Falling subscriber counts at Netflix and the company’s plummeting stock price surprised investors and purveyors of streaming media this week, but the plot twist was familiar to long-time followers of the content versus distribution power struggle. The uneasy codependence of production and distribution harkens back to the days of silent films, when the Jesse L. Lasky Feature Play Company merged with Adolph Zukor’s Famous Players in 1916, and Famous Players-Lasky acquired a film distribution company called Paramount in a hostile takeover in 1917. The US Department of Justice broke up production and exhibition companies with the 1938 Paramount Consent Decree. The battle for dollars between movie producers and distributors has had more sequels than the James Bond franchise. (Spoiler alert: have you ever heard of Vestron? More about that in a moment.)
NFLX stock declined 35% on Tuesday to $226 from $348, and is down 65% in the last six months from a high of $691. Still, the company has a market value of ~$100 billion.
Netflix offered several reasons for the decline. Subscription-sharing. Proliferation of streaming competitors. Disconnection from Russia. These are plausible, but not comforting explanations, because they don’t imply a quick fix or long-term solution.
Founded in 1997 to sell and rent DVDs via snail-mail, the company started streaming and video on demand services in 2007, and launched its content-production juggernaut with House of Cards in 2013. However, the bulk of its content was licensed from other media companies that were pleased to receive revenue from a previously untapped source. For a while, Netflix dominated the space.
Amazon started a service, called Amazon Unboxed, in 2006 that allowed consumers to purchase and download movies and other content. Amazon Studios was started in 2010 to develop, finance, produce, and distribute original programming. By 2015, Amazon shut down Unboxed and shifted completely over to its Prime Video streaming product. Amazon Studios now is a behemoth, producing a slate of big- budget films annually, selectively releasing some in theaters, winning Academy Awards, and competing full-on with other major movie studios.
Now, of course, we have Hulu, Apple TV, Disney +, Paramount+, YouTube TV, Peacock, and more.
The market sector grows larger and more complicated. When streaming was new, the production companies were content to allow startups like Netflix and Amazon Prime take the risks of creating a new market. However, now that the market has been established, media content producers prefer not to share streaming revenues with third-party distribution partners if they can keep the money in-house, so they create their own services. More competition tests the limits of consumer spending on these services and puts downward pressure on pricing, while content licensing and production costs inevitably rise.
Vestron was founded in 1981 to take advantage of a new market for videodisc and video cassette sales and rentals, beginning with video rights to the Time Life Films television programming library. Vestron expanded its offerings with films licensed from movie studios, including some from MGM/UA. Studios were content to allow a startup take the risk of creating a new market for VHS and other tape formats.
By 1985, Vestron was successful enough to go public, raising $440 million in an IPO on the New York Stock Exchange. However, every major film studio began to market its own videocassettes. As today with streaming revenues, they preferred to keep the money in-house. Vestron had to create its own original content. The company’s fortunes peaked in 1987 with exclusive theatrical and video distribution rights to Dirty Dancing, a sleeper hit film produced for $4.5 million that earned $214 million at the box office. Ultimately, Vestron could not ramp up its successful production slate enough to compete, and could not profitably license content from other producers.
By the end of 1990, Vestron declared bankruptcy. Its assets were sold off by 1992.
Three years later, in 1995 DVDs, the latest iteration of a technology that had been evolving since the 1960s, began to replace VHS cassettes for home video sales and rentals. And in 1997, Netflix was founded.
Coming full circle in a sense, last week Amazon completed the $8.5 billion acquisition of MGM/UA, whose assets include a library of 4,000 films and 17,000 television shows. For a company the size of Amazon, that was a modest acquisition.
Although there is timeless wisdom in the Yogi Berra maxim that the hardest thing to predict is the future, it is likely that contestations and combinations between media producers and distributors will continue.
What’s next? Although there is timeless wisdom in the Yogi Berra maxim that the hardest thing to predict is the future, it is likely that contestations and combinations between media producers and distributors will continue.
We are thinking that Netflix could acquire or merge with Paramount and increase its content in a way similar to Amazon’s MGM/UA acquisition? Since the whole season of the Netflix saga isn’t available to stream in its first week, you will have to come back for the next episode. The bigger point is that more consolidation is likely. Stay tuned.
End.
