Two weeks ago, I co-wrote an Open Letter to the Charles E. Smith Jewish Day School in the Washington, D.C. area raising concerns about the school’s “Diversity, Equity, Inclusion and Justice” (DEIJ) program. Like so many others, the school’s diversity program does not provide alternative perspectives to the typical “anti-racist” point of view. My co-author and I, both of whom had children graduate from the school, regard this “pedagogy” as a form of indoctrination.
I decided to post this Open Letter on JEDLAB, a Jewish educators Facebook group with 12,000 members. I was active in the early days of JEDLAB, a space where innovative educators shared and discussed cutting edge ideas and approaches often at odds with the Jewish educational establishment. I loved it so much I even interviewed the founder in eJewish Philanthropy.
It seemed a perfect forum for generating interesting and important discussion about emerging diversity programs in Jewish educational settings.
Apparently, however, DEIJ initiatives in Jewish schools are not open for discussion.
Almost immediately, a member of the Facebook group pronounced the post “racist.” The member said I had no business posting my views there. Several others piled on, also calling the post “racist” and urging its immediate removal. Not a single person took exception or came to my defense (except, of course, in private messages). The comment from the member accusing me of promulgating racism had numerous “likes,” including one from a mainstream Jewish professional who is a self-proclaimed moderate on the subject. His vote of support for this vitriol suggests otherwise.
About an hour after posting, the post was removed without explanation by the administrators of the group. There are two possible explanations:
The first is that the administrators agreed that raising concerns about the “anti-racist” perspective being taught to kids is inherently racist. Ibrahim X. Kendi has spoken, and we must all fall in line.
If that’s the case, I despair over the future of Jewish education.
A second possibility is that the administrators received complaints that my ideas make the space “unsafe” for participants. This, of course, meant that the administrators had to silence someone with a different point of view. This is the “heckler’s veto”: a few shrill voices who protest a particular viewpoint get spineless institutions to stifle debate.
This is the “heckler’s veto”: a few shrill voices who protest a particular viewpoint get spineless institutions to stifle speech.
If that’s the case, I again despair over the future of Jewish education.
Our kids must be educated in a culture and sensibility that values Makhloket Leshem Shamayim—arguments for the sake of heaven. This sensibility welcomes—even encourages—debate among people with different points of view. The Jewish tendency to question and engage in intellectual discourse is one of the great qualities of the Jewish tradition. Why would anyone, least of all Jewish educators, try to blot this out? Don’t we want our kids to be critical thinkers and challenge the status quo?
Of course, there are many Jewish educators and parents who do value discussion among people with different viewpoints. A headmaster of a pluralistic Jewish school direct messaged me on Facebook and thanked me for raising the topic. One prominent professor called to say “I wanted to kiss you.” Numerous Jewish day school teachers reached out to me and my co-author of the Open Letter, thanking us for giving a voice to their concerns. These teachers cannot speak publicly themselves because, well, they fear they will be cancelled, just like my Facebook post.
These teachers cannot speak publicly themselves because, well, they fear they will be cancelled, just like my Facebook post.
How is that good for the Jews?
David Bernstein is the Founder of Jewish Institute for Liberal Value (JILV.org). Follow him on Twitter @DavidLBernstein.
Cancel Culture, Jewish Educators Style
David Bernstein
Two weeks ago, I co-wrote an Open Letter to the Charles E. Smith Jewish Day School in the Washington, D.C. area raising concerns about the school’s “Diversity, Equity, Inclusion and Justice” (DEIJ) program. Like so many others, the school’s diversity program does not provide alternative perspectives to the typical “anti-racist” point of view. My co-author and I, both of whom had children graduate from the school, regard this “pedagogy” as a form of indoctrination.
I decided to post this Open Letter on JEDLAB, a Jewish educators Facebook group with 12,000 members. I was active in the early days of JEDLAB, a space where innovative educators shared and discussed cutting edge ideas and approaches often at odds with the Jewish educational establishment. I loved it so much I even interviewed the founder in eJewish Philanthropy.
It seemed a perfect forum for generating interesting and important discussion about emerging diversity programs in Jewish educational settings.
Apparently, however, DEIJ initiatives in Jewish schools are not open for discussion.
