fbpx

May 8, 2024

The Braid Showcases Stories of Asian American Jews for Double-Heritage Month

For Asian American Jews, May is double-heritage month: It’s Asian Pacific American and Jewish American Heritage Month. What better time for The Braid to present its first ever theatre show written and produced by Asian American Jews? 

“What Do I Do with All This Heritage?” premiering May 15, brings to life more than a dozen true stories and one “rollicking” song. The stories offer a witty, insightful and sometimes heartbreaking exploration of what it’s like to balance two age-old traditions in your heart. 

The show represents a partnership between The Braid, which for 16 years has prided itself on showcasing stories from every corner of the Jewish experience, and The LUNAR Collective, founded in 2020 to become the only national organization by and for Asian American Jews. 

“Ever since I wrote a story for “True Colors,” The Braid’s landmark smash hit of true stories from Jews of Color, I’ve dreamed of creating a theatre show about the lives of Asian Jews,” David Chiu, producer of “What Do I Do with All This Heritage?,” told the Journal. 

Chiu, who is Chinese and Jewish, is The Braid’s marketing and communications director, as well as an L.A. community leader for LUNAR. 

“Having so much heritage enriches me in all sorts of wonderful ways that my heart wants to share it with the world,” he said. “This show is an incredible opportunity to do that; it’s literally a dream come true.”

“What Do I Do with All This Heritage?” explores the experiences that occur at the crossroads of cultures. The writers range in age from 12 to their 70s. In addition to Chiu, the show’s creative team includes LUNAR’s co-executive directors Jenni Rudolph and Maryam Chishti, Vanessa Bloom (also an L.A. Community Leader of LUNAR), producer Ronda Spinak (The Braid’s co-founder and artistic director) and director Susan Morgenstern. 

There are stories of mixed-race and mixed-religion Jews, patrilineal Jews and growing up in a Jewish community in India that’s existed for countless generations. “This has been a wonderful merging of my love for our community and my love for theater,” Chishti told the Journal. “Hearing the myriad of stories from our community has been informative, heartbreaking and exciting, and it solidifies and reiterates the need for [LUNAR’s] existence.”

Chishti’s story is about being both Muslim and Jewish. “At this painful time of Muslim/Jewish division … I hope that people can be reminded of the foundational similarities between these two faiths and hope for a brighter future for both communities,” she said. “I hope that the show will allow our audience to better understand our community — our pain, our joy, our similarities, and our differences.”

Chishti believes the show provides a wonderful window into what makes Asian Jews, Asian Jews. “You won’t be the same after hearing it,” she said.

In her true story, Leila Chomski writes about being a Vietnamese American teenager struggling to reconcile her Orthodox Jewish tradition with her secret love of dancing to K-Pop.

In her true story, Leila Chomski writes about being a Vietnamese American teenager struggling to reconcile her Orthodox Jewish tradition with her secret love of dancing to K-Pop. “I wanted to be picked for this show really badly; I recited the entire book of Psalms and visited a rabbi’s grave in the hopes of bettering my chances,” Chomski told the Journal. “I like to be not only religious but also spiritual and I believe that if you want something, you should turn to G-d and really show him you want it.”  She added, “Realistically, I could have been picked without all this hype, but it wouldn’t have felt as special.”

Chomski said it would be amazing if the show could be regarded as a relevant celebration of Jewish Asian life. “Regarding my particular story, it would be nice to bring attention to the logistical difficulties Orthodox Asian Jews face in balancing religious observance and interest in Asian culture,” she said. For instance, many traditional Asian foods like pork, shrimp or crab, will always be off-limits. “This can leave an Orthodox Jewish Asian person feeling that everything in their life is filtered, a replacement of the real, original culture,” she said. “Telling this story also shows that someone in this position can overcome this feeling and have a happy ending.”

The cast — Kimberly Green, Kenzo Lee, Lillian McKenzie, Victoria Rani and Kaitlyn Tanimoto — is entirely Asian American, and Green and McKenzie are Jewish, as well. 

“I love working with the Braid, they always curate beautiful meaningful stories; the writing is provoking and is filled with a strong positive message,” Green told the Journal. “This show in particular feels special as I have never worked on a show when my Asian culture is center stage.”

Green, who is a Korean Puerto Rican Jew, hopes the audience will “fall in love with each of us through the stories we tell, and leave the show wanting to include Asians in their circle of friends, and embrace them as equals.” Chiu, who believes the show has brought the emergent Asian Jewish community further together, said “What Do I Do with All This Heritage?” has a lot of laughs, sweet moments and fun musical moments. “Even in the stories that will give you a good cry, there’s still joy and hope,” he said. “LUNAR has ‘Embracing Joy’ as one of its core values, and we always knew we wanted to make a joyful show.

“I hope that in these tumultuous times, that joy will be a gift to everyone.” 

“What Do I Do with All This Heritage?” runs from May 15 through June 9 in person in Los Angeles. They will also have two shows live-on-Zoom, as well as performances in the Bay Area on May 18 and 19. Learn more at the-braid.org/heritage.

The Braid Showcases Stories of Asian American Jews for Double-Heritage Month Read More »

‘Killing America’ and The Evolution of Hate

Filmmaker Eli Steele set out  to explore why antisemitism exploded in Bay Area schools, and subsequently why it is prevalent on many campuses across the state. The result is “Killing America,” a captivating 38-minute documentary featuring interviews with parents, teachers, students and footage of a school board meeting. 

The film presents a compelling, alarming and frustrating narrative. It highlights the prioritization of Equity, Diversity and Inclusion (DEI) and ethnic studies over honor classes. However, after uploading the movie trailer on YouTube and other social media platforms, Steele received a cease-and-desist letter from Menlo-Atherton High School’s M-A Chronicle, accusing him of using footage of a school board meeting without permission.

“They gave me 10 days to remove the footage from the film or I would be sued,” Steele told the Journal. “But two days after April 2, they filed bogus copyright claims against my trailer on YouTube and Vimeo and had the trailer removed. I knew I clearly didn’t violate any terms. I used the footage under the Fair Use doctrine, which allows the use of copyrighted footage as long as it is transformed.”

In one of the clips taken from the school board meeting at the Sequoia Union High School District, a student raised a sign that read: “Let’s not forget the IDF lied about the beheading of 40 babies.” An Israeli parent whose family in Israel was greatly affected by a Hamas terror attack protested, but was quickly silenced by one of the board members who sided with the student, saying that the students have the right to speak for or against anyone they want.

The idea of making the film began last August when a group of parents in the Bay Area reached out to Steele about honor classes being replaced gradually by ethnic studies. Those didn’t include teaching about the Holocaust but rather promoted antisemitism in a way, portraying Israel as the oppressor and the Palestinians as the oppressed. Some parents referred to the slideshow the teacher presented as “propaganda.”

“We talked back and forth, and after Oct. 7 I heard from the parents again, and that’s when I started the investigation,” Steele said. 

Steele recalled how he attended a student protest in Long Beach after Oct. 7 and was shocked to find activists demonstrating against Israel and in support of Hamas. “What surprised me is that they didn’t have the decency to acknowledge what happened to Israeli civilians. I have seen that before, a few years ago when I made ‘What Killed Michael Brown.’”

That documentary delved into race relations in the United States, examining the 2014 shooting in self-defense of Michael Brown by a police officer in Ferguson, Missouri. The killing sparked riots at the time. The film asserts that since the 1960s, whites have been regularly accused of racism.

The film was initially rejected by Amazon for its streaming service but later added following public criticism. “This was one of the first times in America when bigotry happened,” Steele said. “The country split about what happened to Michael Brown and I saw it play out again on October 7.”

