fbpx

November 5, 2024

Thoughts on Kristallnacht in a Post-October 7th World

Eighty-six years ago this week, a series of pogroms took place in Germany. More than 1,000 synagogues were burned, their pews destroyed, sacred Torah scrolls, and holy books set aflame. More than 7,000 Jewish businesses were ransacked and 30,000 men aged 16-60 were arrested and sent off to newly expanded German concentration camps. These pogroms were given a fancy name, Kristallnacht (The Night of Broken Glass), and it is by that name that they are best known. 

Over the past 30 years the Germans have ceased to refer to Kristallnacht as Kristallnacht but as the Reich pogroms of November 1938. Crystal is beautiful, and has a certain sound and delicacy to it, but the “Reich pogroms” tells the much deeper truth of sanctioned violence against the Jews. 

Synagogues were often built in triangulation with the Cathedral and the Protestant Churches to indicate that Germany was a pluralistic, multi-religious community and the synagogues that were built were an expression of the great progress that the Jews had made within Germany. By building buildings of significance, Jews made their presence and their prominence manifest. 

What the Nazis were doing that night was to essentially show the most physical, the most public way imaginable how far they were willing to go, what price they were willing to pay, to tear the Jewish community out of the fabric of Germany.

What the Nazis were doing that night was to essentially show in the most physical, the most public way imaginable how far they were willing to go, what price they were willing to pay, to tear the Jewish community out of the fabric of Germany. 

How did the German synagogue function under Nazism?  On Monday it became a theater because Jewish actors could not perform on the German stage.  On Tuesday it became a symphony hall as Jewish musicians were dismissed from German orchestras. On Wednesday it became an opera house, because opera singers needed a place to earn a living. During the day the synagogue served as a school, for Jewish children expelled from German schools. Their teachers were often professors, writers and artists struggling to survive in a new world. The art teacher might be a world-class artist; the music instructor, a concert pianist. The Jewish school was the safest place for a Jewish child; yet the most dangerous part of the student’s day was walking to and from school. Harassment was routine, bullying was accepted, violence was sanctioned. Teachers turned their back even when they did not overly encourage the violence. 

On Monday morning the synagogue became the place for the distribution of welfare. On Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday, classes were convened in the synagogue teaching Jews mobile professions, because the best way to survive, the best way to leave is if you had a mobile profession so you could earn a living in the country to which you must immigrate. Synagogues were a training center for a generation en route to exile.  

The synagogue was also a place where you taught people who didn’t know what it really was to be Jewish.  The synagogue remained a place where prayers were recited, but prayers took on a new meaning. 

Hour after hour on Kristallnacht the pace of the pogrom intensified, and minute by minute the damage toll increased. No Jewish institution or business or home was safe. The terror directed at the Jews was often not the action of strangers but neighbors. Some brought their children to see the burning synagogues, just as an earlier generation in the American South brought children to lynchings and just as only three years later ordinary men and women in Latvia, Lithuania, Poland and in other former Soviet occupied territories brought their children to see the “Holocaust by Bullets,” the execution and burial in mass graves of Jewish neighbors and even friends. 

In the aftermath of Kristallnacht, the Jews in Germany were left without their synagogues. Many had lost their businesses and their homes. The concentration camps of Buchenwald, Dachau and Sachsenhausen were overflowing with new Jewish inmates. Most Jews were without illusions. Jewish life in the Reich was no longer possible. Many committed suicide. The most desperate tried to leave. Unwanted at home, Jews had only a few havens abroad. They could not stay and yet they had nowhere to go. 

The American response to the 1938 pogroms was interesting if not fascinating.  By 1938, America understood and had embodied the value of freedom of religion. No other event garnered such universal condemnation. From the extreme right to the extreme left, leadership in the Catholic, Protestant and every other form of religious denomination condemned Kristallnacht. If you are setting a synagogue up in smoke, you are destroying freedom of religion.  

By attacking the synagogue, the Nazis were attacking not only the heart and soul of the Jewish community, but they were also attacking the institution that had responded to the catastrophe. The Nazis deprived Jews of anything roughly resembling a public life or a communal life.  And they violently ripped them out of the presence of German society.  

In 2024, what are the implications of remembering the November 1938 pogroms in the post-Oct. 7 world? 

• The synagogue remains the most important symbol of the Jewish presence in a society.  

• An attack on a synagogue is an attack on all society. 

• Synagogues must be secured not only by self-protection but by civil society which regards freedom of worship as an essential, indispensable component of a free society. The same is true for Hillel Houses in the center of campuses and for other Jewish buildings. 

In Europe, synagogues have become seemingly armed camps, protected by the police and even the military. We cannot allow that to happen in the United States. 

• Civil society must hold.  In the aftermath of the worst antisemitic killings in American History, the Tree of Life Synagogue murders, civil society took control; political leaders, police officials, religious leaders and communal leaders all came together. The Pittsburgh Steelers and the Pittsburgh Penguins put Jewish Stars on their uniforms, the World Series paused for a Moment of Silence, and the Pittsburgh Gazette printed the Kaddish on its front page. Haters cannot win, if those who do not hate join together to defeat them. 

• Mayors and Governors, police chiefs and district attorneys, moral leaders and community leaders must take the lead, and Jews must call upon their friends to step forward. 

• Religious leaders must also step forward. Freedom of religion must mean freedom for all religions including Jews. 

• If a swastika is painted on a Jewish building, a priest, a minister, an imam and all civil leaders must join hands with the rabbi in cleansing the building and jointly removing the stain.  

• We may not allow our friends to become indifferent, and certainly, not compliant 

• If powerless Jews in 1938 Germany were not passive, powerful Jews today dare not remain passive, or worse yet, be reluctant to exercise their power and call upon their friends. 

• We dare not accept this level of antisemitism as the “new normal.”  

So we remember. 

• We remember with pride the role of the synagogue and the prominence of the synagogue in German society.  

• We remember the cruelty that was inflicted on Jews 86 years ago. 

• We remember the bystanders who watched the synagogues burn and who brought their kids to watch the synagogues burn.   

• We remember the outrage of the world that did not step up to do something serious about the situation.  

• We remember the courage of the Jews who understood they had to get out and that got out, and the despair of the Jews who knew they had to get out and couldn’t find a place to go. 

• We remember sadly that this was only the beginning: the beginning of the end. 

And as a post-Oct. 7 society, we must resolve to make this the end to the explosive antisemitism we are experiencing today.