Netflix: We’ve Seen This Movie Before
Alan Robert Ginsberg
Falling subscriber counts at Netflix and the company’s plummeting stock price surprised investors and purveyors of streaming media this week, but the plot twist was familiar to long-time followers of the content versus distribution power struggle. The uneasy codependence of production and distribution harkens back to the days of silent films, when the Jesse L. Lasky Feature Play Company merged with Adolph Zukor’s Famous Players in 1916, and Famous Players-Lasky acquired a film distribution company called Paramount in a hostile takeover in 1917. The US Department of Justice broke up production and exhibition companies with the 1938 Paramount Consent Decree. The battle for dollars between movie producers and distributors has had more sequels than the James Bond franchise. (Spoiler alert: have you ever heard of Vestron? More about that in a moment.)
NFLX stock declined 35% on Tuesday to $226 from $348, and is down 65% in the last six months from a high of $691. Still, the company has a market value of ~$100 billion.
Netflix offered several reasons for the decline. Subscription-sharing. Proliferation of streaming competitors. Disconnection from Russia. These are plausible, but not comforting explanations, because they don’t imply a quick fix or long-term solution.
Founded in 1997 to sell and rent DVDs via snail-mail, the company started streaming and video on demand services in 2007, and launched its content-production juggernaut with House of Cards in 2013. However, the bulk of its content was licensed from other media companies that were pleased to receive revenue from a previously untapped source. For a while, Netflix dominated the space.
Amazon started a service, called Amazon Unboxed, in 2006 that allowed consumers to purchase and download movies and other content. Amazon Studios was started in 2010 to develop, finance, produce, and distribute original programming. By 2015, Amazon shut down Unboxed and shifted completely over to its Prime Video streaming product. Amazon Studios now is a behemoth, producing a slate of big- budget films annually, selectively releasing some in theaters, winning Academy Awards, and competing full-on with other major movie studios.
Now, of course, we have Hulu, Apple TV, Disney +, Paramount+, YouTube TV, Peacock, and more.
The market sector grows larger and more complicated. When streaming was new, the production companies were content to allow startups like Netflix and Amazon Prime take the risks of creating a new market. However, now that the market has been established, media content producers prefer not to share streaming revenues with third-party distribution partners if they can keep the money in-house, so they create their own services. More competition tests the limits of consumer spending on these services and puts downward pressure on pricing, while content licensing and production costs inevitably rise.
Vestron was founded in 1981 to take advantage of a new market for videodisc and video cassette sales and rentals, beginning with video rights to the Time Life Films television programming library. Vestron expanded its offerings with films licensed from movie studios, including some from MGM/UA. Studios were content to allow a startup take the risk of creating a new market for VHS and other tape formats.
By 1985, Vestron was successful enough to go public, raising $440 million in an IPO on the New York Stock Exchange. However, every major film studio began to market its own videocassettes. As today with streaming revenues, they preferred to keep the money in-house. Vestron had to create its own original content. The company’s fortunes peaked in 1987 with exclusive theatrical and video distribution rights to Dirty Dancing, a sleeper hit film produced for $4.5 million that earned $214 million at the box office. Ultimately, Vestron could not ramp up its successful production slate enough to compete, and could not profitably license content from other producers.
By the end of 1990, Vestron declared bankruptcy. Its assets were sold off by 1992.
Three years later, in 1995 DVDs, the latest iteration of a technology that had been evolving since the 1960s, began to replace VHS cassettes for home video sales and rentals. And in 1997, Netflix was founded.
Coming full circle in a sense, last week Amazon completed the $8.5 billion acquisition of MGM/UA, whose assets include a library of 4,000 films and 17,000 television shows. For a company the size of Amazon, that was a modest acquisition.
What’s next? Although there is timeless wisdom in the Yogi Berra maxim that the hardest thing to predict is the future, it is likely that contestations and combinations between media producers and distributors will continue.
We are thinking that Netflix could acquire or merge with Paramount and increase its content in a way similar to Amazon’s MGM/UA acquisition? Since the whole season of the Netflix saga isn’t available to stream in its first week, you will have to come back for the next episode. The bigger point is that more consolidation is likely. Stay tuned.
End.
Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.
Editor's Picks
Israel and the Internet Wars – A Professional Social Media Review
The Invisible Student: A Tale of Homelessness at UCLA and USC
What Ever Happened to the LA Times?
