fbpx

Dying to be heard: Shmuel Ziegelboim’s last words

On May 12, 1944, a Polish man named Shmuel Ziegelboim was desperate to tell the world that millions of his fellow Jews were being murdered in Poland.
[additional-authors]
May 3, 2016

On May 12, 1944, a Polish man named Shmuel Ziegelboim was desperate to tell the world that millions of his fellow Jews were being murdered in Poland. So, in his London flat, he wrote a letter and then killed himself.

The letter found its way into a little corner of The New York Times, where it was noticed by Alfred Kazin, literary editor of the New Republic, who wrote about it in the magazine.

Here’s an excerpt from Ziegelboim’s letter: 

“I take the liberty of addressing to you my last words, and through you to the Polish government and the Polish people, to the governments and peoples of the Allied states — to the conscience of the world.

“From the latest information received from Poland, it is evident that the Germans, with the most ruthless cruelty, are now murdering the few remaining Jews in Poland. Behind the ghetto’s walls the last act of a tragedy unprecedented in history is being performed.

“The responsibility for this crime of murdering the entire Jewish population of Poland falls in the first instance on the perpetrators, but indirectly it is also a burden on the whole of humanity, the people and the governments of the Allied states which thus far have made no effort toward concrete action for the purpose of curtailing this crime.

“From some 3,500,000 Polish Jews and about 700,000 other Jews deported to Poland from other countries — according to official statistics provided by the underground Bund organization — there remained in April of this year only about 300,000, and this remaining murder still goes on.”

Seeing his people get slaughtered, Ziegelboim had a hole in his heart that he tried to fill with a pen and paper.

Kazin, one of the leading public intellectuals of his day, was shaken by the desperation of Ziegelboim’s final act and outraged by the world’s silence. He meditated on both in a deep and erudite essay.

I came across Kazin’s essay in the book “Insurrections of the Mind: 100 Years of Politics and Culture in America.” What struck me most about Kazin’s piece and Ziegelboim’s letter was the very notion of witnessing an unspeakable crime in real time.

It’s one thing to read about a terror attack that killed three people yesterday, or even to learn about a horrible tragedy that happened 70 years ago. But to hear about the murder of 3 million people as it is actually happening?

How does one handle such unbearable news?

We live in a world where a complaint about a microaggression on a college campus can spread through social media and get millions of views within a few days.

How would the murder of millions during the Holocaust have played out if we had Twitter, Facebook and Instagram?

Shmuel Ziegelboim had no mechanism to broadcast his outrage. His voice was powerless in real time. He figured that if he killed himself, well, maybe the drama of a man’s last words would improve the chance of getting his message through. It turns out he was right: He gave his life for his message. 

As difficult as it was for Ziegelboim to make his voice heard, we’re now in an era of voice overabundance. Anyone with an Internet connection can be heard, anytime. There are digital shops that specialize in creative stunts on social media that will get your message heard by millions throughout the world.

As a result, we’re seeing in our digital public square a multitude of grievances competing for our attention. A clever campaign about a silly grievance may get more play than the drab news of genocide of women and children in Africa. 

This is not power to the people. It’s power to the clever.

As we commemorate Yom HaShoah, it’s worth reflecting on Shmuel Ziegelboim’s desperate final act to remind ourselves that not all grievances are created equal.

There surely must be many Ziegelboims around the world right now who are witnessing unspeakable crimes but don’t have the knowhow or opportunity to get their voices heard. 

They are seeing journalists being jailed, gays being lynched, women being raped, villages being ravaged. Many of these crimes remain below the radar; they’re not blessed by the bright lights of a social media campaign.

If we don’t seek out these voices, it’s not likely they will reach us.

The world may have changed radically since Shmuel Ziegelboim wrote his final words in 1944, but there are still witnesses who are dying to be heard.

Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.

Unbreakable Blue Thread: Reclaiming Our Past and Our Future

I write to you, all you first and second generations, and I assure you from generations five, six and seven that if we keep doing what we need to do, if we stand together, keep our traditions, educate ourselves in our ancient wisdom, keep Hebrew spoken and sung in our midst, we will not only endure. We Jews will thrive.

Unstuck in the Middle with You

Kwall, the Raymond P. Niro Law Professor at DePaul University College of Law, argues for a center defined by enough common commitments to make communal life possible.

Sewage Without Borders

Israel’s water security depends on what flows into the sea on the other side of all of them, and our water policy should start from that reality.

Torah Portion: Vayera

The parsha ends with the binding of Isaac, the Akeida, probably the darkest chapter in the entire Torah.

Let Them Talk

If we want our younger generations to love our faith, our culture, and our peoplehood, we need to be welcoming when they show interest and have a spark of curiosity.

A Wild and Improbable Story Hits Israel

It turns out that claim about Israel being a democracy wasn’t just propaganda. The two million Arabs who live in the world’s only Jewish state really do have the power to vote.

Why I Came to Vote in Israel

My journey to the ballot box was circuitous. The path I hope Israel will follow is derech Adonai: the way of righteousness and justice.

Bibi’s Battle

Overall, the anti-Netanyahu bloc is projected to win 53 seats, while the Netanyahu-led right-wing religious bloc is projected to win 50. Both are expected to fall well short of a 61-seat majority.

Bibi and Gadi

Let’s consider how Netanyahu and Eisenkot would govern differently given their many similarities on international and security matters.

Riots in France, Balagan in Israel

Suddenly, after years of lecturing Israel about being “too violent,” Macron was calling in his army to deal with out-of-control rioters, declaring that “those who sought to bring down the Republic will be held accountable.”

Up (and Down) In Michigan

A report on the Jewish nostalgia for a political home in the lead up to Michigan’s elections.

More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.