Voltaire famously stated that we are responsible for all the good we did not do. The great Enlightenment thinker understood that not doing bad is not enough for a stable and healthy society. A society at peace with itself must be one in which citizens are actively engaged in doing good. This need is present in all societies in all times, but especially when challenged by discord, unrest and division. Often, one person can effect positive change. In his important book on the Holocaust, “The Righteous,” Martin Gilbert tells the story of a bishop in France who wrote a letter to priests in his area to be read publicly. The letter instructed parishioners to protect Jews from the Nazis. A member of his congregation drove on bicycle to more than 40 churches and had the letter read from every pulpit.
Because of innumerable individual acts like that of the bishop, more than two hundred thousand of France’s wartime population of three hundred thousand Jews were saved.
The renowned French novelist, Émile Zola, who was not Jewish, took on the entire corrupt, antisemitic, political and religious establishment and rocked French society to its foundation. Alfred Dreyfus, an assimilated French Jew, was wrongly accused of treason. Zola knew that the charge was bogus and wrote the letter “J’accuse,” confronting the authorities with a charge of antisemitism and deceit.
Eventually, after great social upheaval and international outrage, the truth was revealed, and Dreyfus was exonerated. Here again, a single person simply could not tolerate falsehood and injustice and acted according to his conscience. He paid a very heavy price, having to flee to England and suffering scorn in his country, but he proved that one righteous person can change society for the better.
In a recent article in The Atlantic, Timothy Ryback reveals an astounding development in Hitler’s rise to power, and in his overthrowing of a democratic government. In this case, it was not what people did, but rather what they did not do that changed the world. Ryback notes that if certain individuals had acted at the right moment, the entire horror of the Second World War, including the Holocaust, would not have occurred.
Ryback calls Hitler’s ascendancy “political contingency rather than historical inevitability,” meaning that it didn’t need to happen. It was not destined: “Had Hitler’s predecessor in the chancellery, Kurt von Schleicher, remained in office another six months, or had German President Paul von Hindenburg exercised his constitutional powers more judiciously, or had a faction of moderate conservative Reichstag delegates cast their votes differently, then history may well have taken a very different turn.” More specifically, “Hindenburg did not call his new chancellor to account for violent public excesses against Communists, Social Democrats and Jews. He did not exercise his Article 53 powers.” Here we have a dramatic example of a few individuals, and one in particular, who could have prevented a world war and mass murder. Joseph Goebbels “would later marvel that the National Socialists had succeeded in dismantling a federated constitutional republic entirely through constitutional means.” Hallowed institutions are only as good as the individuals charged with the responsibility to maintain their integrity.
Hallowed institutions are only as good as the individuals charged with the responsibility to maintain their integrity.
Civilizations collapse when individuals abdicate their responsibility to act for just and moral causes for the common good. America has a Bill of Rights; Canada has a Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Where is the Bill or Charter of Responsibilities? Without the responsibility to participate and improve society and take a stand against hatred, intimidation and injustice, how will rights be preserved?
Judaism teaches that each person is a world. That principle implies a sacred nature to the individual, a divine spark. I would suggest that it also means that the individual has the potential for much influence for good.
The idea of fate and individual helplessness is Greek. Thucydides wrote that the strong do what they want and the weak suffer what they must, meaning that might makes right and that ordinary individuals have no effect on the course of history. It was Judaism in biblical times that introduced the idea of moral agency and individual personal responsibility. Judaism’s gift to the world was the obligation to be righteous, “a kingdom of priests and a holy nation” (Exodus 19:6).
One of Canada’s founding fathers, Joseph Howe, used to ask three questions concerning personal responsibility in establishing a new country: “What is right? What is just? What is for the public good?” Those are the kinds of questions that inspire people like the bishop and Zola, and they are questions that most definitely would not occur to a Hindenburg.
Let us put an end to the insidious notion that the individual is powerless. Voltaire was right. It isn’t enough to be good. One must do good. One person can save another; one person can change the world.
Dr. Paul Socken is Distinguished Professor Emeritus and founder of the Jewish Studies Program at the University of Waterloo.
