Ariel Sharon served as Israel’s Prime Minister for five years and visited the United States ten times during this period. His first visit was in March 2001, two months into George W. Bush’s term. Yitzhak Rabin visited the newly-elected President Clinton in March 1993. Prime Minister Netanyahu traveled to see President Donald Trump in February 2017, just a month after Trump was sworn in. After President Obama was installed in the White House in 2009, he had meetings first with President Peres and then with PM Netanyahu in May.
Naftali Bennett will be meeting President Joe Biden on Thursday, at the end of a long summer. More than half a year has passed since Biden took office. And he seemed to be in no rush to meet with an Israeli leader. Certainly not with former Prime Minister Netanyahu, who was unfashionably late to congratulate Biden on his victory, and whose history with the previous administration in which Biden served is hardly one of cordial relations. But Biden also seemed leisurely when Netanyahu was replaced by Bennett. He was surely pleased with the change of guard in Jerusalem. And yet, he kept Bennett waiting before scheduling a rendezvous.
This is no coincidence. It is not just the result of a busy schedule and an overwhelming agenda for both leaders—from the pandemic, to passing budgets and reforms, to handling foreign policy crises. It is also a result of intended delay. Biden wanted to delay the meeting because he didn’t quite know what he’d say to Bennett on the most pressing issue for Israel—Iran. In fact, it’s not unfair to suspect that he wanted to hold Bennett back until a deal with Iran is a fait accompli. And it’s not unreasonable to assume that the meeting was finally scheduled only when Biden realized that the mullahs are going to take their time—and that he can no longer defer the meeting without it seeming like a snub.
So, what could he tell him about Iran? Probably very little.
Biden cannot tell him that Iran has his full attention. Clearly, he has another theater of operation to worry about for the next few weeks, until the withdrawal from Afghanistan is completed.
Biden cannot tell him that Iran has his full attention. Clearly, he has another theater of operation to worry about for the next few weeks, until the withdrawal from Afghanistan is completed.
He cannot tell Bennett that Iran is responsive to American attempts to come to an agreement, because it’s not. In fact, the events in Afghanistan gave the Iranians a good reason to raise the bar and see if a post-withdrawal America is more receptive to compromise (that is, an agreement more favorable to Iran) than a pre-withdrawal America.
He cannot make promises about American commitments to regional security that would not sound a little hollow—not after the miserable fall of Kabul.
And he cannot tell him that Iran is in retreat because what happens in Lebanon, Gaza, Syria and other places would prove him wrong.
So, Biden has little to offer on this front, which could become a problem because clearly this is the main topic on Bennett’s mind. Yesterday, a high ranking “diplomatic source” briefed the media in preparation for the meeting, and had two main messages to communicate:
-
- Netanyahu is to blame for the situation in which Israel finds itself.
- A return to the JCPOA would be a mistake.
Think about these two messages.
The first one creates an atmosphere of mutual agreement. For Biden, as well as for Bennett, blaming the predecessor is a good start. Biden would say: it was a mistake (on the part of Trump, and he was influenced by Netanyahu) to ditch the JCPOA. Bennett would say: Netanyahu fought for something whose result is ultimately unfavorable to Israel (Bennett would not say that ditching the JCPOA was a mistake).
The second one is also not as problematic as it used to be, because at this moment, there’s no JCPOA to which to return. The Iranians seem uninterested. Bennett would say: an agreement isn’t going to solve the problem. Biden would say: we oppose a nuclear Iran and await Iran’s return to the negotiating table. No big dispute.
But note this: blaming the predecessor and waiting for a better agreement or no agreement is a political strategy, not a strategy against Iran. Does Bennett have such strategy to propose that Biden would accept? Does Biden have such strategy to propose that Bennett would accept? We can say even today, that the meeting is going to be declared a success. And it will be a success. The two leaders will probably get along, and will do their best not to muddy the waters of the U.S.-Israel relations. Israel is going to declare its commitment to a bipartisan policy. Biden will declare the commitment of his party to Israel is as strong as ever.
And yet, a nagging question remains: are the leaders in Tehran worried about the possible outcome of the Biden-Bennet meeting? If they aren’t, the meeting cannot honestly be declared a success.
When Bennett Meets Biden: Terms of Success
Shmuel Rosner
Ariel Sharon served as Israel’s Prime Minister for five years and visited the United States ten times during this period. His first visit was in March 2001, two months into George W. Bush’s term. Yitzhak Rabin visited the newly-elected President Clinton in March 1993. Prime Minister Netanyahu traveled to see President Donald Trump in February 2017, just a month after Trump was sworn in. After President Obama was installed in the White House in 2009, he had meetings first with President Peres and then with PM Netanyahu in May.
Naftali Bennett will be meeting President Joe Biden on Thursday, at the end of a long summer. More than half a year has passed since Biden took office. And he seemed to be in no rush to meet with an Israeli leader. Certainly not with former Prime Minister Netanyahu, who was unfashionably late to congratulate Biden on his victory, and whose history with the previous administration in which Biden served is hardly one of cordial relations. But Biden also seemed leisurely when Netanyahu was replaced by Bennett. He was surely pleased with the change of guard in Jerusalem. And yet, he kept Bennett waiting before scheduling a rendezvous.
