Let me tell you two stories about the beginning of the world.
The first, you’ve likely heard before.
In the beginning, there was nothing.
In the original Hebrew, this is expressed with the words “tohu” and “bohu,” which the Stone Chumash translates as “astonishingly empty.” According to King James, it means “without form and void.” In the Septuagint’s parlance, “unsightly and unfurnished.” For Tyndale, “voyde and emptie.” For Robert Alter, “welter and waste.”
And then, God made something. And God saw that it was good. And so, God kept making more things. Light and dark. Land and sea. People and animals. God created and created until the nothingness—the empty, unsightly, weltering void—was all filled up.
The second story is perhaps less familiar.
In the beginning, there was everything, and God, thrumming with potential and pulsing with unfathomable love, desired to create a world so that this potential could be actualized, and this love could be expressed. There was just one problem: there was no space in which to create, only fullness. Everywhere you looked, there was more God, more infinity.
And so, God withdrew Godself to the sides of this primordial fullness, clearing an open space in which creation would be possible.
One of these stories is related by the Book of Genesis in its first portion; the other is related by the Kabbalists and echoed by the Hasidic masters. In one of these stores, creation is an act of filling; in the other, creation is an act of emptying out. One story tells us that creation is a positive act—the fashioning of objects; the other tells us that creation deals first and foremost with negative space.
We can relate these two stories to two modes of perception, discussed by the philosopher Alan Watts. “If I draw a circle, most people, when asked what I have drawn, will say I have drawn a circle or a disc, or a ball. Very few people will say I’ve drawn a hole in the wall, because most people think of the inside first, rather than thinking of the outside.”
Looking at the night sky, we see stars but ignore the space between them. Looking at the forest, we see plants but ignore the soil that connects them. Looking out at a landscape, we see hills, but forget the continent that holds them. Looking at creation, we see an accumulation of stuff but ignore the cleared space from which it emanates.
Looking at creation, we see an accumulation of stuff but ignore the cleared space from which it emanates.
Both of these stories are, in their own ways, true. Rebbe Nachman, in his retelling of our second creation story, refers to this as the paradox of Yesh v’Ein, presence and absence, yes and no, what is and what isn’t. We can see this paradox in many Jewish texts, always appearing in a new form.
According to Isaiah, for instance, the angels in heaven cry out: “Holy, holy, holy! The LORD of Hosts! His presence fills all the earth!” (6:3). This is a vision of a world shot through with divine presence from top to bottom.
According to Ezekiel, however, the angels cry “Blessed is the Presence of the LORD from His place.” (3:12). Here, a vision of a world that God blesses from afar.
Which is it then?
Is God here or not?
Is creation a fullness or a hollow?
Do we live in a realm of yesh or ein?
The answer is yes.
In God’s act of contraction, teaches Rebbe Nachman, the cleared space for creation was cleared also of divinity. It had to be. A sentence later, however, he states: “But of course, there is still divinity here, because nothing can be without God’s lifeforce” (Likutai Mohoran 64:1).
If it seems confusing, that’s because it is. Humans aren’t always great at holding two truths, one in each hand. Not to worry, though. This is to be expected.
“You won’t fully grasp it,” Rebbe Nachman concludes, “until the future to come.”
And so, with Parashat Bereishit, we embark on a new year of reading Torah. As we go, we pray that God will grant us new insights into the familiar stories, allowing us to see the negative space—the white between the black of the letters, the hidden meanings that are left unsaid—which will bring us ever closer to Rebbe Nachman’s “future to come,” when we will at last see that both creation stories are one.
Matthew Schultz is the author of the essay collection “What Came Before” (2020). He is a rabbinical student at Hebrew College in Newton, Massachusetts.
Unscrolled: Presence and Absence
Matthew Schultz
Let me tell you two stories about the beginning of the world.
The first, you’ve likely heard before.
In the beginning, there was nothing.
In the original Hebrew, this is expressed with the words “tohu” and “bohu,” which the Stone Chumash translates as “astonishingly empty.” According to King James, it means “without form and void.” In the Septuagint’s parlance, “unsightly and unfurnished.” For Tyndale, “voyde and emptie.” For Robert Alter, “welter and waste.”
And then, God made something. And God saw that it was good. And so, God kept making more things. Light and dark. Land and sea. People and animals. God created and created until the nothingness—the empty, unsightly, weltering void—was all filled up.
The second story is perhaps less familiar.
In the beginning, there was everything, and God, thrumming with potential and pulsing with unfathomable love, desired to create a world so that this potential could be actualized, and this love could be expressed. There was just one problem: there was no space in which to create, only fullness. Everywhere you looked, there was more God, more infinity.
And so, God withdrew Godself to the sides of this primordial fullness, clearing an open space in which creation would be possible.