Dr. Michael Berenbaum is educational consultant to ASHER, the American Society for Holocaust Education and Remembrance.  

Thoughts on Kristallnacht in a Post-October 7th World Read More »

The ‘Better for Israel’ Thing

These are days of trepidation, and tests. A new president is elected, and the world wonders about the future of the U.S., about the future of U.S. policies, about the future of U.S. involvement in international affairs. Americans go to the polls thinking about the economy, immigration, abortion. The world watches with other things on its mind. 

Every new president is a black box. Yes, he was the president some four years ago. Yes, she is still the VP. And yet, and yet – a new president is a reason to wonder about plans, tendencies, appointments, priorities, pressures. We know – and by “we” I’m narrowing the scope to talking about Israelis – that a new president is tasked with the command to be “good” for America. We wish to think that “good” for America doesn’t mean “less good” for us, Israelis, who have no real say in the choice of a new American leader, but are highly impacted by the outcome. 

Last week, we asked Israelis two questions about Donald Trump and Kamala Harris. We asked which of these two is “better” for the U.S., and which is “better” for Israel. We did not define what “better” means, and better could mean many things. And yet, we got a response that seems sensible: By and large, the share of Israelis who see Trump and Harris as better for America is about the same size. Right-wingers say Trump, center-left voters say Harris. But when the perspective changes, when Israelis are asked about the candidates and Israel, the response changes too — to 56% for Trump 20% for Harris (61%-20% among Jews). 

What causes the variation? It is mostly Israelis on the center and the left who change their view. Here’s an example how: 75% of self-defined “center-left” Israelis say Harris is better for America. It is easy to understand why. These Israelis have views quite similar to the views of the Democratic Party on things such as abortion, democracy, respect for the rights of minorities. But when we asked them about the candidates and Israel, only 46% of them choose Harris as better, while the others shift to either Trump (10%), or “no one” (22%) or “don’t know” (22%). Center-left Israelis have a hard time explicitly pointing at Trump — Trump! — as their preferred choice. Still, they make their choice clear by refraining from sticking with Harris when the question changes.

You might find it strange. “Better” must reflect an ideology. So, you’d expect that Israelis who want a “two-state solution” and Israelis who want an “annexation” would not point at the same person as “better” for Israel. And yet, a clear majority of Israelis do. Why? Because there are some things on which most Israelis agree, and these are the exact issues on which Trump seemed to them like the “better” choice.

A clear majority of Israelis think Trump would be “better” for Israel. Why? Because there are some things on which most Israelis agree, and these are the exact issues on which Trump seemed to them like the “better” choice. 

Let me give you one clear and recent example: the status of UNRWA (The United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East). After many years in which this supposedly humanitarian organization served mainly one purpose – to keep the Palestinian refugee problem as a problem and prevent any hope for ever finding a solution that does not involve damage to Israel’s security and future – Israel had had enough. Involvement of UNRWA workers in acts of terrorism on Oct. 7 and after, pushed the Knesset to make a move. It decided that Israel is going to cut ties with the agency, and thus make it much more complicated for UNRWA to operate. 

The U.N. reacted as you’d expect it to react. The U.S. reacted – well, here’s where the “good for Israel” becomes an issue – by saying it is “deeply troubled.” The U.S. called UNRWA “a key partner.” That’s an agency that 92 Members of Knesset voted against. The only MKs opposing it were Arab MKs – all 10 of them. There’s no more consensus than that. There’s no clear sign that for a clear majority of Israelis “better for Israel” means accepting the idea that UNRWA isn’t a solution to anything, it is a problem. 

 What is Harris’ position on UNRWA? Former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley described the situation aptly: “the U.S. stopped giving them hundreds of millions of dollars … Biden-Harris gave the money back.” So, the position of the Biden administration (and there’s no hint that Harris was an objector on this issue) is one that Israelis reject. It is not the right-wing coalition rejecting it. It is not “Netanyahu.” It is not the “pro-annexation camp.” It is the representatives of all Jewish Israelis. It is 80% of the country. It is a rare consensus on what needs to be done, on what’s better for Israel. 

You can call it a litmus test. You can call it a case with which to reject the often-repeated truism that “better” is always in the eye of the beholder and a matter for debate between two or three Israeli camps – and thus that the mere question of who’s better for Israel is unanswerable. 

But it is answerable. UNRWA is an answer.

Something I wrote in Hebrew

Here’s what I urged my fellow Israelis to keep in mind:

Remember this is not our election. They will affect us, of course, but they are not ours. If they tell you: “She” or “he” lost the elections because of Israel or Gaza — don’t believe it. True, it is possible that several thousands of voters in one or two states will vote one way or the other because of Israel or Gaza, and in that state there will be a small margin in favor of one of the candidates, and people here are going to say “Hey, our issue decided the elections in America.” It’s a nice story for newspapers, that isn’t true in any way. Even in a state where 30,000 votes will decide the election, and even if it turns out that there are 30,000 votes that voted one way or another because of Israel (Muslims in Michigan, Jews in Georgia, whatever), there will be many millions more voters whose interest is in other things. Their issues will decide the election, not ours.

A week’s numbers

Israelis understand that “better” for Israel isn’t always “better” for America (survey by JPPI).

A reader’s response

Abigail Silver wrote: “I’m more worried about antisemitism than about Israel.” My response: Some days, me too.


Shmuel Rosner is senior political editor. For more analysis of Israeli and international politics, visit Rosner’s Domain at jewishjournal.com/rosnersdomain.

The ‘Better for Israel’ Thing Read More »

The Dilemma of Iran’s Support for Its Proxies

According to Ham-mihan newspaper on Oct. 28, 2024, Kourosh Ahmadi, an international affairs analyst close to the Iranian regime, stated in an interview: “Tensions [in the Middle East] will continue only if Israel’s policy is to destroy the Axis of Resistance, while Iran seeks to defend it.” Following Israel’s attack on military targets in Iran, Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ali Khamenei, remarked, “Some believe that refraining from producing certain weapons that provoke arrogant powers, including missiles, can bring security for Iran [read: the Iranian regime]. But this false notion essentially instructs the people and officials to keep the country weak to ensure security.”

The Regime’s Role in Regional Destabilization

On the first day of the war in the Middle East last October, few believed the Iranian regime was the driving force behind the conflict. However, the Iranian opposition, the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI), based on 45 years of experience resisting a regime that masks domestic repression with external wars and crises, declared that the heart of warmongering lies in Tehran.

