fbpx

November 30, 2022

A Bisl Torah — Preparing for Light

The Jewish month of Kislev ushers in Hannukah, the Festival of Lights. Our family spent the last few days dusting off our hannukiyah, cleaning candle wax and making room for the holiday to find a place in our home. Like other holidays, there is preparation. For Rosh Hashana and Yom Kippur, one prepares their soul, making amends with God, understanding where in our relationships we have fallen short. For Pesach, we prepare our homes, ridding leavened products from refrigerators and pantries to signify an elimination of ego and loftiness. But with Hannukah, the preparation isn’t as formulaic. How does one prepare for light to emerge?

A gut response is that light fares best in the darkest of conditions. Throw on an overhead lamp and bring in a bunch of flashlights, the flickering candles won’t receive their due attention. Light shines when darkness pervades. The contradictions abound. Create ample darkness to amplify moments of light? Is that really what we are meant to prepare?

No. I think the preparation for Hannukah is understanding that despite the pervasiveness of darkness, light breaks through. Rabbi Nachman teaches, “Just as the plague of darkness immediately preceded the redemption from Egypt, so too, the darkest hour always comes right before the dawn.” During the bleakest of moments: personal depression, communal despair, divisions between family and nation, one prepares for light by not succumbing to darkness. One prepares for light by clinging to hope.

It takes one spark to illuminate a room. It takes one ounce of hope to change a person’s life.

Preparing for light is facing the darkness we feel, the darkness we experience and declare, this does not define me. No matter the heaviness of the night, there is room for light to emerge.

And a miracle of Hanukkah is choosing light, over and over again.

Shabbat Shalom


Rabbi Nicole Guzik is a rabbi at Sinai Temple. She can be reached at her Facebook page at Rabbi Nicole Guzik or on Instagram @rabbiguzik. For more writings, visit Rabbi Guzik’s blog section from Sinai Temple’s website.

A Bisl Torah — Preparing for Light Read More »

Instinct, Intellect and Religion

We must resolve the conflict between instinct and
what’s generally considered to be its antithesis, intellect.
Although the former is more difficult to understand
it should be treated even by the intellect with reasonable respect.,
and for religions let us also show regard, not relegating our respect for them because of either
intellect or instinct, like Jacob wrestling with an angel, the antithesis of both, a wily writher,
which is — I hope I am not preaching — what religion is about,

refereed by what by definition is impartial, doubt.

In “Sigourney Weaver Has Us All Fooled: She’s Really Quite Silly,” in the NYT, 11/27/22, Kyle Buchanan writes:

Acting can sometimes be a battle between intellect and instinct, and by either measure, the 73-year-old Weaver is formidable. Co-stars talk about the way she marks up her scripts, scribbling down the motivations behind every line, action or lifted prop; onscreen, she projects that intelligence in a calm, cool way and can handily outthink any scene partner. But Weaver’s natural instincts have proved important, too, ever since her first starring role as the resourceful Ellen Ripley in the 1979 sci-fi classic “Alien.”

Gershon Hepner is a poet who has written over 25,000 poems on subjects ranging from music to literature, politics to Torah. He grew up in England and moved to Los Angeles in 1976. Using his varied interests and experiences, he has authored dozens of papers in medical and academic journals, and authored “Legal Friction: Law, Narrative, and Identity Politics in Biblical Israel.” He can be reached at gershonhepner@gmail.com.

Instinct, Intellect and Religion Read More »

Do We Fight Hate as Winners or Whiners?

The biggest scandal in the Jewish world today is not the rise in antisemitism, but the fact that the more money and noise we’ve thrown at the problem, the worse it’s gotten.

If fighting antisemitism were a business, it would have gone belly up a long time ago. It’s the equivalent of investing a fortune to improve your product, and then realizing you actually made it worse.

So, what happened?

It turns out there’s a simple explanation for this epic squandering of Jewish resources in the “fight against hate.” Donors love a good fight. It makes it look like we’re doing something, like we won’t be silenced, like we’re fighting back against evil forces.

This activity makes us feel good, so we rarely have to ask: Is any of this working?

Activists who fundraise know all this. They know there’s nothing like “they’re coming to get us!” and “it’s never been worse!” to get the hysterics triggered and the checks rolling in.

Media companies know it, too. It’s the oldest media trick in the book: Put fear and alarmism in a headline and you’re guaranteed to boost your audience.

There is also, of course, human nature. If we feel attacked, our instinct is to fight back. If we see a swastika on a wall, or hear someone yell “dirty Jew,” or face an anti-Israel march on a college campus, we’ve been taught that to remain silent is to be complicit, that we must make some noise against hate.

