I have a two German Reichsmarks silver coin dated 1933, the first year of the Nazi regime in Germany. Curiously, the figure on the obverse (“heads”) side is not that of Adolf Hitler, but rather of Martin Luther. I mention this because, in a way, the coin segues to a difference of opinion that I have with the late Rabbi Jonathan Sacks.
Rabbi Jonathan Sacks (Z’L), former Chief Rabbi of the United Kingdom and Commonwealth and Member of the House of Lords, was one of the most influential Jewish leaders of the late-20th and early-2st centuries. His death in 2020 left a void, a particularly glaring one now after Oct. 7. I especially appreciated his non-judgmental approach to diverse views, whether within Judaism or without, and I will never forget his courageous remarks to the House of Lords on the evolution of antisemitism into anti-Zionism. Yet, one of the statements he made in his popular book “Not in God’s Name” (2015) has troubled me.
In the book, Rabbi Sacks uses biblical texts to expose the roots of religious violence and to outline how to confront it. He includes a remarkably comprehensive review of the antisemitism that Jews have experienced in both the Christian and Muslim worlds, from centuries past until the modern day. The troubling bit appears in the chapter titled “Sibling Rivalry” when he states “The Holocaust was not the result of Christianity; it is important to state this categorically.”
Citing the poet Heinrich Heine, Rabbi Sacks connects the Holocaust to Germany’s pagan roots, not Christianity. He refers to Christian opponents of the Nazi regime and he draws attention to the Christians who saved Jews, including the 25,000 righteous individuals of all nations recognized by Yad Vashem. Yes, there were Christians such as Martin Niemӧller and Dietrich Bonhoeffer who opposed Hitler, but the rabbi’s statement ignores the millions who did nothing, or even worse. In fact, most Germans, including Hitler, never left the Church.
That the Nazis opposed Christianity, and that Nazi and Christian ideologies were antithetical to each other, was a widespread claim made after World War II. However, authors such as Richard Steigmann (“The Holy Reich,” 2003) emphasize that, in practice, a close, if ambiguous, relationship existed between Nazism and Christianity. Holocaust scholar Doris Bergen, points out that a number of Nazi leaders, including those involved in mass murder, held important positions in the church. Moreover, the vast majority of Germans remained baptized members of the official churches throughout the Nazi period.
… a number of Nazi leaders, including those involved in mass murder, held important positions in the church.
In fact, Nazi propagandists made extensive use of the connection to Martin Luther, the German theologian and major proponent of the Protestant Reformation, more than four centuries ago. A poster of Luther published in 1933, the same year as my coin, states: “Hitler’s fight and Luther’s teaching are the best defense for the German people.” Indeed, in a recent article on Luther in The Jewish Chronicle, the writer and clergyman Michael Coren notes that the Nazis used Luther’s antisemitism to create a Nazi version of Christianity within the German Lutheran church. At his Nuremberg trial, Nazi master propagandist Julius-Streicher said, in his defense, that he was only repeating Luther’s 1543 writings from his antisemitic book “The Jews and Their Lies.”
Furthermore, the Nazi concept of racial purity, embodied in the definition of a Jew as anyone with a Jewish grandparent, had a Christian origin. It was the Spanish Inquisition, after all, that introduced the concept of Limpieza de Sangre (purity of blood) in the 15th century.
The Holocaust (or, as Winston Churchill initially called it, “a crime without a name”) was the result of a long history of antisemitism, during which the Christian church played a significant role, a role that should not be minimized.
I don’t know why Rabbi Sacks was intent on giving Christianity a pass with respect to the Holocaust. He does not shy away from describing Christian persecution of Jews elsewhere in his book. In fact, he himself mentions the Inquisition and Limpieza de Sangre at an earlier point. Nor does my bringing this up diminish my respect and appreciation of Rabbi Sacks. I was reassured to read in The Jerusalem Post that Israeli soldiers serving on the frontlines facing Gaza and Lebanon after Oct. 7 were issued a pamphlet with Rabbi Sacks’ writings, translated into Hebrew, in which the rabbi reflects on the indomitable spirit of the Jewish people. One soldier said that it felt as though Rabbi Sacks was with them, giving them support and blessings for the journey ahead.
Jacob Sivak, a Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada, is a retired professor, University of Waterloo.
