In recent days, President Biden has twice publicly cautioned Israel to observe “the rules of war” when it strikes back at Hamas terrorists. He appeared to be referring to the importance of avoiding civilian casualties in Gaza. But exactly how far does he expect Israel to go in limiting its actions because of the presence of civilians?
The president’s description of Hamas as “pure, unadulterated evil” places the current conflict squarely in the category of a good-versus-evil conflict, like World War II. With regard to civilian casualties, the position of the United States and its allies in World War II was that civilian deaths were an unfortunate but inevitable consequence of their war of self-defense. Israel’s approach to the issue is similar.
Beginning in March 1944, the Americans and British carried out extensive attacks on railways across France, Belgium, and western Germany in advance of the June 6 D-Day landings. The breadth of the air strikes made it inevitable that there would be some civilian casualties; they averaged about 100 per bombing.
On May 7, British Prime Minister Winston Churchill told President Franklin D. Roosevelt he was concerned about “the number of Frenchmen killed in the raids on the railway centers in France.” Churchill estimated that the total number of French civilian deaths in the operation would reach 10,000, in addition to tens of thousands of injured. The British leader asked FDR to “consider the matter from the highest political standpoint,” because his war cabinet was unanimously convinced that continuing the bombings would “leave a legacy of hate” toward the Allies among the French populace.
Roosevelt responded: “However regrettable the attendant loss of civilian lives, I am not prepared to impose from this distance any restriction on military action by the responsible commanders that in their opinion might militate against the success of [the upcoming D-Day landings] or cause additional loss of life to our Allied Forces of invasion.”
On October 31, 1944, British planes targeted the Gestapo’s Danish headquarters, on the campus of the University of Aarhus. The target was situated in the dormitory buildings, which were flanked by civilian hospitals on both sides. Nonetheless, the raid proceeded in broad daylight, because it was militarily advantageous to do so. Most of the bombs hit their mark but several stray bombs hit another campus building which was under construction, killing ten workers. Likewise, a British bombing raid on Gestapo headquarters in Copenhagen the following year destroyed the building, but some bombs accidentally hit a nearby school, killing an estimated 125 civilians.
The U.S. carried out bombing strikes on German oil factories in and around Auschwitz during daylight hours, when military planners had every reason to believe the factories would be filled with Jewish slave laborers. Civilian casualties were inevitable but the administration felt that harm to the Jewish prisoners was justified in order to achieve America’s war aims. For the same reason, U.S. bombers were sent to strike the V-2 rocket factory in the Buchenwald concentration camp in broad daylight, when it could be assumed that Jewish prisoners would be in the factory. Nearly 400 of them were killed in the bombing.
Not only was the Roosevelt administration willing to risk killing Jewish civilians in order to strike those military targets—it even was willing to endanger the lives of Allied POWs. About 1,400 British servicemen were imprisoned in Auschwitz beginning in the autumn of 1943, and six hundred remained there as of the summer of 1944, working as slave laborers in the oil factories. The U.S. and British governments were well aware that the POWs were there; in fact, the Red Cross regularly brought them food packages. One of the POWs, Charles Coward, smuggled information to the British government about the mass-murder process that was taking place in the Birkenau section of the camp. But the presence of the POWs did not deter the daylight air strikes on factories where British prisoners might be working. As a result, thirty-eight of the British prisoners were killed, and many others injured, in the American bombing on August 20.
In some instances, the U.S. and its allies went further and undertook deliberate attacks on enemy civilians in order to advance the war effort.
Beginning in February 1942, the British undertook what was known as “area bombing,” which meant attacking civilian areas in order to undermine the German public’s morale. The United States assented to this approach and participated in many of the most famous strikes on civilian targets. The British-American bombing of Hamburg in July 1943 left 40,000 dead, and the attack on Dresden by U.S. and British bombers in February 1945 killed tens of thousands more.
This approach was sometimes employed on the Pacific front as well. The Roosevelt administration’s firebombing of Tokyo in March 1945 caused over 100,000 civilian fatalities. The Truman administration selected two Japanese civilian centers as the targets of its nuclear bombs, leaving approximately 135,000 dead in Hiroshima and 64,000 in Nagasaki.
Israel does not deliberately kill enemy civilians, but one of the principles of its military actions in built-up areas such as Gaza resembles that of the Allies in World War II—that strikes against the enemy must proceed even if there are civilian casualties.
Will President Biden support Israel taking an approach comparable to what the United States did in World War II? Or will he expect Israel to do as he says, not as the U.S. has done? The answer will become apparent soon.
