If you wonder whether this is truly the end of an era, whether Prime Minister Netanyahu is truly on his way out, whether a new Israeli government–of right, center and left–is truly materializing, you are up for disappointment. The disappointment of anyone who must wait a tad more for the final word. Yes, all of the above is an option, maybe even a likelihood, but not yet a certainty. There is still time. There are still ways for the likelihood to return to being an impossibility. There are still 50 hours until Yesh Atid’s Yair Lapid mandate expires. And it’s a week or so before the earliest time in which a new government can be sworn in. A whole long week. That’s eternity.
Just remember: two weeks ago the “change government”–that is, a government other than one headed by Netanyahu–was taken off the table by the same person who is currently slated to be the head of it. Naftali Bennett, of the Yamina party, declared the option dead when rockets were flying from Gaza and an Arab-Israeli mob burned cars and stores and synagogues. He said it is dead, and we all believed it is dead because the people speaking on his behalf sounded so confident, so sure.
Then he flipped. Or flipped back, or whatever you want to call it. Bennett is a curious player in our political drama, and it isn’t easy to determine whether he is the smartest, most cunning politician on the block (proof: he could be the next PM with just six seats in the Knesset), or an unreliable and erratic leader, with good cards and more than a grain of good luck (everyone is willing to put up with him, to get rid of Netanyahu).
To make a long story short, here is where we are: Bennett is a leader of a right-wing party. He committed himself to join a right-wing government if such a possibility exists. On Sunday evening, he declared that the possibility does not exist, and that he had thus decided to form a unity government with his buddy Lapid and other parties, from right (Yamina and New Hope), to center (Blue and White, Yesh Atid), to left (Labor and Meretz). Support of at least one Arab party, probably Raam would also be necessary to get to 61.
Why did Bennett make the move? There are two options based on two competing narratives. One–because he realized that it is either this or a fifth election. So he decided that this would be the right time to join his ideological rivals to avoid more chaos. Two–because he wants to be the Prime Minister, and thus sabotaged all attempts to form a right-wing government under Netanyahu. In short, some see him as a mature adult who prioritized country before political camp, and others see him as an opportunist who prioritized self before ideology.
Does it matter? Maybe not. What does matter is whether Israel is going to have a government and whether such government can function with a measure of efficiency. The answer to both questions is vague. The week before a government is formed is going to be tense. The right-wing parties will apply as much pressure as they can on MKs from Yamina and New Hope, calling them names and protesting wherever they live because all that’s needed to terminate the planned coalition is one deserter. Just one. A sixty-member coalition can’t form a government.
As for this government’s future, it is much too early to forecast. Clearly, it will be a government whose main common denominator is the fear of the big bear Netanyahu. If Netanyahu is the rival, the coalition has a reason to stick together, lest HE return. And yet, on many other things this coalition is going to be the most complicated to handle since forever. From gay rights to Gaza, from the Supreme Court to state and religion, from the nuclear agreement with Iran to the civics curriculum at middle schools–this coalition agrees on nothing.
As for this government’s future, it is much too early to forecast. Clearly, it will be a government whose main common denominator is the fear of the big bear Netanyahu.
Under such circumstances, one might question why such a government should be formed at all. The answer is to restore stability and have a functioning government for some time; to deal with the most uncontroversial topics, such as road congestion, the price of housing, economics and healthcare (yes, in Israel healthcare is uncontroversial), policing and environmental issues; to look for a common good on which both Labor and New Hope can agree; and to implement policies with which both Meretz and Yamina can live.
Oh, and send Netanyahu packing. That’s the main goal. Some would say this is silly. One does not form an incoherent coalition to get rid of one man who is quite successful at his craft. Others would say that this is the most important thing for Israel right now, because Netanyahu is the obstacle that is clogging Israel’s political system. Let him go first, worry about managing an incoherent government later. Is this really happening? Let’s practice patience–it’s an important quality.
