For many, for the first time in decades, peace in the Middle East feels possible.
The Trump-brokered 20-point framework—now accepted by Hamas under U.S. and Israeli pressure—offers a ceasefire, the release of hostages, and a new political reality in Gaza.
But its success won’t depend only on diplomacy or reconstruction. It will depend on whether the web of lies that has fueled this conflict for generations—the lie that recasts Zionism as the world’s great evil—can finally be dismantled.
If that lie remains, the “peace” now in sight will be little more than a pause between wars.
The Oldest Trick in the Autocrat’s Book
From Caracas to Moscow, Havana to Tehran, dictators and demagogues have long invoked a familiar villain: Zionism. Their fixation has never truly been about Israel or Jews—it has always been about power and fear.
In the modern autocrat’s playbook, anti-Zionism isn’t an ideology but a tactic: a way to unify factions, redirect rage, and disguise failure under the pretense of “solidarity.” It works for the same reason antisemitism has for centuries—it makes hate sound righteous.
For generations, antisemitism served as a pressure valve for rulers. When societies were buckling under corruption or defeat, Jews were blamed—accused of being both powerless and omnipotent. The genius of the lie was its flexibility: it explained everything, demanded no proof, and absolved those in power.
After the Holocaust, open antisemitism became taboo in much of the world. But the instinct to offload guilt onto a Jewish abstraction survived. It simply changed names. The new vessel was Zionism.
Moscow’s Manipulation
This transformation was engineered.
In the 1960s and 70s, the Soviet Union helped to repackage classical antisemitism into a political ideology disguised as “anti-Zionism.” Seeking to weaken both the West and the young democratic State of Israel—a refuge for Jews fleeing oppression—Moscow turned old conspiracy myths into Cold War propaganda.
Through KGB-backed disinformation, Zionism was portrayed as an imperialist cabal, a tool of American domination, even a moral twin of Nazism. Soviet agents and their allies exported this poison through the Non-Aligned Movement and sympathetic media across Africa, Asia, and Latin America.
That campaign gave autocrats everywhere a gift: permission to revive antisemitic myths under the halo of “justice.” The vocabulary changed; the function did not.
Projection for Power
Projection is the lifeblood of authoritarianism. Dictators need binaries—pure and corrupt, oppressed and oppressor—to preserve control. The easiest way to sustain that illusion is to invent a villain.
In Latin America, where corruption and inflation hollow many economies, “Zionism” is invoked as shorthand for foreign manipulation—a scapegoat for homegrown decay. In parts of Africa, strongmen rail against “Zionist imperialism” to pose as anti-colonial heroes while silencing dissent.
Autocrats in Russia and China, though often pragmatic with Israel, use similar propaganda about “Zionist infiltration” and “Western plots.” Across the Arab world, anti-Zionism has become ritual—a moral performance that excuses tyranny. Under the banner of “resistance,” regimes justify oppression and failure.
The Present Moment — and the Challenge of Truth
Now, at a moment of fragile hope, these old lies face their first real test in decades.
The ceasefire and Trump’s 20-point peace plan could finally end Hamas’s rule in Gaza and begin a new chapter for Israelis and Palestinian Arabs alike. But peace will endure only if the ideological machinery that fueled the violence for decades is dismantled.
The ceasefire and Trump’s 20-point peace plan could finally end Hamas’s rule in Gaza and begin a new chapter for Israelis and Palestinian Arabs alike. But peace will endure only if the ideological machinery that fueled the violence for decades is dismantled.
From Tehran to Ramallah, generations have been taught that “Zionism”—and by extension, Jews—are the source of their misery. This Soviet-aided myth, fused with radical Islamist dogma, has created a worldview where hatred feels moral and peace feels like betrayal—as seen among demonstrators who once demanded a “ceasefire” but now chant for Israel’s destruction.
If that mindset survives, no peace will. The greatest obstacle to the region’s future is not the absence of negotiation but the persistence of a narrative that paints Jewish self-determination as original sin.
