This week, the Congresswomen of “The Squad” pushed to rescind $1 billion in American foreign aid to Israel’s Iron Dome defense system, predictably whipping the American Jewish community into a frenzy. Influential individuals and organizations alike released statements condemning the move, with Congressman Ted Deutch going so far as to accuse Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib “and all those who see no place for a Jewish state on the map” of antisemitism. I applauded Congressman Deutch and the Democrats for immediately reassuring their constituents of their commitment to the American-Israeli alliance by overwhelmingly voting to fund the Iron Dome later that week. Worth noticing during the unfolding drama, however, was a familiar sentiment arising among younger Zionists in our community, many of whom have recently expressed the opinion that in an era when Israel faces accusations and mischaracterizations of imperialism and colonialism, perhaps making a spectacle over the United States’s funding of the Jewish state’s military is not the wisest move.
Rudy Rochman is one of these pro-Israel activists, and an impressive one at that. Rochman achieved fame in specifically younger Jewish circles by publishing Youtube videos of him in conversation, and often in confrontation, with Palestinian activists, anti-Zionist Jews on college campuses, and neo-Nazis. His popularity has only increased over time— he now stands at nearly one hundred thousand followers on Instagram, where he promotes educational videos on Zionism and his own appearances on various talk shows. Rochman is known for characterizing the Jewish people as a great indigenous tribe, comparable to the Native Americans, and therefore tethered to Eretz Yisrael with a natural right to resurrect our ancient civilization there. I have my own opinions on this angle of pro-Israel activism, but no one can deny its positive impact on, for example, AIPAC’s student coalition.
“The way the aid is structured causes Israel to be completely dependent on the US. I don’t want Israel to be dependent on any country…Israel can sustain itself and build its own weapons here.”
— Rudy Rochman
A recurring, eyebrow-raising Rochman argument is that Israel should not be given foreign aid. “The way the aid is structured,” he says, “causes Israel to be completely dependent on the U.S.. I don’t want Israel to be dependent on any country…Israel can sustain itself and build its own weapons here.” Rochman asserts that Israeli military manufacturing companies are going out of business by way of American replacement, symbolic of a greater issue at hand: Israel is adamant about its sovereignty, independence, and legitimacy, but actions speak louder than words.
This begs the question: should Zionists oppose foreign aid?
My answer is no, not because I don’t greatly admire the activism of Rochman, but rather because I believe that Zionism has consistently been successful thanks to its habit of forging alliances. An example of this would be the shocking mutual recognition of Israel in 1948 between bitter adversaries, the United States and the Soviet Union, … a decision that Rabbi Joseph B. Soloveichik famously cited as proof of God’s approval of Zionism.
Of course, my heart compels me to romanticize Israel as the grand embodiment of Jewish self determination, unrestrained by the burden of shady weapon deals and political maneuvering. And of course, I understand where young Zionists come from in ascribing to this idealism. This impulse is what led many of us, myself included, to feel uneasy immediately following the signing of Abraham Accords. We felt compelled to celebrate that Israel had made peace with Arab states after decades of intolerance, yet found it impossible to ignore the human rights track record of said Arab states. At the end of the day, we applauded, because knowledge of nations and their histories, especially in the Middle East, informs us that peace is not built upon symbolic acknowledgements of each other’s “right to exist,” but rather on mutual interests. To expect anything else of the American-Israeli relationship would exceptionalize the Jewish state, rather than normalize it.
I want the two nations I feel the utmost affection for to be aligned with each other in the diplomatic arena, not by way of “dependence,” but by way of cooperation and coercion. Israel should pressure the United States away from signing another Iran Deal, and the United States should pressure Israel away from further settlement construction in the West Bank. None of this is possible without a good relationship, which any voyeur of international politics will tell you means a transactional one.
Zionist Jews in the Diaspora should not oppose foreign aid, and should indeed stand up for our fellow Jews when life-saving Israeli defense infrastructure is under attack, not because Israel is not strong enough to stand on its own two feet, but because the highest indicator of strength for any country is in engagement with the world, not isolation from it.
