fbpx

Barak’s Threatened Promises

Reform and Conservative leaders -- who have been lobbying for years to have their rabbis, institutions and practices recognized in the Jewish state -- do not expect the government of Prime Minister Ehud Barak to usher in an era of change.
[additional-authors]
July 8, 1999

The post-election optimism among advocates of religious pluralism in Israel has dampened somewhat with the inclusion of three Orthodox parties in Israel’s new government.

Reform and Conservative leaders — who have been lobbying for years to have their rabbis, institutions and practices recognized in the Jewish state — do not expect the government of Prime Minister Ehud Barak to usher in an era of change.

However, they say the elections have brought about some encouraging developments, including potentially sympathetic ears in key ministries and an increase in the Knesset in the number of supporters of religious pluralism.

While Reform and Conservative leaders in Israel speak of returning to the court system to fight for religious equality, their counterparts in the United States seem more willing to give Barak a chance to address his primary goal — peace with Syria and the Palestinians — before pressuring him about pluralism concerns.

For their part, Orthodox leaders in the United States say they are taking a “wait-and-see” approach to the new Israeli government.

During his campaign, Barak promised he would never support the controversial conversion bill, which lies at the heart of the pluralism conflict.

The bill, which would anchor in law the long-standing de facto Orthodox control over conversions in Israel, was proposed by those concerned that the Supreme Court was trying to change the status quo.

Barak also promised that under his administration, no Jew of any stream would feel like a second-class Jew in Israel.

In Jerusalem, Rabbi Ehud Bandel, president of the Masorti movement, as the Conservative movement is known in Israel, said the liberal movements would be watching closely to see if Barak keeps his campaign promises.

“This was certainly not the change we were anticipating,” said Bandel, referring to the inclusion of three Orthodox blocs in Barak’s coalition.

The groups are the Shas and the National Religious parties, and the United Torah Judaism bloc.

Coalition agreements Barak signed with the National Religious Party and Shas implied that the Orthodox parties may still attempt to revive the conversion bill legislation, although the possibility of a new committee to discuss compromises was also mentioned.

“The bottom line is that our work is not going to be done for us by Barak,” Regev said.

“Our work will be as critical as ever, both in terms of mobilizing public opinion in Israel and throughout the Jewish world, and through addressing concrete issues by launching legal challenges.”

In New York, Rabbi Ammiel Hirsch, executive director of ARZA — Association of Reform Zionists of America, emphasized that the Reform movement wants to give Barak’s government the opportunity to accomplish its primary goal — attaining peace with Syria and the Palestinians.

“To a certain degree we’re giving him the benefit of the doubt,” Hirsch said, noting that “all in all we feel better with this government than the past government on matters of importance to us. It’s not perfect, but it’s better than it was.”

Rabbi Ismar Schorsch, chancellor of the Conservative movement’s New York-based Jewish Theological Seminary, agreed that peace should be Barak’s top priority, adding that “absence of peace exacerbates the religious-secular rift.”

Schorsch, like others in the liberal Judaism camp, pointed to the role that potentially sympathetic leaders in the ministries of Education and Interior, formerly headed by Orthodox parties, may play in advancing religious pluralism.

The Education Ministry is now headed by Yossi Sarid, of the leftist Meretz Party, and the Interior Ministry — which controls crucial issues of citizenship and immigration — is now headed by Natan Sharansky, of the Yisrael Ba’Aliyah immigrants party.

“On the ground, on a daily basis there will be a great deal of relief in the religious pluralism area,” Schorsch said.

Orthodox leaders in the United States said they do not expect-and do not want to see-major changes in Israel on the religious pluralism front.

The Orthodox Union, led by Dr. Mandell Ganchrow, recently formed an international Orthodox group that will present a united response on the part of Orthodox Diaspora Jewry to issues that concern Israel.

“We intend to speak out, be pro-active and articulate positions to ensure the Torah standards that have guided the people of Israel for thousands of years, including one standard for conversion, marriage and divorce supported by Israel’s Chief Rabbinate,” Ganchrow said.

The new organization will issue statements and arrange for delegations to meet with the government leaders and the press.

Ganchrow and Rabbi Avi Shafran, spokesman for the fervently Orthodox Agudath Israel of America, said the religious pluralism issue is of little concern to most Israelis. Noting that one-fourth of the Jewish vote in Israel went to a religious party, Shafran said, “It’s not at all hyperbole to say a full quarter of the Jewish population, if not more, considers what in America we call Orthodoxy to be the authentic expression of Jewish religion.”

“Even if they don’t choose to be observant, they know that when it comes to defining conversion or if something is kosher, there is only one standard,” said Shafran, who also is director of Am Echad, an organization that aims to present the Orthodox perspective to the Jewish public.

“Radically changing that single standard — which is what the Reform and Conservative movements want — is a dangerous thing to do,” he said.

Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.

Editor's Picks

Latest Articles

More news and opinions than at a
Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.

More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.

More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.