After the 2022 uprising, the Iranian regime teetered on the edge of collapse and depended on conflict and crisis in the region to survive. It turned to foreign wars to prevent another uprising and avoid being overthrown by the Iranian people and their resistance. In a speech on Oct. 23, referring to Yahya Sinwar, the leader of Hamas, and Hassan Nasrallah, the leader of Hezbollah, Khamenei said, “If it weren’t for Yahya Sinwar and Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah, the fate of the region would have been different.” Germany’s Foreign Minister stated, “It is absolutely clear that [the Iranian regime] is behind these attacks.” In its 45-year history, this regime has not seen a single moment without war and bloodshed, either in the region or within Iran itself.

Hezbollah’s Role in the Region

Among the Iranian regime’s proxy forces, which have expanded its warmongering, crisis-exporting, and terrorism in the region and even into parts of East Africa, Hezbollah holds a unique position. Hezbollah has been involved in various international assassinations, such as the bombing of the U.S. Marine barracks in Lebanon and the attack on the Jewish community center in Argentina, and it has also played a critical role in training and coordinating resistance forces for terrorist acts and warfare. Hezbollah took part in the final coordination between Hamas and other forces involved in the Oct. 7 attack, and in Syria it served as the backbone of proxy forces that brutally suppressed the Syrian people, resulting in hundreds of thousands of deaths.

Hezbollah has also been heavily involved in drug trafficking, generating substantial revenues while establishing ties with criminal gangs, providing a strategic advantage to the regime.

The Strategic Deadlock of the Iranian Regime

The Iranian regime is compelled to support its proxies and will not abandon them unless in absolute weakness, as war and crisis are essential to the regime’s survival. However, continuing this support risks direct confrontation with Israel, which would inevitably spark popular uprisings. Moreover, the path to a nuclear bomb has been effectively closed, as crossing this red line would bring irreversible consequences.

The Policy of Appeasement Toward the Regime

For the past four decades, the European Union and the U.S. have pursued a appeasement policy of dialogue with the Iranian regime despite the regime’s severe human rights violations, which, according to the U.N. Special Rapporteur’s July 2024 report, amount to genocide and crimes against humanity. This policy has granted the regime international impunity.

Ignoring the regime’s interference and terrorism in the region has led to visible consequences: A significant portion of the Middle East is in flames. With its unchecked terrorism, the regime has turned Europe into part of its battlefield. From June 2018 to June 2024, Iran was responsible for at least 11 attacks in Europe, including an assassination attempt on Professor Alejo Vidal-Quadras, former vice president of the European Parliament.

The religious dictatorship also collaborates with organized crime groups to expand its terrorism, making the regime an immediate threat to European and global security. Continuing this policy leads directly to the crises we are now witnessing in the Middle East.

A Democratic Alternative as the Key to Regional Peace

For over four decades, the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI) has served as a democratic alternative to the regime. This coalition brings together various political, ideological and religious orientations, united by a shared goal and a rejection of all forms of dictatorship, whether under the Shah or the mullahs.

Several key factors have enabled this resistance to stand firm against the regime and drive change in Iran, including a belief in the separation of state and religion opposing the ruling fundamentalism, long-term resilience at any cost, broad social support, and principles of humanity and equality that strengthen unity among diverse segments of Iranian society, including Shiite and Sunni Muslims, non-Muslims, and oppressed ethnic minorities. This alternative aims to establish a republic based on gender equality and autonomy for ethnic minorities — a country free from executions and torture, and a nonnuclear Iran in peace and solidarity with its neighbors and the entire world.


Hamid Enayat is a political scientist, specializing on the topic of Iran, who collaborates with the Iranian democratic opposition.

The Dilemma of Iran’s Support for Its Proxies Read More »

This Veterans Day Remember This Jewish Dodger

Fans of the Los Angeles Dodgers no doubt consider Freddie Freeman a hero for his MVP performance in the World Series. But with Veterans Day approaching, all Americans should take a moment to appreciate the valor of a former Dodger less well-known to today’s baseball aficionados — Moe Berg, a catcher who spied for the U.S. during World War II.

Morris Berg was born to Russian-Jewish immigrant parents in a tenement on East 121st Street in Manhattan on March 2, 1902. At seven, demonstrating a passion for both the game and secret identities, he played for a Methodist Church team under the pseudonym Runt Wolfe. 

After graduating Barringer High School, Berg played shortstop for Princeton, where he majored in modern languages. He and another teammate would communicate on the field in Latin.

As Nicholas Dawidoff details in “The Catcher Was a Spy,” his definitive biography of Berg, after graduating magna cum laude in 1923, Berg was signed by the Brooklyn Dodgers (known then as the Robins) and batted .186 in 49 games. St. Louis Cardinals scout Mike Gonzalez notoriously coined the phrase “good field, no hit” after watching him play.

Continuing to balance his intellectual and athletic interests he then spent the winter studying philosophy at the Sorbonne in Paris. In 1926, as a student at Columbia Law School, he joined the White Sox and shifted to a catcher after the team’s first three options were injured. The move, and Berg’s enigmatic nature, were praised by legendary manager Casey Stengel, who remarked, “I call him the mystery catcher. Strangest fellah who ever put on a uniform.”

In 1929, Berg hit a career-high .288 in 106 games and received two votes in balloting for the American League’s Most Valuable Player. That was his hitting peak, however, and he retired after 15 years with a lifetime batting average of .243. One teammate quipped, “He can speak ten languages, but he can’t hit in any of them.”

In the meantime, however, Berg leveraged his athletic abilities in support of America. In 1934, while in Japan on a goodwill tour alongside all-star teammates Babe Ruth and Lou Gehrig, Berg, who had learned Japanese, took home movies of the Tokyo skyline that were eventually used in General Jimmy Doolittle’s 1942 bombing raids on the Japanese capital following the attack on Pearl Harbor. 

Following his 1939 retirement as a player, Berg remained a committed patriot. He undertook an undercover assignment as a sports ambassador in Latin America under the auspices of the Office of the Coordinator of Inter-American Affairs – a U.S. government agency dedicated to countering German and Italian propaganda efforts in Latin America. He parlayed that opportunity into a job as an officer in the Office of Strategic Services (OSS), the forerunner of the CIA, in 1943. 

At the OSS, his missions included posing as a businessman in Switzerland and being dropped behind enemy lines in Italy to make contact with an Italian atomic scientist. Also fluent in German, Berg was assigned to potentially assassinate the leading German physicist and Nobel Prize winner Werner Heisenberg, in Zurich if Heisenberg indicated during a lecture there that Berlin was close to developing an atomic bomb. (Germany wasn’t, so Berg didn’t kill Heisenberg.)

