For a people with an earned reputation for academic excellence and street seichel, Jews nowadays are establishing an entirely different tribal stereotype: a people chock-full of morons; a confederacy of Jewish stupidity.
Perhaps wisdom is still there, but it’s being misdirected, aimed not at moral clarity but superficial cachet; self-directed not toward noble deeds and Nobel Prizes but social acceptance and abject surrender.
Either way, it’s not a good look and can lead to disastrous consequences. Vocal self-hating outliers are serving as unofficial spokesmen, aiding and abetting in the resurrection of pernicious Jewish stereotypes—all for their own narcissistic benefit.
Have they learned absolutely nothing from the entirety of Jewish history: pariah status everywhere, first to be expelled, massacred in every epoch?
Let’s start with the most mindboggling doozy of all—the words of a Jewish Democratic state attorney general demonstrating what tikkun olam looks like on crack!
Dana Nessel was addressing Michigan’s Democratic Jewish Caucus, where she was being honored for choosing not to attend the state’s Democratic Convention because she knew she would be pelted by antisemites—from her own party! So, she proved her moral mettle by invoking Queen Esther of Persia: “We have a moral imperative to place the needs of the world above even our own self-interest and, yes, even our own survival.”
What did she say? Yes, you heard right: A Jewish elected official took the stage at a room full of Jews and told them to sacrifice themselves for the greater good of the people who despise them.
She urged Michigan’s Jews to “sacrifice the comfort, safety and security and even the very future of our own people in exchange for the opportunity to save the rest of humanity. . .. What good is defending the historic homeland of our ancestors and demanding that candidates acknowledge its right to exist if the planet upon which it rests is no longer inhabitable?”
Finally, she patronized Jewish Democrats by telling them that Republicans are “focused on transgender girls playing JV volleyball” and not on the important stuff, like “wealth inequality and artificial intelligence.”
Where to begin with this bonehead? First, Queen Esther is most certainly not your inspiration if you believe she was prepared to silence herself and accept the sacrifice of the Jewish people. That’s what Jewish Democrats have been doing for years now. But it was not the modus operandi of the Jewish Queen of Persia, who took great risks to persuade the king to spare her people and punish their enemy, instead.
The Persian Queen chose her people over her self-interest and didn’t ask them to embrace collective suicide. Send Nessel back to Hebrew School and keep her out of public office.
Send Nessel back to Hebrew School and keep her out of public office.
She is a tragic example of Reform Judaism’s obsession with social justice over Jewish survival. She has breathlessly adopted the New Testament’s tribal workout of “turning the other cheek,” rhetorically asking: “What would Jesus—the original revisionist Jew—do?”
We’ve been here many times before. During the Enlightenment, Jews were emancipated on the condition that they trade in their Jewish particularity for full European integration. The Dreyfus Affair and the Holocaust eventually put the lie to those illusory guarantees. During the Stalinist days of the Soviet Union, Jews were told that if there was any hope of ushering in a worldly utopia, they must ignore the antisemitic purges, erase all tribal commitments, and march in solidarity with the proletariat.
Now Jewish political leaders are reciting the very same suicidal script! Which people, exactly, do Sanders, Schumer, Schiff, Slotkin, Ossoff and Raskin belong to? Surely not the Jewish people.
In Nessel’s case, she was apparently riding sidecar beside the number one ranked Jew-hater in all of Michigan—Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed. He addressed the Jewish Caucus, too, apologizing for an unforgivable snafu earlier in the campaign when he minimized, and justified, an Islamist attack at Temple Israel in West Bloomfield Township, by stating: “Hurt people hurt people.” The assailant, apparently, was related to Hezbollah commanders who the IDF had just killed.
El-Sayed addressed Jewish Michiganers by lamenting, “To anyone who feels like my comments might have been hurtful, I’m really sorry.”
That’s not an apology. El-Sayed blamed Jews for being overly sensitive, as if he was merely delivering the right message but innocently, at the wrong moment. Yet another example of one of today’s widely accepted slippery tactics in passing the buck: insert “context” to override the content of what was actually said.
El-Sayed then crossed the line into extreme Jewish pandering: declaring the “value of tikkun olam, to repair the world.”
