Falling subscriber counts at Netflix and the company’s plummeting stock price surprised investors and purveyors of streaming media this week, but the plot twist was familiar to long-time followers of the content versus distribution power struggle. The uneasy codependence of production and distribution harkens back to the days of silent films, when the Jesse L. Lasky Feature Play Company merged with Adolph Zukor’s Famous Players in 1916, and Famous Players-Lasky acquired a film distribution company called Paramount in a hostile takeover in 1917. The US Department of Justice broke up production and exhibition companies with the 1938 Paramount Consent Decree. The battle for dollars between movie producers and distributors has had more sequels than the James Bond franchise. (Spoiler alert: have you ever heard of Vestron? More about that in a moment.)
NFLX stock declined 35% on Tuesday to $226 from $348, and is down 65% in the last six months from a high of $691. Still, the company has a market value of ~$100 billion.
Netflix offered several reasons for the decline. Subscription-sharing. Proliferation of streaming competitors. Disconnection from Russia. These are plausible, but not comforting explanations, because they don’t imply a quick fix or long-term solution.
Founded in 1997 to sell and rent DVDs via snail-mail, the company started streaming and video on demand services in 2007, and launched its content-production juggernaut with House of Cards in 2013. However, the bulk of its content was licensed from other media companies that were pleased to receive revenue from a previously untapped source. For a while, Netflix dominated the space.
Amazon started a service, called Amazon Unboxed, in 2006 that allowed consumers to purchase and download movies and other content. Amazon Studios was started in 2010 to develop, finance, produce, and distribute original programming. By 2015, Amazon shut down Unboxed and shifted completely over to its Prime Video streaming product. Amazon Studios now is a behemoth, producing a slate of big- budget films annually, selectively releasing some in theaters, winning Academy Awards, and competing full-on with other major movie studios.
Now, of course, we have Hulu, Apple TV, Disney +, Paramount+, YouTube TV, Peacock, and more.
The market sector grows larger and more complicated. When streaming was new, the production companies were content to allow startups like Netflix and Amazon Prime take the risks of creating a new market. However, now that the market has been established, media content producers prefer not to share streaming revenues with third-party distribution partners if they can keep the money in-house, so they create their own services. More competition tests the limits of consumer spending on these services and puts downward pressure on pricing, while content licensing and production costs inevitably rise.
Vestron was founded in 1981 to take advantage of a new market for videodisc and video cassette sales and rentals, beginning with video rights to the Time Life Films television programming library. Vestron expanded its offerings with films licensed from movie studios, including some from MGM/UA. Studios were content to allow a startup take the risk of creating a new market for VHS and other tape formats.
By 1985, Vestron was successful enough to go public, raising $440 million in an IPO on the New York Stock Exchange. However, every major film studio began to market its own videocassettes. As today with streaming revenues, they preferred to keep the money in-house. Vestron had to create its own original content. The company’s fortunes peaked in 1987 with exclusive theatrical and video distribution rights to Dirty Dancing, a sleeper hit film produced for $4.5 million that earned $214 million at the box office. Ultimately, Vestron could not ramp up its successful production slate enough to compete, and could not profitably license content from other producers.
By the end of 1990, Vestron declared bankruptcy. Its assets were sold off by 1992.
Three years later, in 1995 DVDs, the latest iteration of a technology that had been evolving since the 1960s, began to replace VHS cassettes for home video sales and rentals. And in 1997, Netflix was founded.
Coming full circle in a sense, last week Amazon completed the $8.5 billion acquisition of MGM/UA, whose assets include a library of 4,000 films and 17,000 television shows. For a company the size of Amazon, that was a modest acquisition.
Although there is timeless wisdom in the Yogi Berra maxim that the hardest thing to predict is the future, it is likely that contestations and combinations between media producers and distributors will continue.
What’s next? Although there is timeless wisdom in the Yogi Berra maxim that the hardest thing to predict is the future, it is likely that contestations and combinations between media producers and distributors will continue.
We are thinking that Netflix could acquire or merge with Paramount and increase its content in a way similar to Amazon’s MGM/UA acquisition? Since the whole season of the Netflix saga isn’t available to stream in its first week, you will have to come back for the next episode. The bigger point is that more consolidation is likely. Stay tuned.