What we rarely ask, however, is: What kind of noise is most effective?

Most of us automatically assume that “exposing, denouncing and condemning” antisemitism is the correct approach. It feels so logical and natural. How can it be wrong?

It can be wrong if it makes us look weak.

Like it or not, the more we “expose, denounce and condemn” any little act of antisemitism, the more we look like whiners and grievance junkies, and the more we show fear and weakness.

The great majority of Jews in America are anything but weak. They’re achievers. They work hard. They give back to society. They’re winners.

The problem is that we’re winners who have been making the noise of losers. Our collective wailing against any sign or hint of antisemitism has turned us into fragile, insecure scolds, which has not only damaged the Jewish brand but has made the Jew haters smell blood. 

We failed to realize that when you “fight” against an emotion like hate, you’re setting yourself up for failure. Haters will always hate, which may be lucrative for activists but means we look like we’re always losing.  There’s no amount of “fight” that will quiet haters, especially not in a country where even vile speech is protected speech.

Fighting against hate is not like fighting against an army with guns and tanks. It’s fighting an emotion with another emotion. By giving so much emotional attention to the haters, we empower and incentivize them. We tell them: “Look, you have the power to make us go nuts trying to fight you.”

The typical argument in favor of the “fight” is that we establish consequences for the hate. But this need for consequences makes us look even weaker. We’re like the weak kid in school who goes to the principal hoping a bully will get punished for hitting him.

We’re no longer that weak kid in school, and we should stop acting like one. It’s time to regain our mojo and start acting like winners. Not just because it’s a smart PR strategy but because it’s who we are.

Let’s stop apologizing for our success because we’re afraid it will fuel antisemitic “tropes.” Nothing fuels antisemitism more than Jews showing weakness and fear. The noise we make should revolve around our pride and our accomplishments, not our fears.

We should inundate college campuses with the significant achievements of Jews in both America and in Israel. We should fight hate not just by exposing haters but by exposing the enormous Jewish contributions to humanity. 

If we must have guards at our synagogues and file lawsuits to protect our rights, by all means let’s do it. And yes, let’s go after anti-Jewish and anti-Israel bias in any institution where it festers, not least the mainstream media, academia and the United Nations. But those defensive measures should not be the noise that defines us. 

What defines us is the resiliency of an ancient people that continues to thrive in a free country like America.

No hater can take that away from us. And if we absolutely must spend money behind a campaign against hate, let the slogan be: “Jew haters are losers.”

Do We Fight Hate as Winners or Whiners? Read More »

Trump Crossing Lines—Again

The British entertainer and philosopher Elton John once sang, “You can tell by the lines I’m reciting that I’ve seen that movie too.”

So when Donald Trump yet again tiptoes right up to the line that separates mere cultural insensitivity from abject bigotry – and then obliterates that line altogether –  it’s clear that we have seen this movie far too many times. Despite his enthusiastic support for the state of Israel and his occasional exploitation of his Jewish grandchildren, it has now become impossible to excuse the former president for his ongoing and unfortunate habit of empowering anti-Semites.

The fact that Trump’s biases are a product of political convenience rather than deep-seated animosity is irrelevant. The ultimate outcome is that his behavior encourages and facilitates the hard-core haters who creep out of the cracks between our societal floorboards whenever the former president signals his approval. The most recent and most unnecessary proof of this thesis came last week, when Trump hosted a pair of noted anti-Semites for dinner at his Mar-a-Lago estate. Rapper Kanye West and notorious white supremacist Nick Fuentes were his guests for a meal in which West and Trump sparred over which of them would be a superior presidential candidate in 2024 and Fuentes stroked Trump’s gargantuan ego with compliments regarding his skills as a campaigner.

The fact that the evening’s conversation did not include any discussion of the perceived shortcomings of the Jewish people and faith is immaterial. The fact that Trump invited West to join him only weeks after the rapper’s latest anti-Semitic public salvos (see my November 16 column) suggests a grotesque insensitivity and lack of awareness of the message sent by a once and potentially future president socializing with a known and repeated trafficker of anti-Jewish ugliness. 

But Fuentes’ presence links Trump to even more repulsive hatreds. Throughout his brief career as a political commentator, Fuentes has alternately declared his belief that the Holocaust never occurred and told hideous jokes that allude to the worst of the Shoah’s atrocities. Not limiting his bile to slurs against Jews, Fuentes has also reveled in similar invectives against women, blacks, gays and Muslims, along with praise for Vladimir Putin, the Taliban and Adolph Hitler.

