fbpx

October 23, 2013

What Next

By Dean Steinberg

So here I am, a Doctor: the thing I have been working on for a good seven years. Actually I finished classes right on time (albeit a short leave of absence to do some prison time, but I'm sure that’s fairly common in the doctoral student body across various universities), but it was that damn dissertation which was a real pain in the ass.  That added all the extra years, and when I say pain in the ass, I mean it in the most painful, annoying, miserable way. Think hemorrhoid, the size of a baseball. The last thing I thought of before I went to sleep, and the first thing I thought of when I woke up. The big shocker turned out to be that all this thinking about the paper did nothing towards getting it finished. I actually had to sit down, do research, and write, to accomplish that. I know, what the fuck, how annoying?

Anyway, done and done. So where's the parade, the fireworks, even a congratulations lay? Nope. Just time to move on to the next thing. And wouldn’t you know, the next thing comes with a whole new set of anxieties, worries, and of course…procrastination.

Judaic law states that we must continually learn up until the day we die, and if we stop learning then it is as if we are dead. So I guess I am a really law abiding Jew because I keep placing new goals and pushing myself in unknown areas.  I seem to be achieving them—Masters, Doctorate, Homeowner—but it does appear to take years to do it and at this rate I am going to be too old soon to enjoy any of this shit. 

I do look around though, and see those who stop learning, or striving to improve, and simply enjoy the shit they already have, but they don't seem to be enjoying it all that much. They do eat a lot though, and man can they talk about restaurants. But that's not me. And if I can't get shitfaced, restaurants get boring after I have finished my meal. So that leaves me to strive to incorporate new things into my life. Yes, it brings with it fear, anxiety, sometimes feelings of shame, but when I'm in it, even when I'm feeling all those unpleasant emotions, I'm not bored. I think I'll take anything over being bored.

What Next Read More »

Pew finds Jews mostly liberal

One of the most interesting findings of the respected Pew Research Center’s poll of American Jews was the continuing theme of Jewish liberalism and approval of Barack Obama’s performance — a vote of confidence in the president exceeded only by that of African-American Protestants and Hispanic Catholics.

“Jews are among the most strongly liberal, Democratic groups in U.S. politics,” the Pew report said. “There are more than twice as many self-identified Jewish liberals as conservatives, while among the general public, this balance is nearly reversed. In addition, about seven-in-ten Jews identify with or lean toward the Democratic Party. Jews are more supportive of President Barack Obama than are most other religious groups. And about eight-in-ten Jews say homosexuality should be accepted by society.”

The survey is a landmark in research on the Jewish states of mind, the first such major survey since the National Jewish Population Survey of 2000-2001. It digs deeply into religious practice, participation in community activities, educational and economic attainment, demographics, and social and political views. It will help shape writing, commentary and research on Jewish American life for years to come.

It was taken between Feb. 20 and June 13 of this year, including a diverse sampling of 3,475 Jews, who are representative of the 6 million-plus American Jews. 

The pollsters were aware of the difficulty of defining who is a Jew. “This is an ancient question with no single, timeless answer,” they said. They divided Jews in two ways. One was by religion — those who “say their religion is Jewish (and who do not profess any other religion).” The other was “Jews of no religion — people who describe themselves … as atheist, agnostic or nothing in particular, but who have a Jewish parent or were raised Jewish and who still consider themselves Jewish in some way.” Interestingly, the survey found that the overwhelming majority of Jews considered themselves Jewish by religion.

The findings on Jewish attitudes toward Obama come at a significant time. While the Pew pollsters were in the field, the president was under fire for his policies on Syria, Iran and Israel, and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu clearly didn’t like the way he was going.

In addition, he was headed toward yet another brutal confrontation with Republicans, especially the GOP in the House of Representatives. His approval ratings in national polls had dropped sharply since his 2012 re-election.

That drop wasn’t the case among Jews. A total of 65 percent of those surveyed by Pew said they approved of the way Obama was doing his job. Both women and men felt the same way, by just about the same percentage — a contrast to surveys of the general population, which show Obama more popular among women. The same is also true among age groups — with 64 percent of Jews over 50 approving of him and 66 percent of those under 50 agreeing.

