The third round, the booster, is not yet a definitive remedy for anything. But the world of COVID is a world in which decisions are made as if in the fog of war.
On Sunday morning, I took my third shot of the COVID-19 vaccine in slightly more than half a year. Forty eight hours earlier or so, the government decided to allow those over 50 years old to receive the booster. That was a Friday. On Friday night, thousands were already vaccinated, on Saturday, operation vaccine moved to city centers. People were going out to the theater, to a restaurant, to a pub, and ended up standing in line to get a vaccine.
Why wait?
That’s what I thought when I booked my shot for early Sunday morning. The third round, the booster, is not yet a definitive remedy for anything. But the world of COVID is a world in which decisions are made as if in the fog of war. Battalions of doctors must advance, and the citizen must decide if he wants to ride with them, of stay behind.
Psychologically, taking the third shot feels like a decision, and not taking it feels like avoiding decision. But that’s an illusion. There are in fact two decisions from which to choose: you decide to take the shot—or you decide not to take the shot. It’s true that the former decision demands action, while the latter demands nothing. And yet, both are decisions. Both could have positive or negative consequences. Both should be weighted in the exact same way, against each other. What is the worst case scenario if one doesn’t get the booster, and what is the world case scenario if one gets it? And what’s the best case scenario in both cases? After a short back and forth, I opted to take the vaccine, and also to take it now, rather than wait to see what happens to other people who take it (if that’s the choice, the honest observer must also consider what happens in the meantime to those who do not take it).
Hence, we must choose… The unforeseen results of doing nothing—or the unforeseen results of doing the best we can come up with at this time.
My appointment was for ten in the morning. I arrived at 9:50, and by 10:02 the whole thing was over. Israel organized for this third round of vaccines like an army of veterans. In two to three days, tens of thousands of people were vaccinated, no problem, no long lines, no complaints. If you want the shot, you will get it, and quickly. Those who did not yet vaccinate were slower to respond, or slower to decide. Or, in some cases, do not want to vaccinate.
It’s easy to sympathize with those who are slow to respond. This has been a tiring year, and having to get yet another appointment for yet another shot is not easy for everyone. Those who refuse to immunizethemselves and insist on risking their neighbors are more difficult to understand. Some of them are kooky, some are not particularly bright, some are detached from reality, and some are immature. The era of social media provided each such objector with a megaphone. They use it to spread misinformation, to sow apprehension, to present themselves as martyrs who fight against evil forces (our doctors). They thrive because the very essence of battling a pandemic like COVID is uncertainty. And so, their arguments are not completely unfounded. No, we cannot guarantee that the vaccine is fully effective. No, it was not tested for as long as we’d wish. No, there’s no other country from which we can learn about the exact outcome of a booster.
A medical worker prepares to administer a third dose of COVID 19 vaccine to a patient on August 1, 2021 in Netanya, Israel. (Photo by Amir Levy/Getty Images)
So why are we still taking the risk, and the shot? Because of the flip side of the same coin.
No, we cannot guarantee that without the vaccine the country can keep functioning. No, we have no time to test the vaccine for as long as we’d wish and still stop the pandemic before it kills many thousands. No, we can’t rely on slower countries to serve as example if we want to be effective.
Hence, we must choose. The unknown consequence of the pandemic—or the unknown consequence of the booster. The unforeseen results of doing nothing—or the unforeseen results of doing the best we can come up with at this time. The recommendations of experts—or the recommendations of a mix of conspiracy theorists, fame–seeking celebrities, alternative healers and the rest of the objectors’ crew.
On Sunday, I made my choice. To be honest: it is an easy choice.
Shmuel Rosner is an Israeli columnist, editor, and researcher. He is the editor of the research and data-journalism website themadad.com, and is the political editor of the Jewish Journal.
The novel is set in 1952 and centers on Jay deVenezia, a 23-year-old, six-foot-five-inch Italian Jew from the Bronx, and his older brother, Eric “Bud” deVenezia.
“Bloody Murray,” whose first season is available on ChaiFlicks, stars Naomi Levov as Mo, better known as Murray, and Rotem Sela as her best friend and roommate, Dana.