”I wanted to give parents a voice because they’ve been silenced and ridiculed for so long by the school board, activist teachers and school authorities.”
– Eli Steele

He continued, “People often ask why I made ‘Killing America’ and Diana Blum, the film’s main subject, said something that summed up my thoughts perfectly. I wanted to give parents a voice because they’ve been silenced and ridiculed for so long by the school board, activist teachers and school authorities. This film is our way to get around that ideological resistance and be heard once and for all.”

Blum, a mother of two Menlo-Atherton High School students who immigrated to the United States as a child, explained that her parents didn’t want her to experience antisemitism in Ukraine, only for her to encounter it again as an adult in the States. The film starts with Blum reading quotes and posts by teachers and students in the Bay Area: “Glory to Hamas,” “Hamas are freedom fighters” and “I hope Tel Aviv gets bombed.”

Blum, a neurologist, said she felt sad to see history repeating itself, but it also motivated her to speak up. “I never felt antisemitism growing up. Seeing the complete disregard from folks here, all the support for the violence, to see what is happening in my kids’ school. The fact that my parents sacrificed everything to come here so I would not suffer … and now my kids, I’m watching them suffer.”

Five of the people who agreed to be interviewed on camera got cold feet and pulled out at the last minute, including teachers who feared losing their jobs. However, one agreed to be shown on camera with his face obscured. This teacher portrayed the school system as taking away individualism and replacing it with a singular way of thinking.

“Some teachers do not allow their kids to express their own opinions because their thinking doesn’t align with the masses,” said the teacher. “They talk about community in the classroom. They want everything to align with the same lines of thinking or the same feelings about certain things; the government is going to take care of you. You don’t need to worry about being in the honors track. You just belong here with all the rest of society.”

Christine Linnebach, a Friends of Lowell Foundation board member,  was quoted in the film that “right after George Floyd, it seemed that there was an injustice that had occurred, but that injustice, just like napalm, triggered injustices throughout all of our school boards across the nation. All these merit-based high schools were suddenly under attack by the progressive members of the board of education who had decided that grades and test scores were racist. The school board weaponized everybody’s skin color and you were either an oppressor or the oppressed. The progressive dogma, the ideology of promoting diversity, is really creating a system of division and hatred.”

This environment allowed teachers like Chloe Gentile-Montgomery from Menlo-Atherton High to teach students that Israel had stolen the land from the Palestinians, presenting a false map allegedly depicting before and after Israel got control of the land, and falsely quoting the U.N. as saying that the creation of Israel was illegal.

The Almanac, a San Francisco-based online news site, quoted Hila Maoz, an Israeli parent who was at the school board meeting. The mother, whose child studies at M-A said: “This is a presentation that spreads hatred. My daughter was harassed … We as Israelis and Jews are being harassed, we are targeted, and we no longer feel at home.”

Steele emphasized that this type of teaching isn’t exclusive to this school or the Bay Area alone; it’s happening all over California and beyond. This sets the background for why we are witnessing so much antisemitism on U.S. campuses. The root of the problem lies – among other things – in the school system.

“It is everywhere,” he said. “That’s why so many communities are requesting the film: to highlight the antisemitism in their area and to discuss what can be done,” said Steele.

The premiere of “Killing America” took place on March 2 at the Guild in Menlo Park, CA.

“I invited the principal of Menlo-Atherton High and the Sequoia School District Board. Nobody came,” Steele said. “Later, the principal slammed the film as propaganda and called it ridiculous. But he hadn’t watched the film. He based his views on the trailer only. So obviously there is a huge bias in the community, and it’s not surprising that the paper would want to censor the film.”

Steele could have easily created a longer documentary on the subject, but the rise in antisemitism prompted him to edit and release it early. In a post on X, he wrote:

“The ‘crime’ that ‘Killing America’ commits is telling the truth during these ideological times. Watch the film and you’ll see why extremist ideologues are doing everything in their power to censor it and why I decided not to play their game and go straight to you, The People.

“I have made the point to release this film as widely as possible for free because I want the word out. We’ve been too timid for too long and allowed ourselves to be intimidated. Please share this film widely.”

When asked what can be done to turn things around, Steele said he encourages parents to go to school board meetings, make sure they are aware of what their children are being taught and voice their concerns.

“Killing America,” can be streamed at rumble.com/v4np95x-killing-america-documentary-38-mins.html.

‘Killing America’ and The Evolution of Hate Read More »

After the Most Shattering Day in Jewish History Since the Holocaust, Can a Timeless Jewish Practice Help Us Heal?

“We were in Greece for Sukkot and it was Shabbat … someone in my extended family looked at their phone and said, ‘Something crazy is happening in Israel …’” 

“First it was just disbelief … This couldn’t happen to the Israel we know. The Israel we know is invincible.”

“I run every Saturday morning and I see all the regulars running with me. But on Oct. 7 it was 6:30, 6:45, and I don’t see anyone on the street, and I wonder, ‘What happened? Where is everyone?’ And then close to 7:30 I see this man pass by and he’s doing a gesture like, panicking. So I called my wife. She was asleep. But she looked at her phone and told me, ‘Come quickly, there is a war …’”

“The first overwhelming emotion I experienced was fear. You never expect something horribly tragic like this to happen … I was surprised by how much it brought up every time in my life I had felt unsafe in the past.” 

“It was disorienting, horrific, heartbreaking, terrifying. There was a profound sense of being betrayed.”

“That day took everything – the core of what we believed Israel is about – and cast it into doubt …”

The morning of Oct. 7 and the days that followed charged and changed the course of Israeli and Jewish history. The event marked every identified and committed Jew with a scar on the soul that will never fully disappear. Taking its place among other great tragedies that have stained Jewish destiny, we know that what happened that terrible day cannot be undone.

But can we heal from it?

Is there a place we can go, a prayer we can say that could heal our shattered hearts? Are there arms big enough to hold our grief, our trauma and possibly tame it or tamp it down? Perhaps most urgently, as we collectively bear the continuous cascade of antisemitism and anti-Zionism infecting already open wounds with their dark and dirty poison, many are wondering: How can we find safety in the world again?

The Israel-based organization Or Halev – “Light of the heart” – offers an answer: the hard but fulfilling work of a meditation practice rooted in Jewish text and tradition, and designed to unburden the suffering Jewish soul. It is not a magic cure and there are no guarantees, but the testimonies of practitioners vow that a week on Or Halev’s immersive silent retreat, which accommodates all levels of Jewish observance or none at all, can be life-changing. (Full disclosure: This writer is a regular attendee.) It can restore a sense of wholeness in a broken world, a capacity for wonder in a God that sometimes hides, and a general feeling of safety, stability, or just plain “okayness” even in the most crushing circumstances. And it’s coming to the Brandeis-Bardin campus in Simi Valley on June 3.

“Within the first week [of Oct. 7], we said, ‘What can we do? What can we offer?,’” Rabbi James Jacobson-Maisels, the founder and spiritual leader of Or Halev, said during a recent interview from the northern Israel kibbutz he calls home. “We started with short, 3-5 minute daily grounding practices in Hebrew” – which they pushed out to their Israeli WhatsApp group – “Just, like, ‘Be with us and do this.’ How can we calm the system? How can we find safety right now? Can we feel that there is some beneficence in the world and not just threat?” 

