President Trump’s proposed “Big, Beautiful Bill” has faced strong opposition from Democratic leaders and most major media outlets. Critics have portrayed it as extreme and harmful. But a closer look shows that not everyone on the left sees it that way. In fact, some Democrats—even those who don’t support the bill overall—are willing to admit that certain parts deserve serious discussion.
Dakarai Larriett, a Democratic candidate for U.S. Senate in Alabama, is one of those voices. Larriett has made it clear that he does not support the bill as a whole. But unlike many in his party, he’s not calling for it to be dismissed outright. “If we refuse to talk about the few parts that might help people,” Larriett said, “we’re doing more harm than good.”
That kind of honest, balanced view isn’t often heard in today’s political climate. Some Americans, including some Democrats, may be more open to parts of the bill than the media have led people to believe.
One section of the bill focuses on improving how federal agencies use taxpayer money. It proposes detailed audits of every department to reduce waste, eliminate overlap, and modernize outdated programs. These efforts don’t cut benefits. Instead, they aim to make sure public funds are being spent responsibly.
Larriett highlighted the need for better oversight, pointing to incidents like a $67 million fighter jet crashing into the ocean. “We keep arguing about tax brackets,” he said. “But nobody’s asking why billions of dollars disappear every year in defense spending and bloated contracts. Audits shouldn’t be controversial.”
Another part of the bill proposes cuts to Medicaid, raising concerns from Democrats about how these changes might affect people who still qualify. Larriett agrees that this section needs clearer language. “Right now, the eligibility standards aren’t well defined,” he said. “I support stopping fraud, but we need to be careful. You can’t just make broad cuts and hope it affects the right people.”
Instead of rejecting the proposal entirely, Larriett is calling for revisions—not removal. That’s a key distinction that many of the bill’s harshest critics ignore.
Perhaps the most promising section of the bill focuses on education. It offers a national tax credit for donations to Scholarship Granting Organizations (SGOs), which give private school scholarships to students from low- and middle-income families. These types of programs already exist in states like Florida, where organizations like Step Up for Students serve over 120,000 children, many of whom are Black or Hispanic.
Larriett sees this section as especially important. “If you’re a student stuck in a failing school just because of your ZIP code, a scholarship like this can change your life,” he said. “Wealthier families already have options. These programs give working families options too.”
The bill also expands 529 education savings accounts so that families can use them for things like SAT prep, tutoring, homeschooling supplies and job training—not just college tuition. These changes make education savings more flexible and help close the opportunity gap between high- and low-income families.
Finally, the bill invests in workforce development. It increases support for apprenticeships, creates partnerships between high schools and local businesses, and removes restrictions that keep Pell Grants from being used for short-term job training programs. The bill recognizes that not every student wants, or needs, a four-year degree.
Larriett agreed. “Skilled trades are in demand, but students don’t hear about them,” he said. “This bill supports practical paths—like HVAC, coding, or automotive repair—that lead to real jobs.”
“This bill supports practical paths—like HVAC, coding, or automotive repair—that lead to real jobs.”
Despite strong reactions from many in Washington, the “Big, Beautiful Bill” includes several ideas that could bring both parties to the table—if they’re willing to be honest. The bill is not perfect. Some sections need to be changed. Others may need to be removed entirely. But dismissing everything in the bill just because it came from Trump is short-sighted.
As Larriett put it, “If we can’t even say a single policy idea might be worth looking at just because of who proposed it, then we’re not solving problems—we’re just playing games. And the American people are the ones losing.”
Most voters aren’t looking for political drama. They want results. Even if this bill doesn’t pass in full, parts of it—on education, healthcare waste, and federal efficiency—could form the basis for future bipartisan reforms. But only if lawmakers are willing to talk—and to listen.
Gregory Lyakhov is the youngest nationally syndicated columnist in the U.S., with work regularly featured in the New York Post, Wall Street Journal, The Hill, and more.