After the story broke publicly and many prominent Republicans criticized Trump, the former president indicated that Fuentes had not been invited but had accompanied West. “He arrived with a guest whom I had never met and knew nothing about.”

It is entirely possible that Trump was unaware of Fuentes’ identity and history prior to the dinner. But it is worth noting that once the news of Fuentes’ visit and past outrages became public, Trump’s only initial instinct was deniability. As of the time this column was filed, he has made no effort to denounce Fuentes or any of the highly objectionable verbal affronts that the white supremacist has uttered over the last several years.

In all likelihood, Trump will offer some half-hearted condemnation in the days ahead. This follows the same playbook that he employed after initially claiming that he knew nothing about former Klansman David Duke during the 2016 campaign after Duke endorsed him, or in the days after the Charlottesville race riots the following year, when Trump read a scripted statement walking back his original comments that there “very fine people on both sides” of a white nationalist rally. 

Then and now, Trump has calculated that this type of positioning helps with a small but loud portion of his base. He flirts with the worst type of racists, bigots and anti-Semites but avoids using language himself that would directly express similar sentiments. Several years ago, this tactic was odious. Now it’s simply tiresome.

Team Trump believes that such rhetorical tap-dancing is harmless, even while it normalizes hate speech for an unnervingly large portion of the populace. 

Team Trump believes that such rhetorical tap-dancing is harmless, even while it normalizes hate speech for an unnervingly large portion of the populace. So they will rationalize his conduct, although with a somewhat smaller echo chamber than before, because this is what they do. 

But as Sir Elton once sang, “You’re crazy if you think that you can fool me. Because I’ve seen that movie too.”


Dan Schnur is a Professor at the University of California – Berkeley, USC and Pepperdine. Join Dan for his weekly webinar “Politics in the Time of Coronavirus” (www.lawac.org) on Tuesdays at 5 PM.

Trump Crossing Lines—Again Read More »

Comedians Discuss Infamous Dave Chappelle Monologue

As the host of a recent episode of “Saturday Night Live,” Dave Chappelle devoted much of his 15-minute monologue to the widely denounced antisemitic statements and activity involving rapper Kanye West and NBA star Kyrie Irving. 

But on the “SNL” stage, the iconic comedian delivered jokes about the disproportionate number of Jews in Hollywood, leading many to accuse him of using antisemitic tropes that fuel Jew hatred. 

At the start of his Nov. 12 appearance, Chappelle took out a piece of paper and said, “Before I start tonight, I just wanted to read a brief statement that I prepared. I denounce antisemitism in all its forms, and I stand with my friends in the Jewish community.” He paused, then added, “And that, Kanye, is how you buy yourself some time.”

The comedian joked about what’s permissible and not permissible to say about Jews. “If they’re Black, then it’s a gang. If they’re Italian, it’s a mob. But if they’re Jewish, it’s a coincidence and you should never speak about it,” Chappelle said. 

All this led some to argue Chappelle was normalizing antisemitism and sympathizing with West and Irving more than he was poking fun at the perpetuators of anti-Jewish tropes.  

Others defended Chappelle. 

The Journal reached out to several Jewish comedians and asked for their takes about the now-infamous monologue.

“It might be because I’m so sick of ‘the woke,’ over-the-top, everyone being offended by everything [that] I am a little less guarded about these things.”
-Avi Liberman

“It might be because I’m so sick of ‘the woke,’ over-the-top, everyone being offended by everything [that] I am a little less guarded about these things,” comedian Avi Liberman said in a phone interview. “But the litmus test is, ‘Is it funny or not?’ If it’s funny, I don’t have a problem with it, and I just found it funny.”

Liberman said he was impressed with the topicality of the material. Given Chappelle was joking about events that had happened over the past couple of weeks, he must’ve written the jokes quickly, he said. 

“It’s lose-lose to talk about,” comedian Elon Gold told the Journal. “Everybody is right, and words matter. If you’re angry at Dave, you’re right, because words matter and lead to real-world consequences. If you loved Dave and laughed and enjoyed the comedy, you’re right too, because comedy is supposed to talk about what’s relevant and what’s happening. Even if what’s happening out there is ugly, it’s a comedian’s job to talk about it.”

Comedian Mark Schiff also watched the monologue. He said Chapelle’s statement implying Jews place blame on the African American community for their history of persecution was “ridiculous.”

“Who is blaming the Blacks for the Holocaust? I don’t know anybody who is blaming Black people for the Holocaust,” he said. “It was a ridiculous statement.”