Jacobson-Maisels, 50, known to his students as “Rav James,” has been a devoted practitioner of mindfulness meditation since his student days at Brown University. Having grown up in a traditional Jewish home, he turned to meditation as a practical way to address what liturgical prayer couldn’t: sleeplessness stemming from anxiety and depression. As his personal practice deepened – in tandem with increasing Jewish observance – Jacobson-Maisels discovered that meditation not only subdued his emotional pain, but that there was a striking if somewhat underappreciated tradition of meditation practice found within Judaism itself, particularly in Hasidut and Kabbalah. Rebbe Nachman of Breslov’s Hitbodedut practice is one such example, but more extensive explorations can be found in the work of Kalonymus Kalman Shapira, the Piaseczno rebbe, who led a secret synagogue in the Warsaw Ghetto, and whom Jacobson-Maisels considers his foremost teacher and guide. What would it look like to combine Hasidic wisdom, Jewish mysticism, Torah and ritual observance with what is traditionally thought of as Eastern-dominated Buddhist meditation practice? Or Halev was born in 2011.

Rabbi James Jacobson-Maisels (Amir Ganun Photography)

Still, despite years of dedicated practice, Jacobson-Maisels found himself reeling in the days and months following Oct. 7. Suddenly, he was experiencing a kind of overwhelming, intense emotional state he had not known since his youth. It wasn’t until he arrived in the U.S. last January to lead a retreat on the East Coast that he realized just how dysregulated he was. “I flew to America and as soon as I landed my whole system just calmed down,” he said. “The minute I stepped off the plane I was like, whew. The difference was palpable, and kind of shocking. It was like, ‘Oh. That’s what I’ve been carrying.’”

In the immediate aftermath of Oct. 7, Or Halev focused on comforting distraught and disoriented Israelis, among them evacuees from the kibbutzim lining the Gaza Envelope and survivors of the Nova Music Festival. They did not anticipate, however, the desperate outpouring from their students in the Diaspora.

In the immediate aftermath of Oct. 7, Or Halev focused on comforting distraught and disoriented Israelis, among them evacuees from the kibbutzim lining the Gaza Envelope and survivors of the Nova Music Festival. They did not anticipate, however, the desperate outpouring from their students in the Diaspora – who were also heartbroken over Oct. 7 and dealing with a very visible surge in global antisemitism. For this cohort, Or Halev organized a “daily sit” on Zoom, where community members from all over the world could come together, share some words of Torah and sit quietly together over a screen. 

Michael Rosenzweig, a lawyer, nonprofit leader and the former CEO of the Pardes Institute for Jewish Studies, attended his first weeklong retreat with Or Halev last summer in Big Bear. “I’m not the kind of person that would normally be open to this kind of stuff,” he said during an interview from his home in Atlanta. “I’m a hard-nosed, critical, cynical, skeptical person. I like to be in control. But one of the things that I discovered at Big Bear is that, actually, that doesn’t have to be who I am all of the time. And it might not even be who I want to be most of the time.” 

Rosenzweig described the experience as “transformational,” “insightful” and “emotional,” but within a few months of his spiritual breakthrough, Oct. 7 happened. Rosenzweig said he found it impossible to reclaim the intense focus or bliss-feeling that can transpire on a weeklong retreat. He even signed up for another – which Or Halev facilitated in Sharpsburg, Md. – but something wasn’t clicking. In addition to the emotional upset of Israel at war – especially having lived and worked there, and with a son who currently lives there – Rosenzweig found himself in the hospital recovering from surgery. As he convalesced, he tuned in to an online class Jacobson-Maisels taught ahead of Pesach, which included time for a group sit. “That was the first time since Oct. 7 that I had a meditation experience that transported me, that achieved what I had come to expect after the Big Bear retreat,” Rosenzweig said. “It allowed me to move to a different place; I felt transformed. And I was enormously grateful.”

As Rabbi Nancy Flam explained when she co-led Or Halev’s first weeklong retreat on the West Coast in 2016, retreat is not vacation, but hard work. Meditation is a practice, like any other; the more you work at it, the better you get, the more effective the impact. Yet even the most diligent practitioners can experience difficulty sometimes, because the condition of a meditation only reflects the condition of a person’s mind. And minds change, emotions ebb and flow, physical sensations arise (some pleasant, some unpleasant) – constantly.

Aaron Rosenthal, 50, had been meditating for the better part of 33 years when the horrors of Oct. 7 triggered post-traumatic effects from his own history and knocked his practice routine off course. “It was really overwhelming,” he said during an interview from Nova Scotia, Canada. Rosenthal had long been accustomed to extended sits but in the days following Oct. 7 he said he could manage only 10-15 minutes at a time. And yet, he said, “even during that first week, those minutes were like these little islands of refuge when it felt like there was nowhere else to turn. It was helpful to have a place to go when the outside world didn’t feel safe.”

Despite his extensive history of practice, Rosenthal only recently discovered that he could meditate Jewishly — meaning, in Jewish community, with Jewish teachers, grounded in Jewish learning. Over the past four years, he enrolled in classes with the Institute for Jewish Spirituality and Or Halev, and is now on track to become a certified Jewish meditation instructor. After Oct. 7, he offered to lead some of Or Halev’s daily online sits and saw firsthand how many people in the community were feeling upset and alone. “It’s a very tender space,” he said of the meditation Zoom room. “You can see a lot of sadness in people’s faces when they arrive. There’s a lot of sighing. You can just see people coming in with a lot of stress, a lot of heaviness.”

Amir Ganun Photography

Rosenthal knows from his own experience of severe childhood trauma how meditation can temper distress by – somewhat counterintuitively – allowing it in. “When PTSD is really strong and it’s kind of taking over, so much of your life and character seems to be a reaction to the pain and trauma,” Rosenthal said. “Those experiences have to be reprocessed, but through a less traumatic lens.” Therapy is essential, Rosenthal said, “but meditation was really, really key to that process because so much of [meditation practice] is learning to be with what is there, learning to be with your feelings. It’s like there’s a whole bunch of really noisy guests in the apartment of your head and they can cause all kinds of chaos until we learn that they’re there for a reason and we can make space for them. And just that acknowledgment brings relief.”

Nir Penso lives in Modi’in, Israel and directs the young leadership program for Bina, a Jewish educational and social change organization founded in 1996. He and his team are responsible for running a gap year program for Israeli teens who wish to defer army service and develop leadership skills through community service. Two months after Oct. 7, Penso, 51, was concerned that his staff was overwhelmed by the traumatic effects of the massacres in the south, as well as the war in Gaza, and decided they needed a day to regroup and process the changed country they were living in. If even the adults were out of sorts, how could they properly guide the young adults under their tutelage? 

Last January, Penso arranged for Or Halev to facilitate a day-long retreat for him and his staff at a community center in Ramla. “It was a little bit weird at first, to sit together and be quiet, and concentrate on ourselves in the middle of hell,” Penso told me. “Just putting our phones aside for six or seven hours was a major aim to reach.”

As the day wore on, though, his staff settled into the program, despite varying levels of interest or experience in contemplative meditation. “There were different levels of ripeness or maturity to deal with these kinds of activities,” Penso said, “but at the end, when I asked them ‘What was the day like for you?,’ they told me it was a great opportunity to stop, look inward, and breathe into the  pain and see the big picture.” 

Penso recalled one powerful activity when the team paired off into groups and he and a colleague engaged in a “welcoming practice,” verbally welcoming whatever emotion arose in the moment. “For the final question, she asked me, ‘How do you feel right now?’ And I said, ‘Lonely.’ And she said, ‘Welcome loneliness.’ And suddenly you see the reaction of her eyes to my eyes, and you see how many walls and barriers your face contains, and how, in fifteen minutes of concentration, you can show to the world a totally different face.”