At the OSS, his missions included posing as a businessman in Switzerland and being dropped behind enemy lines in Italy to make contact with an Italian atomic scientist. 

In 1945, Berg was selected to receive the Medal of Freedom, the top honor given to civilians during wartime, from President Harry S. Truman. The citation read: “Mr. Morris Berg, United States Civilian, rendered exceptionally meritorious service of high value to the war effort from April 1944 to January 1946. In a position of responsibility in the European Theater, he exhibited analytical abilities and a keen planning mind. He inspired both respect and constant high level of endeavor on the part of his subordinates which enabled his section to produce studies and analysis vital to the mounting of American operations.” 

Though Berg declined to accept the award, his sister later did, later donating it to the Baseball Hall of Fame. 

When his contract wasn’t renewed by the government, Berg struggled financially. In 1960, he agreed to write a book about his peripatetic life, but the project collapsed when the editor realized Berg was not Moe Howard from comedy troupe The Three Stooges. 

Berg’s dual passions for espionage and baseball remained unabated, however. In 1969, Dawidoff writes, Berg “probably” played a role in providing Israel with 100 military helicopters in an effort to aid an American ally, and might have met Israeli Prime Minister Golda Meir. Three years later, minutes before he died at the age of 70 on May 29, 1972, he purportedly turned to a hospital nurse and with his last words asked: “How did the Mets do today?” They had won. Berg’s baseball card today is the only one on display in the CIA Museum.


Rabbi Dr. Stuart Halpern is Senior Adviser to the Provost of Yeshiva University and Deputy Director of Y.U.’s Straus Center for Torah and Western Thought. His books include “The Promise of Liberty: A Passover Haggada,” which examines the Exodus story’s impact on the United States, “Esther in America,” “Gleanings: Reflections on Ruth” and “Proclaim Liberty Throughout the Land: The Hebrew Bible in the United States.”

This Veterans Day Remember This Jewish Dodger Read More »

Jews and Democrats

I hope we will know who our next president is by the time you read this column. But because I wrote this on Monday, the day before voting concluded, there was no way to predict whether the results will be finalized on Tuesday night – or whether we will be forced to wait days or even weeks before we know the final outcome.

We also won’t know precisely how the Jewish community voted until the first post-election exit polls are released, although most pre-election surveys suggest a small movement this year toward Trump and other Republican candidates. While likely falling far short of the massive shift that Trump has predicted, it does appear that discomfort among a small number of Jewish voters toward progressive Democrats’ anti-Israel sentiments has cost Harris some level of support.

These changes, coupled with larger shifts among Arab-American voters to Trump because of that community’s unhappiness with the Biden Administration’s approach to the Middle East, may have made the key swing state of Michigan a more difficult challenge for Democrats. But barring a realignment of unexpected proportions, it should be safe to say that the Gaza war has not changed the fact that large majorities of American Jews will continue to remain loyal Democrats.

Barring a realignment of unexpected proportions, it should be safe to say that the Gaza war has not changed the fact that large majorities of American Jews will continue to remain loyal Democrats. 

Which makes this a useful opportunity for us to revisit the long-standing question of why the Jewish community leans so reliably leftward. Now that many Latino voters have begun to reexamine their long-standing Democratic ties, American Jews are the only ethnic group in American politics that seems to have resisted the trajectory that immigrants have generally followed after coming to this country. This discussion is a familiar one: As far back as the Irish and Italian immigrants who arrived here in the 18th and 19th centuries, most of those who came to the U.S. over our history gravitated toward crowded urban neighborhoods which they shared with others from their home countries.

For most of that time, Democrats have dominated the political machines in these coastal big cities, partly by providing services and support for the economically disadvantaged. Waves of immigrants from Southern and later Eastern Europe, and more recently from Latin America and Asia, benefited from this assistance, and their communities began their participation in the American political system as consistent Democratic voters.

But as these immigrants settled and became more economically successful, they often moved away from the urban cores to more comfortable and spacious suburban settings. As their personal financial situations improved, many began to realign politically as well. As a result, the children and grandchildren of these early arrivals became more likely to vote Republican. The two exceptions to these trends had always been Jewish and Latino voters, both of whom remained Democrats in large numbers even while ascending the economic ladder. Until now.

This Jewish “exception” has frustrated Republicans for decades, and their exasperation has grown as the two parties’ constituencies have adopted increasingly different feelings about Israel. But Jewish voters have made it clear to pollsters for many years that Israel has not been as high a priority for them as domestic social and cultural issues, such as abortion rights and anti-poverty programs. Whether these preferences are a result of the Jewish people’s history as targets of discrimination and oppression, because of cultural discomfort with the religious conservatism that dominates today’s GOP, or perhaps for other reasons, I will defer to those wiser than me. But the end result is a demographic group that is unique in its approach to American politics.

These decisions have become even more difficult over the last 13 months. The Gaza war has demonstrated the rising strength of anti-Israel progressives in the Democratic Party. We’ve also seen a continued expansion of the nativist ugliness on the far right that has become more unavoidable both in discussions of foreign policy and our daily lives. The most unyielding partisan zealots on both sides work mightily to pretend that their party is entirely blameless. The rest of us know better, and we will continue to grudgingly accept the imperfect alternatives available to us.


Dan Schnur is the U.S. Politics Editor for the Jewish Journal. He teaches courses in politics, communications, and leadership at UC Berkeley, USC and Pepperdine. He hosts the monthly webinar “The Dan Schnur Political Report” for the Los Angeles World Affairs Council & Town Hall. Follow Dan’s work at www.danschnurpolitics.com.

Jews and Democrats Read More »

Ahead of General Election, Get-Out-the-Vote Effort Targets Jewish L.A. Voters

Signs reading “Don’t Kvetch. Vote” and “Your Vote. Your Jewish Future” decorate a midsize retail space on S. Beverly Drive in Beverly Hills.

It’s the recently launched voter center for Los Angeles Unites: Coalition of Jewish Voters, a Jewish voter mobilization effort that, since opening on Sept. 19, has enlisted hundreds of volunteers across Los Angeles to register Jewish voters and educate them about the state and local races on the ballot, ahead of the Nov. 5 general election.