“I wasn’t a fan of it,” Schiff, a regular Journal contributor, said. “All the time he spent on the Jews, it sounded like a comedy sermon. He thinks he needs to teach us things. I come from a different school. All I care about is entertaining people. They criticize people like me for not taking on issues. I don’t care about issues when I’m entertaining. I just want them to sit back and laugh. Chappelle had the opposite effect of entertaining me.”

New York-based comic Ariel Elias described Chappelle as attention-seeking. She even questioned the judgement of “SNL” for giving him a platform. 

“Dave Chappelle wants to be a part of the zeitgeist, wants to be controversial, and we are all just giving oxygen to his flames,” she said in an email. “I think the bigger issue isn’t what he had to say, but why the people in charge at ‘SNL’ decided that Chappelle’s voice was the one we needed to hear from right now. His monologue was the most watched of the season. So maybe we need to ask ourselves some questions about why we keep giving this man the attention he obviously craves.”

This was not the first time Chappelle’s comedy has caused controversy. In his 2021 Netflix special, “The Closer,” he offended the transgender community, which prompted LGBTQ groups to call for the special’s removal from the service.

The irony is that many in the Jewish community, who are now criticizing Chappelle, supported Chappelle during the last call for the comedian’s cancellation, Gold said.  

“I’m sure there were many in the Jewish community when Dave was going after the trans community who said, ‘Calm down, take a joke,’” Gold said. “The world is looking at us now, saying, ‘Calm down, relax Jews, take a joke.’ The world doesn’t get how we are under attack in the streets, in our synagogues, in our houses of worship all over the world, in bus stations in Israel. That hatred is deadly serious and not to be joked about, but again, that’s our job, our job is to joke about everything, especially what’s happening now.“

A few months ago, Gold attended comedian Bob Saget’s funeral. Chappelle was there, too, saying Kaddish. Gold said the African American comedian isn’t an antisemite. 

But the larger issue is the tendency to call for a comic’s cancellation the moment he or she says something making people uncomfortable. The Jewish community, Gold believes, ought to have a more nuanced response than demanding a comedian’s cancellation.

“Cancel-culture is anti-Jewish and anti-Jewish teachings, which is all about teshuvah.”
– Elon Gold

“Cancel culture is anti-Jewish and anti-Jewish teachings, which is all about teshuvah,” Gold said. 

A comedian who declined to be identified was hesitant about censoring anyone who works in comedy. 

“From Don Rickles to Lenny Bruce, comedians have always pushed buttons,” they said. “Dictating what they can and cannot say sets a scary precedent for people who are supposed to be pointing out truths that make us uncomfortable.”

Comedians Discuss Infamous Dave Chappelle Monologue Read More »

Israel’s Desert Is Setting for Key Climate Change Conference

To read more articles from The Media Line, click here.

Experts on climate change and its impact on people and the environment gathered this week in the desert of southern Israel for the annual Conference on Drylands, Deserts and Desertification (DDD), hosted by Ben-Gurion University of the Negev at its Sde Boker campus.

The international event brought in more than 200 speakers and scores of attendees from dozens of countries, including India, Morocco and the United States.

Guests included researchers in climate science, environmental science and desertification, attending numerous panels over the course of the week-long event. Much of the focus was on renewable energy and how it impacts on the landscape of a country, in particular solar energy and its spatial demands.

Keynote lectures at the DDD conference included an address by Professor Henry Falk from Emory University on how climate change will impact public health and the measures available to mitigate that phenomenon.

The Media Line spoke to Ben-Gurion University Professor Avigad Vonshak, one of the driving forces behind the conference, who until this year was at the forefront of the event. According to Vonshak, DDD is one of the only conferences of its kind that is affiliated with the UN Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD). Indeed, one of the guest speakers was Dr. Barron Joseph Orr, the lead scientist at the UNCCD.

Next week The Media Line will present in-depth reports on the state of solar power in Israel and on reforestation and its link to halting desertification.

Israel’s Desert Is Setting for Key Climate Change Conference Read More »

A Campaign Against Jew Hatred That Actually Worked

Since I started writing about antisemitism about a decade ago, I’ve had trouble answering one question: Why are Jews, who excel in fields from literature to music, so bad at confronting lies and hate? 

Part of the answer of course is that antisemitism is irrational — based on conspiracy theories that morph every century. It’s also sadly the case that many Jews today in a position to create change — professors, heads of nonprofits, CEOs — would much rather suppress their Jewish identity to maintain their social “status.” 

But neither fully explains how, for instance, the lies of “Palestinianism” have been able to completely consume our campuses. A small exhibition at the New-York Historical Society shows that this was not always the case.