“It’s okay. Welcome sadness, welcome stress. All of your feelings are legitimate.“- Nir Penso

Penso said the practices he learned on retreat have helped him be a better parent, making him more sensitive to whatever his children are going through – he tries to actively “welcome” their emotional turbulence. “I realized that you have the right to choose how to address every situation, and you have the responsibility to hold yourself accountable and make adjustments. To consider how you are treating the events we are all facing here,” Penso said. “Sometimes when I feel really bad news is coming, I remember the face of [my colleague], who looked back at me and said ‘It’s okay. Welcome sadness, welcome stress. All of your feelings are legitimate.’ The experience somehow changed my thoughts of how to deal with conflict, how to react when things are challenging.” 

One of the most difficult realities Israelis are confronting now is that their trauma isn’t exactly in the rearview mirror yet – the assault is ongoing. The war with Hamas continues. The hostages are still captive. Soldiers keep dying. Hezbollah launches missiles daily. Even Iran, which until recently was content to battle by proxy, launched their first direct attack on Israel in history. How do you begin to heal when the wound hasn’t stopped bleeding?

As Rachel Goldberg-Polin, mother of hostage Hersh Goldberg-Polin, put it during a recent podcast interview, “Normative trauma is that the truck hits you out of nowhere … every bone in your body is broken … the truck has driven off. And you have to figure out, ‘When am I gonna be okay to sit up?’” she said to Dan Senor on “Call Me Back.” 

“What we are dealing with is the truck is still on us … I’m in the middle of being raped … I’m trapped under this truck. So my focus is, ‘Ohmigosh, don’t move the wrong way and die.’”  

After Iran launched its unprecedented missile attack and Jacobson-Maisels had to carry his 8-year-old daughter to their bomb shelter in the middle of the night, he was somehow calm and composed, despite the existential threat. He told me that within the same 24 hours, he had been hovering in a bomb shelter with his family and then watching the most beautiful sunset with his daughter. Both experiences were equally real, equally true. “The sunset doesn’t care what happened last night,” he said. 

The turbulence of these times has given him yet another reason to appreciate Jewish history and survival. He noted that his beloved rebbe, Kalman Shapira, endured unimaginable circumstances in the Warsaw Ghetto. And yet he reached for light, for transcendence, even in the darkness. In fact, Kalman Shapira’s best known work, “Esh Kodesh” (“Sacred Fire”) is a collection of the 86 sermons he delivered in the ghetto before he was sent to the Trawniki concentration camp and shot to death by the Nazis. His written sermons were found buried in a milk canister a year after the war ended. 

If anyone understood how to carry on a vibrant inner life while enduring outer torment, it was the Piaseczno Rebbe. 

“What we’re experiencing now is not unusual in Jewish history,” Jacobson-Maisels said, noting that even a tragic past can serve as comfort. “It’s painful, it’s horrible. But it’s not uncommon. And one thing I’ve found so powerful recently is that the wisdom of our tradition is speaking to us; and has spoken to us, again and again. So there’s this way we can rely on it. Not that it has solutions, but in the sense of acknowledging that this pain is real, this fear is real, and still, there’s a way we can find safety and connection in our reliance on the Divine, on the fact that we’re part of something deeper and broader. There’s a web of relation and history and feeling and community that I am held in. Even when external circumstances are terrible.”

Or Halev’s ‘Opening the Heart’ retreat takes place June 3-9 at the Brandeis-Bardin campus in Simi Valley. Register at Orhalev.net/opening-the-heart 

After the Most Shattering Day in Jewish History Since the Holocaust, Can a Timeless Jewish Practice Help Us Heal? Read More »

What We Should Know About the Dueling Definitions of Antisemitism

There are now dueling definitions of antisemitism: One offered by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance [IHRA] and a dissenting Jerusalem definition that attempts to articulate the difference between legitimate criticism of Israel, however harsh, and antisemitism.* 

A word of background on IHRA: In January 2000, Swedish Prime Minister Göran Persson convened an international conference to consider mandatory Holocaust education in Stockholm. Twenty-one heads of state and delegations representing 46 countries attended. After all the appropriate speeches were given, a Task Force for International Cooperation on Holocaust Education, Remembrance and Research was organized. Since 2013, it has become known as the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) (www.holocaustremembrance.com), a 31-nation intergovernmental body whose purpose, according to U.S. delegate Mark Weitzman, is to garner support for Holocaust education, remembrance, and research from state leaders, academicians, and politicians. Government funding and prestige is available to support national and international projects.

The task force adopted by consensus (and not without some controversy), working definitions of Holocaust denial, anti-gypsy/anti-Roma discrimination and most recently, antisemitism. Despite the fact they much operate via consensus, this unique combination of experts and governmental diplomats have not succumbed to anticipated paralysis. Instead, the IRHA greatly facilitates international cooperation. As the problem of antisemitism in Europe grew, they sought to articulate a working definition of antisemitism, making clear that it was a working, evolving definition — not a legal definition.

IHRA defines antisemitism as:

“Antisemitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of antisemitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities.”

It then illustrated the working definition by giving examples of antisemitism:

• Calling for, aiding, or justifying the killing or harming of Jews in the name of a radical ideology or an extremist view of religion.

• Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Jews as such or the power of Jews as collective — such as, especially but not exclusively, the myth about a world Jewish conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government or other societal institutions.

• Accusing Jews as a people of being responsible for real or imagined wrongdoing committed by a single Jewish person or group, or even for acts committed by non-Jews.

• Denying the fact, scope, mechanisms (e.g. gas chambers) or intentionality of the genocide of the Jewish people at the hands of National Socialist Germany and its supporters and accomplices during World War II (the Holocaust).

• Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust.

• Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations.

It is important to note that IHRA defines Holocaust denial as antisemitism, plain and simple, something scholars in the field have been contending for decades. 

IHRA then confronted the thorny issue of distinguishing between legitimate criticism of Israel and antisemitism. They were clearly influenced by former Soviet dissident and former Israeli Minister for the Diaspora, Natan Sharansky’s important contribution. He invoked the “three Ds” for distinguishing between the two: 

• Double Standards, judging Israel by one standard and the rest of the world, including democratic countries, by another.

• Delegitimization, moving from criticism of Israel policies toward the notion that Israel has no right to exist or is an illegitimate country. 

• Demonization, regarding Israel as the source of (all) evil, a demonic force in the world.

IHRA argues that antisemitism is:

• Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor.

• Applying double standards by requiring of it a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation.

• Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism (e.g., claims of Jews killing Jesus or blood libel) to characterize Israel or Israelis.

• Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.

• Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel.

In 2021, a rival definition was introduced: The Jerusalem Declaration was written by a group (most identifiably and proudly on the left) of some 200 scholars in Antisemitism Studies and related fields, including Holocaust Studies, Israel, Palestine, and Middle East Studies, Jewish History and Political Science. This declaration may now become even more controversial because Harvard University just appointed one of its signers and advocates Professor Derek Penslar, as co-Chair of its taskforce on antisemitism.

The Declaration seeks to understand and describe antisemitism while protecting free speech and leaving room to criticize Israel, even harshly, without such criticism automatically being labeled antisemitism.

The Jerusalem Declaration states:

Antisemitism is discrimination, prejudice, hostility, or violence against Jews as Jews (or Jewish institutions as Jewish).

Like IHRA, the definition was the easy part, the most important distinctions are to be found in the commentary guidelines that also engage the larger issue of racism. It views antisemitism as a form of racism, not or not merely sui generis. 

It is racist to essentialize (treat a character trait as inherent) or to make sweeping negative generalizations about a given population. What is true of racism in general, is true of antisemitism in particular.

1. What is particular in classic antisemitism is the idea that Jews are linked to the forces of evil. This stands at the core of many anti-Jewish fantasies, such as the idea of a Jewish conspiracy in which “the Jews” possess hidden power that they use to promote their own collective agenda at the expense of other people. This linkage between Jews and evil continues in the present: In the fantasy that “the Jews” control governments with a “hidden hand,” that they own the banks, control the media, act as “a state within a state,” and are responsible for spreading disease (such as COVID-19). All these features can be instrumentalized by different (and even antagonistic) political causes.