As part of a Jewish voter mobilization efforts, volunteers conduct outreach within their social circles. Courtesy of Teach Coalition

The nonpartisan education advocacy group Teach Coalition, a project of the Orthodox Union (OU), was behind the Beverly Hills-based voter center. The initiative worked in partnership with approximately 40 Jewish organizations, including Jewish Federation Los Angeles, to ensure Jews were involved with and participating in the upcoming election.

“For years, we’ve been engaging Jewish communities across the board, making sure our voices are heard to their maximum potential,” Dan Mitzner, OU director of government affairs, said. “We’re not on the menu anymore, we’re at the table. So that’s what we’re about, increasing voter turnout in a major way.”

On Nov. 2, the final Shabbat before the election, 15 Los Angeles synagogues partnered with Los Angeles Unites on “We Vote Shabbat,” an initiative to raise awareness about the importance of voting. 

Mitzner described the voting center as a “hub of volunteerism,” where volunteers, known as “Super Volunteers,” were enlisted for their social networks. Among other responsibilities, the volunteers conducted outreach to their extensive contacts and ensured they were registered to vote. 

To do so, each volunteer downloaded an app to their phone that allowed them to connect to their contact list, see who has registered to vote and see who has and hasn’t voted. Using this data, volunteers reached out to their contacts and urged them to vote.

This was effective, said Mitzner, who is based in New York, because getting a text message or call from someone you know can be much more impactful than receiving a random, automated message.

The outreach strategy was “relational,” he said. “We’re making it a peer-to-peer movement.”

While Mitzner acknowledged giving a volunteer access to a friend’s voter information can seem “A little Big Brother-ish,” it’s all public information and doesn’t reveal who someone voted for.

While relative to other communities, Jewish civic engagement was strong, there was still work to be done, Mitzner said.

“We can do better,” he said. “We want to be as close to 100% [voter participation] as we possibly can.” 

With increases in antisemitism happening nationwide in the aftermath of the Oct. 7 attack, the organization’s leadership said Jewish voters were unprecedently driven to participate in the latest election and demonstrate the collective power of their voice.

“Antisemitism is on the ballot,” Mitzner said, pointing to local races that will “have a direct impact on the safety of our community.”

The OU’s Teach Coalition describes itself as a nonprofit and nonpartisan movement that advocates for equitable government funding for nonpublic schools, including Jewish day schools and yeshivas. The organization said it “advocates on behalf of approximately 90% of Jewish day school and yeshivah students nationwide.”

In the months leading up to the election, the OU’s Teach Coalition launched similar get-out-the-vote efforts in New York, Florida and Pennsylvania. It experienced success. In a New York congressional primary race, a “Westchester Unites” campaign contributed to Westchester County Executive George Latimer’s surprising defeat of Rep. Jamaal Bowman, who had expressed opposition to Israel’s war in Gaza. In that election, “15,508 Jewish voters turn[ed] out in a race decided by 12,816 voters,” according to the Teach Coalition.

In Beverly Hills, the voter center was focused on education and outreach, including efforts of combating voter apathy, offering voter registration support and absentee ballot assistance while serving as a hub of community engagement. 

A get-out-the-vote volunteer Courtesy of Teach Coalition

What the organization didn’t do was tell people how to vote.

“We are a 501(c)(3). We don’t rate or endorse any candidates,” Mitzner said. “We don’t provide opinions or endorsements of any candidate. We ask people to do their homework and vote their conscience.”

The Beverly Hills location of the voter center was a natural choice, said Rebecca Zisholtz, director of marketing and communications at the Teach Coalition. When determining where to launch a voter center, the organization sought areas with high foot traffic as well as sizable Jewish communities.

“All of our voter centers are very purposely situated in the heart of Jewish communities,” Zisholtz said. “We want to be where the people are.”

Ahead of General Election, Get-Out-the-Vote Effort Targets Jewish L.A. Voters Read More »

‘Are You a Zionist?’ How Jon Hirsch and His Son Were Forced to Leave an Oakland Coffee Shop Over a ‘Violent’ Star of David Cap

I have known Jon Hirsch since we attended high school together, and for as long as I can remember, he wore baseball caps. Often, they were vintage ones that looked as though they had seen better days. But that was the charm of Jon’s caps. Each one seemed to tell a story. 

Last year, Hirsch, whose maternal grandparents were Holocaust survivors, was researching Jewish orphans as a means of looking into his family history when he saw a banner ad featuring a replica of a Hebrew Orphan Asylum 1938 vintage ballcap. With its unique shape and Star of David embossed on the front, the cap seemed to tell a story. 

Hirsch soon learned that The Hebrew Orphan Asylum, which was located on Manhattan’s Upper East Side, was more than a venerable Jewish charity; its second purpose — famous at the time — was to serve as host of Negro League baseball games, and that included the Negro National League’s New York Black Yankees. He bought the hat instantaneously. 

On Oct. 26, Hirsch, who grew up in Los Angeles, and his five-year-old son walked into Oakland’s Jerusalem Cafe to buy his wife a latte. Hirsch was wearing his vintage ballcap with the Star of David on it. 

While they waited for their order, father and son played chess in the back of the cafe. It was then that the North Oakland coffee shop’s co-owner, Abdulrahim Harara, approached Hirsch and his son and began demanding that they leave. 

“Are you a Zionist?” Harara repeatedly demanded to know, as captured on video by Hirsch. Hirsch refused to answer because, as he told me, he understood that the question should have no bearing on whether someone can remain in a coffee house. 

“This is a violent hat and you need to leave,” declared Harara. 

“This is a violent hat?” Hirsch pushed back. 

The tension worsened and Hirsch’s young son began to cry. The co-owner called the police and Harara and other staff claimed Hirsch was harassing them. Hirsch and his son were eventually forced to leave, but not before Harara followed them into the street and screamed an expletive at the little boy, shouting, “Your dad’s a b—.”

I asked Hirsch if he knew about the one-year-old cafe’s controversy this past year: On its menu, two of its drink offerings featured Hamas’ infamous, inverted red triangle, which marks Israeli targets. One of those drinks was named “Sweet Sinwar” and the other, “Iced In Tea Fada.” Harara, whose family is from Gaza, has denied that “Sweet Sinwar” was named after Yahya Sinwar, the Hamas terrorist mastermind behind Oct. 7, which marked the largest slaughter of Jews since the Holocaust. 

Hirsch had heard about the controversy, but he didn’t know that he and his son had entered the same cafe. And in his experience, Muslims and Jews sharing space does not have to “equate with conflict. That same morning, I was sitting in a Yemeni cafe and reading Hen Mazzig’s book, ‘The Wrong Kind of Jew,’ and had a nice conversation with one of the workers there,” he said.  