The Crime Good People Commit
Paul Socken
Voltaire famously stated that we are responsible for all the good we did not do. The great Enlightenment thinker understood that not doing bad is not enough for a stable and healthy society. A society at peace with itself must be one in which citizens are actively engaged in doing good. This need is present in all societies in all times, but especially when challenged by discord, unrest and division. Often, one person can effect positive change. In his important book on the Holocaust, “The Righteous,” Martin Gilbert tells the story of a bishop in France who wrote a letter to priests in his area to be read publicly. The letter instructed parishioners to protect Jews from the Nazis. A member of his congregation drove on bicycle to more than 40 churches and had the letter read from every pulpit.
Because of innumerable individual acts like that of the bishop, more than two hundred thousand of France’s wartime population of three hundred thousand Jews were saved.
The renowned French novelist, Émile Zola, who was not Jewish, took on the entire corrupt, antisemitic, political and religious establishment and rocked French society to its foundation. Alfred Dreyfus, an assimilated French Jew, was wrongly accused of treason. Zola knew that the charge was bogus and wrote the letter “J’accuse,” confronting the authorities with a charge of antisemitism and deceit.
Eventually, after great social upheaval and international outrage, the truth was revealed, and Dreyfus was exonerated. Here again, a single person simply could not tolerate falsehood and injustice and acted according to his conscience. He paid a very heavy price, having to flee to England and suffering scorn in his country, but he proved that one righteous person can change society for the better.
In a recent article in The Atlantic, Timothy Ryback reveals an astounding development in Hitler’s rise to power, and in his overthrowing of a democratic government. In this case, it was not what people did, but rather what they did not do that changed the world. Ryback notes that if certain individuals had acted at the right moment, the entire horror of the Second World War, including the Holocaust, would not have occurred.
Ryback calls Hitler’s ascendancy “political contingency rather than historical inevitability,” meaning that it didn’t need to happen. It was not destined: “Had Hitler’s predecessor in the chancellery, Kurt von Schleicher, remained in office another six months, or had German President Paul von Hindenburg exercised his constitutional powers more judiciously, or had a faction of moderate conservative Reichstag delegates cast their votes differently, then history may well have taken a very different turn.” More specifically, “Hindenburg did not call his new chancellor to account for violent public excesses against Communists, Social Democrats and Jews. He did not exercise his Article 53 powers.” Here we have a dramatic example of a few individuals, and one in particular, who could have prevented a world war and mass murder. Joseph Goebbels “would later marvel that the National Socialists had succeeded in dismantling a federated constitutional republic entirely through constitutional means.” Hallowed institutions are only as good as the individuals charged with the responsibility to maintain their integrity.
Civilizations collapse when individuals abdicate their responsibility to act for just and moral causes for the common good. America has a Bill of Rights; Canada has a Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Where is the Bill or Charter of Responsibilities? Without the responsibility to participate and improve society and take a stand against hatred, intimidation and injustice, how will rights be preserved?
Judaism teaches that each person is a world. That principle implies a sacred nature to the individual, a divine spark. I would suggest that it also means that the individual has the potential for much influence for good.
The idea of fate and individual helplessness is Greek. Thucydides wrote that the strong do what they want and the weak suffer what they must, meaning that might makes right and that ordinary individuals have no effect on the course of history. It was Judaism in biblical times that introduced the idea of moral agency and individual personal responsibility. Judaism’s gift to the world was the obligation to be righteous, “a kingdom of priests and a holy nation” (Exodus 19:6).
One of Canada’s founding fathers, Joseph Howe, used to ask three questions concerning personal responsibility in establishing a new country: “What is right? What is just? What is for the public good?” Those are the kinds of questions that inspire people like the bishop and Zola, and they are questions that most definitely would not occur to a Hindenburg.
Let us put an end to the insidious notion that the individual is powerless. Voltaire was right. It isn’t enough to be good. One must do good. One person can save another; one person can change the world.
Dr. Paul Socken is Distinguished Professor Emeritus and founder of the Jewish Studies Program at the University of Waterloo.
Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.
Editor's Picks
Israel and the Internet Wars – A Professional Social Media Review
The Invisible Student: A Tale of Homelessness at UCLA and USC
What Ever Happened to the LA Times?
