The left hates Bibi. It’s as true today as it was yesterday, but it may not be true tomorrow.
There are stirrings of a new attitude towards Israel’s controversial Prime Minister. People who saw him as the greatest threat to Israel’s democracy now look to him as Israel’s only hope. People who labeled him an extremist now pray that he can prove to be a moderating force in Israeli politics. People who hated his corruption now have bigger worries on their minds.
This is all because there’s a new government in Jerusalem. It’s loaded up with ministers from the Kahanist Jewish Power party and the anti-LGBT Noam party. It wants to hamstring the Supreme Court, build more settlements, and bring immigration law into alignment with strict Jewish law.
As a result, Bibi — the boogeyman of the left — suddenly doesn’t look so bad.
The Jerusalem Post writes, “Netanyahu must defend democracy from his coalition partners.” The Jewish Journal asks, “Will Bibi Be Israel’s Savior?” Countless articles suggest that Bibi will be the so-called “adult in the room,” keeping his coalition partners happy without actually letting them do too much damage.
None of this makes much sense. Why should Bibi save Israel from a coalition he created? After all, he was the one who resurrected the far-right. Why would anyone think that he is any different from the rest of him?
And yet, here we are. And it’s not just a hallucination. We can see it in action. Bibi himself is trying to be the adult in the room — or at least trying to be seen as one. He is urging Ben-Gvir to stay off the Temple Mount. He is reassuring the press that gay rights are safe. He is distinguishing himself from his new coworkers — especially Ben-Gvir, Maoz, and Smotrich.
Looking at Netanyahu in comparison to this cast of characters, some on the left are wondering why we made such a fuss about him in the past. Something about a submarine deal, and ordering too much pistachio ice cream on the company credit card, or perhaps the scandal about the security detail for his bratty son. From where we currently stand, it all sounds like so much shtuyot — nonsense.
And now some of us are asking why we didn’t partner with him instead of trying to take him down. Why didn’t we do what the ultra-Orthodox parties have done — which is to do business with him, trading him job security in exchange for important ministries and good legislation?
And now some of us are asking why we didn’t partner with him instead of trying to take him down. Why didn’t we do what the ultra-Orthodox parties have done — which is to do business with him, trading him job security in exchange for important ministries and good legislation?
Perhaps this is what will happen next time around. It’s possible that Bibi, exhausted from putting out PR fires from his new coalition partners, might prefer to join forces with centrists like Lapid and Gantz. The left, tired of Ben-Gvir’s inflammatory rhetoric and policies, may embrace Bibi with open arms.
Of course, there will be those who will never stop hating him. There will be those who will remember that it wasn’t all shtuyot. He was guilty of incitement, of corruption, and of putting self before party and party before country.
But there will also be those on the left who are happy to forgive and forget, just like we forgave and forgot with Bennett. If anyone can recall, Naftali Bennett was once treated by the foreign press like Ben-Gvir himself — a far-right extremist settler who would destroy Israel’s secular character and democracy. Less than a decade later he was heading up a center-left Jewish-Arab unity coalition.
When the only important criteria on the table was “anyone but Bibi,” the left put aside its concerns about Bennett and Bennett put aside his concerns about the left.
The next time around, the only important criteria on the table might be “anyone but Ben-Gvir.” If that’s the case, we might just find ourselves crowning Bibi “King of the Left.”
Matthew Schultz is the author of the essay collection “What Came Before” (2020). He is a rabbinical student at Hebrew College in Newton, Massachusetts.
Bibi: New King of the Israeli Left?
Matthew Schultz
The left hates Bibi. It’s as true today as it was yesterday, but it may not be true tomorrow.
There are stirrings of a new attitude towards Israel’s controversial Prime Minister. People who saw him as the greatest threat to Israel’s democracy now look to him as Israel’s only hope. People who labeled him an extremist now pray that he can prove to be a moderating force in Israeli politics. People who hated his corruption now have bigger worries on their minds.
This is all because there’s a new government in Jerusalem. It’s loaded up with ministers from the Kahanist Jewish Power party and the anti-LGBT Noam party. It wants to hamstring the Supreme Court, build more settlements, and bring immigration law into alignment with strict Jewish law.
As a result, Bibi — the boogeyman of the left — suddenly doesn’t look so bad.
The Jerusalem Post writes, “Netanyahu must defend democracy from his coalition partners.” The Jewish Journal asks, “Will Bibi Be Israel’s Savior?” Countless articles suggest that Bibi will be the so-called “adult in the room,” keeping his coalition partners happy without actually letting them do too much damage.
None of this makes much sense. Why should Bibi save Israel from a coalition he created? After all, he was the one who resurrected the far-right. Why would anyone think that he is any different from the rest of him?
And yet, here we are. And it’s not just a hallucination. We can see it in action. Bibi himself is trying to be the adult in the room — or at least trying to be seen as one. He is urging Ben-Gvir to stay off the Temple Mount. He is reassuring the press that gay rights are safe. He is distinguishing himself from his new coworkers — especially Ben-Gvir, Maoz, and Smotrich.
Looking at Netanyahu in comparison to this cast of characters, some on the left are wondering why we made such a fuss about him in the past. Something about a submarine deal, and ordering too much pistachio ice cream on the company credit card, or perhaps the scandal about the security detail for his bratty son. From where we currently stand, it all sounds like so much shtuyot — nonsense.
