“Don’t compare me to the Almighty, compare me to the alternative.”
This has been one of Joe Biden’s favorite lines for most of his political career, but it also nicely summarizes the messaging strategy that most incumbent officeholders employ when running for re-election. They want voters to think about their decision as a choice between the available options rather than an up-or-down referendum, primarily because being seen as preferable to another candidate is a much lower bar for success than being judged against an imaginary and often unrealistically idealized option.
Gavin Newsom’s challenge is that the rules for a California recall election call for a referendum — literally. The first question on the recall ballot asks voters to make a binary decision on whether Newsom should or should not be removed from office. His potential successors are not even introduced into the equation until the ballot’s second question, which makes it more difficult for Newsom’s campaign to frame the election more advantageously as a choice.
Not that this setup has kept Newsom from attempting to convince Californians to view this race comparatively. The governor won his election in 2018 by a wide margin, but large portions of the Democrats’ progressive base has never been all that enthusiastic about a leader they see as a somewhat entitled and centrist establishment politician.
There are two ways for a campaign to motivate its base: tell voters exciting and inspiring things about their candidate, or tell them frightening things about the opposition. Last spring, when it appeared that the world was beginning to emerge from our pandemic-driven shutdown, Newsom’s team tried the first approach, sending the governor around the state to announce various funding and economic recovery projects. When that didn’t move the needle, they shifted to Plan B.
Being seen as preferable to another candidate is a much lower bar for success.
Newsom’s initial tactic was to present the recall as a campaign against Donald Trump. But Trump isn’t on the ballot, so the governor’s campaign moved on to the candidates who were running. In the recall’s early stages, most of Newsom’s opponents were fairly unknown, so alerting voters about the dangers of a multi-candidate amorphous conservative Republican blob was not a sufficiently tangible threat to alarm Democratic loyalists.
But that all changed when talk show host Larry Elder entered the race and quickly moved up in the polls. Newsom now had a living, breathing, talking opponent who says and does controversial things and could therefore serve as an ideal foil about whom he could warn progressive voters. Fueled by a massive funding advantage, Newsom has turned his guns on Elder and has aimed to portray him as a threat to deep-blue California. Not coincidentally, Newsom’s poll numbers appear to have improved over the course of this onslaught.
But Newsom’s efforts to cast the recall as a choice between the available options has been even more effective when he has established a contrast between California and other states. Unlike the shutdowns of 2020 and early 2021, when the governor’s COVID-related mandates caused immense economic and societal disruption, the widespread availability of vaccines in recent months has made Newsom’s cautious approach to the pandemic more palatable to many Californians. Mask mandates and vaccine restrictions are certainly an inconvenience, but create a less onerous set of constraints than those we’d faced during earlier stages of the virus’ spread.
At the same time, Republican governors in more conservative states have moved in the opposite directions, not only avoiding state mandates but often forbidding local governments from imposing such requirements in their own communities. The result has been an increase in the number of Covid hospitalizations and deaths in those states, which has allowed Newsom to warn Californians that they could suffer a similar fate if a Republican governor took office here.
In the campaign’s closing days, Newsom is relying on a number of leading national Democrats to inspire his state’s progressive voters. Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders have weighed in, and President Biden and Vice President Harris may be deployed as well. All that high-profile fire power may be enough to allow Newsom to survive, but if the recall is defeated, the governor’s first thank you cards should go to Elder and to the GOP governors of Texas and Florida, who helped California’s embattled chief executive turn this recall campaign from a referendum into a choice.
Dan Schnur is a Professor at the University of California – Berkeley, USC and Pepperdine. Join Dan for his weekly webinar “Politics in the Time of Coronavirus” (www/lawac.org) on Tuesdays at 5 PM.
Recall Turns Into a Choice
Dan Schnur
“Don’t compare me to the Almighty, compare me to the alternative.”
This has been one of Joe Biden’s favorite lines for most of his political career, but it also nicely summarizes the messaging strategy that most incumbent officeholders employ when running for re-election. They want voters to think about their decision as a choice between the available options rather than an up-or-down referendum, primarily because being seen as preferable to another candidate is a much lower bar for success than being judged against an imaginary and often unrealistically idealized option.
Gavin Newsom’s challenge is that the rules for a California recall election call for a referendum — literally. The first question on the recall ballot asks voters to make a binary decision on whether Newsom should or should not be removed from office. His potential successors are not even introduced into the equation until the ballot’s second question, which makes it more difficult for Newsom’s campaign to frame the election more advantageously as a choice.
Not that this setup has kept Newsom from attempting to convince Californians to view this race comparatively. The governor won his election in 2018 by a wide margin, but large portions of the Democrats’ progressive base has never been all that enthusiastic about a leader they see as a somewhat entitled and centrist establishment politician.
There are two ways for a campaign to motivate its base: tell voters exciting and inspiring things about their candidate, or tell them frightening things about the opposition. Last spring, when it appeared that the world was beginning to emerge from our pandemic-driven shutdown, Newsom’s team tried the first approach, sending the governor around the state to announce various funding and economic recovery projects. When that didn’t move the needle, they shifted to Plan B.
Newsom’s initial tactic was to present the recall as a campaign against Donald Trump. But Trump isn’t on the ballot, so the governor’s campaign moved on to the candidates who were running. In the recall’s early stages, most of Newsom’s opponents were fairly unknown, so alerting voters about the dangers of a multi-candidate amorphous conservative Republican blob was not a sufficiently tangible threat to alarm Democratic loyalists.