Biden’s ‘Rules of War’? Not in World War II
Rafael Medoff
In recent days, President Biden has twice publicly cautioned Israel to observe “the rules of war” when it strikes back at Hamas terrorists. He appeared to be referring to the importance of avoiding civilian casualties in Gaza. But exactly how far does he expect Israel to go in limiting its actions because of the presence of civilians?
The president’s description of Hamas as “pure, unadulterated evil” places the current conflict squarely in the category of a good-versus-evil conflict, like World War II. With regard to civilian casualties, the position of the United States and its allies in World War II was that civilian deaths were an unfortunate but inevitable consequence of their war of self-defense. Israel’s approach to the issue is similar.
Beginning in March 1944, the Americans and British carried out extensive attacks on railways across France, Belgium, and western Germany in advance of the June 6 D-Day landings. The breadth of the air strikes made it inevitable that there would be some civilian casualties; they averaged about 100 per bombing.
On May 7, British Prime Minister Winston Churchill told President Franklin D. Roosevelt he was concerned about “the number of Frenchmen killed in the raids on the railway centers in France.” Churchill estimated that the total number of French civilian deaths in the operation would reach 10,000, in addition to tens of thousands of injured. The British leader asked FDR to “consider the matter from the highest political standpoint,” because his war cabinet was unanimously convinced that continuing the bombings would “leave a legacy of hate” toward the Allies among the French populace.
Roosevelt responded: “However regrettable the attendant loss of civilian lives, I am not prepared to impose from this distance any restriction on military action by the responsible commanders that in their opinion might militate against the success of [the upcoming D-Day landings] or cause additional loss of life to our Allied Forces of invasion.”
On October 31, 1944, British planes targeted the Gestapo’s Danish headquarters, on the campus of the University of Aarhus. The target was situated in the dormitory buildings, which were flanked by civilian hospitals on both sides. Nonetheless, the raid proceeded in broad daylight, because it was militarily advantageous to do so. Most of the bombs hit their mark but several stray bombs hit another campus building which was under construction, killing ten workers. Likewise, a British bombing raid on Gestapo headquarters in Copenhagen the following year destroyed the building, but some bombs accidentally hit a nearby school, killing an estimated 125 civilians.
The U.S. carried out bombing strikes on German oil factories in and around Auschwitz during daylight hours, when military planners had every reason to believe the factories would be filled with Jewish slave laborers. Civilian casualties were inevitable but the administration felt that harm to the Jewish prisoners was justified in order to achieve America’s war aims. For the same reason, U.S. bombers were sent to strike the V-2 rocket factory in the Buchenwald concentration camp in broad daylight, when it could be assumed that Jewish prisoners would be in the factory. Nearly 400 of them were killed in the bombing.
Not only was the Roosevelt administration willing to risk killing Jewish civilians in order to strike those military targets—it even was willing to endanger the lives of Allied POWs. About 1,400 British servicemen were imprisoned in Auschwitz beginning in the autumn of 1943, and six hundred remained there as of the summer of 1944, working as slave laborers in the oil factories. The U.S. and British governments were well aware that the POWs were there; in fact, the Red Cross regularly brought them food packages. One of the POWs, Charles Coward, smuggled information to the British government about the mass-murder process that was taking place in the Birkenau section of the camp. But the presence of the POWs did not deter the daylight air strikes on factories where British prisoners might be working. As a result, thirty-eight of the British prisoners were killed, and many others injured, in the American bombing on August 20.
In some instances, the U.S. and its allies went further and undertook deliberate attacks on enemy civilians in order to advance the war effort.
Beginning in February 1942, the British undertook what was known as “area bombing,” which meant attacking civilian areas in order to undermine the German public’s morale. The United States assented to this approach and participated in many of the most famous strikes on civilian targets. The British-American bombing of Hamburg in July 1943 left 40,000 dead, and the attack on Dresden by U.S. and British bombers in February 1945 killed tens of thousands more.
This approach was sometimes employed on the Pacific front as well. The Roosevelt administration’s firebombing of Tokyo in March 1945 caused over 100,000 civilian fatalities. The Truman administration selected two Japanese civilian centers as the targets of its nuclear bombs, leaving approximately 135,000 dead in Hiroshima and 64,000 in Nagasaki.
Israel does not deliberately kill enemy civilians, but one of the principles of its military actions in built-up areas such as Gaza resembles that of the Allies in World War II—that strikes against the enemy must proceed even if there are civilian casualties.
Will President Biden support Israel taking an approach comparable to what the United States did in World War II? Or will he expect Israel to do as he says, not as the U.S. has done? The answer will become apparent soon.