Who Are the Jews On Joe Biden’s Cabinet?
You’re Not a Bad Jewish Mom If Your Kid Wants Santa Claus to Come to Your House
No Labels: The Group Fighting for the Political Center
Latest Articles
Why Is it that the Better We Diagnose Anti-Semitism, the Worse it Gets?
A Bisl Torah — Go Out Before Them
Balaam’s Metaphorical Ass
For America’s 250th Birthday, Jewish Journal Launches E-book “250 Reasons to Thank America”
Print Issue: What Happened to Loving Our Country? | July 3, 2026
From Los Angeles to Jerusalem: Dorraine Weiss Built a New Life in Israel at 62
A Baharat Scented T’bit
This recipe is traditional and personal at the same time, which feels fitting.
Red, White and Blue Dairy Treats for Your Fourth of July Celebration
These delicious red, white and blue dairy desserts make it worth going parve for your Independence Day barbecue or picnic.
Table for Five: Pinchas
Women’s Rights
Mel Brooks Turns 100, AFI Bumps ‘Blazing Saddles’ to Top of Comedy List
Brooks has spent his career making large targets look small: Nazis, tyrants, bigots, Hollywood annoyances, studio logic, bad taste, good taste and, now, age.
The Limitations of a Housing Act and Two Practical Solutions
America’s housing crisis demands more than incremental turns. By doubling capital gains relief and launching the T.E.A.C.H. Homes Program, policymakers can inject immediate momentum into a market desperately needing it.
What Does the Rise of Democratic Socialists Mean for Jews and Democrats?
The DSA has shown that being anti-Israel, even if a candidate lacks experience, is enough to win.
Remembering Little Big Horn 150 Years Later as Historians, not Prosecutors or Priests
Today, for Americans and Jews, the Battle of Little Big Horn has relevance and resonance.
Rosner’s Domain | Savior No More
The greater the expectation, the sharper the disappointment.
Hineni: Choosing Torah
As always, we each have the power to choose to listen, to learn, and to grow, or we can shut our ears to that still, small voice. Are you listening? Are you willing? Are you here?
The Agreement with Iran: This Lemon Is Sour, but Israel Can – and Must –Make Lemonade
If Israel can help ensure that the enriched uranium leaves Iran, and if it can use this moment to push Iran and its money out of Lebanon, then a damaging agreement can still be turned into a strategic opening.
Doubling Down on Who We Are
The work, the ancient, urgent, irreplaceable work of Jewish community, is the answer. Not as retreat. Not as consolation. But as the most powerful response available to us.
I Chose Judaism
I was born Jewish, but I chose Judaism in the sense that I came to understand what Judaism represents, how it gives meaning and purpose to my life and how important it is for the world.
Did Netanyahu Undermine Israel’s Most Valuable Asset?
For 75 years, Israeli prime ministers, left and right, kept American politics out of their statecraft. Netanyahu ended that tradition. The bill is coming due.
The Life and Times of Zeda Max – Part 2
Lincoln’s Fast and Moses’ Faith: A July Fourth Reflection
Lincoln’s covenantally-minded republic, what he called God’s “almost chosen people,” would emerge from the conflict victorious, just as Moses’ would eventually return to the Promised Land after their fracture and resulting exile.
We Are Grieving: A Lament
I am grieving the loss of an illusion, that we had finally outgrown this ancient poison, that education and progress had cured a sickness older than our temples’ ruins.
On Wholeness
This, I think, is belonging. And belonging is always to play a part in something larger than oneself.
It’s Really a Wonderful Life
Like George Bailey, Moses felt he could not carry this burden alone and did not want to live. Even Moses could not see all the good that he had done in this life. Little did he know that thousands of years later, we would still be thankful for his leadership.
Grief in our Times
During the three weeks before Tisha b’Av we remember how the Romans began their attack, breaking the walls, creating insecurity and fear among the people.
If Jews Are Not Indigenous to the Land of Israel, Then What Does ‘Indigenous’ Even Mean?
Indigeneity asks where a people became a people – not where its descendants happened to be living centuries later. By that standard, few peoples and lands match more clearly the idea of indigeneity than the Jewish people with the Land of Israel.
More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.