The left hates Bibi. It’s as true today as it was yesterday, but it may not be true tomorrow.
There are stirrings of a new attitude towards Israel’s controversial Prime Minister. People who saw him as the greatest threat to Israel’s democracy now look to him as Israel’s only hope. People who labeled him an extremist now pray that he can prove to be a moderating force in Israeli politics. People who hated his corruption now have bigger worries on their minds.
This is all because there’s a new government in Jerusalem. It’s loaded up with ministers from the Kahanist Jewish Power party and the anti-LGBT Noam party. It wants to hamstring the Supreme Court, build more settlements, and bring immigration law into alignment with strict Jewish law.
As a result, Bibi — the boogeyman of the left — suddenly doesn’t look so bad.
The Jerusalem Post writes, “Netanyahu must defend democracy from his coalition partners.” The Jewish Journal asks, “Will Bibi Be Israel’s Savior?” Countless articles suggest that Bibi will be the so-called “adult in the room,” keeping his coalition partners happy without actually letting them do too much damage.
None of this makes much sense. Why should Bibi save Israel from a coalition he created? After all, he was the one who resurrected the far-right. Why would anyone think that he is any different from the rest of him?
And yet, here we are. And it’s not just a hallucination. We can see it in action. Bibi himself is trying to be the adult in the room — or at least trying to be seen as one. He is urging Ben-Gvir to stay off the Temple Mount. He is reassuring the press that gay rights are safe. He is distinguishing himself from his new coworkers — especially Ben-Gvir, Maoz, and Smotrich.
Looking at Netanyahu in comparison to this cast of characters, some on the left are wondering why we made such a fuss about him in the past. Something about a submarine deal, and ordering too much pistachio ice cream on the company credit card, or perhaps the scandal about the security detail for his bratty son. From where we currently stand, it all sounds like so much shtuyot — nonsense.
And now some of us are asking why we didn’t partner with him instead of trying to take him down. Why didn’t we do what the ultra-Orthodox parties have done — which is to do business with him, trading him job security in exchange for important ministries and good legislation?
And now some of us are asking why we didn’t partner with him instead of trying to take him down. Why didn’t we do what the ultra-Orthodox parties have done — which is to do business with him, trading him job security in exchange for important ministries and good legislation?
Perhaps this is what will happen next time around. It’s possible that Bibi, exhausted from putting out PR fires from his new coalition partners, might prefer to join forces with centrists like Lapid and Gantz. The left, tired of Ben-Gvir’s inflammatory rhetoric and policies, may embrace Bibi with open arms.
Of course, there will be those who will never stop hating him. There will be those who will remember that it wasn’t all shtuyot. He was guilty of incitement, of corruption, and of putting self before party and party before country.
But there will also be those on the left who are happy to forgive and forget, just like we forgave and forgot with Bennett. If anyone can recall, Naftali Bennett was once treated by the foreign press like Ben-Gvir himself — a far-right extremist settler who would destroy Israel’s secular character and democracy. Less than a decade later he was heading up a center-left Jewish-Arab unity coalition.
When the only important criteria on the table was “anyone but Bibi,” the left put aside its concerns about Bennett and Bennett put aside his concerns about the left.
The next time around, the only important criteria on the table might be “anyone but Ben-Gvir.” If that’s the case, we might just find ourselves crowning Bibi “King of the Left.”
Matthew Schultz is the author of the essay collection “What Came Before” (2020). He is a rabbinical student at Hebrew College in Newton, Massachusetts.
Bibi: New King of the Israeli Left?
Matthew Schultz
The left hates Bibi. It’s as true today as it was yesterday, but it may not be true tomorrow.
There are stirrings of a new attitude towards Israel’s controversial Prime Minister. People who saw him as the greatest threat to Israel’s democracy now look to him as Israel’s only hope. People who labeled him an extremist now pray that he can prove to be a moderating force in Israeli politics. People who hated his corruption now have bigger worries on their minds.
This is all because there’s a new government in Jerusalem. It’s loaded up with ministers from the Kahanist Jewish Power party and the anti-LGBT Noam party. It wants to hamstring the Supreme Court, build more settlements, and bring immigration law into alignment with strict Jewish law.
As a result, Bibi — the boogeyman of the left — suddenly doesn’t look so bad.
The Jerusalem Post writes, “Netanyahu must defend democracy from his coalition partners.” The Jewish Journal asks, “Will Bibi Be Israel’s Savior?” Countless articles suggest that Bibi will be the so-called “adult in the room,” keeping his coalition partners happy without actually letting them do too much damage.
None of this makes much sense. Why should Bibi save Israel from a coalition he created? After all, he was the one who resurrected the far-right. Why would anyone think that he is any different from the rest of him?
And yet, here we are. And it’s not just a hallucination. We can see it in action. Bibi himself is trying to be the adult in the room — or at least trying to be seen as one. He is urging Ben-Gvir to stay off the Temple Mount. He is reassuring the press that gay rights are safe. He is distinguishing himself from his new coworkers — especially Ben-Gvir, Maoz, and Smotrich.
Looking at Netanyahu in comparison to this cast of characters, some on the left are wondering why we made such a fuss about him in the past. Something about a submarine deal, and ordering too much pistachio ice cream on the company credit card, or perhaps the scandal about the security detail for his bratty son. From where we currently stand, it all sounds like so much shtuyot — nonsense.