But Hirsch is far from naive. Last year, he and his son, who was four years old at the time, entered an Oakland comic book shop. While perusing comics, his son returned to his father and asked, “Abba, what is ‘bloodthirsty’?”

“Since Oct. 7, we have had to teach our son the word, ‘prejudice,’ after he told me that he heard some people at the comic book store say that Israelis are bloodthirsty,” recalled Hirsch. Never one to back down at such a moment, Hirsch took his son by the hand and spoke loud enough for the bigoted people to hear him. “I told my son loudly that what they’re doing is called prejudice,” Hirsch told me.

“Since Oct. 7, we have had to teach our son the word, ‘prejudice,’ after he told me that he heard some people at the comic book store say that Israelis are bloodthirsty.” – Jon Hirsch

The impact of the antisemitic incidents on Hirsch’s now five-year-old son still remains. The child has asked his father if they are allowed to speak Hebrew in stores. He has also asked Hirsch to roll up the windows in the car when he plays Sephardic music. “He asked me if the police are going to take me to Alcatraz,” said Hirsch, who moved to Oakland with his wife and children three years ago. 

In my view, nearly every aspect of the cafe incident seemed hostile to Jews, and that includes how the police handled matters. Oakland police told Hirsch that he was trespassing. A female police officer was holding Hirsch’s driver’s license and writing down his information, and she did not stop Harara from taking a video of his license, which, of course, included his home address. “I tried to pull the clipboard to the other side when she allowed him to film my license and she pulled it away from me,” said Hirsch. 

At one point, the owner of the cafe told him that he wouldn’t have been asked to leave the cafe if he had not entered wearing the cap. She then wrongly informed him that establishments have the right to deny customers service for their religion or sexual orientation. Hirsch couldn’t believe what he was hearing. He described how Harara attempted to defend his action to remove him and his son by telling the property owner that Hirsch “knew where he was at. He knew where he was coming.”

Until this past year, Hirsch had mostly viewed Oakland as an inclusive city. I asked him if he had ever been targeted with antisemitism there before, especially when he had worn the ballcap. “Nine out of 10 interactions about my hat are wonderful and encouraging, and not just from Jews,” he said. “Sometimes, a driver screams ‘Free Gaza,’ or someone whispers something under their breath.” 

In one disturbing case, Hirsch recalled that two volunteers who were canvassing for a ballot initiative approached him, took one look at his cap, and one woman told the other, “Don’t talk to him. All he cares about are the millionaires, the racists, and the conservatives.”

The irony was amazing: For as long as I have known him, Hirsch has proudly remained a bleeding-heart liberal. “I’m probably one of the most active Democratic volunteers you’ve ever met in your life,” he said. “But those are three things she thought she knew about me.” 

The Jewish Community Relations Council Bay Area is working closely with Hirsch to offer support, and Hirsch stressed that he and his family “have received support in every direction. There isn’t a single other Jewish family on our street, but our neighbors have been here to talk to us.” At school, his son’s kindergarten teacher has decided to teach about the upcoming holidays early. Hirsch’s son will be able to teach the class about Hanukkah himself “so he can have a moment of feeling proud and Jewish in front of his peers,” said Hirsch. 

On X, Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Burbank) condemned the incident and offered his support to Hirsch and his family. A spokesperson for California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) told Jewish Insider, “No one should be discriminated against for their religious beliefs. Businesses in California are prohibited from discriminating on the basis of religious identity or beliefs. Hate has no place in our state.”

What happened on Oct. 26 “changed my son’s perception of the world” Hirsch lamented. Recently, he showed his son Schiff’s tweet. “I said, ‘This is our next senator, and he said that what happened to us was wrong. It was the biggest smile of his I’d seen since all this started. After I left his room, I cried for a long time. I’m indebted to Adam Schiff.”

Hirsch is currently pursuing legal options. “My wife asked me, ‘Do you regret buying me a latte?’ But then she said, ‘Every other person I know would have simply left [the cafe]. But this happened to the right person, because you are immovable,’” he said. When asked if he will stay in Oakland, Hirsch responded, “It’s a great question. The answer is that I don’t know. I want to stay. But at a certain point, my principles have to give away to my kids’ needs, and if we have to cut our losses and say this city isn’t safe for us, we will.”

After speaking with Hirsch, I was moved to recognize three takeaways from this revolting incident: First, the fact that Hirsch is a secular Jew is irrelevant; the co-owner of that cafe saw a Star of David on a dark blue baseball cap and immediately identified him as a “violent” Jew whose presence was intolerable. The grandson of a former New York Black Yankees player could have walked in wearing that hat as a tribute to the Hebrew Orphan Asylum and he still would have been accosted for wearing a “violent hat.” 

Second, the fact that a cafe called Jerusalem Coffee House opened in Oakland last year and has yet to be attacked, vandalized or defaced truly says something: Apparently, in America in 2024, the only way you can name a cafe after Jerusalem is if you’re known among locals for despising Israel and naming drinks after terrorists. Harara is Palestinian and opened the Jerusalem Coffee House, which claims to celebrate Palestinian culture. Would an Israeli ever attempt to open a cafe in Oakland named after Hebron, home to the Caves of the (Jewish) Patriarchs, and celebrate Jewish culture?

And third, I am reminded that what is experienced early in life always cuts deeper. “That cap became a staple in my wardrobe after the comic book shop incident,” said Hirsch. “I was raised in L.A. by two Holocaust survivors. I wanted my son to see me as an example of wearing that Star of David in public. If I could have it tattooed on my head, I would.”


Tabby Refael is an award-winning writer, speaker and weekly columnist for The Jewish Journal of Greater Los Angeles. Follow her on X and Instagram @TabbyRefael.

‘Are You a Zionist?’ How Jon Hirsch and His Son Were Forced to Leave an Oakland Coffee Shop Over a ‘Violent’ Star of David Cap Read More »

Who’s Afraid of the Big Bad Jew – the Bad Guys!

My parents taught me “don’t judge a book by its cover” — out of respect for the author. In the case of Rabbi Raphael Shore’s new book “Who’s Afraid of the Big Bad Jew: Learning to Love the Lessons of Jew-Hatred,” it’s the opposite. Judge the book by its bold, striking, Jew-positive cover – out of great respect for this author.