“Confronting Hate 1937-1952” examines how a groundbreaking media campaign launched by the American Jewish Committee (AJC) to combat rising antisemitism in the United States actually worked.

“Confronting Hate 1937-1952” examines how a groundbreaking media campaign launched by the American Jewish Committee (AJC) to combat rising antisemitism in the United States actually worked. AJC CEO David Harris calls it “a testament to the vision of creative individuals committed to preserving and strengthening our pluralistic democracy.”

American antisemitism didn’t begin in the mid-20th century, but it did reach a dangerous peak. In 1935, a newspaper called American Gentile featured on its front page: “Let’s Take America Away From the Jews!” and “Jewish CARTHAGE Must Be Destroyed if Free America Is To Survive!” By 1937, roughly 50 demonstrations a week, including rallies at Madison Square Garden, spewed antisemitic propaganda on the streets of New York City, inciting violence. Organizations such as the Anti-Jewish League to Protect American Rights and the American National Party distributed leaflets with slogans like “White Men Do Not Buy From Jews” and “Buy Gentile, Employ Gentile, Vote Gentile.” One 1938 survey found that nearly 41% of Americans thought that Jews were too powerful.

The campaign partnered with dozens of artists, writers, political leaders, women’s and church groups, and celebrities to spread anti-hate messages across the U.S. in innovative ways. 

The AJC campaign, spearheaded by advertising executive Richard Rothschild, partnered with dozens of artists, writers, political leaders, women’s and church groups and celebrities (including Frank Sinatra and Judy Garland) to spread anti-hate messages across the U.S. in innovative ways. Rothschild produced graphic posters, newspaper ads, and pamphlets, as well as comic books such as “They Got the Blame,” which chronicled the history of scapegoating.

Nazism, Rothschild said in a 1973 interview, sought to spread internal discord. “Divisiveness can be the source of a country’s greatest weakness,” he said. His goal: to show the evil of antisemitism while also showing the importance of unity. “It would not be enough to show that antisemitism was bad for Jews,” he said. “We had to show that it was bad for America and Americans.” 

For the first six years of the project, the AJC did not use its name. That changed after the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising in 1943. 

The centerpiece of the exhibition is a short documentary about an extraordinary 15-minute radio broadcast on Sunday, October 29, 1944. “Today, the National Broadcasting Company brings its listeners a program of historic moment,” war correspondent James Cassidy began the show. “The first direct broadcast of a Jewish religious service from German soil since Adolf Hitler and his Nazis began the destruction not only of the Jewish religion but of all religions, more than a decade ago.” 

The service, produced by the AJC and its radio director Milton Krents, took place in an open field near the site of a demolished synagogue in Aachen, Germany. With the sound of artillery rounds thundering in the background, we hear the haunting audio from Army Chaplain Sidney Lefkowitz, a rabbi from Richmond, Virginia, who led the service in front of 51 Jewish soldiers; a young private served as the cantor. 

In a short address, Chaplain Lefkowitz acknowledged what the service represented. “Even as we sadly observe the ruins amid we stand and consider the loss of lives with which this victory has been purchased, we are solaced with the thought, though the cost must be high, of the lasting memorial which consecrates the sacrifice, and upon it is written in letters that glow like burning coals, ‘The spirit of man cannot be conquered.’” 

The service, broadcast throughout Germany, was meant as a warning. “The Allied armies, composed of every color, faith, and nationality, will never halt until freedom takes the place of tyranny on every inch of Axis soil,” said Krents. But it also immediately captured the attention of Americans; the response was so profound that it was later re-aired. “The Aachen broadcast is a vivid reminder of the spirit and resilience of American GIs as they fought to eradicate Nazism,” said curator Debra Schmidt Bach. “Milton Krents understood the symbolism and importance of the service, and we are fortunate that he left us this poignant legacy and vivid example of the power of American cooperation.”

Forgotten in the decades after the war, the service at Aachen is only available to us now because of a chance discovery by AJC archive director Charlotte Bonelli, who noticed a brief mention of it in a Krents oral history in the mid-2000s. 

The lessons of the AJC campaign are extremely valuable. American Jews need to start using our creative brains to fight the demons now descending on three fronts (Islamists, white supremacists, and “Black Hebrew Israelites”), as rapper Kosha Dillz did with “Death Con 3.”

Just as important, the overall focus needs to be on unity — on the beautiful mosaic of immigrants that America once stood for. But you can’t have that mosaic if there’s an over-emphasis on race — from either real racists or “anti-racists.” Woke ideology is meant to create division — precisely the type of division that leads to increased antisemitism. 