End.
Netflix: We’ve Seen This Movie Before
Alan Robert Ginsberg
Falling subscriber counts at Netflix and the company’s plummeting stock price surprised investors and purveyors of streaming media this week, but the plot twist was familiar to long-time followers of the content versus distribution power struggle. The uneasy codependence of production and distribution harkens back to the days of silent films, when the Jesse L. Lasky Feature Play Company merged with Adolph Zukor’s Famous Players in 1916, and Famous Players-Lasky acquired a film distribution company called Paramount in a hostile takeover in 1917. The US Department of Justice broke up production and exhibition companies with the 1938 Paramount Consent Decree. The battle for dollars between movie producers and distributors has had more sequels than the James Bond franchise. (Spoiler alert: have you ever heard of Vestron? More about that in a moment.)
NFLX stock declined 35% on Tuesday to $226 from $348, and is down 65% in the last six months from a high of $691. Still, the company has a market value of ~$100 billion.
Netflix offered several reasons for the decline. Subscription-sharing. Proliferation of streaming competitors. Disconnection from Russia. These are plausible, but not comforting explanations, because they don’t imply a quick fix or long-term solution.
Founded in 1997 to sell and rent DVDs via snail-mail, the company started streaming and video on demand services in 2007, and launched its content-production juggernaut with House of Cards in 2013. However, the bulk of its content was licensed from other media companies that were pleased to receive revenue from a previously untapped source. For a while, Netflix dominated the space.
Amazon started a service, called Amazon Unboxed, in 2006 that allowed consumers to purchase and download movies and other content. Amazon Studios was started in 2010 to develop, finance, produce, and distribute original programming. By 2015, Amazon shut down Unboxed and shifted completely over to its Prime Video streaming product. Amazon Studios now is a behemoth, producing a slate of big- budget films annually, selectively releasing some in theaters, winning Academy Awards, and competing full-on with other major movie studios.
Now, of course, we have Hulu, Apple TV, Disney +, Paramount+, YouTube TV, Peacock, and more.
The market sector grows larger and more complicated. When streaming was new, the production companies were content to allow startups like Netflix and Amazon Prime take the risks of creating a new market. However, now that the market has been established, media content producers prefer not to share streaming revenues with third-party distribution partners if they can keep the money in-house, so they create their own services. More competition tests the limits of consumer spending on these services and puts downward pressure on pricing, while content licensing and production costs inevitably rise.
Vestron was founded in 1981 to take advantage of a new market for videodisc and video cassette sales and rentals, beginning with video rights to the Time Life Films television programming library. Vestron expanded its offerings with films licensed from movie studios, including some from MGM/UA. Studios were content to allow a startup take the risk of creating a new market for VHS and other tape formats.
By 1985, Vestron was successful enough to go public, raising $440 million in an IPO on the New York Stock Exchange. However, every major film studio began to market its own videocassettes. As today with streaming revenues, they preferred to keep the money in-house. Vestron had to create its own original content. The company’s fortunes peaked in 1987 with exclusive theatrical and video distribution rights to Dirty Dancing, a sleeper hit film produced for $4.5 million that earned $214 million at the box office. Ultimately, Vestron could not ramp up its successful production slate enough to compete, and could not profitably license content from other producers.
By the end of 1990, Vestron declared bankruptcy. Its assets were sold off by 1992.
Three years later, in 1995 DVDs, the latest iteration of a technology that had been evolving since the 1960s, began to replace VHS cassettes for home video sales and rentals. And in 1997, Netflix was founded.
Coming full circle in a sense, last week Amazon completed the $8.5 billion acquisition of MGM/UA, whose assets include a library of 4,000 films and 17,000 television shows. For a company the size of Amazon, that was a modest acquisition.
What’s next? Although there is timeless wisdom in the Yogi Berra maxim that the hardest thing to predict is the future, it is likely that contestations and combinations between media producers and distributors will continue.
We are thinking that Netflix could acquire or merge with Paramount and increase its content in a way similar to Amazon’s MGM/UA acquisition? Since the whole season of the Netflix saga isn’t available to stream in its first week, you will have to come back for the next episode. The bigger point is that more consolidation is likely. Stay tuned.
