Israel’s leaders in Jerusalem are “not rushing toward an Obama-like public spat with the Biden administration over Iran policy,” writes Brig. Gen. Michael Herzog of the Washington Institute. Jerusalem “is preparing for dialogue.”
“Wars begin when aggressive powers believe that their targets are weaker, or give the false impression that they are weaker, or at least stay inert in the face of provocation,” warns Victor Davis Hanson of the Center for American Greatness and Stanford University’s Hoover Institution.
The Iran issue is back on the table. The Biden administration is looking for a way to return to the nuclear agreement. Iran is looking for a way to return to it on its own terms and with no additional conditions attached. Israel is seeking to either disrupt the return to the old deal or verify that a new deal, much stricter, is implemented. Saudi Arabia is looking for a way to work alongside Israel without being dragged into a public spat with someone else.
The implied conclusion of what we know is this: Not all parties will get what they want. To make it even more complicated, some players are seeking a compromise solution on a topic that, for some players, there can be no compromise.
America is stepping into this field with an inherent deficiency: In tough negotiations, the party with higher stakes has a natural advantage. Nuclear Iran is much more important for Iran, Israel and Saudi Arabia than it is for Biden and his team.
This prioritization makes the Americans more likely to accept compromise and makes Iran and Israel less likely to do so. Is dialogue itself a show of weakness? No, not always. But in this case, all parties can easily identify an American weakness. The United States cares about Iran — but not as much as Iran or Israel do.
The United States cares about Iran — but not as much AS Iran or Israel do.
Under such circumstances, America must compensate, in some fashion, for its weakness. Of course, it has the means to do such a thing because it is a superpower, unlike Iran and Israel. If countries in the Middle East suspected that the United States is fully invested in getting a workable agreement, they’d have no other choice but to pay close attention to its priorities. Almost two decades ago, Libya’s leader Muammar Gaddafi agreed to eliminate his country’s weapons of mass destruction. He agreed because, at the time, America seemed fully committed to the elimination of such means in the region.
Today, we do not yet see a similar commitment. Not even close. For obvious reasons (many of which are easy to sympathize with), America seems more committed to restoring the agreement than to achieving the ultimate goal of making sure that Iran does not become a nuclear weaponized aggressive regime. This makes Iran more emboldened and makes Israel more nervous. Herzog writes, “the option of taking military action against Iran’s nuclear program… is not mere posturing.” So Jerusalem is preparing for a quiet dialogue, alongside preparations for other things.
Jewish Journal
Iran Negotiations: America’s Inherent Disadvantage
Shmuel Rosner
Israel’s leaders in Jerusalem are “not rushing toward an Obama-like public spat with the Biden administration over Iran policy,” writes Brig. Gen. Michael Herzog of the Washington Institute. Jerusalem “is preparing for dialogue.”
“Wars begin when aggressive powers believe that their targets are weaker, or give the false impression that they are weaker, or at least stay inert in the face of provocation,” warns Victor Davis Hanson of the Center for American Greatness and Stanford University’s Hoover Institution.
The Iran issue is back on the table. The Biden administration is looking for a way to return to the nuclear agreement. Iran is looking for a way to return to it on its own terms and with no additional conditions attached. Israel is seeking to either disrupt the return to the old deal or verify that a new deal, much stricter, is implemented. Saudi Arabia is looking for a way to work alongside Israel without being dragged into a public spat with someone else.
The implied conclusion of what we know is this: Not all parties will get what they want. To make it even more complicated, some players are seeking a compromise solution on a topic that, for some players, there can be no compromise.
America is stepping into this field with an inherent deficiency: In tough negotiations, the party with higher stakes has a natural advantage. Nuclear Iran is much more important for Iran, Israel and Saudi Arabia than it is for Biden and his team.
This prioritization makes the Americans more likely to accept compromise and makes Iran and Israel less likely to do so. Is dialogue itself a show of weakness? No, not always. But in this case, all parties can easily identify an American weakness. The United States cares about Iran — but not as much as Iran or Israel do.
Under such circumstances, America must compensate, in some fashion, for its weakness. Of course, it has the means to do such a thing because it is a superpower, unlike Iran and Israel. If countries in the Middle East suspected that the United States is fully invested in getting a workable agreement, they’d have no other choice but to pay close attention to its priorities. Almost two decades ago, Libya’s leader Muammar Gaddafi agreed to eliminate his country’s weapons of mass destruction. He agreed because, at the time, America seemed fully committed to the elimination of such means in the region.
Today, we do not yet see a similar commitment. Not even close. For obvious reasons (many of which are easy to sympathize with), America seems more committed to restoring the agreement than to achieving the ultimate goal of making sure that Iran does not become a nuclear weaponized aggressive regime. This makes Iran more emboldened and makes Israel more nervous. Herzog writes, “the option of taking military action against Iran’s nuclear program… is not mere posturing.” So Jerusalem is preparing for a quiet dialogue, alongside preparations for other things.
Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.
Editor's Picks
Israel and the Internet Wars – A Professional Social Media Review
The Invisible Student: A Tale of Homelessness at UCLA and USC
What Ever Happened to the LA Times?
Who Are the Jews On Joe Biden’s Cabinet?
You’re Not a Bad Jewish Mom If Your Kid Wants Santa Claus to Come to Your House
No Labels: The Group Fighting for the Political Center
Latest Articles
A Bisl Torah – Hope Revealed
The Unraveling of Candace Owens
Longing for Shushan after October Seventh
A Moment in Time: “Thinking Outside of the Box”
Print Issue: Got College? | Mar 29, 2024
Rabbis of LA | Grief Helped Pave a Career Highway for Rabbi Anne Brener
Culture
A Love Letter to ‘The Jewish Holiday Table’
Moroccan Fish: A Taste of Casablanca for Passover
Katie Workman: The Mom 100, Comfort Food and Ground Turkey Tacos
National Hillel Basketball Tournament in Maryland Led by Two Shalhevet Alumni
Make a Star of David Pendant with Drinking Straws
New York Jewish Couple Redefines Kosher Wine Market
“We want Jews to stop drinking terrible wines or good wines that are overpriced. They don’t need to compromise anymore.”
Campus Watch March 28, 2024
A roundup of incidents, good and bad, happening on school campuses.
War and Tech Meet, Creating Need for Israel Tech Missions Venture
David Siegel’s Israel Tech Mission aims to showcase the Jewish state’s innovation in the face of war by connecting global tech leaders and investors with local pioneers like X-trodes
Table for Five: Tzav
Bloodless
Hollywood
Spielberg Says Antisemitism Is “No Longer Lurking, But Standing Proud” Like 1930s Germany
Young Actress Juju Brener on Her “Hocus Pocus 2” Role
Behind the Scenes of “Jeopardy!” with Mayim Bialik
Podcasts
Katie Workman: The Mom 100, Comfort Food and Ground Turkey Tacos
Jamie Pachino: “So Help Me Todd,” Food on TV and Chocolate Chip Cake
More news and opinions than at a
Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.
More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.