The soldiers who attended the service at Aachen had survived Omaha Beach, one of the bloodiest sites of the Normandy invasion, and later fought in the brutal Battle of Saint-Lô in France. “These are men who belonged to a group of people that had been deemed by the Nazis to be cowardly — that they should be exterminated from the earth,” says Bonelli. “They’re standing on German soil, singing ancient Jewish prayers, equal members of the Allied advancing forces. It was a symbol that the war was coming to an end, and that Judaism and the Jewish people would survive.” 

It is precisely this type of symbolism, innovatively updated for the 21st century, that needs to become a fixture on every U.S. campus.


Karen Lehrman Bloch is editor in chief of White Rose Magazine. 

A Campaign Against Jew Hatred That Actually Worked Read More »

Say Goodbye to Toxic Trumpism: An Election Day Lesson

It’s 7:10 a.m. on election day and I wake up thinking politics. The novelty of a Los Angeles rainfall offers symbolic hope that months of poll watching, pundit columns and excessive campaign contributions will finally be washed away. Both the rain and the election are overdue.  

Rain may dampen local turnout. “Low propensity voters,” AKA Democrats, might stay home. But in most of today’s key places such as Philadelphia, Milwaukee, Phoenix and the hills of New Hampshire, the weather looks good. Hard core politico that I am, I checked. Yesterday. 

As a doctor, I see politics through healthcare, with the Affordable Care Act (ACA) as my touchstone. I walked precincts and contributed to President Obama’s campaign in hope that reform would improve access. The ACA, or Obamacare, brought health insurance to around 20 million Americans, about as many as enrolled in Medicare when it started. President Trump campaigned to “repeal and replace” it. But when the July 2017 vote arrived, replacement was mysteriously absent. The repeal, defeated by three Republican nay votes, including Senator McCain’s famously decisive “thumbs down,” would have cost an estimated 15 million Americans their health insurance. The minor expense of the healthcare subsidies didn’t harm the economy, nor were they keeping us from being “great again.” The issue seemed not about America’s healthcare, but Trump’s obsession with obliterating the Obama legacy. Then, as now, few Republican legislators would stand up to him.  

2:00 p.m. Not much news. The media reports a $2 billion PowerBall lottery ticket has been sold in LA.  PowerBall may have just picked LA’s future mayor!

4:00 p.m. The first polls on the East Coast close. Senator Tim Scott (R-S.C.) kicks off the early “tease projections,” all known shoo-ins. One of my grade school buddies, feeling pessimistic, texts his intention to drown his sorrows in Knob Hill Small Batch bourbon. It will probably not prove the worst choice of the evening.   

10:00 p.m. Déjà vu of the 2020 election. Florida unleashes a red flood, but it fails to spread beyond the state’s borders. The anticipated national red wave is morphing into a bluish-purple ripple, with the two sides struggling, evenly matched, like punch drunk boxers. The big prizes, control of the Senate and House, may remain unclaimed for days to weeks. 

A hopeful early sign is the defeat of many GOP election deniers. Trump’s refusal to accept his 2020 loss was understandable, given his ego and utter self-absorption. But the “big lie” should have been transparent to everyone. On the eve of the 2020 election the polls all predicted Trump’s defeat. On election eve “538,” Nate Silver’s wonky poll-crunching website, estimated the likelihood of a Trump loss at 89%. Silver missed only one of the 50 states, calling Florida for Biden. Did multiple polling organizations also conspire in the “steal”? Could the Dems really steal tens of thousands of votes in multiple states and leave no trail of evidence? Will Rogers once commented that, “I’m not a member of any organized political party. I’m a Democrat.” Republican election deniers ironically seem more impressed than Rogers by Dems’ organizational capabilities.

Recent gerrymandering of legislative districts, voter suppression and the unleashing of a torrent of anonymous special interest money by the Citizens United decision conspire to push the public hand from the levers of power. 

Less hopefully, the American political system drifts farther from popular control. The Electoral College system, an obstacle to popular will, was “baked into the pie” in 1788. But recent gerrymandering of legislative districts, voter suppression and the unleashing of a torrent of anonymous special interest money by the Citizens United decision conspire to push the public hand from the levers of power. 

Saturday 8:00 p.m. Democrat Catherine Cortez Masto’s victory in Nevada secures Democratic control of the Senate. I’m reminded of Joseph Welch’s dramatic dressing down of Senator Joseph McCarthy during the 1955 Army McCarthy hearing: “Have you no sense of decency, sir, at long last?” McCarthy never recovered. American voters’ rejection of election deniers and Trump flunkies may similarly provide the shock needed to redirect the GOP and secure the political soul of the nation. 