And now some of us are asking why we didn’t partner with him instead of trying to take him down. Why didn’t we do what the ultra-Orthodox parties have done — which is to do business with him, trading him job security in exchange for important ministries and good legislation?
Perhaps this is what will happen next time around. It’s possible that Bibi, exhausted from putting out PR fires from his new coalition partners, might prefer to join forces with centrists like Lapid and Gantz. The left, tired of Ben-Gvir’s inflammatory rhetoric and policies, may embrace Bibi with open arms.
Of course, there will be those who will never stop hating him. There will be those who will remember that it wasn’t all shtuyot. He was guilty of incitement, of corruption, and of putting self before party and party before country.
But there will also be those on the left who are happy to forgive and forget, just like we forgave and forgot with Bennett. If anyone can recall, Naftali Bennett was once treated by the foreign press like Ben-Gvir himself — a far-right extremist settler who would destroy Israel’s secular character and democracy. Less than a decade later he was heading up a center-left Jewish-Arab unity coalition.
When the only important criteria on the table was “anyone but Bibi,” the left put aside its concerns about Bennett and Bennett put aside his concerns about the left.
The next time around, the only important criteria on the table might be “anyone but Ben-Gvir.” If that’s the case, we might just find ourselves crowning Bibi “King of the Left.”
Matthew Schultz is the author of the essay collection “What Came Before” (2020). He is a rabbinical student at Hebrew College in Newton, Massachusetts.
Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.
Editor's Picks
Israel and the Internet Wars – A Professional Social Media Review
The Invisible Student: A Tale of Homelessness at UCLA and USC
What Ever Happened to the LA Times?
Who Are the Jews On Joe Biden’s Cabinet?
You’re Not a Bad Jewish Mom If Your Kid Wants Santa Claus to Come to Your House
No Labels: The Group Fighting for the Political Center
Latest Articles
The Crisis in Jewish Education Is Not About Screens
Theodor Herzl’s Liberal Nationalist Leap of Hope – and America’s
Nation of Laws – A poem for Parsha Mishpatim
Borrowed Spotlight Art Exhibit Pairs Holocaust Survivors with Celebrities
A Bisl Torah — Holy Selfishness
A Moment in Time: “Choosing our Move”
Waiting for Religious Intelligence as for AI and Godot
Award-Winning Travel Author Lisa Niver Interviews Churchill Wild Guide Terry Elliott
Print Issue: One Man’s Show | February 6, 2026
How Meir Fenigstein Brings Israeli Stories to the American Screen
Does Tucker Carlson Have His Eye on The White House?
Jason Zengerle, a contributing writer for The New York Times Magazine, and staff writer at the New Yorker wrote a new book about Carlson, “Hated By All The Right People: Tucker Carlson and The Unraveling of The Conservative Mind.”
Michelle Heston: Valentine’s Day, Cake Love & Chocolate Ganache
Taste Buds with Deb – Episode 142
Love Stories – A Persian Love Cake
Love is precious and this Persian Love Cake is the perfect way to show a little love to your friends and family.
Table for Five: Mishpatim
Empathy for Strangers
Meir Fenigstein: One Man’s Show
How Meir Fenigstein Brings Israeli Stories to the American Screen
Rosner’s Domain | In 2026, It’s Right vs. Right
The elections of 2026 will not be “right vs. center-left.” They will be “right vs. right.”
Bret Stephens Has Kicked Off a Long Overdue Debate: Are Jews Fighting the Right Way?
Why is it that despite the enormous resources and money we spend fighting antisemitism, it just keeps getting worse?
Why “More Jewish Education” Keeps Making Things Worse
If we want a different future, we must be willing to examine what already exists, what has failed, and what is quietly working.
Cain and Abel Today
The story of Cain and Abel constitutes a critical and fundamental lesson – we are all children of the covenant with the opportunity to serve each other and to serve God. We are, indeed, each other’s keeper.
Belonging Matters. And Mattering Matters Too.
A society that maximizes belonging while severing it from standards produces conformity, not freedom. A society that encourages mattering divorced from truth produces fanaticism, not dignity. Life and liberty depend on holding the two together.
The Chief Rabbi and the Commander in Chief: A Presidents’ Day Reflection
Both the Chief Rabbi and America’s Commander in Chief understood that America and Israel were bonded by the Bible, allies in a faith guided by God’s ancient promise of freedom centuries ago.
The Writing on Jerusalem’s Walls: A Sober Glimpse at Israel’s Future
The Israeli public may look at Jerusalem with nostalgic longing, but it misses the glaring warning sign the city is raising. The current Jerusalem model is not sustainable at the national level.
Theology and the Absence of Moral Agency in Gaza
Fear alone cannot explain Gaza’s moral void after Oct. 7.
In Combatting K–12 Antisemitism, You Can’t Educate Haters Out of Power
The hostility we’re seeing today in K–12 schools has very little to do with education and everything to do with power.
What the Jewish People Can Learn from Bad Bunny
It was a masterclass in moral confidence. He met a moment of anger with dignity, and a moment of division with cultural self-assurance. He reminded America who Latinos are, without begging for permission or absolution.
The Antidote to Antisemitism
We are in command of our own destiny—and it’s not wrong to defend our sovereignty.
Thou Shall Not Covet: A Mantra for Mental Health
Envy is a completely unproductive, and even self-destructive, emotion.
More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.