2. Antisemitism can be manifested in words, visual images, and deeds. Examples of antisemitic words include utterances that all Jews are wealthy, inherently stingy, or unpatriotic. In antisemitic caricatures, Jews are often depicted as grotesque, with big noses and associated with wealth. Examples of antisemitic deeds are: Assaulting someone because she or he is Jewish, attacking a synagogue, daubing swastikas on Jewish graves, or refusing to hire or promote people because they are Jewish.

3. Antisemitism can be direct or indirect, explicit, or coded. For example, “The Rothschilds control the world” is a coded statement about the alleged power of “the Jews” over banks and international finance. Similarly, portraying Israel as the ultimate evil or grossly exaggerating its actual influence can be a coded way of racializing and stigmatizing Jews. In many cases, identifying coded speech is a matter of context and judgement, taking account of these guidelines.

4. Denying or minimizing the Holocaust by claiming that the deliberate Nazi genocide of the Jews did not take place, or that there were no extermination camps or gas chambers, or that the number of victims was a fraction of the actual total, is antisemitic.

They then directly engage the question of when criticism of Israel is antisemitic and when it is not, clearly offering both a more detailed depiction of the problem and greater room for robust, even angry criticism of Israel. Some critics of the Jerusalem Declaration regard this as giving cover to anti-Israel leftist views.

B. Israel and Palestine: examples that, on the face of it, are antisemitic

5. Applying the symbols, images, and negative stereotypes of classical antisemitism (see guidelines 2 and 3) to the State of Israel.

6. Holding Jews collectively responsible for Israel’s conduct or treating Jews, simply because they are Jewish, as agents of Israel.

7. Requiring people, because they are Jewish, publicly to condemn Israel or Zionism (for example, at a political meeting).

8. Assuming that non-Israeli Jews, simply because they are Jews, are necessarily more loyal to Israel than to their own countries.

9. Denying the right of Jews in the State of Israel to exist and flourish, collectively and individually, as Jews, in accordance with the principle of equality.

They then move on to the criticism of Israel that is not or not necessarily antisemitic:

C. Israel and Palestine: examples that, on the face of it, are not antisemitic (whether or not one approves of the view or action)

10. Supporting the Palestinian demand for justice and the full grant of their political, national, civil, and human rights, as encapsulated in international law.

11. Criticizing or opposing Zionism as a form of nationalism or arguing for a variety of constitutional arrangements for Jews and Palestinians in the area between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean. It is not antisemitic to support arrangements that accord full equality to all inhabitants “between the river and the sea,” whether in two states, a binational state, unitary democratic state, federal state, or in whatever form.

12. Evidence-based criticism of Israel as a state. This includes its institutions and founding principles. It also includes its policies and practices, domestic and abroad, such as the conduct of Israel in the West Bank and Gaza, the role Israel plays in the region, or any other way in which, as a state, it influences events in the world. It is not antisemitic to point out systematic racial discrimination. In general, the same norms of debate that apply to other states and to other conflicts over national self-determination apply in the case of Israel and Palestine. Thus, even if contentious, it is not antisemitic, in and of itself, to compare Israel with other historical cases, including settler-colonialism or apartheid.

13. Boycott, divestment, and sanctions are commonplace, nonviolent forms of political protest against states. In the Israeli case they are not, in and of themselves, antisemitic.

14. Political speech does not have to be measured, proportional, tempered, or reasonable to be protected under Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights or Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights and other human rights instruments. Criticism that some may see as excessive or contentious, or as reflecting a “double standard,” is not, in and of itself, antisemitic. In general, the line between antisemitic and non-antisemitic speech is different from the line between unreasonable and reasonable speech.

The most obvious differences between the two definitions are regarding BDS not as inherently antisemitic but as a reasonable — and because it is non-violent — a responsible form of protest. 

The most obvious differences between the two definitions are regarding BDS not as inherently antisemitic but as a reasonable—and because it is nonviolent — a responsible form of protest. The advocacy of a one-state solution that would see the country from the Jordan River to the Sea as the state of all its citizens — and one might say, not a Jewish State — would not inherently be antisemitic according to this definition.

The notion that some things are not “inherently” antisemitic does not help one clarify when they are and are not antisemitic. Where is the line to be drawn? 

The notion that some things are not “inherently” antisemitic does not help one clarify when they are and are not antisemitic. Where is the line to be drawn? The Jerusalem Declaration leaves room for such criticism not be considered inherently antisemitic or automatically antisemitic without quite detailing when or if it is antisemitic.

The 14th point of the Jerusalem Declaration moves in two different directions. It first proclaims political speech as protected speech under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and Article 10 of the European Union and indicates that it applies even to political speech that is unmeasured, disproportional, distempered, or unreasonable. All speech is protected in the United States unless it is libelous. Yet all speech is also subject to criticism, which is the essence of free speech. 

However, when speech is “unmeasured, disproportional, distempered, or unreasonable,” one might reasonably ask, why? 

And one might very well conclude that the speaker is out of control and overly emotional. One need not be a psychiatrist to wonder if there might be a reason for such behavior. One possibility to be considered  — surely not the only one, is animus — a particular animus called antisemitism. 

The Jerusalem Declaration states: “Criticism that some may see as excessive or contentious, or as reflecting a ‘double standard,’ is not, in and of itself, antisemitic.” No one can argue against that contention, yet it may well be antisemitic, but the Declaration offers no guidance to determine when such criticism is antisemitic. It all depends on what is said.  Declaring speech not inherently antisemitic is different than contending that it is not antisemitic.

Let us return to Sharansky’s notice of three Ds; Double Standards, Delegitimization and Demonization, to determine where to draw the line in understanding of what is legitimate (often well-warranted criticism) and what is antisemitism. These three demarcations point the way and we might truly want to return to Potter Stewart’s wisdom: “I know it when I see it.”


Michael Berenbaum is director of the Sigi Ziering Institute and a professor of Jewish Studies at American Jewish University.

What We Should Know About the Dueling Definitions of Antisemitism Read More »

History’s Oldest Hatred

At a lovely seder at the home of Rabbi Steven Stark Lowenstein from Am Shalom Synagogue in Glencoe, Illinois, Rabbi Steve and his wife Julie introduced an interesting twist on the Four Questions. They invited attendees to ask questions of their own.

One woman posed something that is on the mind of so many during these horrifying times:  Why have people hated Jews for so long?

Rabbi Steve requested that my daughter reply. Alissa is a curator and Holocaust scholar who recently received her PhD with a dissertation that brings together elements of Jewish studies, American history, fine art, and visual culture.

She proceeded to provide a brief review of history’s oldest hatred. Antisemitism, she said, can be traced back to ancient times, when Judaism became the first monotheistic religion, placing it at odds with the religions of the day that worshipped multiple gods. Then, with the rise of Christianity, anti-Jewish hatred accompanied the myth that it was the Jews who murdered Jesus. The blood libel – that Jews sacrificed Christian children in order to use their blood for ritual purposes – was one of the better-known related accusations that “justified” the creation of Jewish ghettos and antisemitic persecution throughout the ages. When Christianity prohibited usury, Jews, who were banned from entering many professions, were left little choice but to become moneylenders, facing the scorn of those they served. Meanwhile, despite the common roots of Judaism and Islam as “Abrahamic religions,” the relationship between Jews and Muslims has long been fraught, marked by numerous mass murders of Jews in the Middle East and North Africa over the centuries, well before the birth of the Jewish State.