Where do we go from here? LA’s election day rainfall won’t end our drought and a blue ripple won’t resuscitate the body politic. Trump lost the popular vote in two presidential elections and orchestrated GOP defeats in two midterms. The GOP leadership should have broken with him after January 6th. Now they should heed the voters, do the right thing and at long last, say goodbye to toxic Trumpism.


Daniel Stone is Regional Medical Director of Cedars-Sinai Valley Network and a practicing internist and geriatrician with Cedars Sinai Medical Group. The views expressed in this column do not necessarily reflect those of Cedars-Sinai.

Say Goodbye to Toxic Trumpism: An Election Day Lesson Read More »

Rosner’s Domain— Climbing the Override Law Tree

Sometimes, to understand a forest, you must look at one tree. A new government is coming to Israel, energetic, revolutionary, ambitious. There is a blizzard of rumored initiatives, there is a storm of trial balloons, there is a pour of proposals and demands — some of which will materialize, and many that will not. Some of them are realistic, and many will hit a brick wall. Facing such a tempest is confusing, and intimidating. Thus, it’s sometimes better to pick one proposed change, and examine it up close. Let’s do it, using the demand to pass a High Court override law. Such a law would allow the Knesset to repass a law when it is struck down by the court.

The debate about the override law cannot have a fact-based conclusion. Both sides have facts; both sides have ideologues. The facts are chosen selectively to support a position. One camp says: In Canada there is such law. The other camp says: Canada has a constitution! One camp sees Canada as proof that a country can have an override law and remain a functioning democracy. The other camp believes the Canada case is irrelevant. 

I had a long conversation this week about our difficulty, as humans, to change our minds with Professor Azar Gat, the author of a fantastic new book: “Ideological Fixation.” He writes in the book, “What I mean by ideological fixation … refers to the ways in which devotion to value preferences may distort understanding of reality, the assessment of past events and future potentialities.” He also writes that “cognitive biases in interpreting the world may serve the causes people pursue, as single-minded and sometimes narrow-minded convictions are often conducive to galvanizing support and pushing through intellectual and social agendas in the public sphere.”

Humans have evolutionary, philosophical, psychological and social reasons for sticking to their positions. The debate about the override law sometimes sounds like a discussion of lawyers but long ago ceased to be the turf of legal professionals. It is a conflict between social groups, an expression of identity. The law professors have no chance of convincing anyone, certainly not when there are law professors on both sides. 

What does the public think? Most Israelis do not delve into the details of the arguments for and against the law. Most of them formulate a position based on the signal they get from within their social group. Right-wing voters receive a strong signal to support the change — and therefore they do. Center-left voters receive a strong signal that they must oppose the change — and therefore they do. Both tend to believe that “the other side” is being irrational. It’s not impossible to argue that both, in fact, are being irrational. 

The argument for change rests on a bogus case, as if legal experts supported by the court stand in the way of politicians as they strive to implement the policies the public wants. True, some policies were disrupted by the court. True, in some cases the court seemed to have exceeded its mandate. But the system isn’t broken, and the courts aren’t the obstacle standing between Israel and an efficient government. The court is the scapegoat of government. When governments fail, they have someone to blame. Hence, the zeal of radicals who truly believe that an override law is going to change stubborn realities. 

The argument against change also rests on a bogus case, as if an override law means the end of Israel’s democracy. It does not. In fact, the law will barely change Israel’s legal construct, as the Knesset, even today, can override any court decision by changing the Basic Law on which the court relies to strike a law. In Israel’s system, Basic Laws are just like any law: A simple majority can alter their wording as it wishes. In fact, Basic Laws are constantly altered to allow for new political arrangements (Example: the recently created Alternate PM position was created by changing a Basic Law). And so, what the new government intends to do is merely make it somewhat simpler to override a court decision. Whether that’s advisable is a good question but claiming that such move is going to put Israel at great risk is an overstatement.

Like many of the currently proposed changes, the override law challenges Israelis — especially those who supported opposition parties — with the most difficult task: to reserve judgment. 

Like many of the currently proposed changes, the override law challenges Israelis — especially those who support opposition parties — with the most difficult task: to reserve judgment. Some initiatives might ultimately work to Israel’s benefit, some might not come to fruition, some are going to pass and then be reversed, mugged by reality. And yes, some plans could bring about a change that opposition voters aren’t going to agree with. Is that not the point of having elections?

