On December 12, Princeton University President Christopher Eisgruber issued a statement referring to “hypothetical calls for the genocide of Jews” and confidently declaring that he has “never heard calls for genocide, or calls for murder, on this campus … If ever there were calls for genocide or calls for murder on this campus,” he said, “this University would respond forcefully under its rules in order to protect [its] values.”
As a Princeton student, I have personally been witness to many calls for genocide on my own campus, calls that my university president appears to deny. During the recent explosion of demonstrations on campus, students chanted “From Princeton to Gaza, globalize the Intifada,” a clear call for violence against Jews on this very campus; “One Solution, Intifada revolution,” ominously — and perhaps intentionally — invoking Hitler’s final solution; and “From the water to the water, Palestine is Arab” in Arabic (Min al-mayye il al-mayye, falastin arabiyye), an explicit directive to entirely rid Israel of its Jews, and perhaps Christians too.
The vociferous calls for genocide on campus must shape how we read Eisgruber’s statement, as it effectively leaves readers with two possible interpretations. Either Eisgruber is genuinely unaware of these incidents or has decided on his own to dismiss the claim that the aforementioned chants are “calls for genocide.” as ‘not serious’.
If the former is the case, then our university president is extremely out of touch with what is happening on his campus — and it is not for lack of notice from the student body. Jewish students have repeatedly turned to members of the administration to discuss these incidents and their impact on Princeton’s Jewish community: Countless campus news articles and op-eds have referenced calls for “intifada” and campus protestors’ assertions that “resistance is justified,” and other rationalizations for the mass murder, rape and kidnappings on Oct. 7 in the name of ‘resistance to colonialism,’ and an open letter, signed by almost 2,000 Princeton alumni, students, faculty and staff, addressed directly to President Eisgruber that expressed concern over Princeton’s lack of response to campus antisemitism.
Since it is virtually impossible that the university administration remains unaware of these clear calls to violence against Jews on campus, the second option presented is the only plausible message being communicated. In other words, calling for genocide would be unacceptable, but nothing that has happened up until this point reaches some arbitrary threshold yet to be articulated by the powers that be. I appreciate that Eisgruber acknowledged that “calling for the genocide or murder of Jews or any group is always wrong and appalling,” but that does not give him and Princeton a pass to misrepresent the campus climate. By reinterpreting and downplaying antisemitic language that promotes violence against Jews on campus, Eisgruber has made it clear that when it comes to protecting Jewish students on campus, the university will turn a blind eye. It is a strategy unthinkable had this type of language been directed at any other identity or group in our university community.
All I ask of Princeton’s leadership is to stand for moral clarity; all I ask is that they ensure that I and my fellow Jewish students are safe on campus. The challenges we confront today extend beyond our immediate moment; today is not just about today — It also shapes the trajectory of our collective future. The current events, with calls for violence against Jews all the while generating indifference on the part of those in authority, recall the harrowing tales of my grandparents, survivors of the Holocaust, in the years leading up to the Second World War. No one seemed to care, no one could be bothered, no one took the threats seriously or could be roused out of their slumber. The bitter consequences of blithely dismissing the ‘hypothetical’ are there for all to see.
Alexandra Orbuch is a Junior at Princeton University studying History. She serves as publisher of the Princeton Tory, the university’s journal for conservative thought.
A Message to Princeton: The Calls for the Genocide of Jews on Your Campus Are Real
Alexandra Orbuch
On December 12, Princeton University President Christopher Eisgruber issued a statement referring to “hypothetical calls for the genocide of Jews” and confidently declaring that he has “never heard calls for genocide, or calls for murder, on this campus … If ever there were calls for genocide or calls for murder on this campus,” he said, “this University would respond forcefully under its rules in order to protect [its] values.”
As a Princeton student, I have personally been witness to many calls for genocide on my own campus, calls that my university president appears to deny. During the recent explosion of demonstrations on campus, students chanted “From Princeton to Gaza, globalize the Intifada,” a clear call for violence against Jews on this very campus; “One Solution, Intifada revolution,” ominously — and perhaps intentionally — invoking Hitler’s final solution; and “From the water to the water, Palestine is Arab” in Arabic (Min al-mayye il al-mayye, falastin arabiyye), an explicit directive to entirely rid Israel of its Jews, and perhaps Christians too.
The vociferous calls for genocide on campus must shape how we read Eisgruber’s statement, as it effectively leaves readers with two possible interpretations. Either Eisgruber is genuinely unaware of these incidents or has decided on his own to dismiss the claim that the aforementioned chants are “calls for genocide.” as ‘not serious’.
If the former is the case, then our university president is extremely out of touch with what is happening on his campus — and it is not for lack of notice from the student body. Jewish students have repeatedly turned to members of the administration to discuss these incidents and their impact on Princeton’s Jewish community: Countless campus news articles and op-eds have referenced calls for “intifada” and campus protestors’ assertions that “resistance is justified,” and other rationalizations for the mass murder, rape and kidnappings on Oct. 7 in the name of ‘resistance to colonialism,’ and an open letter, signed by almost 2,000 Princeton alumni, students, faculty and staff, addressed directly to President Eisgruber that expressed concern over Princeton’s lack of response to campus antisemitism.