If “Zionism” remains a scapegoat, reconciliation will remain out of reach.
The Mirror They Fear
When tyrants rail against Zionism, what they see in Israel is not oppression but a reflection of what they most fear.
Israel’s story is not one of conquest, but of return.
Not of tyranny, but of freedom.
Not of empire, but of endurance.
It is the only nation in the Middle East where dissent thrives and power changes hands by election, not by coup or decree—and that is precisely what despots hate.
Dictators project their own corruption onto the Jewish state because Israel’s existence exposes everything they are not: accountable, creative, self-critical, vibrantly free.
They don’t seek to shatter the mirror of Zionism—they seek to stain it. By defaming the belief that Jews, like all peoples, have the right to self-determination, they preserve their power while keeping their people shackled to hate and ignorance.
What Comes Next
With Hamas forced to relinquish power and the hostages finally coming home, the next test begins: whether Palestinian society—and the Arab world more broadly—will confront the indoctrination that turned antisemitism into virtue.
If peace is to last, Palestinian leaders must replace a dominant culture of hate with the ethic of coexistence. They must teach that Jews are not interlopers from the “river to the sea,” but an indigenous people whose return fulfilled history, not theft and who aren’t going anywhere.
Only when that truth is spoken—not whispered—can peace take root.
This moment, tenuous but historic, is the best chance in decades for a Middle East free from Hamas’s tyranny and the ideological poison from Hamas’s ideological predecessors that sustained rejection of Jewish sovereignty long before Hamas existed.
Whether it endures depends less on ceasefires than on courage—the courage to end the lies that have murdered peace for generations.
Because peace built on truth is difficult—but it’s the kind that lasts.
Micha Danzig served in the Israeli Army and is a former police officer with the NYPD. He is currently an attorney and is very active with numerous Jewish and pro-Israel organizations, including Stand With Us and the FIDF, and is a national board member of Herut North America.
For Peace, End the Anti-Zionism Lie
Micha Danzig
For many, for the first time in decades, peace in the Middle East feels possible.
The Trump-brokered 20-point framework—now accepted by Hamas under U.S. and Israeli pressure—offers a ceasefire, the release of hostages, and a new political reality in Gaza.
But its success won’t depend only on diplomacy or reconstruction. It will depend on whether the web of lies that has fueled this conflict for generations—the lie that recasts Zionism as the world’s great evil—can finally be dismantled.
If that lie remains, the “peace” now in sight will be little more than a pause between wars.
The Oldest Trick in the Autocrat’s Book
From Caracas to Moscow, Havana to Tehran, dictators and demagogues have long invoked a familiar villain: Zionism. Their fixation has never truly been about Israel or Jews—it has always been about power and fear.
In the modern autocrat’s playbook, anti-Zionism isn’t an ideology but a tactic: a way to unify factions, redirect rage, and disguise failure under the pretense of “solidarity.” It works for the same reason antisemitism has for centuries—it makes hate sound righteous.
For generations, antisemitism served as a pressure valve for rulers. When societies were buckling under corruption or defeat, Jews were blamed—accused of being both powerless and omnipotent. The genius of the lie was its flexibility: it explained everything, demanded no proof, and absolved those in power.
After the Holocaust, open antisemitism became taboo in much of the world. But the instinct to offload guilt onto a Jewish abstraction survived. It simply changed names. The new vessel was Zionism.
Moscow’s Manipulation
This transformation was engineered.
In the 1960s and 70s, the Soviet Union helped to repackage classical antisemitism into a political ideology disguised as “anti-Zionism.” Seeking to weaken both the West and the young democratic State of Israel—a refuge for Jews fleeing oppression—Moscow turned old conspiracy myths into Cold War propaganda.
Through KGB-backed disinformation, Zionism was portrayed as an imperialist cabal, a tool of American domination, even a moral twin of Nazism. Soviet agents and their allies exported this poison through the Non-Aligned Movement and sympathetic media across Africa, Asia, and Latin America.
