On December 12, Princeton University President Christopher Eisgruber issued a statement referring to “hypothetical calls for the genocide of Jews” and confidently declaring that he has “never heard calls for genocide, or calls for murder, on this campus … If ever there were calls for genocide or calls for murder on this campus,” he said, “this University would respond forcefully under its rules in order to protect [its] values.”
As a Princeton student, I have personally been witness to many calls for genocide on my own campus, calls that my university president appears to deny. During the recent explosion of demonstrations on campus, students chanted “From Princeton to Gaza, globalize the Intifada,” a clear call for violence against Jews on this very campus; “One Solution, Intifada revolution,” ominously — and perhaps intentionally — invoking Hitler’s final solution; and “From the water to the water, Palestine is Arab” in Arabic (Min al-mayye il al-mayye, falastin arabiyye), an explicit directive to entirely rid Israel of its Jews, and perhaps Christians too.
The vociferous calls for genocide on campus must shape how we read Eisgruber’s statement, as it effectively leaves readers with two possible interpretations. Either Eisgruber is genuinely unaware of these incidents or has decided on his own to dismiss the claim that the aforementioned chants are “calls for genocide.” as ‘not serious’.
If the former is the case, then our university president is extremely out of touch with what is happening on his campus — and it is not for lack of notice from the student body. Jewish students have repeatedly turned to members of the administration to discuss these incidents and their impact on Princeton’s Jewish community: Countless campus news articles and op-eds have referenced calls for “intifada” and campus protestors’ assertions that “resistance is justified,” and other rationalizations for the mass murder, rape and kidnappings on Oct. 7 in the name of ‘resistance to colonialism,’ and an open letter, signed by almost 2,000 Princeton alumni, students, faculty and staff, addressed directly to President Eisgruber that expressed concern over Princeton’s lack of response to campus antisemitism.
Since it is virtually impossible that the university administration remains unaware of these clear calls to violence against Jews on campus, the second option presented is the only plausible message being communicated. In other words, calling for genocide would be unacceptable, but nothing that has happened up until this point reaches some arbitrary threshold yet to be articulated by the powers that be. I appreciate that Eisgruber acknowledged that “calling for the genocide or murder of Jews or any group is always wrong and appalling,” but that does not give him and Princeton a pass to misrepresent the campus climate. By reinterpreting and downplaying antisemitic language that promotes violence against Jews on campus, Eisgruber has made it clear that when it comes to protecting Jewish students on campus, the university will turn a blind eye. It is a strategy unthinkable had this type of language been directed at any other identity or group in our university community.
All I ask of Princeton’s leadership is to stand for moral clarity; all I ask is that they ensure that I and my fellow Jewish students are safe on campus. The challenges we confront today extend beyond our immediate moment; today is not just about today — It also shapes the trajectory of our collective future. The current events, with calls for violence against Jews all the while generating indifference on the part of those in authority, recall the harrowing tales of my grandparents, survivors of the Holocaust, in the years leading up to the Second World War. No one seemed to care, no one could be bothered, no one took the threats seriously or could be roused out of their slumber. The bitter consequences of blithely dismissing the ‘hypothetical’ are there for all to see.
Alexandra Orbuch is a Junior at Princeton University studying History. She serves as publisher of the Princeton Tory, the university’s journal for conservative thought.
A Message to Princeton: The Calls for the Genocide of Jews on Your Campus Are Real
Alexandra Orbuch
On December 12, Princeton University President Christopher Eisgruber issued a statement referring to “hypothetical calls for the genocide of Jews” and confidently declaring that he has “never heard calls for genocide, or calls for murder, on this campus … If ever there were calls for genocide or calls for murder on this campus,” he said, “this University would respond forcefully under its rules in order to protect [its] values.”
As a Princeton student, I have personally been witness to many calls for genocide on my own campus, calls that my university president appears to deny. During the recent explosion of demonstrations on campus, students chanted “From Princeton to Gaza, globalize the Intifada,” a clear call for violence against Jews on this very campus; “One Solution, Intifada revolution,” ominously — and perhaps intentionally — invoking Hitler’s final solution; and “From the water to the water, Palestine is Arab” in Arabic (Min al-mayye il al-mayye, falastin arabiyye), an explicit directive to entirely rid Israel of its Jews, and perhaps Christians too.
The vociferous calls for genocide on campus must shape how we read Eisgruber’s statement, as it effectively leaves readers with two possible interpretations. Either Eisgruber is genuinely unaware of these incidents or has decided on his own to dismiss the claim that the aforementioned chants are “calls for genocide.” as ‘not serious’.
If the former is the case, then our university president is extremely out of touch with what is happening on his campus — and it is not for lack of notice from the student body. Jewish students have repeatedly turned to members of the administration to discuss these incidents and their impact on Princeton’s Jewish community: Countless campus news articles and op-eds have referenced calls for “intifada” and campus protestors’ assertions that “resistance is justified,” and other rationalizations for the mass murder, rape and kidnappings on Oct. 7 in the name of ‘resistance to colonialism,’ and an open letter, signed by almost 2,000 Princeton alumni, students, faculty and staff, addressed directly to President Eisgruber that expressed concern over Princeton’s lack of response to campus antisemitism.
Since it is virtually impossible that the university administration remains unaware of these clear calls to violence against Jews on campus, the second option presented is the only plausible message being communicated. In other words, calling for genocide would be unacceptable, but nothing that has happened up until this point reaches some arbitrary threshold yet to be articulated by the powers that be. I appreciate that Eisgruber acknowledged that “calling for the genocide or murder of Jews or any group is always wrong and appalling,” but that does not give him and Princeton a pass to misrepresent the campus climate. By reinterpreting and downplaying antisemitic language that promotes violence against Jews on campus, Eisgruber has made it clear that when it comes to protecting Jewish students on campus, the university will turn a blind eye. It is a strategy unthinkable had this type of language been directed at any other identity or group in our university community.