But that all changed when talk show host Larry Elder entered the race and quickly moved up in the polls. Newsom now had a living, breathing, talking opponent who says and does controversial things and could therefore serve as an ideal foil about whom he could warn progressive voters. Fueled by a massive funding advantage, Newsom has turned his guns on Elder and has aimed to portray him as a threat to deep-blue California. Not coincidentally, Newsom’s poll numbers appear to have improved over the course of this onslaught.
But Newsom’s efforts to cast the recall as a choice between the available options has been even more effective when he has established a contrast between California and other states. Unlike the shutdowns of 2020 and early 2021, when the governor’s COVID-related mandates caused immense economic and societal disruption, the widespread availability of vaccines in recent months has made Newsom’s cautious approach to the pandemic more palatable to many Californians. Mask mandates and vaccine restrictions are certainly an inconvenience, but create a less onerous set of constraints than those we’d faced during earlier stages of the virus’ spread.
At the same time, Republican governors in more conservative states have moved in the opposite directions, not only avoiding state mandates but often forbidding local governments from imposing such requirements in their own communities. The result has been an increase in the number of Covid hospitalizations and deaths in those states, which has allowed Newsom to warn Californians that they could suffer a similar fate if a Republican governor took office here.
In the campaign’s closing days, Newsom is relying on a number of leading national Democrats to inspire his state’s progressive voters. Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders have weighed in, and President Biden and Vice President Harris may be deployed as well. All that high-profile fire power may be enough to allow Newsom to survive, but if the recall is defeated, the governor’s first thank you cards should go to Elder and to the GOP governors of Texas and Florida, who helped California’s embattled chief executive turn this recall campaign from a referendum into a choice.
Dan Schnur is a Professor at the University of California – Berkeley, USC and Pepperdine. Join Dan for his weekly webinar “Politics in the Time of Coronavirus” (www/lawac.org) on Tuesdays at 5 PM.
Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.
Editor's Picks
Israel and the Internet Wars – A Professional Social Media Review
The Invisible Student: A Tale of Homelessness at UCLA and USC
What Ever Happened to the LA Times?
Who Are the Jews On Joe Biden’s Cabinet?
You’re Not a Bad Jewish Mom If Your Kid Wants Santa Claus to Come to Your House
No Labels: The Group Fighting for the Political Center
Latest Articles
Table for Five: Vayera
Route 66 Turns 100: Fall in Chicago, the Mother Road and the Great American Road Trip
Israel Bonds Ceremony, CCFP’s ‘Ambassadors of Peace,’ ‘Letters, Light and Love’
“Art Over Hate”
Everyone by Name – A poem for Parsha Vayera
Hagar’s Oppression is the Source of the Hegira
Print Issue: A Jewish Victory | October 30, 2026
In the face of growing anti-Israel and antisemitic conduct in public schools, the L.A. Unified School District has delivered an important victory for our community.
A Bisl Torah ~ Are You Paying Attention?
Why are we less likely to notice those who are most important?
A Moment in Time: The Israeli Election – Counting Votes, Building Bridges
Rabbis of LA | Rabbi Rembaum on Life Without Fredi
First of two parts
‘You Can See Everything’: Holmes on the Range
In 2026, you don’t expect an American movie – even a documentary – to include an almost Talmudic discussion focusing on the meaning of the word “can.”
Ruby Red Beet Kubbah
If you can’t get to Jerusalem, make a pot of this incredible red kubbah.
A Jewish Victory
In the face of growing anti-Israel and antisemitic conduct in public schools, the Los Angeles Unified School District has delivered an important victory for our community.
Trusting G-d’s Plan ft. Elaine Chaya
Zion Ozeri’s Photographs Reveal the Many Faces of Jewish Identity
His photographs portray Jews shaped by different cultures, histories and traditions while revealing the connections that unite them.
Milken School Opens Jan Koum Campus in Bel Air
The site is now home to Milken’s Upper School, serving students in grades 9 through 12, and expands the school’s footprint across its three campuses to 28 acres.
For Teens, Israel Travel Is Not the End Goal. Jewish Peoplehood Is.
A well-designed Israel experience cannot resolve every question. But it can give young people context, relationships, language, and a sense that they belong to a people and a story larger than themselves.
El-Sayed, Mélenchon, and the Future They Portend
Some have accused me of anti-Muslim bias. Let me answer that plainly: I have none. My issues with El-Sayed would be the same whether he were Jewish, Christian, Hindu or Baha’i.
Unbreakable Blue Thread: Reclaiming Our Past and Our Future
I write to you, all you first and second generations, and I assure you from generations five, six and seven that if we keep doing what we need to do, if we stand together, keep our traditions, educate ourselves in our ancient wisdom, keep Hebrew spoken and sung in our midst, we will not only endure. We Jews will thrive.
Unstuck in the Middle with You
Kwall, the Raymond P. Niro Law Professor at DePaul University College of Law, argues for a center defined by enough common commitments to make communal life possible.
Sewage Without Borders
Israel’s water security depends on what flows into the sea on the other side of all of them, and our water policy should start from that reality.
Torah Portion: Vayera
The parsha ends with the binding of Isaac, the Akeida, probably the darkest chapter in the entire Torah.
Gene Lichtenstein, August 15, 1930-October 18, 2026
Mr. Lichtenstein edited the Jewish Journal of Los Angeles from 1986 until 2000.
Let Them Talk
If we want our younger generations to love our faith, our culture, and our peoplehood, we need to be welcoming when they show interest and have a spark of curiosity.
A Wild and Improbable Story Hits Israel
It turns out that claim about Israel being a democracy wasn’t just propaganda. The two million Arabs who live in the world’s only Jewish state really do have the power to vote.
Why I Came to Vote in Israel
My journey to the ballot box was circuitous. The path I hope Israel will follow is derech Adonai: the way of righteousness and justice.
More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.