The Nazis Were Christians and Adolf Hitler Was Not an Atheist
Jacob Sivak
I have a two German Reichsmarks silver coin dated 1933, the first year of the Nazi regime in Germany. Curiously, the figure on the obverse (“heads”) side is not that of Adolf Hitler, but rather of Martin Luther. I mention this because, in a way, the coin segues to a difference of opinion that I have with the late Rabbi Jonathan Sacks.
Rabbi Jonathan Sacks (Z’L), former Chief Rabbi of the United Kingdom and Commonwealth and Member of the House of Lords, was one of the most influential Jewish leaders of the late-20th and early-2st centuries. His death in 2020 left a void, a particularly glaring one now after Oct. 7. I especially appreciated his non-judgmental approach to diverse views, whether within Judaism or without, and I will never forget his courageous remarks to the House of Lords on the evolution of antisemitism into anti-Zionism. Yet, one of the statements he made in his popular book “Not in God’s Name” (2015) has troubled me.
In the book, Rabbi Sacks uses biblical texts to expose the roots of religious violence and to outline how to confront it. He includes a remarkably comprehensive review of the antisemitism that Jews have experienced in both the Christian and Muslim worlds, from centuries past until the modern day. The troubling bit appears in the chapter titled “Sibling Rivalry” when he states “The Holocaust was not the result of Christianity; it is important to state this categorically.”
Citing the poet Heinrich Heine, Rabbi Sacks connects the Holocaust to Germany’s pagan roots, not Christianity. He refers to Christian opponents of the Nazi regime and he draws attention to the Christians who saved Jews, including the 25,000 righteous individuals of all nations recognized by Yad Vashem. Yes, there were Christians such as Martin Niemӧller and Dietrich Bonhoeffer who opposed Hitler, but the rabbi’s statement ignores the millions who did nothing, or even worse. In fact, most Germans, including Hitler, never left the Church.
That the Nazis opposed Christianity, and that Nazi and Christian ideologies were antithetical to each other, was a widespread claim made after World War II. However, authors such as Richard Steigmann (“The Holy Reich,” 2003) emphasize that, in practice, a close, if ambiguous, relationship existed between Nazism and Christianity. Holocaust scholar Doris Bergen, points out that a number of Nazi leaders, including those involved in mass murder, held important positions in the church. Moreover, the vast majority of Germans remained baptized members of the official churches throughout the Nazi period.
In fact, Nazi propagandists made extensive use of the connection to Martin Luther, the German theologian and major proponent of the Protestant Reformation, more than four centuries ago. A poster of Luther published in 1933, the same year as my coin, states: “Hitler’s fight and Luther’s teaching are the best defense for the German people.” Indeed, in a recent article on Luther in The Jewish Chronicle, the writer and clergyman Michael Coren notes that the Nazis used Luther’s antisemitism to create a Nazi version of Christianity within the German Lutheran church. At his Nuremberg trial, Nazi master propagandist Julius-Streicher said, in his defense, that he was only repeating Luther’s 1543 writings from his antisemitic book “The Jews and Their Lies.”
Furthermore, the Nazi concept of racial purity, embodied in the definition of a Jew as anyone with a Jewish grandparent, had a Christian origin. It was the Spanish Inquisition, after all, that introduced the concept of Limpieza de Sangre (purity of blood) in the 15th century.
The Holocaust (or, as Winston Churchill initially called it, “a crime without a name”) was the result of a long history of antisemitism, during which the Christian church played a significant role, a role that should not be minimized.
I don’t know why Rabbi Sacks was intent on giving Christianity a pass with respect to the Holocaust. He does not shy away from describing Christian persecution of Jews elsewhere in his book. In fact, he himself mentions the Inquisition and Limpieza de Sangre at an earlier point. Nor does my bringing this up diminish my respect and appreciation of Rabbi Sacks. I was reassured to read in The Jerusalem Post that Israeli soldiers serving on the frontlines facing Gaza and Lebanon after Oct. 7 were issued a pamphlet with Rabbi Sacks’ writings, translated into Hebrew, in which the rabbi reflects on the indomitable spirit of the Jewish people. One soldier said that it felt as though Rabbi Sacks was with them, giving them support and blessings for the journey ahead.