Only African-American Protestants, with 88 percent, and Hispanic Catholics, 76 percent, give the president higher approval ratings.

However, the same percentages of Orthodox Jews do not share these beliefs, particularly the ultra-Orthodox, the survey found. For example, 82 percent of Jews overall feel that homosexuality should be accepted by society, while 58 percent of the Orthodox Jews felt it should be discouraged, with that sentiment reaching 70 percent among the ultra-Orthodox. And just 33 percent of Orthodox Jews gave Obama a favorable job-performance rating, with the number even lower among the ultra-Orthodox, 28 percent.

This minority is growing. The Orthodox Jewish community has double the birthrate of the rest of the Jews, and it is substantially younger. Those trends add up to increased Orthodox influence in the political world if they chose to use it. 

Jewish Republicans have tried to mobilize them in past presidential elections, but, so far, each time the Democratic candidate has received a solid majority, the numbers hardly wavering from one election to the next. 

But in recent weeks, their efforts have been damaged by the cadre of radical Republicans in the House, and by Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), who closed down the federal government in their effort to kill the Affordable Care Act (ACA), also known as Obamacare.

You might think the Republicans are on the right track after the Obamacare Web sites’ troubled introduction, and after months of conservative attacks on the ACA, with polls showing that, while negative sentiment is declining, the Affordable Care Act is still unpopular.

But that’s not the case with Jews. They back Obamacare. The American Jewish Committee’s Web site noted that most public opinion polls show a majority of Jews favor the ACA. The Pew survey explains why. 

The poll shows that even among the irreligious, Jewish identity is intertwined with feelings of obligation to society and remembrance of how Jews have been persecuted. Jews worry about the underdogs, who are on the difficult road that they, their parents or grandparents traveled.

The Holocaust is deep in Jewish consciousness. Pew reported that roughly seven in 10 U.S. Jews (73 percent) say remembering the Holocaust is an essential part of what being Jewish means to them. Nearly as many say leading an ethical and moral life is essential to what it means to be Jewish. And a majority of U.S. Jews say working for justice and equality in society is essential to being Jewish.

The hard-hearted Republican conduct of the past weeks, plus the House Republicans’ willingness to shut down badly needed government services run counter to those feelings. That will likely shape how a majority of Jews vote in the 2014 midterm election, as well as in 2016, when the country picks a successor to Barack Obama.


Bill Boyarsky is a columnist for the Jewish Journal, Truthdig and L.A. Observed, and the author of “Inventing L.A.: The Chandlers and Their Times” (Angel City Press).

Pew finds Jews mostly liberal Read More »

Low-key FIDF fundraiser still rakes in the dough

Where have all the big stars gone?

There was nothing flashy or fanciful about this year’s Friends of the Israel Defense Forces western region gala, annually chaired by billionaire mogul Haim Saban and his wife, Cheryl.

The Oct. 22 event, held at the Beverly Hilton Hotel, is usually one of the most energizing and inspiring of the year’s Jewish lot, but this year was some exception – in more ways than one.

The gala itself was uncharacteristically tame. In the past, the usually star-studded event has filled the giant ballroom at the Hyatt Regency in Century City, sometimes with upwards of 1,200 guests. Iconic musicians like Andrea Bocelli and Barbra Streisand have performed, while “Seinfeld” star Jason Alexander has dutifully emceed.

But this year, there was little of that. The venue was changed to the Hilton, which is reliable but smaller. No headlining musical act was invited to perform, though the always entertaining David Foster Wallace reprised his role as host of “FIDF Idol” an after dinner concert in which mostly up and coming talents took the stage. [It was pointed out to me that I should have acknowledged surprise guest Lionel Richie, who gave a surprise performance at the end of the night.]

Big name attendees were also scarcer this year, though Israeli mega-producer Avi Lerner was there, as was Electus founder Ben Silverman. The shiniest star in the whole lot, though, was the real “American Idol,” Simon Cowell, who sat gleaming in a corner with his very pregnant girlfriend (Jewish divorcee Lauren Silverman, with whom Cowell had an affair while she was still married) and from where he publicly pledged $50,000 to the Israel Defense Forces.