Give me a break. Say what you actually mean, El-Sayed: “To ‘repair the world,’ bring on the next Caliphate!”
The flippancy with words these days is truly atrocious. There is no shame in self-deception if it serves to manipulate the unwary. Taking advantage of public ignorance, Islamists invoke tikkun olam. “Scholars” misapply “genocide” to describe “casualties of war” in asymmetric warzones where terrorists deploy children as shields. The LGBTQ community proudly marches to “Queers for Palestine.” Feminists wear hijabs. Progressives ceaselessly make reference to a mythical Palestine as if such a nation had ever once existed.
The flippancy with words these days is truly atrocious. There is no shame in self-deception if it serves to manipulate the unwary. Taking advantage of public ignorance, Islamists invoke tikkun olam.
And my new favorite: Self-hating, nominally affiliated Jews condemning the Jewish state, and global Jewry, by foreshadowing their false accusations with the preamble, “Speaking as a Jew, . . .”
Under whose authority are they speaking? Have they ever been to Israel? Have they, or anyone they know, ever been victims of murderous antisemitism? Have they read widely and traveled broadly to Jewish communities in distress?
The “speaking as a Jew” Jews should not be speaking for anyone—especially not their people. They are not authorized spokespersons. The task was never delegated to them. They would be the last to be chosen. Their self-absorbed narcissism is dangerous to Jews and should be of no interest to any sensitive, rational, clear-thinking person.
It’s time for real Jews to drown out the treachery of those taking liberties without true entitlements. And repeat after me:
“As a Jew, Israel, like every other nation, has the right to protect its people from indiscriminate rocket fire and beheadings, its girls from mass rapes, its infants from being torched in ovens, and its elderly from being taken hostage. In fighting wars it does not initiate, Israel should be expected to defend itself with all military means available, especially when its methods do not violate the laws of armed combat and are not disproportionate under international humanitarian law. The words ‘genocide,’ ‘mass starvation,’ and ‘human rights violations’ apply to its enemies, and not to the Jewish state.”
Say that, and you’ll be speaking, undeniably, as a Jew.
Thane Rosenbaum is a novelist, essayist, law professor and Distinguished University Professor at Touro University, where he directs the Forum on Life, Culture & Society. He is a contributing writer for White Rose magazine. His most recent book is titled, “Beyond Proportionality: Israel’s Just War in Gaza.”
‘As a Jew’ Jews—Shut Up!
Thane Rosenbaum
For a people with an earned reputation for academic excellence and street seichel, Jews nowadays are establishing an entirely different tribal stereotype: a people chock-full of morons; a confederacy of Jewish stupidity.
Perhaps wisdom is still there, but it’s being misdirected, aimed not at moral clarity but superficial cachet; self-directed not toward noble deeds and Nobel Prizes but social acceptance and abject surrender.
Either way, it’s not a good look and can lead to disastrous consequences. Vocal self-hating outliers are serving as unofficial spokesmen, aiding and abetting in the resurrection of pernicious Jewish stereotypes—all for their own narcissistic benefit.
Have they learned absolutely nothing from the entirety of Jewish history: pariah status everywhere, first to be expelled, massacred in every epoch?
Let’s start with the most mindboggling doozy of all—the words of a Jewish Democratic state attorney general demonstrating what tikkun olam looks like on crack!
Dana Nessel was addressing Michigan’s Democratic Jewish Caucus, where she was being honored for choosing not to attend the state’s Democratic Convention because she knew she would be pelted by antisemites—from her own party! So, she proved her moral mettle by invoking Queen Esther of Persia: “We have a moral imperative to place the needs of the world above even our own self-interest and, yes, even our own survival.”
What did she say? Yes, you heard right: A Jewish elected official took the stage at a room full of Jews and told them to sacrifice themselves for the greater good of the people who despise them.
She urged Michigan’s Jews to “sacrifice the comfort, safety and security and even the very future of our own people in exchange for the opportunity to save the rest of humanity. . .. What good is defending the historic homeland of our ancestors and demanding that candidates acknowledge its right to exist if the planet upon which it rests is no longer inhabitable?”
Finally, she patronized Jewish Democrats by telling them that Republicans are “focused on transgender girls playing JV volleyball” and not on the important stuff, like “wealth inequality and artificial intelligence.”