Something I wrote in Hebrew

Here’s something I wrote, addressing disheartened Israeli opposition voters:

What bothers you, that the right won? That the ultra-Orthodox will receive more funding? That substantive legislation is going to change? That the power of the court will be eroded? Don’t say “democracy.” This is a hollow argument. An argument that smacks of rejection of democracy. In fact, democracy has just proven its potency, and brought a new coalition to power. Don’t say “real democracy” because that also smacks of rejection of democracy. It smells like a demand that the rules of democracy be formulated so that the losing side will be the actual winner. Be honest about the things that truly bother you, try to understand what is really causing you despair. When you know what this thing is, you may also have the strength to fight back

A week’s numbers

The numbers behind the column on the left-hand side of the page:

A reader’s response:

Debbi Rosenman writes: “You seem to bend over backwards to defend the worst government in Israel’s history.” My response: you mean the incoming government? Sorry, but I’m not sure how one can tell that a government is the “worst ever” before it even started its term. 


Shmuel Rosner is senior political editor. For more analysis of Israeli and international politics, visit Rosner’s Domain at jewishjournal.com/rosnersdomain.

Rosner’s Domain— Climbing the Override Law Tree Read More »

JNF-USA Conference, Sephardic Film Fest, Sinai Akiba Challah Bake

Nearly 1,500 proud Zionists, philanthropists and people who love Israel attended Jewish National Fund-USA’s (JNF-USA) National Conference in Boston last month. 

“The excitement, the buzz, the celebration of being together—it was really something special!” JNF-USA National Communications Manager Jennifer Milton told the Journal. 

The multiday gathering, held from Nov. 4-6, included unbelievable performances by members of JNF-USA’s Special in Uniform Band, which is supported by the group’s Arts and Entertainment Task Force. Local philanthropist Civia Caroline founded the JNF-USA Arts and Entertainment Task Force. 

JNF-USA Greater Los Angeles philanthropists; the JNF-USA Arts and Entertainment Task Force; and members of the Special in Uniform Band. Photo courtesy of JNF-USA

Additionally, Alyse Golden Berkley, one of JNF-USA’s major supporters from Los Angeles, received the organization’s highest honor. She was awarded with the JNF-USA President’s Award.

Attendees included JNF-USA’s President Sol Lizerbram; JNF-USA Greater Los Angeles Board Member Sara Cannon; and Israel’s Ambassador to the U.S. Michael Herzog. 

“The conference was a combination of intense learning about our impact in Israel, meeting and reuniting with our JNF-USA family from around the country, learning what other regions are doing, and having so much fun,” Cannon, the regional JNF-USA Women for Israel chair, said.

The organization’s annual conference brings together high school students, college students, rabbinical students, leading philanthropists, prominent Zionist thought leaders and Israelis from the Negev and Galilee who are directly and positively impacted by the partnership of Jewish National Fund-USA. 


More than 120 Sinai Akiba Academy community members came together for an event organized as part of the Shabbos Project’s Worldwide Challah Bake. Courtesy of Sinai Akiba Academy

On Nov. 10, in celebration of the Shabbos Project’s Worldwide Challah Bake initiative, over 120 Sinai Akiba Academy (SAA) community members came together for the first in-person, community-wide Challah Bake in three years. Led by SAA math teacher Heather Lipman, the SAA community mixed and braided bread together, in preparation for Shabbat.

When registration went live in September, the event sold out in less than three hours, and was a highlight of the school year thus far. SAA gave special thanks to the tireless event committee, led by Co-Chairs Shelly Shapiro and Sindy Paikal; the Sinai Akiba Community Builders and Parent Association leadership; Sinai Temple Rabbi Nicole Guzik for kicking off the evening, and to the hero of the baking process, Lipman, who ensured the challot were moist, fluffy, and ready for Shabbat. 

“More than anything, it was so wonderful to be together!” SAA leadership said.


From left: Jewish Journal Publisher David Suissa and “Sephardic Spice Girls” Sharon Gomperts and Rachel Sheff. Courtesy of Sephardic Educational Center
The opening night gala of the Sephardic Film Festival presented Nira Sayegh (center) with the Maimonides Leadership Award. She is joined by attorney Neil Sheff (left) and Sephardic Educational Center Director Rabbi Daniel Bouskila. Courtesy of the Sephardic Educational Center

The Sephardic Educational Center kicked off its 15th annual Sephardic Film Festival with a celebratory opening night gala at Paramount Studios.

The Nov. 13 program featured a buffet dinner, silent auction award ceremony and feature film screening followed by screenings the entire week at the Music Hall Theater in Beverly Hills.

The film festival highlights Sephardic communities and their experiences from Iraq to India, from Morocco to Bulgaria, to Rhodes and more.

JNF-USA Conference, Sephardic Film Fest, Sinai Akiba Challah Bake Read More »