fbpx

My Generation

n 1944, when I was 17 and a freshman at Cornell University, I introduced my mother to my new college girlfriend. When the young lady left, my mother asked me how we met. \"We were sitting at the same table in the cafeteria and started to talk.\" Her eyes opened wide. \"You what? You mean you were not formally introduced?\"
[additional-authors]
March 6, 2003

In 1944, when I was 17 and a freshman at Cornell University,
I introduced my mother to my new college girlfriend.

When the young lady left, my mother asked me how we met.

“We were sitting at the same table in the cafeteria and
started to talk.”

Her eyes opened wide. “You what? You mean you were not
formally introduced?”

Before everyone assumes that shadchanim (arranged marriages)
and chaperoned dates were the norms for wartime Jewish youth in the Ivy League,
let me point out a paradox: My shocked mother, a 1925 graduate of Cornell Law School,
made a career as a labor lawyer working for labor unions, truck drivers,
garment workers and the like. She was a secular Jew, a militant feminist and an
active political supporter of the Holy Trinity of New York Jewry: President
Roosevelt, Governor Lehman and Mayor LaGuardia.

But on the subject of marital relations, and all that led up
to them, she was at one with her Lithuanian Orthodox Jewish ancestors.

We, her three sons, did not date until we left for college.
Nor did our friends, all middle-class Jews. There was some gossip about
possible pregnancies among our classmates at Forest Hills High School, but I
cannot recall any of us ever discussing homosexuality and the idea of
cross-dressing — even on Purim — simply never occurred.

We knew, of course, that several girls in our class were
regarded as “fast,” which, to our unsophisticated minds, meant that they petted
in the movies on Saturday night. But it wasn’t until another year went by and I
was a soldier on leave in Paris that I finally discovered what all the
excitement was about.

As I reach my 76th birthday, all this seems like it was
lived in another country. I will spare you the usual doleful comments of the
aged on how today’s youth has declined morally, physically and intellectually.
Actually, if I judge by my four children, three grandchildren and their
friends, they are doing very nicely in all three categories, thank you. (I take
exception only to their taste in popular music.)

One thing they were spared was the chaotic political
environment in which my brothers and I came to maturity. My three older
children grew up, went to college, entered into their professions and made
careers for themselves. Military service was never an issue, nor was the threat
of attack at home by a foreign enemy. My fourth child, younger by two decades,
might yet have to deal with such threats, especially if the present
administration enters into what its enemies will regard as a sacred war against
an infidel culture in which all the world becomes the battlefield.

Contrast this with their father’s experience. By my 22nd
birthday I had served in two armies and the “illegal” immigration movement to
Palestine. It was years before I returned to the college campus to earn my
degrees. Nor was my experience exceptional; millions of American men (and not a
few women) spent much of their youth separated from their families, putting
their lives on the line and on hold, so to speak, while the national interest
was served.

Today people speak of mine as the “greatest generation” and
pay it the homage normally given to firemen and police officers. From the
Olympian heights of a seventh decade, the description is not apt. Certainly, by
one measure at least, we were dreadful failures. What we have left to our
children and grandchildren is a worse legacy even than the one our parents left
to us. We inherited a world convulsed by the effects of two world wars, but
buoyed by the hope that mankind had learned its ghastly lessons and would do
away with genocide, oppression, colonialism and the other ills of the first
half of the century. Instead, we leave them violent nationalisms, atomic
threats, Africa, Cambodia and Al Qaeda, among other actual and potential
disasters.

My mother grew to be much more accepting of my choice of
girlfriends and even of my ways of meeting them. In fact, 10 years after my
father’s death, she married an attorney whom she met in an elevator in the
building in which they both had offices.

I never had the nerve to make the obvious point. To do so
would not have been befitting a member of the greatest generation.  


Yehuda Lev is a former associate editor of The Jewish Journal. He lives in Providence, R.I.

Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.

Editor's Picks

Latest Articles

Ladino Shabbat at Sinai

On a recent Shabbat, Sinai celebrated the Ladino tradition and invited me to tell my story.

A Short Fuse

At 73, I know I am on a slippery slope that’s getting slipperier.

Newsom’s Machinations

Newsom’s machinations are a warning that the current difficulties for American politicians facing rising voter unhappiness with Israel will only become harder.

How Antisemites Can Save the Jews

American Jews have always understood a key lesson of life: even if your victimhood is justified, if you wear it it will kill you.

Trump in ‘The Twilight Zone’

With moral clarity not clouded by anti-Trump, anti-Israel hysteria, everyone should be able to get behind this just war against Iran—not unlike Israel’s just war in Gaza.

Hating Trump More Than Terrorists

While one of the world’s most evil regimes is taking a beating, much of the mainstream media, Hollywood and our cultural elite would rather focus on who’s doing the beating.

The ‘Scream’ Franchise Is Back—Sans Antisemites.

It seems that Melissa Barrera – and those who followed her off set – may have inadvertently saved the franchise from itself. In getting back to basics, the film found a way to connect with audiences from both the past and the present.

More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.