One of these stories is related by the Book of Genesis in its first portion; the other is related by the Kabbalists and echoed by the Hasidic masters. In one of these stores, creation is an act of filling; in the other, creation is an act of emptying out. One story tells us that creation is a positive act—the fashioning of objects; the other tells us that creation deals first and foremost with negative space.
We can relate these two stories to two modes of perception, discussed by the philosopher Alan Watts. “If I draw a circle, most people, when asked what I have drawn, will say I have drawn a circle or a disc, or a ball. Very few people will say I’ve drawn a hole in the wall, because most people think of the inside first, rather than thinking of the outside.”
Looking at the night sky, we see stars but ignore the space between them. Looking at the forest, we see plants but ignore the soil that connects them. Looking out at a landscape, we see hills, but forget the continent that holds them. Looking at creation, we see an accumulation of stuff but ignore the cleared space from which it emanates.
Both of these stories are, in their own ways, true. Rebbe Nachman, in his retelling of our second creation story, refers to this as the paradox of Yesh v’Ein, presence and absence, yes and no, what is and what isn’t. We can see this paradox in many Jewish texts, always appearing in a new form.
According to Isaiah, for instance, the angels in heaven cry out: “Holy, holy, holy! The LORD of Hosts! His presence fills all the earth!” (6:3). This is a vision of a world shot through with divine presence from top to bottom.
According to Ezekiel, however, the angels cry “Blessed is the Presence of the LORD from His place.” (3:12). Here, a vision of a world that God blesses from afar.
Which is it then?
Is God here or not?
Is creation a fullness or a hollow?
Do we live in a realm of yesh or ein?
The answer is yes.
In God’s act of contraction, teaches Rebbe Nachman, the cleared space for creation was cleared also of divinity. It had to be. A sentence later, however, he states: “But of course, there is still divinity here, because nothing can be without God’s lifeforce” (Likutai Mohoran 64:1).
If it seems confusing, that’s because it is. Humans aren’t always great at holding two truths, one in each hand. Not to worry, though. This is to be expected.
“You won’t fully grasp it,” Rebbe Nachman concludes, “until the future to come.”
And so, with Parashat Bereishit, we embark on a new year of reading Torah. As we go, we pray that God will grant us new insights into the familiar stories, allowing us to see the negative space—the white between the black of the letters, the hidden meanings that are left unsaid—which will bring us ever closer to Rebbe Nachman’s “future to come,” when we will at last see that both creation stories are one.
Matthew Schultz is the author of the essay collection “What Came Before” (2020). He is a rabbinical student at Hebrew College in Newton, Massachusetts.
Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.
Editor's Picks
Israel and the Internet Wars – A Professional Social Media Review
The Invisible Student: A Tale of Homelessness at UCLA and USC
What Ever Happened to the LA Times?
Who Are the Jews On Joe Biden’s Cabinet?
You’re Not a Bad Jewish Mom If Your Kid Wants Santa Claus to Come to Your House
No Labels: The Group Fighting for the Political Center
Latest Articles
Rosner’s Domain | How Will the War End?
How to Talk to Americans About Iran and Israel
MAGA’s Isolationist Wing Could Make World War III More Likely
Iran’s Nuclear Escalation Is Not Just Israel’s Problem — It’s the World’s
Letter to Trump
Moral Complexity, Not Moral Confusion
Culture
Marcus Freed Has a Loose Screw in His Head — And He Calls It a Blessing
“Chutzpah”: The Story of a Haredi, Queer Role Model
Hollywood Film Producer and Philanthropist Peter Samuelson on ‘Finding Happy’
A Memoir for Fathers, Sons, and Anyone Trying to Break the Cycle
Return of Iran’s Royal Family Would Be Game Changer
In this moment of uncertainty, the restoration of the monarchy represents a beacon of hope, offering a path forward that prioritizes humanity, diplomacy, and peace over division and conflict.
To Feel with our Brethren
We feel “as if,’”we were once slaves and now “as if” we might truly become free.
The Logic Behind a Preemptive Strike
What’s extraordinary here is that tiny Israel — just a sliver of land on the eastern edge of the Mediterranean — is doing what the entire Western world should have done long ago.
It’s All About the Saudis
Israel still knows that an expanded version of the Abraham Accords that includes Saudi Arabia is a necessary linchpin for regional peace.
New ICC Poll Reveals Strong Majority of Americans Believe in Israel’s Right to Defend Itself Against Iran
The survey, which was taken by 800 U.S. adults, showed that over 80% agree it is critical to stop Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons.
Hollywood
Spielberg Says Antisemitism Is “No Longer Lurking, But Standing Proud” Like 1930s Germany
Young Actress Juju Brener on Her “Hocus Pocus 2” Role
Behind the Scenes of “Jeopardy!” with Mayim Bialik
Podcasts
Sam E. Goldberg: Respect the Chain, Restaurants and Ratatouille
Happie Hoffman: Music, Emotion and Gluten-Free Cinnamon Challah
More news and opinions than at a
Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.
More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.