That campaign gave autocrats everywhere a gift: permission to revive antisemitic myths under the halo of “justice.” The vocabulary changed; the function did not.
Projection for Power
Projection is the lifeblood of authoritarianism. Dictators need binaries—pure and corrupt, oppressed and oppressor—to preserve control. The easiest way to sustain that illusion is to invent a villain.
In Latin America, where corruption and inflation hollow many economies, “Zionism” is invoked as shorthand for foreign manipulation—a scapegoat for homegrown decay. In parts of Africa, strongmen rail against “Zionist imperialism” to pose as anti-colonial heroes while silencing dissent.
Autocrats in Russia and China, though often pragmatic with Israel, use similar propaganda about “Zionist infiltration” and “Western plots.” Across the Arab world, anti-Zionism has become ritual—a moral performance that excuses tyranny. Under the banner of “resistance,” regimes justify oppression and failure.
The Present Moment — and the Challenge of Truth
Now, at a moment of fragile hope, these old lies face their first real test in decades.
The ceasefire and Trump’s 20-point peace plan could finally end Hamas’s rule in Gaza and begin a new chapter for Israelis and Palestinian Arabs alike. But peace will endure only if the ideological machinery that fueled the violence for decades is dismantled.
From Tehran to Ramallah, generations have been taught that “Zionism”—and by extension, Jews—are the source of their misery. This Soviet-aided myth, fused with radical Islamist dogma, has created a worldview where hatred feels moral and peace feels like betrayal—as seen among demonstrators who once demanded a “ceasefire” but now chant for Israel’s destruction.
If that mindset survives, no peace will. The greatest obstacle to the region’s future is not the absence of negotiation but the persistence of a narrative that paints Jewish self-determination as original sin.
If “Zionism” remains a scapegoat, reconciliation will remain out of reach.
The Mirror They Fear
When tyrants rail against Zionism, what they see in Israel is not oppression but a reflection of what they most fear.
Israel’s story is not one of conquest, but of return.
Not of tyranny, but of freedom.
Not of empire, but of endurance.
It is the only nation in the Middle East where dissent thrives and power changes hands by election, not by coup or decree—and that is precisely what despots hate.
Dictators project their own corruption onto the Jewish state because Israel’s existence exposes everything they are not: accountable, creative, self-critical, vibrantly free.
They don’t seek to shatter the mirror of Zionism—they seek to stain it. By defaming the belief that Jews, like all peoples, have the right to self-determination, they preserve their power while keeping their people shackled to hate and ignorance.
What Comes Next
With Hamas forced to relinquish power and the hostages finally coming home, the next test begins: whether Palestinian society—and the Arab world more broadly—will confront the indoctrination that turned antisemitism into virtue.
If peace is to last, Palestinian leaders must replace a dominant culture of hate with the ethic of coexistence. They must teach that Jews are not interlopers from the “river to the sea,” but an indigenous people whose return fulfilled history, not theft and who aren’t going anywhere.
Only when that truth is spoken—not whispered—can peace take root.
This moment, tenuous but historic, is the best chance in decades for a Middle East free from Hamas’s tyranny and the ideological poison from Hamas’s ideological predecessors that sustained rejection of Jewish sovereignty long before Hamas existed.
Whether it endures depends less on ceasefires than on courage—the courage to end the lies that have murdered peace for generations.
Because peace built on truth is difficult—but it’s the kind that lasts.
Micha Danzig served in the Israeli Army and is a former police officer with the NYPD. He is currently an attorney and is very active with numerous Jewish and pro-Israel organizations, including Stand With Us and the FIDF, and is a national board member of Herut North America.
Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.
Editor's Picks
Israel and the Internet Wars – A Professional Social Media Review
The Invisible Student: A Tale of Homelessness at UCLA and USC
What Ever Happened to the LA Times?
Who Are the Jews On Joe Biden’s Cabinet?