Where to begin with this bonehead? First, Queen Esther is most certainly not your inspiration if you believe she was prepared to silence herself and accept the sacrifice of the Jewish people. That’s what Jewish Democrats have been doing for years now. But it was not the modus operandi of the Jewish Queen of Persia, who took great risks to persuade the king to spare her people and punish their enemy, instead.
The Persian Queen chose her people over her self-interest and didn’t ask them to embrace collective suicide. Send Nessel back to Hebrew School and keep her out of public office.
She is a tragic example of Reform Judaism’s obsession with social justice over Jewish survival. She has breathlessly adopted the New Testament’s tribal workout of “turning the other cheek,” rhetorically asking: “What would Jesus—the original revisionist Jew—do?”
We’ve been here many times before. During the Enlightenment, Jews were emancipated on the condition that they trade in their Jewish particularity for full European integration. The Dreyfus Affair and the Holocaust eventually put the lie to those illusory guarantees. During the Stalinist days of the Soviet Union, Jews were told that if there was any hope of ushering in a worldly utopia, they must ignore the antisemitic purges, erase all tribal commitments, and march in solidarity with the proletariat.
Now Jewish political leaders are reciting the very same suicidal script! Which people, exactly, do Sanders, Schumer, Schiff, Slotkin, Ossoff and Raskin belong to? Surely not the Jewish people.
In Nessel’s case, she was apparently riding sidecar beside the number one ranked Jew-hater in all of Michigan—Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed. He addressed the Jewish Caucus, too, apologizing for an unforgivable snafu earlier in the campaign when he minimized, and justified, an Islamist attack at Temple Israel in West Bloomfield Township, by stating: “Hurt people hurt people.” The assailant, apparently, was related to Hezbollah commanders who the IDF had just killed.
El-Sayed addressed Jewish Michiganers by lamenting, “To anyone who feels like my comments might have been hurtful, I’m really sorry.”
That’s not an apology. El-Sayed blamed Jews for being overly sensitive, as if he was merely delivering the right message but innocently, at the wrong moment. Yet another example of one of today’s widely accepted slippery tactics in passing the buck: insert “context” to override the content of what was actually said.
El-Sayed then crossed the line into extreme Jewish pandering: declaring the “value of tikkun olam, to repair the world.”
Give me a break. Say what you actually mean, El-Sayed: “To ‘repair the world,’ bring on the next Caliphate!”
The flippancy with words these days is truly atrocious. There is no shame in self-deception if it serves to manipulate the unwary. Taking advantage of public ignorance, Islamists invoke tikkun olam. “Scholars” misapply “genocide” to describe “casualties of war” in asymmetric warzones where terrorists deploy children as shields. The LGBTQ community proudly marches to “Queers for Palestine.” Feminists wear hijabs. Progressives ceaselessly make reference to a mythical Palestine as if such a nation had ever once existed.
And my new favorite: Self-hating, nominally affiliated Jews condemning the Jewish state, and global Jewry, by foreshadowing their false accusations with the preamble, “Speaking as a Jew, . . .”
Under whose authority are they speaking? Have they ever been to Israel? Have they, or anyone they know, ever been victims of murderous antisemitism? Have they read widely and traveled broadly to Jewish communities in distress?
The “speaking as a Jew” Jews should not be speaking for anyone—especially not their people. They are not authorized spokespersons. The task was never delegated to them. They would be the last to be chosen. Their self-absorbed narcissism is dangerous to Jews and should be of no interest to any sensitive, rational, clear-thinking person.
It’s time for real Jews to drown out the treachery of those taking liberties without true entitlements. And repeat after me:
“As a Jew, Israel, like every other nation, has the right to protect its people from indiscriminate rocket fire and beheadings, its girls from mass rapes, its infants from being torched in ovens, and its elderly from being taken hostage. In fighting wars it does not initiate, Israel should be expected to defend itself with all military means available, especially when its methods do not violate the laws of armed combat and are not disproportionate under international humanitarian law. The words ‘genocide,’ ‘mass starvation,’ and ‘human rights violations’ apply to its enemies, and not to the Jewish state.”