Trump’s “Big, Beautiful Bill” Isn’t Perfect—But Even Some Democrats See Value
Gregory Lyakhov
President Trump’s proposed “Big, Beautiful Bill” has faced strong opposition from Democratic leaders and most major media outlets. Critics have portrayed it as extreme and harmful. But a closer look shows that not everyone on the left sees it that way. In fact, some Democrats—even those who don’t support the bill overall—are willing to admit that certain parts deserve serious discussion.
Dakarai Larriett, a Democratic candidate for U.S. Senate in Alabama, is one of those voices. Larriett has made it clear that he does not support the bill as a whole. But unlike many in his party, he’s not calling for it to be dismissed outright. “If we refuse to talk about the few parts that might help people,” Larriett said, “we’re doing more harm than good.”
That kind of honest, balanced view isn’t often heard in today’s political climate. Some Americans, including some Democrats, may be more open to parts of the bill than the media have led people to believe.
One section of the bill focuses on improving how federal agencies use taxpayer money. It proposes detailed audits of every department to reduce waste, eliminate overlap, and modernize outdated programs. These efforts don’t cut benefits. Instead, they aim to make sure public funds are being spent responsibly.
Larriett highlighted the need for better oversight, pointing to incidents like a $67 million fighter jet crashing into the ocean. “We keep arguing about tax brackets,” he said. “But nobody’s asking why billions of dollars disappear every year in defense spending and bloated contracts. Audits shouldn’t be controversial.”
Another part of the bill proposes cuts to Medicaid, raising concerns from Democrats about how these changes might affect people who still qualify. Larriett agrees that this section needs clearer language. “Right now, the eligibility standards aren’t well defined,” he said. “I support stopping fraud, but we need to be careful. You can’t just make broad cuts and hope it affects the right people.”
Instead of rejecting the proposal entirely, Larriett is calling for revisions—not removal. That’s a key distinction that many of the bill’s harshest critics ignore.
Perhaps the most promising section of the bill focuses on education. It offers a national tax credit for donations to Scholarship Granting Organizations (SGOs), which give private school scholarships to students from low- and middle-income families. These types of programs already exist in states like Florida, where organizations like Step Up for Students serve over 120,000 children, many of whom are Black or Hispanic.
Larriett sees this section as especially important. “If you’re a student stuck in a failing school just because of your ZIP code, a scholarship like this can change your life,” he said. “Wealthier families already have options. These programs give working families options too.”
The bill also expands 529 education savings accounts so that families can use them for things like SAT prep, tutoring, homeschooling supplies and job training—not just college tuition. These changes make education savings more flexible and help close the opportunity gap between high- and low-income families.
Finally, the bill invests in workforce development. It increases support for apprenticeships, creates partnerships between high schools and local businesses, and removes restrictions that keep Pell Grants from being used for short-term job training programs. The bill recognizes that not every student wants, or needs, a four-year degree.
Larriett agreed. “Skilled trades are in demand, but students don’t hear about them,” he said. “This bill supports practical paths—like HVAC, coding, or automotive repair—that lead to real jobs.”
Despite strong reactions from many in Washington, the “Big, Beautiful Bill” includes several ideas that could bring both parties to the table—if they’re willing to be honest. The bill is not perfect. Some sections need to be changed. Others may need to be removed entirely. But dismissing everything in the bill just because it came from Trump is short-sighted.
As Larriett put it, “If we can’t even say a single policy idea might be worth looking at just because of who proposed it, then we’re not solving problems—we’re just playing games. And the American people are the ones losing.”
Most voters aren’t looking for political drama. They want results. Even if this bill doesn’t pass in full, parts of it—on education, healthcare waste, and federal efficiency—could form the basis for future bipartisan reforms. But only if lawmakers are willing to talk—and to listen.
Gregory Lyakhov is the youngest nationally syndicated columnist in the U.S., with work regularly featured in the New York Post, Wall Street Journal, The Hill, and more.
Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.
Editor's Picks
Israel and the Internet Wars – A Professional Social Media Review
The Invisible Student: A Tale of Homelessness at UCLA and USC
What Ever Happened to the LA Times?
Who Are the Jews On Joe Biden’s Cabinet?
You’re Not a Bad Jewish Mom If Your Kid Wants Santa Claus to Come to Your House
No Labels: The Group Fighting for the Political Center
Latest Articles
Should We Add Something Positive When Asking for Forgiveness?