And now some of us are asking why we didn’t partner with him instead of trying to take him down. Why didn’t we do what the ultra-Orthodox parties have done — which is to do business with him, trading him job security in exchange for important ministries and good legislation?
Perhaps this is what will happen next time around. It’s possible that Bibi, exhausted from putting out PR fires from his new coalition partners, might prefer to join forces with centrists like Lapid and Gantz. The left, tired of Ben-Gvir’s inflammatory rhetoric and policies, may embrace Bibi with open arms.
Of course, there will be those who will never stop hating him. There will be those who will remember that it wasn’t all shtuyot. He was guilty of incitement, of corruption, and of putting self before party and party before country.
But there will also be those on the left who are happy to forgive and forget, just like we forgave and forgot with Bennett. If anyone can recall, Naftali Bennett was once treated by the foreign press like Ben-Gvir himself — a far-right extremist settler who would destroy Israel’s secular character and democracy. Less than a decade later he was heading up a center-left Jewish-Arab unity coalition.
When the only important criteria on the table was “anyone but Bibi,” the left put aside its concerns about Bennett and Bennett put aside his concerns about the left.
The next time around, the only important criteria on the table might be “anyone but Ben-Gvir.” If that’s the case, we might just find ourselves crowning Bibi “King of the Left.”
Matthew Schultz is the author of the essay collection “What Came Before” (2020). He is a rabbinical student at Hebrew College in Newton, Massachusetts.
Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.
Editor's Picks
Israel and the Internet Wars – A Professional Social Media Review
The Invisible Student: A Tale of Homelessness at UCLA and USC
What Ever Happened to the LA Times?
Who Are the Jews On Joe Biden’s Cabinet?
You’re Not a Bad Jewish Mom If Your Kid Wants Santa Claus to Come to Your House
No Labels: The Group Fighting for the Political Center
Latest Articles
Holocaust Museum LA Names Honorary Director, Skirball Sunset Concerts Continues with Innovative Rockers
Rabbis of LA | Rabbi Burg Returns to Los Angeles
Where Beauty Culture Fails
Two Mountains — A poem for Parsha Re’eh by Rick Lupert
Can We Make Anti-Zionism as Taboo as Anti-Semitism?
A Moment in Time: God Laughs, We Discover
A Bisl Torah — Commuting
When taken with someone special, appreciate the commute.
Ulysses’ Restraint by Homer and Ben Zoma but Not by Zionists
Print Issue: “I Stand With the Jews” | August 7, 2026
Why international celebrity and singer Boy George risked his career to stand with Israel.
Beyond the Nebbish: New Hollywood Initiative Seeks to Transform Jewish Representation on Screen
The writers described the experience as personally meaningful, saying it strengthened their connection to Judaism, influenced the stories they wanted to tell and helped build a new sense of community.
Bringing Israeli Doctors Back
ScienceAbroad works with two groups in medicine: physicians who leave Israel for fellowships and Israeli students who attend medical school in Europe.
More Than Flavor: The Healing Power of Herbs and Spices
This week, Rachel and I share our column with our good friend Jill Sharfman.
Table for Five: Re’eh
Flesh And Blood
The Antizionist’s Dilemma
It’s not easy being an antizionist these days. Especially if you’re determined to live in accordance with your most important moral imperative: the denigration of the world’s only Jewish state.
A Brave Voice: Why Boy George Risked His Career to Stand With the Jews
Here was an artist with no personal stake in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, who understood the potential consequences of publicly taking a position, yet chose to publicly support Israel and what he believed was right.
Training Leadership of the Head, the Hand and the Heart
Rosner’s Domain | Are They Disarming Hamas or Netanyahu?
This war over narrative won’t just be between Israel and Hamas. It will also be an internal war over the narrative as Israel’s election is getting closer.
How the Supreme Court Adapted Parshat Shoftim
The Torah offers a better model than avenging and avoiding. It offers a safe opportunity for parties to meet and peacefully explain their perspectives, which might have been misunderstood. They can offer apologies and, where necessary, make amends for harms caused.
Can One Be a Non-Observant Orthodox Jew?
The tradition has always been bigger than any one person’s grip on it. What draws me is simple: I think these texts are a good part of why we are still here as a people. I want to know them and, in my own way, embrace them. Orthodox is where I turn.
Lies, Damned Lies and the Right Side of History
One question alone matters these days: Does this fact strengthen my tribe, or is it bad for it? If bad, it must be suppressed, denied, explained away. The higher truth is the narrative that serves the cause, the quest of the righteous and true.
Life Lessons in Old Age
Hardship and joy are present at every step. There is no time when it will be all good, so focus on the good and carry on. There are always moments to savor and appreciate.
The Forgotten Artist Who Fought Hitler with Faith
During World War II, his reach was breathtaking and he sought to stem the tide of Hitler’s march of death and settled in America for good.
How To Get Right the Woke-Right
The right was supposed to be the safe zone, and recent polling suggests that assumption is weakening.
Is Mamdani Helping Bibi?
By explicitly linking Mamdani’s efforts to rising levels of antisemitism, Netanyahu was able to frame himself as a defender of Israel against growing international hostility.
Israel’s Next Front: The Power of Attraction
Universities, hospitals, cultural and sporting institutions, technology companies and philanthropic foundations increasingly shape a country’s international influence.
Theater Near Portland Marquee Posted ‘Before There Were the Jews, There Was The Odyssey’
A Portland, Oregon theater with a reputation for controversial marquees posted one for Christopher Nolan’s “The Odyssey” that concerned many in the Jewish community.
More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.