End.
Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.
Editor's Picks
Israel and the Internet Wars – A Professional Social Media Review
The Invisible Student: A Tale of Homelessness at UCLA and USC
What Ever Happened to the LA Times?
Who Are the Jews On Joe Biden’s Cabinet?
You’re Not a Bad Jewish Mom If Your Kid Wants Santa Claus to Come to Your House
No Labels: The Group Fighting for the Political Center
Latest Articles
Israel in Three Words
TEBH Gala, Jews of Color Initiative
Boring, Very Boring
Does This Count? – A poem for Parsha Nasso
A Bisl Torah — Keep Searching
Ruth, Naomi, Mara, Maror, Meir and Elisha ben Abuyah
A Moment in Time: “Hmm, That Isn’t Right”
Print Issue: The Rise of Magen Am | May 22, 2026
How a Chabad rabbi built a community security movement in Los Angeles.
When Everything Becomes a Product—Including Girlhood
In her debut book, “Girls®: Generation Z and the Commodification of Everything” Freya India presents a stinging indictment against those she blames for having turned normal girls into GIRLS®, an ideal target market for the social media, pharmaceutical, beauty and online therapy industries.
Rebels, Superheroes and Family Ghosts: Three Skirball Exhibitions on Jewish Reinvention
Three fascinating exhibitions now showing at the Skirball Cultural Center stand on their own, yet together they trace unexpected threads of Jewish identity, memory and cultural reinvention.
Gabba Gabba Oy!
For Cate Thurston, the chief curator at the Skirball, the exhibit gives the museum a chance to “explore this sort of underserved story” about the Jewish relationship and participation and crafting the look of punk
Antisemitism Isn’t Hiding— It’s Evolving on UC Campuses
Universities are supposed to protect political free speech, but antisemitism stops being protected political expression when Jewish students are targeted, threatened, harassed, and blamed for the actions of the state of Israel.
Recognizing Jewish Heritage Month
On this beautiful Sacramento morning, in the face, perhaps in defiance of, so much in the world that is painful, tenuous and deeply troubling, we convened and we lifted up what connects us – the promise of growth and healing, and the potent ability for people to endure, to create change, and to scaffold our communities in justice and truth.
From Antisemitism to Antizionism: Toronto Symposium Marks a New Era in Jewish Advocacy
The inaugural World Symposium Against Antizionism reflected a meaningful shift in how some Jewish thinkers and advocates believe the community should engage with the forces arrayed against it.
AJU Honors Rabbi Bradley Shavit Artson at Gala Marking 25-Year Legacy
A leading voice in Conservative Judaism, Artson has long shaped Jewish thought and leadership far beyond the walls of AJU.
Ancient Glory: Mediterranean Sea Bass
I especially love the way Kalamata olives play against fish, adding a perfectly intense and satisfying umami profile.
Shalom Everybody ft. Lauren Kagan
Fakesgiving Desserts and Drinks
It’s a reminder that gathering with friends and family over a big meal can be done any time of year.
Table for Five: Nasso
Repentance And Restitution
Israel Is Not America’s Client. It Is America’s Forward Defense Partner
Security cooperation with Israel protects the United States and American citizens, saves American taxpayers money and helps anchor American military superiority around the world.
The Rise of Magen Am
How a Chabad rabbi built a community security movement in Los Angeles.
Rosner’s Domain | Bibi and the Meatheads
Netanyahu and his base have held power for most of three decades, yet in spirit, they are still raging against the condescending elites.
What Daisy Taught Me
Students Seem Determined to Illustrate That ‘The Coddling of the American Mind’ Is Still Relevant
Matching the national average, seven out of 10 Dartmouth students refuse to endorse the idea that it is never acceptable to shout down a speaker, and five in 10 say there are instances when it is acceptable to block other students from attending a speech.
Heroines of Oct. 7 on Stage and Livestream
A new women-to-women production, called “HEROINES! Songs & Soliloquies for the Soul.”
J Street: All Tough, No Love
Slinging criticism without responsibility and spewing all complaints all the time, is barn-burning, not bridge-building.
More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.