Almost immediately, a member of the Facebook group pronounced the post “racist.” The member said I had no business posting my views there. Several others piled on, also calling the post “racist” and urging its immediate removal. Not a single person took exception or came to my defense (except, of course, in private messages). The comment from the member accusing me of promulgating racism had numerous “likes,” including one from a mainstream Jewish professional who is a self-proclaimed moderate on the subject. His vote of support for this vitriol suggests otherwise.
About an hour after posting, the post was removed without explanation by the administrators of the group. There are two possible explanations:
The first is that the administrators agreed that raising concerns about the “anti-racist” perspective being taught to kids is inherently racist. Ibrahim X. Kendi has spoken, and we must all fall in line.
If that’s the case, I despair over the future of Jewish education.
A second possibility is that the administrators received complaints that my ideas make the space “unsafe” for participants. This, of course, meant that the administrators had to silence someone with a different point of view. This is the “heckler’s veto”: a few shrill voices who protest a particular viewpoint get spineless institutions to stifle debate.
If that’s the case, I again despair over the future of Jewish education.
Our kids must be educated in a culture and sensibility that values Makhloket Leshem Shamayim—arguments for the sake of heaven. This sensibility welcomes—even encourages—debate among people with different points of view. The Jewish tendency to question and engage in intellectual discourse is one of the great qualities of the Jewish tradition. Why would anyone, least of all Jewish educators, try to blot this out? Don’t we want our kids to be critical thinkers and challenge the status quo?
Of course, there are many Jewish educators and parents who do value discussion among people with different viewpoints. A headmaster of a pluralistic Jewish school direct messaged me on Facebook and thanked me for raising the topic. One prominent professor called to say “I wanted to kiss you.” Numerous Jewish day school teachers reached out to me and my co-author of the Open Letter, thanking us for giving a voice to their concerns. These teachers cannot speak publicly themselves because, well, they fear they will be cancelled, just like my Facebook post.
How is that good for the Jews?
David Bernstein is the Founder of Jewish Institute for Liberal Value (JILV.org). Follow him on Twitter @DavidLBernstein.
Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.
Editor's Picks
Israel and the Internet Wars – A Professional Social Media Review
The Invisible Student: A Tale of Homelessness at UCLA and USC
What Ever Happened to the LA Times?
Who Are the Jews On Joe Biden’s Cabinet?
You’re Not a Bad Jewish Mom If Your Kid Wants Santa Claus to Come to Your House
No Labels: The Group Fighting for the Political Center
Latest Articles
LA Congresswoman Sydney Kamlager-Dove Votes Against Resolution Declaring “From the River to the Sea” Is Antisemitic
ADL: Antisemitic Incidents Increased 140% Last Year
Fun Haggadot for Passover
UC Berkeley Law School Dean Talks About Antisemitism on Campus
Father’s Captivity in Gaza Spurs Family’s Tireless Advocacy for Hostage Release
Understanding the As-a-Jew Jew
Culture
“When Do We Eat?” Director Reflects on Passover Comedy and the Late Michael Lerner
LA Jewish Symphony to Celebrate 30 Years with Anniversary Concert on April 14
Delicious Entrees for Your Passover Seder
A Passover Story — Of Meat Pies and Chicken Tagine
Leave a Seat or Two Empty This Seder
We must improvise a new ritual that marks our present pain, that illustrates our vital connection with Israel and Israelis today.
From a Jewish Nightmare to an American Dream
But in the spirit of resilience, I’d like to suggest that we dare add something more hopeful to our Seders this year, something more American, something about transforming nightmares into dreams
What Does Freedom Mean to My Mother?
Her response was so meaningful, I asked her to write it down because more people need to hear it.
A Walk in Jerusalem After the Doomsday That Wasn’t
After this morning’s aerial defeat of the looming disaster, Israel and the Jewish people’s communication strategy has changed. We have a new reality.
Six Months
Six months of feeling united as Jews, no matter our backgrounds or religious affiliation.
Hollywood
Spielberg Says Antisemitism Is “No Longer Lurking, But Standing Proud” Like 1930s Germany
Young Actress Juju Brener on Her “Hocus Pocus 2” Role
Behind the Scenes of “Jeopardy!” with Mayim Bialik
Podcasts
Joan Nathan: “My Life in Recipes” and Pecan Lemon Torte
Joel Haber: 18 Jewish Foods Podcast and Hamin Kharshuf aka Chulent
More news and opinions than at a
Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.
More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.