Say that, and you’ll be speaking, undeniably, as a Jew.
Thane Rosenbaum is a novelist, essayist, law professor and Distinguished University Professor at Touro University, where he directs the Forum on Life, Culture & Society. He is a contributing writer for White Rose magazine. His most recent book is titled, “Beyond Proportionality: Israel’s Just War in Gaza.”
Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.
Editor's Picks
Israel and the Internet Wars – A Professional Social Media Review
The Invisible Student: A Tale of Homelessness at UCLA and USC
What Ever Happened to the LA Times?
Who Are the Jews On Joe Biden’s Cabinet?
You’re Not a Bad Jewish Mom If Your Kid Wants Santa Claus to Come to Your House
No Labels: The Group Fighting for the Political Center
Latest Articles
AJU Reopens Ziegler School Admissions, Seeks to Reimagine Rabbinic Education
Show Us How It’s Done – A poem for Parsha Lech Lecha
Weinberg: The Secret German Life of a Jewish Last Name
The Anti-Zionist Agenda at the Heart of UC Ethnic Studies
The Beauty of the Slow and Steady
Ziegler School Welcomes Prominent Rabbi, O.C. Federation Names CEO, Pico-Robertson Cleanup
A Moment in Time: Beyond the Chuppah
A Bisl Torah ~ The Company You Keep
Does the company we keep enable our name to be a blessing? Are we doing enough to make our name as great as God intends?
Because We Can
Print Issue: The View From Israel | October 23, 2026
Three years after Oct. 7, a country trying to heal is still waiting for a full accounting of what went wrong.
Rabbis of LA | Rabbi Taff’s Daughter Follows Her Father’s Footsteps
Second of two parts
‘The Nuremberg Women’: The Untold Stories of Eight Women Who Witnessed History
“These women were pivotal to both the process and the outcome of the trial. Yet they were marginalized on many occasions, literally reduced to footnotes.“
A Very Jewish Stew: Toscano Hamin
This Hamin Toscano recipe reminded us of a Tuscan wedding soup.
Table for Five: Lech Lecha
Shield Of Abraham
The View from Israel
Three years after Oct. 7, Israel is still waiting for a full accounting of what went wrong.
Albie Selznick’s Unlikely Connection to David Bowie Inspires New Solo Show
Selznick saw his idol David Bowie perform live when he was 15 and made up his mind that he wanted to create a show of his own and work with Bowie.
Is the New Facebook Film Equal to the Original?
“The Social Reckoning” isn’t about a power struggle, but shows that powerful companies are reluctant to change unless there is pain.
Larry David Is Spot-on in His Satire of the DSA
In his article about his proposals for the Democratic Socialists of America, he jokes that “The DSA has great respect for religious traditions.”
Remember and Be Grateful
Memory is the mother of gratitude. If we do not remember our past, it is difficult to improve our present or build a better future.
Michael Broukhim’s Journey to a Deeper Judaism
What began as a personal exploration of Judaism eventually became intertwined with Broukhim’s professional life.
Rosner’s Domain | No Surprise Is Also an Election Surprise
It’s worth paying attention to what is – or isn’t – happening to our “large” parties. They are quite small, or at least that’s how they appear in the polls even as Election Day draws near.
Lech Lecha: The Journey of Growth and the Process of Becoming
We need not know where every decision will lead before taking the first step. Sometimes acting upon our deepest convictions is itself the beginning of wisdom.
From Atop the Pulpit
New opportunities and challenges have always come and gone. But pulpit clergy with their years of training, education and perspective on life, generated from atop the pulpit, are especially well suited for whatever lies ahead.
Abraham’s Lessons in Leadership on the Eve of Israel’s Elections
Anyone who votes, or leads, would be wise to study the story of Abraham and David.
A Different Kind of Tower
The Tower of Babel reminds us how easily language can divide us. Our shared history reminds us of what becomes possible when we find ways to understand one another.
Paris on Fire, America on Edge and the Generation of the Flood
What is especially troubling to me is that at many of these protests in France you will find signs reading “Intifada Revolution” and “From the River to the Sea, Palestine Will Be Arab,” along with ubiquitous Palestinian flags, and Hamas flags too.
More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.