This is no coincidence. It is not just the result of a busy schedule and an overwhelming agenda for both leaders—from the pandemic, to passing budgets and reforms, to handling foreign policy crises. It is also a result of intended delay. Biden wanted to delay the meeting because he didn’t quite know what he’d say to Bennett on the most pressing issue for Israel—Iran. In fact, it’s not unfair to suspect that he wanted to hold Bennett back until a deal with Iran is a fait accompli. And it’s not unreasonable to assume that the meeting was finally scheduled only when Biden realized that the mullahs are going to take their time—and that he can no longer defer the meeting without it seeming like a snub.
So, what could he tell him about Iran? Probably very little.
Biden cannot tell him that Iran has his full attention. Clearly, he has another theater of operation to worry about for the next few weeks, until the withdrawal from Afghanistan is completed.
He cannot tell Bennett that Iran is responsive to American attempts to come to an agreement, because it’s not. In fact, the events in Afghanistan gave the Iranians a good reason to raise the bar and see if a post-withdrawal America is more receptive to compromise (that is, an agreement more favorable to Iran) than a pre-withdrawal America.
He cannot make promises about American commitments to regional security that would not sound a little hollow—not after the miserable fall of Kabul.
And he cannot tell him that Iran is in retreat because what happens in Lebanon, Gaza, Syria and other places would prove him wrong.
So, Biden has little to offer on this front, which could become a problem because clearly this is the main topic on Bennett’s mind. Yesterday, a high ranking “diplomatic source” briefed the media in preparation for the meeting, and had two main messages to communicate:
Think about these two messages.
The first one creates an atmosphere of mutual agreement. For Biden, as well as for Bennett, blaming the predecessor is a good start. Biden would say: it was a mistake (on the part of Trump, and he was influenced by Netanyahu) to ditch the JCPOA. Bennett would say: Netanyahu fought for something whose result is ultimately unfavorable to Israel (Bennett would not say that ditching the JCPOA was a mistake).
The second one is also not as problematic as it used to be, because at this moment, there’s no JCPOA to which to return. The Iranians seem uninterested. Bennett would say: an agreement isn’t going to solve the problem. Biden would say: we oppose a nuclear Iran and await Iran’s return to the negotiating table. No big dispute.
But note this: blaming the predecessor and waiting for a better agreement or no agreement is a political strategy, not a strategy against Iran. Does Bennett have such strategy to propose that Biden would accept? Does Biden have such strategy to propose that Bennett would accept? We can say even today, that the meeting is going to be declared a success. And it will be a success. The two leaders will probably get along, and will do their best not to muddy the waters of the U.S.-Israel relations. Israel is going to declare its commitment to a bipartisan policy. Biden will declare the commitment of his party to Israel is as strong as ever.
And yet, a nagging question remains: are the leaders in Tehran worried about the possible outcome of the Biden-Bennet meeting? If they aren’t, the meeting cannot honestly be declared a success.
Shmuel Rosner is an Israeli columnist, editor, and researcher. He is the editor of the research and data-journalism website themadad.com, and is the political editor of the Jewish Journal.
Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.
Editor's Picks
Israel and the Internet Wars – A Professional Social Media Review
The Invisible Student: A Tale of Homelessness at UCLA and USC
What Ever Happened to the LA Times?
Who Are the Jews On Joe Biden’s Cabinet?
You’re Not a Bad Jewish Mom If Your Kid Wants Santa Claus to Come to Your House
No Labels: The Group Fighting for the Political Center
Latest Articles
On Counting the Omer
A Memorable Mimouna
Campus Watch April 25, 2024
Will Columbia’s Law School Dean Learn the Law of Free Speech?
Israel’s Defender: The Unstoppable Spokesperson Eylon Levy
Table for Five: Passover Edition
Culture
If You Heard What I Heard Teams Up with Matisyahu for ‘A Night of Resilience’ Benefit
Passover Goodies
Dr. Nicole Saphier Reflects on Motherhood and Jewish Advocacy
Make Felt Seder Plate Elements
Rabbis of LA | Rabbi T’mimah Was Ready the Second Time That God Called
After an 18-year engineering career, her life abruptly changed.
Campus Rioters are not Just Dangerous and Antisemitic. They’re Also Phony.
These are not justice warriors who want peace in Gaza. They are reckless blowhards and conformists pretending to be rebels and picking on the world’s easiest target.
Divining the Future
I would happily settle for being able to see through the end of 2024
When Hatred Spreads
There are approximately 6,000 colleges and universities in America, and almost all of them will hold commencement ceremonies in the next few weeks to honor their graduates.
More than 300 Clergy Members Sign Letter Asking Columbia University To Protect Jewish Students.
Letter was written by Los Angeles Rabbis Erez Sherman and Nolan Lebovitz
Hollywood
Spielberg Says Antisemitism Is “No Longer Lurking, But Standing Proud” Like 1930s Germany
Young Actress Juju Brener on Her “Hocus Pocus 2” Role
Behind the Scenes of “Jeopardy!” with Mayim Bialik
Podcasts
Shani Seidman: Manischewitz, Passover Memories and Matzo Brei
Joan Nathan: “My Life in Recipes” and Pecan Lemon Torte
More news and opinions than at a
Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.
More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.