Dr. Medoff is founding director of The David S. Wyman Institute for Holocaust Studies and author of more than 20 books about Jewish history and the Holocaust. His latest is America and the Holocaust: A Documentary History, published by the Jewish Publication Society & University of Nebraska Press.
Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.
Editor's Picks
Israel and the Internet Wars – A Professional Social Media Review
The Invisible Student: A Tale of Homelessness at UCLA and USC
What Ever Happened to the LA Times?
Who Are the Jews On Joe Biden’s Cabinet?
You’re Not a Bad Jewish Mom If Your Kid Wants Santa Claus to Come to Your House
No Labels: The Group Fighting for the Political Center
Latest Articles
Three More Southern California Journalism Awards! Celebrating Stories from Antarctica, Ireland, and Inspiring Voices
Two Hundred and Five Years – A poem for Parsha Noach
Pico-Robertson Neighborhood Cleanup 2026 Recap
“I Love Life”: Paralyzed for Nearly Two Years, Dennis Prager Talks Gratitude and Happiness at Miami Gala
Memorial at Saban, Soraka Medical Center Mark Three Years Since Oct. 7; ‘Fauda’ Panel
Vegetarianism and Impossible Utopias
A Bisl Torah — Bar Mitzvah Lessons
Many reflect about children’s additional responsibilities as they take on their new title.
A Moment in Time: October 7 – Beyond Black and White
Thorns and Thistles and Two Trees in the Garden of Eden
Print Issue: Making Jewish Fiction New Again | October 16, 2026
In a climate of anti-Jewish censorship, a new fiction imprint from Wicked Son will play a part in determining the future of Jewish fiction in America.
Rabbis of LA | Rabbi Taff and Aliyah
First of two parts
Michael Douglas Memoir, ‘One Helluva Ride,’ Is a Helluva Read
At 82, Douglas has survived cancer, is married to the love of his life, Catherine Zeta-Jones, has been in iconic films including “Wall Street” and “Basic Instinct” and grew up with the pressure of having a famous father, the legendary actor Kirk Douglas.
A Burst of Inspirational Art in Hadassah
What makes them special, in addition to their ethereal beauty, is that four of the paintings are of women; two others, while abstract, appear to reference the female.
‘We Had a Mission to Tell the World Our Story’: ‘Fauda’ Creator Avi Issacharoff
It is Episodes 7 and 8, which take viewers back to Oct. 7, that have generated some of the strongest reactions from audiences around the world.
Three Years Later: 1-in-5 Israelis Report Severe Mental Health Impairment
PTSD diagnoses among children and adolescents in Israel rose almost 2.5-fold after Oct. 7. Clalit Health Services is reaching out to thousands of patients each week who have not reached out for any mental health treatment.
Jewish Charter Schools Take a Step Forward
The possibility of tuition-free Jewish religious education is moving closer to reality.
Jon Polin Wants Answers, Not Revenge, Three Years After Oct. 7
One day before the three-year anniversary of the Oct. 7th attacks, the father of slain hostage Hersh Goldberg-Polin called for a national commission of inquiry, spoke about what comes next for him and Rachel, and said punishment for Israel’s failures is not what he seeks.
Oct. 7 Survivors Share Stories of Loss, Courage and Resilience
The memorial event was organized by StandWithUs in partnership with the Israeli-American Council (IAC), American Jewish Committee (AJC) Los Angeles, Temple of the Arts, the Consulate General of Israel and The Jewish Journal.
“Seeing Reality Clearly”: Noa Tishby’s Oct. 7 Address
This speech is my honest look at where we are as a Jewish community.
Beit Issie Shapiro Gala Celebrates Resilience, Independence and the Power of Possibility
Among the evening’s highlights was an inspiring address by Israeli Paralympic champion Moran Samuel, 44, whose remarkable journey from tragedy to triumph captivated the audience.
Proposition 37: The California Middle-Class Homeownership Act and the Future of Jewish Community in Los Angeles
Housing costs affect whether younger families can remain near grandparents, educators can live near schools and congregations can sustain participation across generations.
Challahs in the Air — Rainbows Everywhere
Someday, I hope to make this rainbow challah with my granddaughters.
Table for Five: Noach
World Gone Wrong
Making Jewish Fiction New Again
In a climate of anti-Jewish censorship, a new fiction imprint from Wicked Son will play a part in determining the future of Jewish fiction in America.
Rosner’s Domain | Meet Galit: Israel’s Decider
If we are right, this election will be decided by a right-winger who agrees with her government on almost everything, except how hard to push.
Torah Portion: Noah
Here is yet another example of the Torah’s eternal relevance.
More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.