The Boycott Divestment Sanctions (BDS) movement and its followers might actually have the opportunity to do something good this week. No, really.
The United Nations Human Rights Council, which usually devotes most of its time to criticizing Israel for defending itself against terrorist attacks, has called an emergency meeting to examine potential human rights abuses committed by the Taliban during their takeover of Afghanistan. There are already reports of Taliban militia ordering women to give up their jobs and to remain indoors, closing schools for girls and forcing young women to marry their fighters, not to mention the persecution of ethnic and religious minorities, and whippings, beatings and other violence against Afghani civilians.
It would seem that this should be an open-and-shut case for a U.N. entity with the expressed purpose of promoting and protecting human rights around the world. But over the years, the Human Rights Council has dedicated the overwhelming majority of its time to Israel-bashing, to the point where the Jewish state has received an official condemnation from the Council on no fewer than 78 occasions since it was reconstituted in 2006—more than the rest of the world combined. In other words, the atrocities, cruelty and the barbarism that is a feature of daily life in Iran, North Korea, and Syria, just to name a few countries, is of less concern to the commission’s members than Israel’s efforts to protect its citizens against constant threats of violence from its foes.
The United States, the European Union and Canada have all criticized the tribunal for its single-minded focus on Israel, as have two former U.N. Secretaries General and even the Council’s own former president. But earlier this year after the terrorist organization Hamas launched several days of missile attacks into Israel, the Council launched an unprecedented permanent “fact-finding mission” against Israel, the first time in the U.N.’s history that a member state was subject to such an inquiry. The Council also commenced an investigation into alleged war crimes committed by the Jewish state, and for good measure called for an arms embargo to be imposed on Israel as well.
It’s exceedingly improbable that the Council would shift their focus from the imagined transgressions of Israel to the actual atrocities taking place in Afghanistan. But if the leading voices in the BDS movement were so inclined, the Taliban’s rampage of violence, misogyny and hate-mongering could present them with an opportunity to demonstrate that their concerns about human rights violations are not just an excuse to engage in continuous exercises of anti-Zionism and antisemitism. If the BDS-ers decided to set aside their single-minded bias and hatred toward Israel for just a short period of time to focus their spotlight instead on the Taliban’s daily outrages, it could help pressure the Human Rights Commission to make the same adjustment.
Granted, that temporary reorientation would do nothing to reverse or even weaken the anti-Israel hatred that flows unceasingly from either BDS supporters or Council members. But it would eliminate one level of hypocrisy from their core arguments—their seemingly myopic belief that there is only one country on the planet that deserves scrutiny for its conduct. Their implied belief that Israel is so uniquely malignant in its behavior that human rights abuses everywhere else in the world should be overlooked or minimalized reveals their true motivations—delegitimizing and ultimately eliminating the world’s only Jewish state.
Of course, calling out the Taliban would have no impact on the core falsehood at the heart of anti-Zionism, the ridiculous notion that Israel’s efforts to defend itself and its people against violent terrorism somehow violates the human rights of those committed to Israel’s destruction. But at the very least it would temporarily cast some necessary attention on the genuine brutality and actual carnage being committed in Afghanistan as opposed to the make-believe crimes of which Israel is incessantly accused.
The much more likely outcome is that while the Taliban destroys a country, terrorizes its people and subjugates its women, the BDSers will remain silent.
The much more likely outcome is that while the Taliban destroys a country, terrorizes its people and subjugates its women, the BDSers will remain silent. The Human Rights Council members will express their concern or issue an ineffectual statement of admonition against the violence. Then both will go back to their more accustomed and hypocritical work of singling out the state of Israel and its people.
Will There Be a BDS Movement Against the Taliban?
Dan Schnur
The Boycott Divestment Sanctions (BDS) movement and its followers might actually have the opportunity to do something good this week. No, really.
The United Nations Human Rights Council, which usually devotes most of its time to criticizing Israel for defending itself against terrorist attacks, has called an emergency meeting to examine potential human rights abuses committed by the Taliban during their takeover of Afghanistan. There are already reports of Taliban militia ordering women to give up their jobs and to remain indoors, closing schools for girls and forcing young women to marry their fighters, not to mention the persecution of ethnic and religious minorities, and whippings, beatings and other violence against Afghani civilians.
It would seem that this should be an open-and-shut case for a U.N. entity with the expressed purpose of promoting and protecting human rights around the world. But over the years, the Human Rights Council has dedicated the overwhelming majority of its time to Israel-bashing, to the point where the Jewish state has received an official condemnation from the Council on no fewer than 78 occasions since it was reconstituted in 2006—more than the rest of the world combined. In other words, the atrocities, cruelty and the barbarism that is a feature of daily life in Iran, North Korea, and Syria, just to name a few countries, is of less concern to the commission’s members than Israel’s efforts to protect its citizens against constant threats of violence from its foes.
