fbpx

Warnock Accused Netanyahu of Endorsing “Occupation Forever”

Georgia Senate candidate Revered Raphael Warnock accused Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in a 2015 sermon of endorsing “occupation today, occupation tomorrow, occupation forever.”
[additional-authors]
December 10, 2020
Democratic U.S. Senate candidate Raphael Warnock speaks at a campaign event on December 8, 2020. (Photo by Elijah Nouvelage/Getty Images)

Georgia Senate candidate Revered Raphael Warnock accused Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in a 2015 sermon of endorsing “occupation today, occupation tomorrow, occupation forever.”

Warnock said in the sermon that both Israeli and Palestinian children have been “caught in the crossfire” in “a land of violence and bloodshed and occupation.” He proceeded to call Netanyahu, who was running for re-election at the time, a “clever politician” and said that Netanyahu’s opposition to a two-state solution at the time amounted to Netanyahu supporting “occupation today, occupation tomorrow, occupation.”

The reverend proceeded to argue that without a Palestinian state, Israel will cease to exist as a Jewish democracy because the Arabs would eventually outnumber the Jews in Israel if the Israeli government were to forgo a two-state solution. “You will have to have apartheid in Israel that denies other citizens, sisters and brothers, citizenship or you will have a democracy that is not a Jewish state,” Warnock said.

He then pointed out that Netanyahu had warned about Arabs coming to the polls in that election, which Warnock called a “racist and vicious” statement. Netanyahu later apologized for that remark.

 

Republican Jewish Coalition Executive Director Matt Brooks argued in a statement that Warnock had compared Netanyahu to segregationist George Wallace, who said “segregation now, segregation tomorrow and segregation forever” during his 1963 inaugural address as the then-governor of Alabama. Brooks called this apparent comparison “simple hatemongering,” pointing to the fact that Linda Sarsour agreed with Warnock’s apparent comparison of Netanyahu to Wallace.

“Warnock claims to have recently come to understand that Hamas is a violent enemy threatening Israel,” Brooks said. “There is a great deal more that he needs to learn about the Palestinians’ goal of genocide and Israel’s history of sacrificing for peace, before the Jewish community could ever begin to trust his newly announced ‘support’ of Israel. The preponderance of anti-Israel statements in his past argues that he will side with Israel’s opponents in the Democratic Party and against Israel at every opportunity.”

 

Democratic Majority for Israel, a pro-Israel Democratic group that recently endorsed Warnock, accused the RJC of “engaging in purposeful misreading & demagoguery” of Warnock’s sermon.

 

A spokesperson from the Warnock campaign told Fox News that Warnock “does not believe Israel is an apartheid state.” Warnock had previously been under fire for his name appearing on a letter that drew a comparison between Israel’s treatment of Palestinians in the West Bank and “apartheid South Africa,” as well as for accusing Israel of shooting “unarmed Palestinian brothers and sisters” in 2018 during the riots at the Israel-Gaza border after the Trump administration moved the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem.

The controversy prompted Warnock to write an op-ed for the Jewish Democratic Council of America (JDCA) on November 10 stating that he doesn’t believe that Israel is an apartheid state and that while he supports “our current partnership with Israel,” he believes that a two-state solution is the only way for there to be peace between Israel and the Palestinians. He also announced his opposition to “the BDS [Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions] movement and its anti-Semitic underpinnings, including its supporters’ refusal to acknowledge Israel’s right to exist.”

Warnock reiterated these remarks in a December 8 virtual event with JDCA, stating that he believes in Dr. Martin Luther King’s sentiment that Israel’s security and right to exist is “uncontestable.” He also said he is having an “increased recognition” about the threat Hamas poses to Israel and that his past comments on Israel were out of concern for Palestinian rights.

Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.

Editor's Picks

Latest Articles

Bringing Israeli Doctors Back

ScienceAbroad works with two groups in medicine: physicians who leave Israel for fellowships and Israeli students who attend medical school in Europe.

The Antizionist’s Dilemma

It’s not easy being an antizionist these days. Especially if you’re determined to live in accordance with your most important moral imperative: the denigration of the world’s only Jewish state.

How the Supreme Court Adapted Parshat Shoftim

The Torah offers a better model than avenging and avoiding. It offers a safe opportunity for parties to meet and peacefully explain their perspectives, which might have been misunderstood. They can offer apologies and, where necessary, make amends for harms caused.

Can One Be a Non-Observant Orthodox Jew?

The tradition has always been bigger than any one person’s grip on it. What draws me is simple: I think these texts are a good part of why we are still here as a people. I want to know them and, in my own way, embrace them. Orthodox is where I turn.

Lies, Damned Lies and the Right Side of History

One question alone matters these days: Does this fact strengthen my tribe, or is it bad for it? If bad, it must be suppressed, denied, explained away. The higher truth is the narrative that serves the cause, the quest of the righteous and true.

Life Lessons in Old Age

Hardship and joy are present at every step. There is no time when it will be all good, so focus on the good and carry on. There are always moments to savor and appreciate.

Is Mamdani Helping Bibi?

By explicitly linking Mamdani’s efforts to rising levels of antisemitism, Netanyahu was able to frame himself as a defender of Israel against growing international hostility.

A Boy, Busts and Bulls

When will we finally cease having hopes that Islamists will honor their commitments to ceasefires? Hasn’t the time finally arrived when we can give up any illusion that terrorists will magically be transformed into diplomats, forsaking their keffiyeh scarves for a Calvin Klein makeover?

More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.