Without knowing anything about the cover’s origins, when you look you see a big, bad-in-a-good-way, strong, muscular Jew, looking down on a sneering, small Adolf Hitler, a balaclava-clad Hamas terrorist and one of the Academic Intifada’s pink-haired, mask-wearing, rampaging snowflakes. The caricature conveys the book’s bold, powerful, unapologetic claim: Although Jew-hatred is an unfortunate fact of life, in this twisted world, it’s actually a mark of respect. The worst people in the world today have joined a cavalcade of history’s greatest killers in choosing to hate us. Then and now, what they most hate about us is that eternal Jewish commitment to living life fully, joyfully, and meaningfully, while making the world a better place.

Admittedly, the book should come with its own trigger warning, as if its unbridled, out-of-the-box cover isn’t warning enough. This summer, Rabbi Shore, a valued colleague, successful film producer and founder of OpenDor Media, a Jewish educational organization, asked me to blurb his book. I confess, I was wary.  

With a quick glance, I saw one politically-incorrect phrase after another practically jumping off the page. Shore argues that “Jew- haters may be evil, but they aren’t always stupid.” He claims that “Judaism and Nazism share the same world view” and that Hitler was correct in labeling himself a “rational antisemite.” Finally, the pièce de résistance, a most toxic combination of words: “Hitler was right.”

I could just imagine the demonization derby the book would trigger — with him, me and anyone else associated with the book canceled. After all, the book does not just get readers thinking the unthinkable. It says the unsayable and, if misquoted, seems to legitimize the illegitimate.

Fortunately, I have this pesky rule I imposed upon myself at the start of my academic career. I insist on reading a book from cover to cover before judging its content – or its cover. I started reading – and was enthralled. 

Rabbi Shore has lived in Israel for 40 years, since graduating from University of Toronto. That means that, as the academic world sucked the oxygen out of its own universe, suffocating so many intellectuals with a boring, heavy-handed conformity, Shore searched for truth. And as too many North American Jews and their peers became thin-skinned, politically-correct and sheep-like, Shore went whole hog Israeli. He is unafraid to defy the conventional wisdom – and ready to shout his heresies from the rooftop — or, more accurately, spread them through hard-hitting films and this book, published by his intrepid publisher (and mine), Adam Bellow of Wicked Son.

At his most delightfully perverse, Shore tells Jews … take the compliment! Apparently, the world’s haters hate Jews because they hate the Jews’ philosophy of love. The evil ones recognize the threat that goodness poses to their malevolent ambitions. In short, he proclaims: “In explaining the root cause of antisemitism, this book will end up illuminating the essence of the Jewish People.” 

The notion of Jews as a “mirror image” of their tormenters is fascinating – and worth pursuing. Going beyond triumphalism or a New Age-y, feel-good-even-if-people-try-to-make-you-feel-bad pretense, Rabbi Shore makes a powerful case for the Jewish people – and Judaism. In so doing, he tackles the ongoing historical mystery: “Why do so many people hate the Jews.” He then explores Jewish identity in a compelling way. And, most important, he shows the world how best to fight the haters. Like any oppressed people, Jews beat the bigots by understanding who we are and celebrating our heritage, our vision, our uniqueness.

Admirably taking the time to probe Nazi ideology, Shore explains that “Hitler articulated the uncomfortable disruptive power of the Jewish People. It is a phenomena that many people feel but cannot articulate. Hitler understood the Jews with icy clarity.”

The “world view” Judaism and Nazism have in common recognizes an “epic ideological struggle” taking place globally, universally, for millennia. “The Nazis fought on the side of brute force and the Jews on the side of love.” Given his satanic ambitions to impose a kingdom of darkness on earth and control the world, “Adolf Hitler was right to fear the Jews. The Jewish People are the Burning Bush that will not be consumed.”

Probing deeper, Shore characterizes Jew-hatred as “the revolt against God and the People who represent Him, against those who were commissioned to bear the ancient moral truths.” Ultimately, then, “Jew-hatred is the struggle to destroy the awesome spiritual potential of humanity by wiping out the Jews.”

Having used the negation of Judaism to define Judaism, Shore then develops the book’s true “purpose.” He wants to understand “the meaning of it all.” Shifting dramatically – and somewhat abruptly – the book builds on Shore’s own journey from superficially being “Jew-ish” as a kid to appreciating the power of God, Jewish peoplehood, and Jewish civilization. 

He argues that Jews have survived and thrived and shaped humanity for millennia “because they are the carriers of information so potent that it has drawn both vehement opposition and begrudging respect from nations.” The Jewish arsenal is “what the Torah calls ‘Jewish weapons’ of the spirit – prayer, Torah study, ethical observance, and belief – in God and His Plan.” 

The Jewish People, he explains, “established a vision for humanity: That history has meaning, that our lives and our world has a purpose, to live with love, mutual respect, human rights, with a utopian vision that all of humanity will one day unite in spirituality, brotherhood and peace.” 

More recently, with the rise of Zionism and Israel’s founding in 1948, this spiritual, ethereal people annoyed the world by adding “a physical army to their spiritual arsenal.” And, trusting in the Lord, Shore deems the Jewish People “indestructible because God’s plan requires an indestructible People, as they are still essential in helping the world fulfill its purpose.“ 

Secular thinkers can question whether God is as present in the world as Rabbi Shore believes. Historians can offer alternative explanations for Jews’ ongoing impact on history and for Jew-hatred’s never-ending, ever-changing, plasticity and toxicity. But every Jew – in fact every person who ever encountered persecution – should learn from the trajectory of Raphael Shore’s argument. We spend far too much time fighting haters, trying to prove what we are not. We need to spend more time learning, affirming, and celebrating who we are and who we can be, regardless of our adversaries or any adversity.

“Who’s Afraid of the Big Bad Jew,” then, is particularly timely. Many Jews are enjoying a post-Oct. 7 “surge” of interest in Judaism – even as the haters spew their surge of venom against Jews, Judaism, Israel and Zionism. We need a robust debate about antisemitism and how to transcend it. We need to make sure that, as I argue in my book of “Letters to My Students,” we prove Jean-Paul Sartre wrong. He said “the antisemite makes the Jew.” No! The Jew makes the Jew. On Oct. 7 – and since – many of us may have discovered what we are willing to fight for, even die for. Now, it’s up to us to determine what we are willing to live for – and what kind of Jewish experiences, values, and, yes, commitments, can help fill our lives with purpose.