All I ask of Princeton’s leadership is to stand for moral clarity; all I ask is that they ensure that I and my fellow Jewish students are safe on campus. The challenges we confront today extend beyond our immediate moment; today is not just about today — It also shapes the trajectory of our collective future. The current events, with calls for violence against Jews all the while generating indifference on the part of those in authority, recall the harrowing tales of my grandparents, survivors of the Holocaust, in the years leading up to the Second World War. No one seemed to care, no one could be bothered, no one took the threats seriously or could be roused out of their slumber. The bitter consequences of blithely dismissing the ‘hypothetical’ are there for all to see.
Alexandra Orbuch is a Junior at Princeton University studying History. She serves as publisher of the Princeton Tory, the university’s journal for conservative thought.
Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.
Editor's Picks
Israel and the Internet Wars – A Professional Social Media Review
The Invisible Student: A Tale of Homelessness at UCLA and USC
What Ever Happened to the LA Times?
Who Are the Jews On Joe Biden’s Cabinet?
You’re Not a Bad Jewish Mom If Your Kid Wants Santa Claus to Come to Your House
No Labels: The Group Fighting for the Political Center
Latest Articles
Our Worst Critic
Different Lessons on Unity: The New York Knicks and Israel
Rabbis of LA | Rabbis Camras, Vogel Take One Step Back
Rabbis of LA | Rabbi Bookstein’s Love Affair with Poland
Goldrich Center Preview Day, L.A. Native Feted at Israel’s Teachers’ Day, EarlyJ Names L.A. Director
A Bisl Torah — What Do They Need?
A Moment in Time: “I Am Here”
Korach and the Mutineers – A poem for Parsha Korach
My family is a mutiny of bald people.
Print Issue: What Will Bibi Do Now? | June 12, 2026
With the U.S. and Iran signing a cease-fire deal that limits Israel’s options, the Israeli prime minister is facing a most difficult moment during an election year.
Iran Deal Puts Israelis in Cognitive Dissonance with ‘Best Friend’ Trump
How does one get angry at the only U.S. president who lived up to the promise of moving the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem?
Ancient Crave-worthy Wisdom in Greek and Biblical Literature
Phil Rosenthal’s Latest Children’s Book Encourages Kids to ‘Just Try It!’
Published by Simon & Schuster, the book, which was published in March, encourages young readers to embrace new experiences, even when they seem a little scary at first.
Marking BCI’s 85th Anniversary, Jewish Leaders Reflect on a Program That Shaped Their Lives
Through communal living, arts, music, discussion, outdoor experiences and Jewish learning, the program has long sought to help young adults explore both Judaism and themselves.
Mandana Dayani at JFSLA: ‘The Spirit of Humanity Is the Choice to Show Up When It’s Hard’
Dayani’s activism has taken many forms over the years, but at its core is a focus on civic engagement and Jewish identity.
From Beverly Hills to Capitol Hill: Three American Jews Honored
The occasion was Project Legacy’s annual Jewish American Heritage Month luncheon, an event that civic engagement leader Ezra Friedlander has, over the years, turned into one of May’s most substantive gatherings in Washington
Alone No More: How Aliyah Became a Lifeline for LiAmi Lawrence
From someone who once needed help finding a job, food and support, Lawrence became the person providing it — offering connections, employment assistance, food gift cards and a 24/7 support line for those in need.
True Legends and a Smoked Brisket
This week we share our column with one of our favorite Instagram bloggers, New Yorker Jeff Mosczyc (pronounced Mah-zik). As the son of a German immigrant father and a first-generation Hungarian mother, his mouthwatering, meat-centric recipes reflect his Ashkenazi background.
Father’s Day Food
This year’s Father’s Day round-up features recipes from different ends of the Jewish spectrum: dill pickle kraut and a Moroccan tomato dip.
Table for Five: Korach
Challenging Moses
Trump’s Surrender to Iran is Evident in First Sentence of Ceasefire Deal
Trump may have the bluster, but the mullahs know they hold the cards.
What Will Bibi Do?
With the U.S. and Iran signing a ceasefire deal that limits Israel’s options, the Israeli prime minister is facing a most difficult moment during an election year.
Don’t Forget the People: The Iran Ceasefire Must Protect Civilians
As details emerge about a signed agreement between the United States and Iran, there still may be room to protect the Persian people from Tehran’s despots, the Lebanese from Hezbollah, Yemenis from the Houthis and Gazans from Hamas.
A Holocaust-Era Heroine for the Ages in ‘The Goddess of Warsaw’
In “The Goddess of Warsaw,” our hero is Lena Browning, an aging Hollywood starlet who has similar credentials to Marilyn Monroe, Joan Crawford and Jane Mansfield.
Trump’s Civilizational Moment
It all depends on one mercurial and imperfect man in the White House. But whether he succeeds or fails, he is leading a free world, much of which no longer understands what it needs to do to survive.
Trump’s New Iran Deal Leaves Israel to Confront Old Dangers Alone
Now Israel watches as its closest friend prepares to hand billions of dollars to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. It sees the nuclear issue endlessly discussed but still unresolved, and Lebanon left hanging in uncertainty.
When ‘Peace’ Breaks Out
Ultimately, although he presented himself as a disruptor, Trump remains captive to the conceptual frameworks, values and norms of Western societies, which place them at a disadvantage in the current clash of civilizations.
More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.