Shmuel Rosner is an Israeli columnist, editor, and researcher. He is the editor of the research and data-journalism website themadad.com and is the political editor of the Jewish Journal.
Is Bibi Truly Done?
Shmuel Rosner
If you wonder whether this is truly the end of an era, whether Prime Minister Netanyahu is truly on his way out, whether a new Israeli government–of right, center and left–is truly materializing, you are up for disappointment. The disappointment of anyone who must wait a tad more for the final word. Yes, all of the above is an option, maybe even a likelihood, but not yet a certainty. There is still time. There are still ways for the likelihood to return to being an impossibility. There are still 50 hours until Yesh Atid’s Yair Lapid mandate expires. And it’s a week or so before the earliest time in which a new government can be sworn in. A whole long week. That’s eternity.
Just remember: two weeks ago the “change government”–that is, a government other than one headed by Netanyahu–was taken off the table by the same person who is currently slated to be the head of it. Naftali Bennett, of the Yamina party, declared the option dead when rockets were flying from Gaza and an Arab-Israeli mob burned cars and stores and synagogues. He said it is dead, and we all believed it is dead because the people speaking on his behalf sounded so confident, so sure.
Then he flipped. Or flipped back, or whatever you want to call it. Bennett is a curious player in our political drama, and it isn’t easy to determine whether he is the smartest, most cunning politician on the block (proof: he could be the next PM with just six seats in the Knesset), or an unreliable and erratic leader, with good cards and more than a grain of good luck (everyone is willing to put up with him, to get rid of Netanyahu).
To make a long story short, here is where we are: Bennett is a leader of a right-wing party. He committed himself to join a right-wing government if such a possibility exists. On Sunday evening, he declared that the possibility does not exist, and that he had thus decided to form a unity government with his buddy Lapid and other parties, from right (Yamina and New Hope), to center (Blue and White, Yesh Atid), to left (Labor and Meretz). Support of at least one Arab party, probably Raam would also be necessary to get to 61.
Why did Bennett make the move? There are two options based on two competing narratives. One–because he realized that it is either this or a fifth election. So he decided that this would be the right time to join his ideological rivals to avoid more chaos. Two–because he wants to be the Prime Minister, and thus sabotaged all attempts to form a right-wing government under Netanyahu. In short, some see him as a mature adult who prioritized country before political camp, and others see him as an opportunist who prioritized self before ideology.
Does it matter? Maybe not. What does matter is whether Israel is going to have a government and whether such government can function with a measure of efficiency. The answer to both questions is vague. The week before a government is formed is going to be tense. The right-wing parties will apply as much pressure as they can on MKs from Yamina and New Hope, calling them names and protesting wherever they live because all that’s needed to terminate the planned coalition is one deserter. Just one. A sixty-member coalition can’t form a government.
As for this government’s future, it is much too early to forecast. Clearly, it will be a government whose main common denominator is the fear of the big bear Netanyahu. If Netanyahu is the rival, the coalition has a reason to stick together, lest HE return. And yet, on many other things this coalition is going to be the most complicated to handle since forever. From gay rights to Gaza, from the Supreme Court to state and religion, from the nuclear agreement with Iran to the civics curriculum at middle schools–this coalition agrees on nothing.
Under such circumstances, one might question why such a government should be formed at all. The answer is to restore stability and have a functioning government for some time; to deal with the most uncontroversial topics, such as road congestion, the price of housing, economics and healthcare (yes, in Israel healthcare is uncontroversial), policing and environmental issues; to look for a common good on which both Labor and New Hope can agree; and to implement policies with which both Meretz and Yamina can live.
Oh, and send Netanyahu packing. That’s the main goal. Some would say this is silly. One does not form an incoherent coalition to get rid of one man who is quite successful at his craft. Others would say that this is the most important thing for Israel right now, because Netanyahu is the obstacle that is clogging Israel’s political system. Let him go first, worry about managing an incoherent government later. Is this really happening? Let’s practice patience–it’s an important quality.