Zionist Jews in the Diaspora should not oppose foreign aid, and should indeed stand up for our fellow Jews when life-saving Israeli defense infrastructure is under attack, not because Israel is not strong enough to stand on its own two feet, but because the highest indicator of strength for any country is in engagement with the world, not isolation from it.
Blake Flayton is New Media Director and columnist at the Jewish Journal.
Should Zionists Oppose Foreign Aid?
Blake Flayton
This week, the Congresswomen of “The Squad” pushed to rescind $1 billion in American foreign aid to Israel’s Iron Dome defense system, predictably whipping the American Jewish community into a frenzy. Influential individuals and organizations alike released statements condemning the move, with Congressman Ted Deutch going so far as to accuse Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib “and all those who see no place for a Jewish state on the map” of antisemitism. I applauded Congressman Deutch and the Democrats for immediately reassuring their constituents of their commitment to the American-Israeli alliance by overwhelmingly voting to fund the Iron Dome later that week. Worth noticing during the unfolding drama, however, was a familiar sentiment arising among younger Zionists in our community, many of whom have recently expressed the opinion that in an era when Israel faces accusations and mischaracterizations of imperialism and colonialism, perhaps making a spectacle over the United States’s funding of the Jewish state’s military is not the wisest move.
Rudy Rochman is one of these pro-Israel activists, and an impressive one at that. Rochman achieved fame in specifically younger Jewish circles by publishing Youtube videos of him in conversation, and often in confrontation, with Palestinian activists, anti-Zionist Jews on college campuses, and neo-Nazis. His popularity has only increased over time— he now stands at nearly one hundred thousand followers on Instagram, where he promotes educational videos on Zionism and his own appearances on various talk shows. Rochman is known for characterizing the Jewish people as a great indigenous tribe, comparable to the Native Americans, and therefore tethered to Eretz Yisrael with a natural right to resurrect our ancient civilization there. I have my own opinions on this angle of pro-Israel activism, but no one can deny its positive impact on, for example, AIPAC’s student coalition.
A recurring, eyebrow-raising Rochman argument is that Israel should not be given foreign aid. “The way the aid is structured,” he says, “causes Israel to be completely dependent on the U.S.. I don’t want Israel to be dependent on any country…Israel can sustain itself and build its own weapons here.” Rochman asserts that Israeli military manufacturing companies are going out of business by way of American replacement, symbolic of a greater issue at hand: Israel is adamant about its sovereignty, independence, and legitimacy, but actions speak louder than words.
This begs the question: should Zionists oppose foreign aid?
My answer is no, not because I don’t greatly admire the activism of Rochman, but rather because I believe that Zionism has consistently been successful thanks to its habit of forging alliances. An example of this would be the shocking mutual recognition of Israel in 1948 between bitter adversaries, the United States and the Soviet Union, … a decision that Rabbi Joseph B. Soloveichik famously cited as proof of God’s approval of Zionism.
Of course, my heart compels me to romanticize Israel as the grand embodiment of Jewish self determination, unrestrained by the burden of shady weapon deals and political maneuvering. And of course, I understand where young Zionists come from in ascribing to this idealism. This impulse is what led many of us, myself included, to feel uneasy immediately following the signing of Abraham Accords. We felt compelled to celebrate that Israel had made peace with Arab states after decades of intolerance, yet found it impossible to ignore the human rights track record of said Arab states. At the end of the day, we applauded, because knowledge of nations and their histories, especially in the Middle East, informs us that peace is not built upon symbolic acknowledgements of each other’s “right to exist,” but rather on mutual interests. To expect anything else of the American-Israeli relationship would exceptionalize the Jewish state, rather than normalize it.
I want the two nations I feel the utmost affection for to be aligned with each other in the diplomatic arena, not by way of “dependence,” but by way of cooperation and coercion. Israel should pressure the United States away from signing another Iran Deal, and the United States should pressure Israel away from further settlement construction in the West Bank. None of this is possible without a good relationship, which any voyeur of international politics will tell you means a transactional one.