Who Are the Jews On Joe Biden’s Cabinet?
You’re Not a Bad Jewish Mom If Your Kid Wants Santa Claus to Come to Your House
No Labels: The Group Fighting for the Political Center
Latest Articles
Rabbis of LA | The Rembaums’ Happy Life Together
Some LA Business Owners and Residents Taking Safety Into Their Own Hands
‘The Israeli in Me Came Out’: At 81, Howard Rosenman Fought His Attackers
Jewish Activist Says She Won’t Be Silenced After Being Attacked at the University of Michigan
A Popular Skewer Recipe
Table for Five: Chayei Sarah
Settling on the Outskirts – A poem for Parsha Chayei Sara
The life of Sara ends with death.
A Moment in Time: Beyond Politics
A Bisl Torah ~ Love at First Hearing
Is attraction based solely on the physical? Or is chemistry based on something deeper?
Why Moses’ Name Is Changed to Menasseh in Judges
Why Israel’s Messy Election Should Worry Washington
The tight relationship between Trump and Netanyahu masks the real debate over Israel churning in the Republican Party, and Israel’s standing among Democrats has never been lower.
Jewish Community Weighs Implications of Democrats’ Midterm Election Victories
Some emphasized the importance of combating antisemitism and protecting Jewish safety, while others called for political engagement and cooperation across party lines.
Print Issue: Election Fever | November 6, 2026
What comes next?
Rosner’s Domain: Weeks of Known Unknowns
So here we are, stuck with just a few bad options to consider. And that’s just the political superposition of undetermined future – alongside it there’s also the possible – probable? – war with Iran.
The Switched Passport: A Lesson in Seeing the Other
That is my hope: that by finding things we can do together, by recognizing each other’s humanity, we might come to see each other more fully.
After the Last Out, Collect a Different Kind of Card
At a time when Jewish education is competing for attention in a world dominated by screens, sports, short-form videos and endless streams of content, these easily collectable cards offer a different kind of engagement.
6 Jewish Takeaways from the Midterm Elections
There is little chance that the combination of a weakened Trump and an emboldened Democratic Congress produces similar levels of support for aggressive action against Iran and its proxies, and other policies that a wide spectrum of Israelis see as crucial to their security.
Israel Drives Them Crazy
In the diaspora and in Israel, we cannot turn back the clock and undo the harm that was done to us. But we can shape our own future. Israel is strong and resolute. So must we be.
A Democratic-Run Congress Will Target Israel as Well as Trump
Democrats who were long considered “moderates” or even pro-Israel have been signaling over the course of the last year that they can no longer be relied upon to back a Jewish state under assault by Iran and its terrorist proxies.
Why Jewish Unity Is So Difficult
When each dispute seems existential, an error is a catastrophe and disagreement seems like betrayal.
Torah Portion: Chayei Sarah
The Torah offers a comforting view of a life beyond this life. We aren’t told what it will be exactly — yes, it’s abstract and vague — but we are told it’s waiting for us as it was for Abraham.
The NAZA Election — Israel and the Jews were Collateral Damage on Tuesday
History teaches that you can always trust the fanatics to overplay their hand, allowing muscular moderates to reassert power.
Present at the Scene: The 2026 Mid Term Elections and the Jewish Vote
How do voters reconcile longstanding party loyalties with changing views of Israel, communal security and American political leadership?
Hatred Opened the Door. A Missed Victory Held It Open.
For me, the disaster isn’t that Democrats won or Republicans lost. It’s that politicians who demonize Israel, deny Jewish self-determination and explain away antisemitism are finding an increasingly receptive electorate in the world’s most important democracy.
The Jewish Dilemma
The central issue is not whether Jewish voters should support Democrats or Republicans. It is whether either party can demonstrate that Jewish security, Jewish identity and Jewish self-determination are compatible with its broader political agenda.
Democrats Win Control of Congress as Election Produces Historic Firsts
Abdul El-Sayed (D-Michigan) becomes first Muslim elected to U.S. Senate, longtime Republican strongholds turn Democratic, and at least five Democratic Socialists of America-backed candidates win U.S. House seats.
More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.