Shmuel Rosner is an Israeli columnist, editor, and researcher. He is the editor of the research and data-journalism website themadad.com and is the political editor of the Jewish Journal.
Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.
Editor's Picks
Israel and the Internet Wars – A Professional Social Media Review
The Invisible Student: A Tale of Homelessness at UCLA and USC
What Ever Happened to the LA Times?
Who Are the Jews On Joe Biden’s Cabinet?
You’re Not a Bad Jewish Mom If Your Kid Wants Santa Claus to Come to Your House
No Labels: The Group Fighting for the Political Center
Latest Articles
In Defense of Israel
Welcoming Guests and the Destiny of Nations
Table for Five: Vayera
Route 66 Turns 100: Fall in Chicago, the Mother Road and the Great American Road Trip
Israel Bonds Ceremony, CCFP’s ‘Ambassadors of Peace,’ ‘Letters, Light and Love’
“Art Over Hate”
Everyone by Name – A poem for Parsha Vayera
We want the best for our children –
Hagar’s Oppression is the Source of the Hegira
Print Issue: A Jewish Victory | October 30, 2026
In the face of growing anti-Israel and antisemitic conduct in public schools, the L.A. Unified School District has delivered an important victory for our community.
A Bisl Torah ~ Are You Paying Attention?
Why are we less likely to notice those who are most important?
A Moment in Time: The Israeli Election – Counting Votes, Building Bridges
Rabbis of LA | Rabbi Rembaum on Life Without Fredi
First of two parts
‘You Can See Everything’: Holmes on the Range
In 2026, you don’t expect an American movie – even a documentary – to include an almost Talmudic discussion focusing on the meaning of the word “can.”
Ruby Red Beet Kubbah
If you can’t get to Jerusalem, make a pot of this incredible red kubbah.
A Jewish Victory
In the face of growing anti-Israel and antisemitic conduct in public schools, the Los Angeles Unified School District has delivered an important victory for our community.
Trusting G-d’s Plan ft. Elaine Chaya
Zion Ozeri’s Photographs Reveal the Many Faces of Jewish Identity
His photographs portray Jews shaped by different cultures, histories and traditions while revealing the connections that unite them.
Milken School Opens Jan Koum Campus in Bel Air
The site is now home to Milken’s Upper School, serving students in grades 9 through 12, and expands the school’s footprint across its three campuses to 28 acres.
For Teens, Israel Travel Is Not the End Goal. Jewish Peoplehood Is.
A well-designed Israel experience cannot resolve every question. But it can give young people context, relationships, language, and a sense that they belong to a people and a story larger than themselves.
El-Sayed, Mélenchon, and the Future They Portend
Some have accused me of anti-Muslim bias. Let me answer that plainly: I have none. My issues with El-Sayed would be the same whether he were Jewish, Christian, Hindu or Baha’i.
Unbreakable Blue Thread: Reclaiming Our Past and Our Future
I write to you, all you first and second generations, and I assure you from generations five, six and seven that if we keep doing what we need to do, if we stand together, keep our traditions, educate ourselves in our ancient wisdom, keep Hebrew spoken and sung in our midst, we will not only endure. We Jews will thrive.
Unstuck in the Middle with You
Kwall, the Raymond P. Niro Law Professor at DePaul University College of Law, argues for a center defined by enough common commitments to make communal life possible.
Sewage Without Borders
Israel’s water security depends on what flows into the sea on the other side of all of them, and our water policy should start from that reality.
Torah Portion: Vayera
The parsha ends with the binding of Isaac, the Akeida, probably the darkest chapter in the entire Torah.
Gene Lichtenstein, August 15, 1930-October 18, 2026
Mr. Lichtenstein edited the Jewish Journal of Los Angeles from 1986 until 2000.
Let Them Talk
If we want our younger generations to love our faith, our culture, and our peoplehood, we need to be welcoming when they show interest and have a spark of curiosity.
More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.