“Who’s Afraid of the Big Bad Jew,” then, is particularly timely. Many Jews are enjoying a post-Oct. 7 “surge” of interest in Judaism – even as the haters spew their surge of venom against Jews, Judaism, Israel and Zionism.

Similarly, we in Israel have experienced an extraordinary roller-coaster year of low-lows and high-highs. Without discounting so much misery all around us, there’s been something mystical in the air. It’s as if all the horrors of Oct. 7, all the violence since, has also brought out a softness, a joy, a generosity, a radiance – as well as a sense of focus and mission in Israeli society.

In that spirit, I sent in the following blurb: “I’m confused. Here comes a book about the most depressing of topics – Jew-hatred throughout the ages – yet it’s inspiring, uplifting. Without underestimating how evil it is, how twisted Jews’ enemies are, Rabbi Raphael Shore pulls off the ultimate Jew-Jitsu: He explains that much of the hate comes because Jew-haters hate Judaism’s empowering, soaring, disruptive message. Rather than succumbing to despair – like too many others – Rabbi Shore wisely, bravely, shows us that the best response to those who hate Jews is to embrace Judaism, appreciate its grandeur, and benefit from it. Bravo!!!”

And, PS – Rabbi Shore points out that his striking book cover doesn’t just evoke Nazi propaganda posters from the 1930s gauzily – it’s a mirror-image of one. In the original, the tall muscular superhero is an Aryan German. The large Jewish star originally was a large swastika. And the little munchkins nattering at the central figure are, of course, Jews.

Thus, both verbally and visually, Shore shows how to transform the negative into the positive, despair into hope, and Jew-hatred, the world’s longest hatred, into Jew-positivity. He makes it easy for many of us to embrace Judaism, a most potent, constructive, and inspiring religion and civilization.


Professor Gil Troy, a Senior Fellow in Zionist Thought at the JPPI, the Jewish People Policy Institute, the Global ThinkTank of the Jewish People, is an American presidential historian. His latest book, “To Resist the Academic Intifada: Letters to My Students on Defending the Zionist Dream” was just published. 

Who’s Afraid of the Big Bad Jew – the Bad Guys! Read More »

Autumn Herb Brooms

For many people, the cool days of autumn mean more time in the kitchen cooking up those feel-good recipes. And our favorite comfort foods wouldn’t be the same without fresh herbs adding taste and aroma. 

One creative way to keep fresh herbs on hand is to assemble them into an herb broom, in which herbs are tied together on a stick, or in this case, a wooden spoon. It serves as a functional kitchen decoration and also makes a great hostess gift if you’re invited somewhere for a meal this season.

I recommend using heartier herbs like rosemary, thyme and bay leaves, as they’ll keep their shape as they dry. Avoid delicate varieties like cilantro or basil, as they will wilt quickly.

I’ve created many herb wreaths through the years as hostess gifts, but herb brooms are so much easier to make, and frankly, they’re a lot more fun to give. It’s sure to sweep someone off their feet.

What you’ll need:

Fresh herbs
Wooden spoon
String
Ribbon

1. Place herbs on a paper towel to dry. I like using three herbs for this broom. It’s simple, yet offers variety.

2. Tie some sprigs of herbs to the handle of the wooden spoon using string. The herbs will be more secure if you tie smaller batches at a time to the spoon.

3. Continue tying herbs to the spoon. Adjust the placement of the herbs as needed, and tie some extra knots if any herbs seem loose.

4. Tie a ribbon on the handle to cover the strings.


Jonathan Fong is the author of “Flowers That Wow” and “Parties That Wow,” and host of “Style With a Smile” on YouTube. You can see more of his do-it-yourself projects at jonathanfongstyle.com.

Autumn Herb Brooms Read More »

Shattered Glass Can’t Break Our Jewish Spirit

In the early morning of November 5, someone smashed the storefront glass at Jewish businesses throughout Pico-Robertson. A suspect, who is not yet known, targeted Mezuzah Gallery on Robertson Boulevard, along with Glatt Mart, Elat Market, Got Kosher bakery and Bargain Oakhurst Pharmacy on Pico Boulevard.

LAPD have yet to announce that this is a hate crime since it is still under investigation. However, only Jewish businesses were hit. Though we are still waiting for the facts to come out, my gut is telling me that this was not random. Someone wanted to send us a message.

This comes the same week that gang members spraypainted “F— Jews” outside of a Jewish home in West LA, and a swastika appeared on a trash can at Crescent Bay Park in Santa Monica, according to local activist Sam Yebri.

When antisemitism like this occurs, we have two options. The first is to go into hiding mode; we can put our heads down, try to blend in and not speak up. If we are just quiet, perhaps it’ll all go away, we think.

The second option – the one I choose – is to be more visibly and proudly Jewish than ever. We can keep frequenting Jewish businesses, go to synagogue and wear our head coverings and our Stars of David and stand up for what we believe in. We can show that we will not be intimidated. No matter how much hate comes our way, it won’t deter us from celebrating our Judaism as publicly as possible.

From personal experience, I’ve found that the more visibly Jewish I am, the more the outside world respects me. They see someone who is so sure of herself and doesn’t compromise her values for others. They see someone who is strong and doesn’t care what people think. They see someone with a higher mission and purpose in life, which is commendable.

There are many Jews like me in Pico-Robertson. Even during this difficult time, when antisemitism is alarmingly high, they are also not backing down. They keep living their Jewish lives. They trust in the covenant that Hashem made with the Jewish people: no matter what antisemitism comes our way, we will continue to survive.

In the wake of this latest targeting, I am thankful that nobody was hurt. I am relieved that life is, for the most part, continuing as usual in Pico-Robertson. And I am grateful for LAPD, Jewish security groups Shmira and Magen Am USA and the concerned citizens who posted about these incidents. We are demonstrating that we refuse to be intimidated.

I posted about what happened on social media, and people from all around the United States started messaging me, asking how they could help. One person told me she bought a mezuzah from Mezuzah Gallery’s online store; I sent the link to others so they could do the same. For those who live locally, I urge you to also go to the grocery stores, bakery and pharmacy to show your support. Standing in solidarity with them in this moment is so important.

No matter what happens with the investigation, one thing is for sure: Shattered glass won’t break our Jewish spirit. It’s time to be louder and prouder than ever – here in Los Angeles, and beyond.

Kylie Ora Lobell is an award-winning writer and Community Editor of the Jewish Journal. You can find Kylie on X @KylieOraLobell or Instagram @KylieOraWriter.

Shattered Glass Can’t Break Our Jewish Spirit Read More »