Book of Life – A B’Sefer Chayim Poem
The Real Free Speech Martyr is Charlie Kirk, Not Jimmy Kimmel
Rosh Hashanah and the Cyrus Accords: Vision and Hope for a New Middle East
Nihilism, the New Normal
The Hope That Baseball Offers
The Jewish Case for Hope Amid History’s Darkness
Judaism refuses to let despair be the final chapter. The messianic hope is not naïve optimism but an act of spiritual defiance. To proclaim that history has meaning in the face of apparent meaninglessness is a form of courage.
The ‘Jewish Nose’ Insult Is Back Again in D.C.
Jokes about Jewish noses are not funny and they are clearly antisemitic.
Arbitariness – Thoughts on Torah Portion Nitzavim 2025
Points of Return – Teshuvah as Working Things Through with Others – Thought on the Shabbat Before Rosh Ha-Shanah 2025
A Plea to Pope Leo: Condemn the Antisemitism of Candace Owens
As antisemitism rises again — and as figures who claim Catholic identity trivialize Hitler and vilify Jews — it is incumbent upon you to speak with moral thunder.
Silence Is Complicity: The Rot at the Heart of Jinsta Influence
Let us speak plainly: many of these influencers are not advocates. They are actors. They cry on cue, curate their grief and sell Jewish tragedy as content. They master the algorithm, not the fight.
Rabbis of LA | 40 Years Down and Many to Go for Rabbi Muskin
“Whenever there is a communal issue, our concept is, ‘let’s try doing it as a community.’ Not just Young Israel. Young Israel is one piece of it.”
AJRCA Accreditation, Autism in Entertainment, iCenter Workshop
Notable people and events in the Jewish LA community.
Athens, Sparta and Jerusalem: Why Netanyahu’s ‘Super Sparta’ Shouldn’t Surprise Us
The tension between Athens and Sparta, openness and fortification, building and defending, has been with the Jewish people from Tanakh through Jabotinsky and into the present moment.
Shofar Blowing in the Wind
This Rosh Hashanah, Synagogues Should Stick to Judaism
If people can give up their cellphones, soda, football and stock trades, they can give up politics for 50 hours.
Rebuilding Lives with Dignity: Ogen’s Lifeline for Israelis in Crisis
For more than 30 years, Ogen, Israel’s trusted nonprofit social lender, has provided families, entrepreneurs, and nonprofits with economic stability, financial guidance, and the tools to rebuild with dignity.
Raphael Lemkin Coined the Term “Genocide.” Now, His Family Says, the Term Is Being Distorted
Kimmel Is Out, But Intifada Is Still In: Hollywood’s Hypocrisy on Political Violence
Free expression is essential in a democracy. No one should call for the censorship of ideas. But there must be accountability when speech crosses into incitement of political violence.
When Good People Do Something
Ari Fuld’s heroism is evident because rarely does the victim become the savior.
A Tale of Two Sunday Evenings in California
While Bill Maher and John Fetterman demonstrated an understanding of Jewish values, across town at the Emmys we saw just the opposite, delivered with the hollow prefix “as a Jew.”
Fallujah and Gaza City: Why Israel Cannot Stop Short of Victory
As Gen. Petraeus warned, “Half-measures in urban warfare do not save lives. They only postpone defeat.”
SNL’s Bowen Yang Has a Genocide Problem
Why is Saturday Night Live star Bowen Yang falsely accusing Israel of genocide, while ignoring the confirmed genocide perpetrated against Muslim Uyghurs in China?
The UN’s War on Israel — and on the Meaning of “Genocide”
It’s hard to overstate how reckless, unserious, and corrosive this claim is — not just for Israel, but for the meaning of the word “genocide” and the principle that nations have a right to defend themselves.
Rosh Hashanah and the American Dream
In reviving this dream, Milken’s center is reviving something even more vital– our faith in life. It is that very faith in life, that force that drove our ancestors, where we can find our optimism as we enter the Jewish new year.
More news and opinions than at a
Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.
More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.