You’re Not a Bad Jewish Mom If Your Kid Wants Santa Claus to Come to Your House
No Labels: The Group Fighting for the Political Center
Latest Articles
A Bisl Torah ~ Are You Paying Attention?
A Moment in Time: The Israeli Election – Counting Votes, Building Bridges
Rabbis of LA | Rabbi Rembaum on Life Without Fredi
‘You Can See Everything’: Holmes on the Range
Ruby Red Beet Kubbah
A Jewish Victory
Trusting G-d’s Plan ft. Elaine Chaya
Zion Ozeri’s Photographs Reveal the Many Faces of Jewish Identity
His photographs portray Jews shaped by different cultures, histories and traditions while revealing the connections that unite them.
Milken School Opens Jan Koum Campus in Bel Air
The site is now home to Milken’s Upper School, serving students in grades 9 through 12, and expands the school’s footprint across its three campuses to 28 acres.
For Teens, Israel Travel Is Not the End Goal. Jewish Peoplehood Is.
A well-designed Israel experience cannot resolve every question. But it can give young people context, relationships, language, and a sense that they belong to a people and a story larger than themselves.
El-Sayed, Mélenchon, and the Future They Portend
Some have accused me of anti-Muslim bias. Let me answer that plainly: I have none. My issues with El-Sayed would be the same whether he were Jewish, Christian, Hindu or Baha’i.
Unbreakable Blue Thread: Reclaiming Our Past and Our Future
I write to you, all you first and second generations, and I assure you from generations five, six and seven that if we keep doing what we need to do, if we stand together, keep our traditions, educate ourselves in our ancient wisdom, keep Hebrew spoken and sung in our midst, we will not only endure. We Jews will thrive.
Unstuck in the Middle with You
Kwall, the Raymond P. Niro Law Professor at DePaul University College of Law, argues for a center defined by enough common commitments to make communal life possible.
Sewage Without Borders
Israel’s water security depends on what flows into the sea on the other side of all of them, and our water policy should start from that reality.
Torah Portion: Vayera
The parsha ends with the binding of Isaac, the Akeida, probably the darkest chapter in the entire Torah.
Gene Lichtenstein, August 15, 1930-October 18, 2026
Mr. Lichtenstein edited the Jewish Journal of Los Angeles from 1986 until 2000.
Let Them Talk
If we want our younger generations to love our faith, our culture, and our peoplehood, we need to be welcoming when they show interest and have a spark of curiosity.
A Wild and Improbable Story Hits Israel
It turns out that claim about Israel being a democracy wasn’t just propaganda. The two million Arabs who live in the world’s only Jewish state really do have the power to vote.
Why I Came to Vote in Israel
My journey to the ballot box was circuitous. The path I hope Israel will follow is derech Adonai: the way of righteousness and justice.
Bibi’s Battle
Overall, the anti-Netanyahu bloc is projected to win 53 seats, while the Netanyahu-led right-wing religious bloc is projected to win 50. Both are expected to fall well short of a 61-seat majority.
Bibi and Gadi
Let’s consider how Netanyahu and Eisenkot would govern differently given their many similarities on international and security matters.
Riots in France, Balagan in Israel
Suddenly, after years of lecturing Israel about being “too violent,” Macron was calling in his army to deal with out-of-control rioters, declaring that “those who sought to bring down the Republic will be held accountable.”
California Governor Election Preview: Xavier Becerra vs. Steve Hilton
Up (and Down) In Michigan
A report on the Jewish nostalgia for a political home in the lead up to Michigan’s elections.
Highest Turnout Ever Recorded in Israel as Ballots Are Cast to Decide Netanyahu’s Fate
The first parliamentary election since Oct. 7, 2023, pits Benjamin Netanyahu’s coalition against Gadi Eisenkot’s ideologically diverse opposition, with neither bloc expected to secure a governing majority.
Can a Day of Political War Be a Day of Sacred Prayer?
Sleep-deprived and anxious, I called my friend Yossi Klein Halevi in Jerusalem in the hope that it might bring some relief to my nervous system.
More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.