Jacob Sivak, a Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada, is a retired professor, University of Waterloo.
Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.
Editor's Picks
Israel and the Internet Wars – A Professional Social Media Review
The Invisible Student: A Tale of Homelessness at UCLA and USC
What Ever Happened to the LA Times?
Who Are the Jews On Joe Biden’s Cabinet?
You’re Not a Bad Jewish Mom If Your Kid Wants Santa Claus to Come to Your House
No Labels: The Group Fighting for the Political Center
Latest Articles
Holocaust Museum LA Names Honorary Director, Skirball Sunset Concerts Continues with Innovative Rockers
Rabbis of LA | Rabbi Burg Returns to Los Angeles
Where Beauty Culture Fails
Two Mountains — A poem for Parsha Re’eh by Rick Lupert
Can We Make Anti-Zionism as Taboo as Anti-Semitism?
A Moment in Time: God Laughs, We Discover
A Bisl Torah — Commuting
When taken with someone special, appreciate the commute.
Ulysses’ Restraint by Homer and Ben Zoma but Not by Zionists
Print Issue: “I Stand With the Jews” | August 7, 2026
Why international celebrity and singer Boy George risked his career to stand with Israel.
Beyond the Nebbish: New Hollywood Initiative Seeks to Transform Jewish Representation on Screen
The writers described the experience as personally meaningful, saying it strengthened their connection to Judaism, influenced the stories they wanted to tell and helped build a new sense of community.
Bringing Israeli Doctors Back
ScienceAbroad works with two groups in medicine: physicians who leave Israel for fellowships and Israeli students who attend medical school in Europe.
More Than Flavor: The Healing Power of Herbs and Spices
This week, Rachel and I share our column with our good friend Jill Sharfman.
Table for Five: Re’eh
Flesh And Blood
The Antizionist’s Dilemma
It’s not easy being an antizionist these days. Especially if you’re determined to live in accordance with your most important moral imperative: the denigration of the world’s only Jewish state.
A Brave Voice: Why Boy George Risked His Career to Stand With the Jews
Here was an artist with no personal stake in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, who understood the potential consequences of publicly taking a position, yet chose to publicly support Israel and what he believed was right.
Training Leadership of the Head, the Hand and the Heart
Rosner’s Domain | Are They Disarming Hamas or Netanyahu?
This war over narrative won’t just be between Israel and Hamas. It will also be an internal war over the narrative as Israel’s election is getting closer.
How the Supreme Court Adapted Parshat Shoftim
The Torah offers a better model than avenging and avoiding. It offers a safe opportunity for parties to meet and peacefully explain their perspectives, which might have been misunderstood. They can offer apologies and, where necessary, make amends for harms caused.
Can One Be a Non-Observant Orthodox Jew?
The tradition has always been bigger than any one person’s grip on it. What draws me is simple: I think these texts are a good part of why we are still here as a people. I want to know them and, in my own way, embrace them. Orthodox is where I turn.
Lies, Damned Lies and the Right Side of History
One question alone matters these days: Does this fact strengthen my tribe, or is it bad for it? If bad, it must be suppressed, denied, explained away. The higher truth is the narrative that serves the cause, the quest of the righteous and true.
Life Lessons in Old Age
Hardship and joy are present at every step. There is no time when it will be all good, so focus on the good and carry on. There are always moments to savor and appreciate.
The Forgotten Artist Who Fought Hitler with Faith
During World War II, his reach was breathtaking and he sought to stem the tide of Hitler’s march of death and settled in America for good.
How To Get Right the Woke-Right
The right was supposed to be the safe zone, and recent polling suggests that assumption is weakening.
Is Mamdani Helping Bibi?
By explicitly linking Mamdani’s efforts to rising levels of antisemitism, Netanyahu was able to frame himself as a defender of Israel against growing international hostility.
Israel’s Next Front: The Power of Attraction
Universities, hospitals, cultural and sporting institutions, technology companies and philanthropic foundations increasingly shape a country’s international influence.
Theater Near Portland Marquee Posted ‘Before There Were the Jews, There Was The Odyssey’
A Portland, Oregon theater with a reputation for controversial marquees posted one for Christopher Nolan’s “The Odyssey” that concerned many in the Jewish community.
More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.