In addition to Best Feature Film, “The Wedding Entertainer” received nominations for Best Actor for Rand, Best Supporting Actor for Tal Friedman, Best Supporting Actress for Malky Goldman, Best Screenplay for Rand and Best Cinematography for Giora Bejach.
Everyone has a direct stake in knowing that one of the most-cited evidentiary pillars in the international campaign against Israel is far shakier than its footnotes suggest.
It is a challenge for which various solutions have already been tried and failed. Most of all, it is a challenge that doesn’t seem to have any prospect of being addressed anytime soon in a way that leads to a final resolution.
Presidential security machinations, like presidential vacation time and decorating budgets, often serve as partisan Rorschach tests: rivals mock, while supporters defend.
The Choice of the Third Vaccine
Shmuel Rosner
On Sunday morning, I took my third shot of the COVID-19 vaccine in slightly more than half a year. Forty eight hours earlier or so, the government decided to allow those over 50 years old to receive the booster. That was a Friday. On Friday night, thousands were already vaccinated, on Saturday, operation vaccine moved to city centers. People were going out to the theater, to a restaurant, to a pub, and ended up standing in line to get a vaccine.
Why wait?
That’s what I thought when I booked my shot for early Sunday morning. The third round, the booster, is not yet a definitive remedy for anything. But the world of COVID is a world in which decisions are made as if in the fog of war. Battalions of doctors must advance, and the citizen must decide if he wants to ride with them, of stay behind.
Psychologically, taking the third shot feels like a decision, and not taking it feels like avoiding decision. But that’s an illusion. There are in fact two decisions from which to choose: you decide to take the shot—or you decide not to take the shot. It’s true that the former decision demands action, while the latter demands nothing. And yet, both are decisions. Both could have positive or negative consequences. Both should be weighted in the exact same way, against each other. What is the worst case scenario if one doesn’t get the booster, and what is the world case scenario if one gets it? And what’s the best case scenario in both cases? After a short back and forth, I opted to take the vaccine, and also to take it now, rather than wait to see what happens to other people who take it (if that’s the choice, the honest observer must also consider what happens in the meantime to those who do not take it).
My appointment was for ten in the morning. I arrived at 9:50, and by 10:02 the whole thing was over. Israel organized for this third round of vaccines like an army of veterans. In two to three days, tens of thousands of people were vaccinated, no problem, no long lines, no complaints. If you want the shot, you will get it, and quickly. Those who did not yet vaccinate were slower to respond, or slower to decide. Or, in some cases, do not want to vaccinate.
It’s easy to sympathize with those who are slow to respond. This has been a tiring year, and having to get yet another appointment for yet another shot is not easy for everyone. Those who refuse to immunizethemselves and insist on risking their neighbors are more difficult to understand. Some of them are kooky, some are not particularly bright, some are detached from reality, and some are immature. The era of social media provided each such objector with a megaphone. They use it to spread misinformation, to sow apprehension, to present themselves as martyrs who fight against evil forces (our doctors). They thrive because the very essence of battling a pandemic like COVID is uncertainty. And so, their arguments are not completely unfounded. No, we cannot guarantee that the vaccine is fully effective. No, it was not tested for as long as we’d wish. No, there’s no other country from which we can learn about the exact outcome of a booster.
So why are we still taking the risk, and the shot? Because of the flip side of the same coin.
No, we cannot guarantee that without the vaccine the country can keep functioning. No, we have no time to test the vaccine for as long as we’d wish and still stop the pandemic before it kills many thousands. No, we can’t rely on slower countries to serve as example if we want to be effective.
Hence, we must choose. The unknown consequence of the pandemic—or the unknown consequence of the booster. The unforeseen results of doing nothing—or the unforeseen results of doing the best we can come up with at this time. The recommendations of experts—or the recommendations of a mix of conspiracy theorists, fame–seeking celebrities, alternative healers and the rest of the objectors’ crew.
On Sunday, I made my choice. To be honest: it is an easy choice.