You might expect that the post-Enlightenment’s embrace of science would have brought a welcome change in the depiction of Jews, but by the time the 20th century came along, eugenics had taken a nefarious hold on science, with Jews (among other groups “of color”) deemed not only to be a separate race, but to be a biologically inferior one.

Alissa pointed out that there was of course a remarkable inconsistency in these beliefs.  Jews were singled out for being different – for not assimilating into the prevailing culture – but also for trying “to pass.”  They were weak and vulnerable, but somehow controlled the world’s politics and economics, with, according to the Czarist forgery, “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion,” a plan to achieve global domination.  Jews were both money-hungry capitalists and communist agitators. They were lesser because they were nonwhite, yet privileged oppressors. In short, just find a reason to hate Jews.  Any reason will do.

Several seder participants asked how they could learn more. Alissa suggested Deborah Lipstadt’s monumental 2019 book, “Antisemitism:  Here and Now.”  Professor Lipstadt, a historian at Emory, is one of the heroes of our people, who, among other accomplishments, has successfully taken on Holocaust deniers in court.  She currently serves in the Biden administration as the United States Special Envoy for Monitoring and Combating Antisemitism. No one could possibly be better suited for that role, especially with college campuses ablaze with anti-Jewish hatred.

In reality, some people are so consumed with anger and hate that the best path forward is not to engage them at all, leaving them to wallow in their own misery. 

Does the history of the world’s oldest prejudice instruct us today?  The lesson for me is that there are those who will despise us simply for what we are – Jews – not for who we are as individuals.  There is a view that getting to know someone necessarily produces empathy and understanding.  In reality, some people are so consumed with anger and hate that the best path forward is not to engage them at all, leaving them to wallow in their own misery.  Expend your energy on yourself, your community, and on those with a sincere interest in learning about you and your faith.

While antisemitism ebbs and flows, history suggests that it will never disappear. Let’s focus on living our lives with a pride befitting the contributions Jews have made, and continue to make, to our shared humanity.  We don’t need anyone else to validate us.  And for the first time in thousands of years, we have a nation and an army to defend us.


Morton Schapiro is the former president of Williams College and Northwestern University.  His most recent book (with Gary Saul Morson) is “Minds Wide Shut:  How the New Fundamentalisms Divide Us.”

History’s Oldest Hatred Read More »

Lucky to Have Potluck

Much of what’s missing these days is the ability for people to talk to each other without exploding. In many instances, it’s become like two barking dogs that only stop when they are dragged away while lunging at each other’s throats. 

I know certain things are impossible to agree on. Abortion will never be a middle ground for many. When it comes to Israel and the Jews, even God can’t convince people. For men who declare they are women and believe they should be allowed in the women’s locker room, there will never be a consensus. Although when it comes to women being allowed to wear nothing but false eyelashes in the men’s locker room, I’m not sure, but I think maybe some men who were adamantly against could be swayed. 

All that aside, for me, there is something terrific, heartwarming, and comforting about people who agree with each other. A breather from dissenting voices is a breath of fresh air. Almost a vacation from the insanity. There are times when I don’t want to argue, defend, or sway a person. I just crave to be with like minds. 

My wife Nancy and I have that. We have belonged to a Shabbat potluck group that’s gone strong for over twenty years. Once a month or so on Shabbat, mostly on Saturday. (We used to do Friday nights, but because of the spike in crime and antisemitism, and the fear of trying to explain to a mugger why we don’t carry money on Shabbat, we meet on Saturday.)

Early in the week a menu is discussed, and each family brings a few dishes. The table is always filled with beautiful flowers, good wine, food and grape juice. There are four families in total. And unless there is an invited outside guest, it’s the same core four except 32% of the time we bring our dog, Leo. 

So after shul, once a month or so, rain or shine, we meet at a different group member’s home. Because many of us go to the same shul, we walk together to that home. During lunch, the conversation circles in 100 different directions. Kids, grandkids, marriage, Israel, a little politics, joke telling, singing, and always both the men and women sharing Torah. Lots of Torah and lots of questions like “What was the rabbi talking about?”   The question I always get is, “Did you stay awake for the speech?”

So friendly, so warm and filled with love. It’s beyond beautiful. Amazingly, lashon hara (evil speech) is almost nonexistent except for you-know-who-you-are. 

When one of the original families recently moved to Florida, we immediately discussed who might fit in and might somewhat agree with our thinking. I understand that except for a cult, there are no two people who agree on everything. And that’s okay. We’re not looking for carbon copies of ourselves. Occasionally a little or a lot of disagreement is fine. But it’s Shabbat and I don’t think any of us want to argue and duke it out. Amazingly in over 20 years, I can’t remember any real fights or explosions. 

When we first started the group, the table was populated with our children and their friends. Lots of spills, and lots of laughs. Chicken strips, ketchup, and threats of no dessert unless you eat three more bites. The kids would pull out their parsha sheet and give over a Divrei Torah (a word of Torah) that always ended with a kiss, hug, smiles, and a yasher koach (may your strength be enriched). And someone saying, “That made that $35,000 in tuition worth it.” We all occasionally miss some of those days.  

One of our married kids is trying to start a group. My wife and I went over to say hi after our last potluck lunch and saw that all the young parents looked exhausted while the kids turned the couch into a trampoline. Ah, the good old days.

There is a trope going around: “The world has gone nuts.” Some, yes, but not ours.  We have wonderful people who populate our lives every day. 

There is a trope going around: “The world has gone nuts.” Some, yes, but not ours. We have wonderful people who populate our lives every day. 

Thank you, God, for our dear friends, great food, your Torah, and Shabbat that make this all possible.


Mark Schiff is a comedian, actor and writer, and hosts, along with Danny Lobell, the ‘We Think It’s Funny’ podcast. His new book is “Why Not? Lessons on Comedy, Courage and Chutzpah.”

Lucky to Have Potluck Read More »

Israel Must Finish Rafah

Six months after Islamists murdered 1,200 innocent Jews in Israel, the war effort is at risk of stalling. 

Agitators successfully turned college campuses into anti-Israel pressure campaigns. Students are waving Hamas and Hezbollah flags. Young agitators unable to distinguish Palestine from Narnia are demanding something they cannot articulate. Rioters seized college buildings without resistance because professors and administrators empathized with them. 

President Biden is helpless to calm matters, caught in a self-made electoral vise. He stayed silent as Arab Muslims in Michigan chanted “Death to America” and “Death to Israel.” Pres. Biden cravenly sacrificed doing what is right in favor of appeasing Michigan voters vital to his reelection. 

New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman offered advice that no Israeli leader should ever follow. Mr. Friedman insisted Israel had to choose between Rafah and Riyadh. 

Friedman posits that letting Rafah survive would bring Israel global goodwill and normalized relations with Saudi Arabia. Burning Rafah to ashes would anger the House of Saud and render Israel international pariah status. 

From premise to solution, Friedman is wrong. He treats life like junior high school, where social cliques matter. If geeks, dorks and dweebs would only humiliate themselves, the cool kids will somehow like them. This defies reality. Prom queens do not date band geeks. Mean girls do not stop gleefully torturing their bullying victims.

Israeli military force created normalized relations with Egypt and Jordan. Diplomacy emanated from Israel’s military victories, not Israeli restraint. Allowing Hamas and Hezbollah to survive to curry favor with the Saudis is nonsensical.

Saudi Madrassas teach Wahhabism. Saudis murdered 3,000 Americans on September 11th, 2001. There is little to like or emulate. Saudi Arabia is tolerated because they have oil. Their best national quality is being less awful than Iran. That is not a ringing endorsement of coolness.