Since it is virtually impossible that the university administration remains unaware of these clear calls to violence against Jews on campus, the second option presented is the only plausible message being communicated. In other words, calling for genocide would be unacceptable, but nothing that has happened up until this point reaches some arbitrary threshold yet to be articulated by the powers that be. I appreciate that Eisgruber acknowledged that “calling for the genocide or murder of Jews or any group is always wrong and appalling,” but that does not give him and Princeton a pass to misrepresent the campus climate. By reinterpreting and downplaying antisemitic language that promotes violence against Jews on campus, Eisgruber has made it clear that when it comes to protecting Jewish students on campus, the university will turn a blind eye. It is a strategy unthinkable had this type of language been directed at any other identity or group in our university community.
All I ask of Princeton’s leadership is to stand for moral clarity; all I ask is that they ensure that I and my fellow Jewish students are safe on campus. The challenges we confront today extend beyond our immediate moment; today is not just about today — It also shapes the trajectory of our collective future. The current events, with calls for violence against Jews all the while generating indifference on the part of those in authority, recall the harrowing tales of my grandparents, survivors of the Holocaust, in the years leading up to the Second World War. No one seemed to care, no one could be bothered, no one took the threats seriously or could be roused out of their slumber. The bitter consequences of blithely dismissing the ‘hypothetical’ are there for all to see.
Alexandra Orbuch is a Junior at Princeton University studying History. She serves as publisher of the Princeton Tory, the university’s journal for conservative thought.
Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.
Editor's Picks
Israel and the Internet Wars – A Professional Social Media Review
The Invisible Student: A Tale of Homelessness at UCLA and USC
What Ever Happened to the LA Times?
Who Are the Jews On Joe Biden’s Cabinet?
You’re Not a Bad Jewish Mom If Your Kid Wants Santa Claus to Come to Your House
No Labels: The Group Fighting for the Political Center
Latest Articles
Unbreakable Bond: From Einstein’s $500 Bond to $57 Billion in Israel Bonds
Kitchri—Comfort and Culture in a Bowl
Everyone Screams for Ice Cream in July: Culturally and Creamy Rich Recipes from Pati Jinich
Great Grilled Grub for National Grilling Month
A Moment in Time: On Sabbatical
Table for Five: Devarim
Letter from Los Angeles
A Jewish Angeleno looks back several decades and wonders whether the golden age of LA Jewry is behind us.
Dear England: Don’t Cry for Thee Argentina
When England took a 1-0 lead early in the second half, I felt a sense of cosmic justice. Sixty years is a long time. Argentina won it the last time. Maybe it was England’s turn.
The Admirable Epstein: ‘Mr. Moonlight: Brian Epstein and the Making of the Beatles‘
The Beatles’ manager’s life makes “a wonderfully inspiring and terribly sad story.”
Summer in Israel: Still Waiting for Tourists to Return
Restaurants, gift shops, hotels and car rental companies have all been hit hard by the ongoing war. The blow to the economy is evident almost everywhere you go.
Rosner’s Domain | Can You Be a Zionist Without Zionism?
Do you want to convince Jews, and the world, that Zionism is a cause worth supporting? Explain what “Zionism” is, and perhaps it will turn out that the world is actually on our side.
The Story This Moment Needs
In this moment of rising antisemitism, I’ve noticed that the way I remember, and retell, my own childhood has changed too.
The Jewish Tree of Life and American Tree of Liberty
The Kristallnacht Monument and the Question of Whether to Stop
Miniature, polite gestures of memorialization serve neither as insurance against future catastrophes nor as tributes to the victims. So should we stop to acknowledge them?
Jewish Donors: Don’t Walk Away
Do not give up on institutions — but do not disengage from the responsibility to hold them accountable.
Capping the Fire Hydrant
For close to 30 years, we forked up whatever we could afford and were happy to do it. It was now time for them to experience the exhilaration of staring at a pile of bills, not knowing where the money would come from.
Lindsey Graham’s Last Dream
It is difficult to see another member of Congress or administration official capable of moving a possible Israel-Saudi deal to fruition.
L.A. Jewish Leaders Split Over Rahm Emanuel’s Israel Speech
During his roughly 30-minute speech, he warned that Israel had become a “prisoner of its own tools” and that the American-Israel relationship, although historically strong, was “at a crossroads.”
When Confronting Israel Becomes a Career Strategy, Who Speaks for California?
At a moment when California faces soaring costs, housing shortages, energy challenges, water insecurity and mounting technological competition from China, Ro Khanna chose to travel halfway around the world in pursuit of yet another public confrontation with America’s closest and best ally in the Middle East.
Bar-Ilan University and Sheba Medical Center Joining Forces for Biotech Innovation Institute With $120 Million Investment
This $120 million investment is modeled after the American NIH, and it will accelerate the timeline from lab discovery to clinical treatment.
Jew Hatred is an Emotion. Discrimination is the Evidence.
Just like any emotion or any label, hate can be denied. What is much harder to deny is one set of rules for the world and another for the Jews. That’s not an emotion. It’s an action.
The Movie Europe Doesn’t Want You to See
“Citizen Vigilante” serves as a warning to governments that if they don’t secure their borders, enforce laws, and protect their most vulnerable, ordinary people will resort to self-help.
Why Was Platner’s Nazi Tattoo Tolerable?
Why America Wins When Europe and Israel Stand Together
Hasan Piker and the Narrative about Israel – Untethered to Reality and Harming the Cause of Palestine
The only hope for a better future is to turn the Palestinians away from Hamas and back on the path of building their economy and a democratic society that conceivably could regain the trust of Israelis.
Who is Going to Disarm Them?
No one else is willing to pay the price except Israel which understands its survival depends on it.
More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.