If you wonder whether this is truly the end of an era, whether Prime Minister Netanyahu is truly on his way out, whether a new Israeli government–of right, center and left–is truly materializing, you are up for disappointment. The disappointment of anyone who must wait a tad more for the final word. Yes, all of the above is an option, maybe even a likelihood, but not yet a certainty. There is still time. There are still ways for the likelihood to return to being an impossibility. There are still 50 hours until Yesh Atid’s Yair Lapid mandate expires. And it’s a week or so before the earliest time in which a new government can be sworn in. A whole long week. That’s eternity.
Just remember: two weeks ago the “change government”–that is, a government other than one headed by Netanyahu–was taken off the table by the same person who is currently slated to be the head of it. Naftali Bennett, of the Yamina party, declared the option dead when rockets were flying from Gaza and an Arab-Israeli mob burned cars and stores and synagogues. He said it is dead, and we all believed it is dead because the people speaking on his behalf sounded so confident, so sure.
Then he flipped. Or flipped back, or whatever you want to call it. Bennett is a curious player in our political drama, and it isn’t easy to determine whether he is the smartest, most cunning politician on the block (proof: he could be the next PM with just six seats in the Knesset), or an unreliable and erratic leader, with good cards and more than a grain of good luck (everyone is willing to put up with him, to get rid of Netanyahu).
To make a long story short, here is where we are: Bennett is a leader of a right-wing party. He committed himself to join a right-wing government if such a possibility exists. On Sunday evening, he declared that the possibility does not exist, and that he had thus decided to form a unity government with his buddy Lapid and other parties, from right (Yamina and New Hope), to center (Blue and White, Yesh Atid), to left (Labor and Meretz). Support of at least one Arab party, probably Raam would also be necessary to get to 61.
Why did Bennett make the move? There are two options based on two competing narratives. One–because he realized that it is either this or a fifth election. So he decided that this would be the right time to join his ideological rivals to avoid more chaos. Two–because he wants to be the Prime Minister, and thus sabotaged all attempts to form a right-wing government under Netanyahu. In short, some see him as a mature adult who prioritized country before political camp, and others see him as an opportunist who prioritized self before ideology.
Does it matter? Maybe not. What does matter is whether Israel is going to have a government and whether such government can function with a measure of efficiency. The answer to both questions is vague. The week before a government is formed is going to be tense. The right-wing parties will apply as much pressure as they can on MKs from Yamina and New Hope, calling them names and protesting wherever they live because all that’s needed to terminate the planned coalition is one deserter. Just one. A sixty-member coalition can’t form a government.
As for this government’s future, it is much too early to forecast. Clearly, it will be a government whose main common denominator is the fear of the big bear Netanyahu. If Netanyahu is the rival, the coalition has a reason to stick together, lest HE return. And yet, on many other things this coalition is going to be the most complicated to handle since forever. From gay rights to Gaza, from the Supreme Court to state and religion, from the nuclear agreement with Iran to the civics curriculum at middle schools–this coalition agrees on nothing.
As for this government’s future, it is much too early to forecast. Clearly, it will be a government whose main common denominator is the fear of the big bear Netanyahu.
Under such circumstances, one might question why such a government should be formed at all. The answer is to restore stability and have a functioning government for some time; to deal with the most uncontroversial topics, such as road congestion, the price of housing, economics and healthcare (yes, in Israel healthcare is uncontroversial), policing and environmental issues; to look for a common good on which both Labor and New Hope can agree; and to implement policies with which both Meretz and Yamina can live.
Oh, and send Netanyahu packing. That’s the main goal. Some would say this is silly. One does not form an incoherent coalition to get rid of one man who is quite successful at his craft. Others would say that this is the most important thing for Israel right now, because Netanyahu is the obstacle that is clogging Israel’s political system. Let him go first, worry about managing an incoherent government later. Is this really happening? Let’s practice patience–it’s an important quality.
Shmuel Rosner is an Israeli columnist, editor, and researcher. He is the editor of the research and data-journalism website themadad.com and is the political editor of the Jewish Journal.
Is Bibi Truly Done?
Shmuel Rosner
If you wonder whether this is truly the end of an era, whether Prime Minister Netanyahu is truly on his way out, whether a new Israeli government–of right, center and left–is truly materializing, you are up for disappointment. The disappointment of anyone who must wait a tad more for the final word. Yes, all of the above is an option, maybe even a likelihood, but not yet a certainty. There is still time. There are still ways for the likelihood to return to being an impossibility. There are still 50 hours until Yesh Atid’s Yair Lapid mandate expires. And it’s a week or so before the earliest time in which a new government can be sworn in. A whole long week. That’s eternity.
Just remember: two weeks ago the “change government”–that is, a government other than one headed by Netanyahu–was taken off the table by the same person who is currently slated to be the head of it. Naftali Bennett, of the Yamina party, declared the option dead when rockets were flying from Gaza and an Arab-Israeli mob burned cars and stores and synagogues. He said it is dead, and we all believed it is dead because the people speaking on his behalf sounded so confident, so sure.