More importantly, Saudi Arabia is a paper tiger with no military. Collapsing their kingdom could take 10 minutes. Crashing the price of oil would bring the Saudis to their knees. 

Friedman’s binary choice between Rafah and Riyadh is folly. Israel can have it all. Smashing Rafah to pieces would remind the world that Israel will not be bullied into national suicide. Once Rafah is finished, Riyadh will eagerly seek to align with the winners. Saudi Arabia will choose cool kid Israel over ugly duckling Iran. 

The Saudis care little about Rafah or displaced Egyptians and Jordanians calling themselves “Palestinians.” The Saudi princes are survivalists. They would instantaneously sacrifice fellow Arabs to prevent their kingdom from being toppled. Saudis know their true enemy is Iran, not Israel. Saudis and Israelis both love conducting business deals. 

Friedman’s most grievous error is assuming Israel can survive without total war victory. Friedman believes total victory is impossible. On the contrary, anything less than total victory would cripple Israel. If Rafah is spared, Netanyahu’s government would crumble. While many politically liberal and leftist people and organizations want this, it would be catastrophic for Israel and the region. A strong Israel is key to regional stability. A weakened Israel delivers chaos. Iran would move speedily toward developing atomic bombs. Saudi Arabia and other Arab Muslim nations would conduct an arms race. Nuclear Armageddon would be a possibility. 

Conversely, Israel could do the one thing that takes a brutally tough character mold. Israel can yell “to hell with public opinion” and wear being hated as a badge of honor. This strategy effectively powered entities as diverse as George W. Bush and Dick Cheney to the 1970s Oakland Raiders. 

The big picture is history, written by the winning side. Israel’s survival requires killing Islamist terrorists on their border before the Islamist terrorists murder Israelis. “Never again” must transcend hollow bumper sticker slogans.

Jewish existence is dependent on successful military incursions, not skilled public relations. 

Jewish existence is dependent on successful military incursions, not skilled public relations. As was the case after the Israeli bombing of the 1982 Iraqi Osirak reactor, condemnation of Israel will fade. News cycles wither. Death is permanent. 

To stay alive, Israel must finish the job. Riyadh will fall in line. The Iran domino matters. Toppling Iran’s genocidal mullahs requires that Israel give Rafah Islamists the mother of all military lashings.


Eric Golub is a retired stockbrokerage and oil professional living in Los Angeles. 

Israel Must Finish Rafah Read More »

No Longer About Nothing

For Jerry Seinfeld there would be

no red lines, as a great comedian;

the only line on which we’d see

him walk appeared to be the median.

 

While on this line he, unbefuddled,

would in a wonderland like Alice

once wander, Jerry never muddled

the media, starring minus malice.

 

His stories were about events

concluding always with confusion,

unspoiled by sheer malevolence,

spite spurned by him as unamusing,

 

his sense of humor never guiding

him towards it as a source

of inspiration by deriding

malignancy of this foul force.

 

Reality now causes Jerry

to walk along a different line.

On the median no more merry,

while anti-Zionists malign

 

the right of Jews to have a state,

along a line that white and blue

he walks, and does not hesitate

to join his maddened crowd, a Jew.


In “Jerry Seinfeld Can No Longer Be About Nothing,” NYT, 5/4/24, Matt Flegenheimer and Marc Tracy write:

Jerry Seinfeld became a mic-cradling, cereal-eating, “did-you-ever-notice”-ing avatar of American Jewish life with a brazenly shrugging persona: a merry indifference to weighty material as a comedian and in his megahit TV show about nothing, as petty and apolitical as he seemed to be.

Now — off-camera, at least — Mr. Seinfeld appears to have reached his post-nothing period.

Since the attacks of Oct. 7 in Israel, and through their bloody and volatile aftermath in Gaza, Mr. Seinfeld, 70, has emerged as a strikingly public voice against antisemitism and in support of Jews in Israel and the United States, edging warily toward a more forward-facing advocacy role than he ever seemed to seek across his decades of fame.

He has shared reflections about life on a kibbutz in his teens, and in December traveled to Tel Aviv to meet with hostages’ families, soberly recounting afterward the missile attack that greeted him during the trip.

He has participated, to a point, in the kind of celebrity activism with which few associate him — letter-signing campaigns, earnest messages on social media — answering simply recently when asked about the motivation for his visit to Israel: “I’m Jewish.”….

In one recent interview — part of a promotional tour for the Pop-Tarts movie — Mr. Seinfeld said he felt “very close to the struggle of being Jewish in the world.”

He has also stopped himself short of full-scale sermonizing.

“I don’t preach about it,” he told GQ last month. “I have my personal feelings about it that I discuss privately. It’s not part of what I can do comedically, but my feelings are very strong.”


Gershon Hepner is a poet who has written over 25,000 poems on subjects ranging from music to literature, politics to Torah. He grew up in England and moved to Los Angeles in 1976. Using his varied interests and experiences, he has authored dozens of papers in medical and academic journals, and authored “Legal Friction: Law, Narrative, and Identity Politics in Biblical Israel.” He can be reached at gershonhepner@gmail.com.

No Longer About Nothing Read More »

More Than 500 UC Faculty Members Call on Board of Regents to Address Anti-Israel Activism by Faculty, Departments

A May 8 letter signed by at least 503 UC faculty members is urging the UC Board of Regents to hold faculty and departments accountable for “promoting anti-Israel activism and inciting antisemitism.”

The letter noted that the board is facing “enormous backlash” from faculty over a potential policy that would bar departments “from using their university websites for making political statements.”  They are the same faculty members whose  “anti-Zionist activism not only brazenly denies Jewish students and faculty their academic freedom, but alarmingly, seeks to purge them from campus life altogether,” the letter contended. “The university must take immediate steps to stop this.” The letter also claimed that these anti-Israel faculty members are playing “a pivotal role in encouraging, supporting and even participating in the pro-Hamas rallies and illegal encampments that are fueling vicious antisemitism on many of our campuses.”

The letter pointed to a study from the AMCHA Initiative showing that there’s been “a more than ten-fold increase in anti-Zionist faculty advocacy and activism on UC campuses since Oct. 7” as a result of the establishment of Faculty for Justice in Palestine at the UC schools. “These chapters’ chief aim is to bring the academic boycott of Israel — a key component of the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement — onto their campuses and into their classrooms and other educational spaces,” the letter stated, explaining that FJP is following the guidelines set forth by the U.S. Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel (USACBI). The USACBI’s guidelines call for the “boycotting educational programs in or about Israel, and canceling or shutting down pro-Israel events and activities; promoting academic programming and campus events that demonize and delegitimize Israel; and condoning the denigration, protest, and exclusion of pro-Israel individuals on campus.”

Those academic BDS-associated activities are “not only flagrant violations of the academic freedom of students and faculty who want to study in or about Israel, they have had a devastating impact on Jewish students and faculty who identify with the Jewish State,” the letter continued. “Indeed, the explosion of antisemitic activity on UC campuses since Oct. 7 – an estimated 2000% increase over the same time last year — can in large measure be directly linked to these academic BDS-compliant efforts.”

The letter alleged that entire academic departments are now endorsing anti-Israel activity, such as the Ethnic Studies Department at UC San Diego declaring that they are boycotting Israel, which it referred to as a “settler… apartheid state.”  It  emphatically states that “the academic boycott of Israel, which anti-Zionist faculty are relentlessly implementing in their classrooms and conference halls, on their websites and social media pages, and — with the help of anti-Zionist student groups — in the campus square, student newspaper and student government, is nothing less than an attempt to completely purge UC campuses of Zionism and Zionists … Please understand that these efforts have made our own campuses inhospitable, threatening and unsafe for the vast majority of Jewish students and faculty who identify with the Jewish state and the Jewish people.”