Zionist Jews in the Diaspora should not oppose foreign aid, and should indeed stand up for our fellow Jews when life-saving Israeli defense infrastructure is under attack, not because Israel is not strong enough to stand on its own two feet, but because the highest indicator of strength for any country is in engagement with the world, not isolation from it.
Blake Flayton is New Media Director and columnist at the Jewish Journal.
Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.
Editor's Picks
Israel and the Internet Wars – A Professional Social Media Review
The Invisible Student: A Tale of Homelessness at UCLA and USC
What Ever Happened to the LA Times?
Who Are the Jews On Joe Biden’s Cabinet?
You’re Not a Bad Jewish Mom If Your Kid Wants Santa Claus to Come to Your House
No Labels: The Group Fighting for the Political Center
Latest Articles
Rosner’s Domain | Meet Galit: Israel’s Decider
Torah Portion: Noah
Noah’s Ark: Building a World of Giving
Abraham and the Tower of Babel: What Is the Connection?
Pray Go On
Three Years After October 7, Israelis Parallel Americans’ Post-9/11 Mood Swings
Baseball’s Bounce Through the American Founding
As the Dodgers continue their march toward a World Series three-peat during America’s 250th year, it’s worth revisiting the relationship between baseball and the American Founding.
Building After Destruction: The Resilience of Am Yisrael
The story of Am Yisrael is one of a people that has endured extraordinary suffering and nevertheless continues to look ahead with faith and hope.
Light and Joy
Inspired by the unbridled bliss of the Simchat Torah holiday, I promised myself that whenever I am overwhelmed, I will focus on things that remind me of why I should be grateful.
On Counterfeit Meaning: Flower Children to Manson, Gen Z to Hamas
How can something as beautiful as the search for a meaningful life connect to something as evil as murder?
Voter ID Proposition: Not Important, But Not Terrible
Proposition 39 can do little harm, might do a little good and is nothing to rush to the ramparts about.
Nobel Rewards Anti-Israel Crusade
Just as disturbing as the award itself has been the satisfaction with which it has been greeted across much of the international press, television and political establishment.
Will the Saudis Look to Israel?
10,000 frontline Houthi militia could determine the outcome of this month’s election and indirectly select the Jewish state’s next leader.
N.Y. Times Whitewashes Israeli Sex Predator
Trybal Gatherings Brings Jewish Summer Camp to Young Adults in Ojai
More than 100 participants recharged, made new friends, and reflected on summer camp nostalgia, while spending meaningful time with 10 campers from Israel.
The Portugal Most Travelers Never See: A Journey Through Sephardic Heritage
Busting Antisemites
It’s a relief to see Jew-haters finally receive some just deserts.
Turning the Tables on Lie of the Century
We have a bunker buster: 10,000 words of evidence that Hamas committed genocide on Oct. 7. What are we planning to do with it?
How I Lost My Composure in Front of 2,000 People
Memorials, especially a memorial for an unspeakable tragedy, are a reminder that, in the end, we can never really “move on.”
Newsom Signs Safe Worship Act, Ira Gershwin Initiative, Technion Society Names Board President
Notable people and events in the Jewish LA community.
Religious Violence and Other Failures
When our service of God degenerates into a paganism of self-worship, the deepest religious failures, including violence, take hold.
The End of the Beginning – A poem for Parsha Bereshit
This is the end of the beginning…
A Bisl Torah ~ Sharp Anchoring
When we teach our children, the lesson they glean should be sharp and clear enough, so they feel anchored by our tradition and confident in our values.
A Moment in Time: October 7 – We Will Not be Defined by Loss
Simchat Torah is the Antidote of Hevel
Print Issue: The Genocide Case Against Hamas | October 9, 2026
Was a single day’s attack, no matter how savage, too brief to qualify as genocide? It turns out that duration has never been the legal test.
More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.