The United States, the European Union and Canada have all criticized the tribunal for its single-minded focus on Israel, as have two former U.N. Secretaries General and even the Council’s own former president. But earlier this year after the terrorist organization Hamas launched several days of missile attacks into Israel, the Council launched an unprecedented permanent “fact-finding mission” against Israel, the first time in the U.N.’s history that a member state was subject to such an inquiry. The Council also commenced an investigation into alleged war crimes committed by the Jewish state, and for good measure called for an arms embargo to be imposed on Israel as well.
It’s exceedingly improbable that the Council would shift their focus from the imagined transgressions of Israel to the actual atrocities taking place in Afghanistan. But if the leading voices in the BDS movement were so inclined, the Taliban’s rampage of violence, misogyny and hate-mongering could present them with an opportunity to demonstrate that their concerns about human rights violations are not just an excuse to engage in continuous exercises of anti-Zionism and antisemitism. If the BDS-ers decided to set aside their single-minded bias and hatred toward Israel for just a short period of time to focus their spotlight instead on the Taliban’s daily outrages, it could help pressure the Human Rights Commission to make the same adjustment.
Granted, that temporary reorientation would do nothing to reverse or even weaken the anti-Israel hatred that flows unceasingly from either BDS supporters or Council members. But it would eliminate one level of hypocrisy from their core arguments—their seemingly myopic belief that there is only one country on the planet that deserves scrutiny for its conduct. Their implied belief that Israel is so uniquely malignant in its behavior that human rights abuses everywhere else in the world should be overlooked or minimalized reveals their true motivations—delegitimizing and ultimately eliminating the world’s only Jewish state.
Of course, calling out the Taliban would have no impact on the core falsehood at the heart of anti-Zionism, the ridiculous notion that Israel’s efforts to defend itself and its people against violent terrorism somehow violates the human rights of those committed to Israel’s destruction. But at the very least it would temporarily cast some necessary attention on the genuine brutality and actual carnage being committed in Afghanistan as opposed to the make-believe crimes of which Israel is incessantly accused.
The much more likely outcome is that while the Taliban destroys a country, terrorizes its people and subjugates its women, the BDSers will remain silent. The Human Rights Council members will express their concern or issue an ineffectual statement of admonition against the violence. Then both will go back to their more accustomed and hypocritical work of singling out the state of Israel and its people.
Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.
Editor's Picks
Israel and the Internet Wars – A Professional Social Media Review
The Invisible Student: A Tale of Homelessness at UCLA and USC
What Ever Happened to the LA Times?
Who Are the Jews On Joe Biden’s Cabinet?
You’re Not a Bad Jewish Mom If Your Kid Wants Santa Claus to Come to Your House
No Labels: The Group Fighting for the Political Center
Latest Articles
LA Congresswoman Sydney Kamlager-Dove Votes Against Resolution Declaring “From the River to the Sea” Is Antisemitic
ADL: Antisemitic Incidents Increased 140% Last Year
Fun Haggadot for Passover
UC Berkeley Law School Dean Talks About Antisemitism on Campus
Father’s Captivity in Gaza Spurs Family’s Tireless Advocacy for Hostage Release
Understanding the As-a-Jew Jew
Culture
“When Do We Eat?” Director Reflects on Passover Comedy and the Late Michael Lerner
LA Jewish Symphony to Celebrate 30 Years with Anniversary Concert on April 14
Delicious Entrees for Your Passover Seder
A Passover Story — Of Meat Pies and Chicken Tagine
Leave a Seat or Two Empty This Seder
We must improvise a new ritual that marks our present pain, that illustrates our vital connection with Israel and Israelis today.
From a Jewish Nightmare to an American Dream
But in the spirit of resilience, I’d like to suggest that we dare add something more hopeful to our Seders this year, something more American, something about transforming nightmares into dreams
What Does Freedom Mean to My Mother?
Her response was so meaningful, I asked her to write it down because more people need to hear it.
A Walk in Jerusalem After the Doomsday That Wasn’t
After this morning’s aerial defeat of the looming disaster, Israel and the Jewish people’s communication strategy has changed. We have a new reality.
Six Months
Six months of feeling united as Jews, no matter our backgrounds or religious affiliation.
Hollywood
Spielberg Says Antisemitism Is “No Longer Lurking, But Standing Proud” Like 1930s Germany
Young Actress Juju Brener on Her “Hocus Pocus 2” Role
Behind the Scenes of “Jeopardy!” with Mayim Bialik
Podcasts
Joan Nathan: “My Life in Recipes” and Pecan Lemon Torte
Joel Haber: 18 Jewish Foods Podcast and Hamin Kharshuf aka Chulent
More news and opinions than at a
Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.
More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.