’ attack on Israel. That resolution condemned the attack, expressed support for Israel’s right to exist and defend itself and acknowledged an increase in antisemitic hate crimes and expressions of antisemitism around the world. It also pledged to protect students from antisemitism and hate and committed the district to educating students to stand against racism, hate and antisemitism.

“The first resolution was stating solidarity and understanding and compassion,” Judith said. “The second one has more depth and substance and more purpose in combating antisemitism.” She hopes the effort will show students and the broader community that standing up for Jewish students is not only acceptable but should be the norm.

“I’m very proud of BHUSD for its part in that,” she said.

For Judith, her family’s experience as refugees from Iran is part of what drives her commitment to speaking out against antisemitism and never staying silent. “We know how fragile life can be and that Jew-hate can be very strong,” she said. “That’s why it’s so important to speak up against it and support those who do.”

Combating Antisemitism Through Education in Beverly Hills Read More »