The letter also accused university administrators of failing to “enforce policies prohibiting faculty from using their positions and university resources for political advocacy and activism.” It urged the board to “establish and enforce robust procedures that ensure campus administrators are held accountable for addressing violations of university policy regarding faculty abuse. Individual faculty who violate these policies must face significant disciplinary consequences. Departments that commit themselves to academic BDS and the genocidal aspiration of destroying the Jewish state are in flagrant violation of their scholarly mission and university regulations, and should be shut down. Administrators unwilling to enforce UC policy should themselves be sanctioned for dereliction of duty.

“If you cannot curb the unchecked political activism of faculty and departments, the University of California will soon become Judenrein — wholly inhospitable and unsafe for its Jewish members — and the University will lose a vital part of its research and teaching staff and its student body, and suffer irreparable reputational and financial harm,” the letter concluded.

“One purpose of the letter is to assure the administration that they have the backing of the faculty to stand firm against the demands of the encampment leadership, which parrot the demands of the BDS movement.” – Prof Judea Pearl

Judea Pearl, chancellor professor of computer science at UCLA, National Academy of Sciences member and Daniel Pearl Foundation president, told the Journal, “one purpose of the letter is to assure the administration that they have the backing of the faculty to stand firm against the demands of the encampment leadership, which parrot the demands of the BDS movement. Any capitulation to these demands would have far reaching consequences throughout higher education, and would amount to rewarding students’ lawlessness and antisemitic intimidation.”

UC Santa Cruz Chemistry Professor Ilan Benjamin also told the Journal, “I have been a faculty member at the University of California for 35 years, who has often spoken out against the abuses of anti-Zionist faculty and departments on my campus. However, since Oct. 7 the problem has become orders of magnitude worse. Now whole departments are not only issuing pro-Hamas statements and calls for dismantling the Jewish state, but are openly endorsing academic boycotts of Israel, whose primary goal is to purge Zionism and Zionists — Jewish faculty like me! — from the University.”

At this time, the UC Board of Regents has not responded to the Journal’s request for comment.

UPDATE: A spokesperson from the UC president’s office said in a statement to the Journal, “University of California President Michael V. Drake, M.D., shares the concerns raised by the authors of the letter. The events in the Middle East, combined with an alarming rise in antisemitism and islamophobia nationally and on college campuses, have had a profound and personal impact on many of our students, faculty, and staff, with many in our community experiencing trauma, fear, and frustration. President Drake has been clear about his priorities and ongoing efforts to ensure that our campuses are safe welcoming, inclusive spaces for all students. Antisemitism is antithetical to the University’s values and our campus codes of conduct and is unacceptable under our principles of community. We look forward to working with campus leaders, faculty, and staff to foster a safe and respectful environment where all members of our community can learn, work, and thrive.”

More Than 500 UC Faculty Members Call on Board of Regents to Address Anti-Israel Activism by Faculty, Departments Read More »

Race to Erase MS Gala 2024: Where Glamour Meets Giving Back!

Get ready to strut your stuff and make a difference at the most anticipated event of the season – the Race to Erase MS Gala! Set to sizzle at the chic Fairmont Century Plaza on May 10, 2024, this soirée isn’t just about fashion and fun; it’s a fierce fight against multiple sclerosis (MS)!
From the moment you step onto the orange carpet, you’ll be swept away by the glitz and glamour of the evening. Picture-perfect moments await as L’AGENCE unveils their latest fashion creations in a show stopping runway extravaganza. But that’s just the beginning! At the heart of the mission lies the groundbreaking Center Without Walls program, a visionary collaboration between eight of the nation’s leading MS research centers. From the innovative minds at Cedars-Sinai and UCSF to the pioneering work of Harvard and Yale, these powerhouse institutions have joined forces to revolutionize the fight against MS. Together, they’re breaking down barriers, sharing insights, and accelerating the pace of discovery in pursuit of effective treatments and, ultimately, a cure. Get ready to groove to the electrifying beats of Grammy-nominated Natasha Bedingfield and Grammy-winning A Great Big World as they take the stage by storm. Their soulful tunes will have you dancing the night away, all while supporting a cause close to our hearts.
And speaking of heart, get ready to be moved by the stories of resilience and hope shared by MS warriors and their families throughout the evening. Their courage and determination remind us why we’re here—to make a real difference in the fight against MS. “We are so thrilled and excited to have the amazing Natasha Bedingfield and incredible A Great Big World entertaining our guests for our 31st Race to Erase MS gala. We are also looking forward to a fabulous and chic fashion show from L’Agence,” shared founder Nancy Davis. But the glitz and glam aren’t just for show; they’re fueling the fight against MS! With every strut down the runway and every note sung, we’re raising crucial funds for the Center Without Walls program, a dream team of top MS research centers across the nation. Shout Out For A Cause will be there reporting from the Orange Carpet.
Cedric the Entertainer and BJ Korros on the red carpet at GBK Luxury Gifting Suite during Oscars 2023
Lights, camera, auction! Gala attendees can also bid on incredible Live Auction opportunities like “EVER DREAMED OF BEING A CELEBRITY FOR A DAY?” Be part of Oscars weekend 2025 in Los Angeles and participate in GBK’s exclusive luxury gifting suite and join in the interviews on the Red Carpet with Host and Entertainment Reporter, BJ Korros! Spend the afternoon mingling with celebrities and walking the red carpet. You and your lucky guest will be transformed by the Glam Squad celebrity artist Raul to ensure you are truly Red Carpet Ready to become a Celebrity for a Day.

GET YOUR TICKETS

So, grab your dancing shoes and get ready to party with a purpose at the Race to Erase MS Gala! Together, we’ll shine a spotlight on MS and show the world that nothing can dim our spirits or dampen our determination to find a cure! For all the latest updates and behind-the-scenes sneak peeks, be sure to follow us on social media using #RaceToEraseMS and #EraseMS. Let’s make MS a thing of the past, one fabulous gala at a time! Find Race to Erase on Facebook and Instagram.
About Race to Erase MS Race to Erase MS was founded in 1993 by Nancy Davis and is dedicated to the treatment and ultimate cure of Multiple Sclerosis. Since the Race to Erase MS foundation was created, there has been more than $58 million raised and 26 FDA approved therapies created to aggressively fight MS that have provided hope, inspiration, and resources to those in the Multiple Sclerosis community. The gala directly benefits the foundation’s Center Without Walls program, a unique collaboration between the world’s leading MS research scientists and investigators who have bolstered their individual efforts into collective action that has led to exciting discoveries in the search for a cure. At the event’s inception 30  years ago, the absence of medications and therapies encouraged its involvement; the Race has been instrumental in funding pilot studies that have contributed to drugs now on the market and other very important therapies that are improving the lives of people suffering from MS. Davis also created the annual “Orange You Happy to Erase MS” campaign, which takes place for the entire month of May (MS Awareness Month) and adds yet another branch of fundraising for MS research.  Throughout the month, a variety of orange products, many of which are specially created for this initiative, are sold to benefit the cause and elevate public awareness about MS. All funds raised support the Center Without Walls program, a unique collaboration of the world’s leading MS research scientists currently representing Harvard, Yale, Cedars Sinai, University of Southern California, Oregon Health Science University, UC San Francisco, Johns Hopkins, and UCLA. This nationwide collaboration of physicians, scientists and clinicians are on the cutting-edge of innovative research and therapeutic approaches to treat MS.  It is the hope of the Race to Erase MS that in addition to combating MS through research in a clinical environment, awareness will be created by educating the public about this mysterious disease.

Race to Erase MS Gala 2024: Where Glamour Meets Giving Back! Read More »