Then he flipped. Or flipped back, or whatever you want to call it. Bennett is a curious player in our political drama, and it isn’t easy to determine whether he is the smartest, most cunning politician on the block (proof: he could be the next PM with just six seats in the Knesset), or an unreliable and erratic leader, with good cards and more than a grain of good luck (everyone is willing to put up with him, to get rid of Netanyahu).
To make a long story short, here is where we are: Bennett is a leader of a right-wing party. He committed himself to join a right-wing government if such a possibility exists. On Sunday evening, he declared that the possibility does not exist, and that he had thus decided to form a unity government with his buddy Lapid and other parties, from right (Yamina and New Hope), to center (Blue and White, Yesh Atid), to left (Labor and Meretz). Support of at least one Arab party, probably Raam would also be necessary to get to 61.
Why did Bennett make the move? There are two options based on two competing narratives. One–because he realized that it is either this or a fifth election. So he decided that this would be the right time to join his ideological rivals to avoid more chaos. Two–because he wants to be the Prime Minister, and thus sabotaged all attempts to form a right-wing government under Netanyahu. In short, some see him as a mature adult who prioritized country before political camp, and others see him as an opportunist who prioritized self before ideology.
Does it matter? Maybe not. What does matter is whether Israel is going to have a government and whether such government can function with a measure of efficiency. The answer to both questions is vague. The week before a government is formed is going to be tense. The right-wing parties will apply as much pressure as they can on MKs from Yamina and New Hope, calling them names and protesting wherever they live because all that’s needed to terminate the planned coalition is one deserter. Just one. A sixty-member coalition can’t form a government.
As for this government’s future, it is much too early to forecast. Clearly, it will be a government whose main common denominator is the fear of the big bear Netanyahu. If Netanyahu is the rival, the coalition has a reason to stick together, lest HE return. And yet, on many other things this coalition is going to be the most complicated to handle since forever. From gay rights to Gaza, from the Supreme Court to state and religion, from the nuclear agreement with Iran to the civics curriculum at middle schools–this coalition agrees on nothing.
Under such circumstances, one might question why such a government should be formed at all. The answer is to restore stability and have a functioning government for some time; to deal with the most uncontroversial topics, such as road congestion, the price of housing, economics and healthcare (yes, in Israel healthcare is uncontroversial), policing and environmental issues; to look for a common good on which both Labor and New Hope can agree; and to implement policies with which both Meretz and Yamina can live.
Oh, and send Netanyahu packing. That’s the main goal. Some would say this is silly. One does not form an incoherent coalition to get rid of one man who is quite successful at his craft. Others would say that this is the most important thing for Israel right now, because Netanyahu is the obstacle that is clogging Israel’s political system. Let him go first, worry about managing an incoherent government later. Is this really happening? Let’s practice patience–it’s an important quality.
Shmuel Rosner is an Israeli columnist, editor, and researcher. He is the editor of the research and data-journalism website themadad.com and is the political editor of the Jewish Journal.
Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.
Editor's Picks
Israel and the Internet Wars – A Professional Social Media Review
The Invisible Student: A Tale of Homelessness at UCLA and USC
What Ever Happened to the LA Times?
Who Are the Jews On Joe Biden’s Cabinet?
You’re Not a Bad Jewish Mom If Your Kid Wants Santa Claus to Come to Your House
No Labels: The Group Fighting for the Political Center
Latest Articles
Bridging Horizons: Mayan Eden’s Quest for Middle Eastern Peace
Reconsidering Trump’s Gaza Plan: A Call to My Arab-American Brothers and Sisters
The Consequence of Saying Too Many No’s
A Super Bowl Audience of 125 Million Will Hear About Antisemitism. Or Not.
Tikkun Olam: Restoring Palisades School Libraries, One Book at a Time
Woman Fatally Shot in Encino; Husband Allegedly Responsible
Culture
Celebrate Bagel and Lox Day on February 9
Capturing Israeli Jazz: Raphael Perez’s Tribute to Israeli Musicians
Book ‘52 Secrets’ is a Playbook for Those Who Operate Under Pressure
Rick Nahmias: Food Forward, Sharing Abundance and Stuffed Cabbage
Following in Miriam’s Footsteps
Miriam and the other righteous women teach us what hope is about.
Armed and Divided – Shabbat Thought – Torah Portion Beshalach 2025 (revised from previous versions)
Thirst – A poem for Parsha Beshalach
Beware the fake Moses.
A Bisl Torah — Take the Step
An important reminder to each one of us is to have faith in God that our lives will change. And God has faith in us to begin the process.
A Moment in Time: “Blend In or Stand Out?
Hollywood
Spielberg Says Antisemitism Is “No Longer Lurking, But Standing Proud” Like 1930s Germany
Young Actress Juju Brener on Her “Hocus Pocus 2” Role
Behind the Scenes of “Jeopardy!” with Mayim Bialik
Podcasts
Rick Nahmias: Food Forward, Sharing Abundance and Stuffed Cabbage
Elizabeth Mehditach: Grocery Shopping, Eating Whole Foods and Quinoa Salad
More news and opinions than at a
Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.
More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.