Shmuel Rosner is an Israeli columnist, editor, and researcher. He is the editor of the research and data-journalism website themadad.com, and is the political editor of the Jewish Journal.
Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.
Editor's Picks
Israel and the Internet Wars – A Professional Social Media Review
The Invisible Student: A Tale of Homelessness at UCLA and USC
What Ever Happened to the LA Times?
Who Are the Jews On Joe Biden’s Cabinet?
You’re Not a Bad Jewish Mom If Your Kid Wants Santa Claus to Come to Your House
No Labels: The Group Fighting for the Political Center
Latest Articles
Mark Ruffalo Once Admitted the ‘Genocide’ Libel Fuels Antisemitism. Now He’s Doing It Again?
Some of My Best Friends Are Jewish: Mark Ruffalo and the Anatomy of a Modern Blood Libel
The Dark Side of DEI
Israel Derangement Syndrome Hits Montreal City Council
Creative Community for Peace Calls Mark Ruffalo’s Ellison Attack Antisemitic, Urges Hollywood to Stop Platforming Him
In Accusing Ellison of Complicity in ‘Genocide,’ Mark Ruffalo Echoes Ancient Tropes of Jewish Control
The Death of the Bucket List: Discovering the Art of Slow Travel in Portugal.
When You Go Out To War — A poem for Parsha Ki Teitzei
When you go out to war, be nice.
“Jerusalemites”
Chosen Links by Boaz spotlight
Did Josephus See Jesus as a Rebellious Son?
A Moment in Time: Looking Back, Moving Forward
A Bisl Torah — Repairs Reopen
Wounds reopen; repair is sometimes never really over.
Print Issue: The Silent Boycott | August 21, 2026
How Israeli academics are being shut out of the international academic world, and how UCLA professor Judea Pearl is fighting back.
Jacob and Esau Clash on the Cross Bronx Expressway in New Book
The novel is set in 1952 and centers on Jay deVenezia, a 23-year-old, six-foot-five-inch Italian Jew from the Bronx, and his older brother, Eric “Bud” deVenezia.
Israeli Rom-Com ‘Bloody Murray’ Balances Life and Art
“Bloody Murray,” whose first season is available on ChaiFlicks, stars Naomi Levov as Mo, better known as Murray, and Rotem Sela as her best friend and roommate, Dana.
Elon Gold’s ‘The Wedding Entertainer’ Up for Best Film at 2026 Ophir Awards
In addition to Best Feature Film, “The Wedding Entertainer” received nominations for Best Actor for Rand, Best Supporting Actor for Tal Friedman, Best Supporting Actress for Malky Goldman, Best Screenplay for Rand and Best Cinematography for Giora Bejach.
The Bad Data Behind the ‘Genocide’ Charge
Everyone has a direct stake in knowing that one of the most-cited evidentiary pillars in the international campaign against Israel is far shakier than its footnotes suggest.
In This Season: Renewing Our L.A. Jewish Community
In this, the season of our renewal, I am proposing a transformational agenda for our Los Angeles Jewish community.
There’s a Leek in the Bureka
Deliciously flaky and crispy with a satisfying creamy filling, these burekas are really easy to prepare.
Table for Five: Ki Teitzei
A Lost Sheep
The Silent Boycott
How Israeli Academics Are Being Shut Out of the International Academic World
Hit the Pause Button
The pause isn’t the absence of action; it’s a sanctuary in time.
Rosner’s Domain | The Repressed Question of Judea and Samaria
It is a challenge for which various solutions have already been tried and failed. Most of all, it is a challenge that doesn’t seem to have any prospect of being addressed anytime soon in a way that leads to a final resolution.
Presidents Have Always Lied — When Threatened by Assassins
Presidential security machinations, like presidential vacation time and decorating budgets, often serve as partisan Rorschach tests: rivals mock, while supporters defend.
Why I’m No Longer a Democrat
It is about refusing to allow partisan loyalty to make us silent when our own community is threatened.
Why I’m Staying in the Democratic Party
Nowhere is it written you have to agree with every position taken by every candidate running as a member of your party.
More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.