That’s right: Simon Cowell, critic extraordinaire, is officially a Zionist; and, on his way out of the gala, told me his plans to visit Israel later this year.

But the Cowell coup was hardly the evening’s redemptive triumph. Far be it from Haim Saban to get upstaged by tamping down. In the end, the host himself took to the podium to project his power and remind everyone that this festivity is really a fundraiser  – $5.2 million in 2009, $9 million in 2010, $14 million in 2012 – and a whopping $20 million in 2013, a record-breaking sum.

Even without the frills, Saban proved he could still bank boodles. The emotional centerpiece of the evening was what it should have been: Israeli soldiers telling their personal stories. One young man recalled losing five family members and his sight to a suicide bombing; and a local L.A. couple with two sons in the IDF earned the blessings of a surprise, staged visit. Why spend a bundle on big rooms and bad food when there could be more for the cause?

Maybe this year Saban decided not to put his money where his mouth is, but where his heart is.

Low-key FIDF fundraiser still rakes in the dough Read More »

In the spirit of Halloween: 10 spooky haunts in the LA area

Ladies and gents, guys and ghouls–in the spirit of Halloween, I'd like to present you with a guide to some of the best ghost-infested locales in the LA area. Although a few of these haunts are hardly hidden, most are not mainstream enough to draw a crowd–perfect for those of you who wish to mingle with the misty apparitions by yourself.

1. The Haunt: Brand Park, Glendale

In the spirit of Halloween: 10 spooky haunts in the LA area Read More »

How to buy the best diamond wedding ring for your buck

When Jeremy Ziskind of Pico-Robertson proposed last year to his then-girlfriend, Allyson Marcus, he had a basic idea of what kind of engagement ring he would give his future wife.

“Allyson told me pretty early on in our relationship that she loved the idea of a heart-shaped ring,” he said. “So I knew that’s what I wanted to get.”

Relying on a tip from a friend, Ziskind searched for rings on How to buy the best diamond wedding ring for your buck Read More »

Kindness connection: Parashat Chayei Sarah (Genesis 23:1-25:18)

Did Avraham attend Yitzchak’s wedding? Well, in the closest thing we have to a wedding description — right at the end of this parasha — Avraham is nowhere to be found. The servant who made the match is there, and the spirit of Sarah is there as she looms large in her son’s memory, but there’s no mention of Avraham. 

And when you consider the parasha more broadly, this absence emerges as but one data point among several. For example, when Avraham buries Sarah at the beginning of the parasha, this time it is Yitzchak who is nowhere to be seen. Yitzchak is similarly absent from the discussion between Avraham and the servant concerning finding Yitzchak a wife. The text makes it abundantly clear that Yitzchak had absolutely nothing to do with it and seems to still know nothing about it until Rivka arrives and the servant explains the whole story. In fact, aside from the one brief and breathtaking exchange that Avraham and Yitzchak have as they climb Mount Moriah, there is not a single line of recorded dialogue between them. And most surprising of all, while we have vivid descriptions of Yitzchak (in his old age) blessing his sons, and of Yakov (at the end of his life) blessing Menashe and Ephraim and all of his sons, there is no scene in which Avraham blesses Yitzchak. He does leave all his possessions to Yitzchak, but there is no deathbed scene, there is no blessing, there are no words whatsoever. It’s too many points to not constitute a pattern. It’s too much of a story to imagine that the Torah isn’t deliberately telling it.

There are surely many possible explanations for this curious — and sad — state of affairs and what the Torah wants us to make of it, and I will attempt only one here. Perhaps what we’re being told is that Avraham experienced the birth and life of Yitzchak as if he were an actor, playing a role in a script that he hadn’t written, and as a result always felt a little bit detached from Yitzchak’s life and story. Yitzchak’s birth was more driven by God’s narrative than Avraham’s. Yitzchak was the direct result of God’s miraculous intervention — an intervention that Avraham deemed unnecessary when God first told it would be happening (“May Yishmael live before You!”). To be sure, Avraham does faithfully carry out all of God’s instructions concerning this miracle child, circumcising him, marrying him off within the family, ensuring that he is the primary heir, and even bringing him up to be bound on the mountain when God asks that he do that, but nowhere do we find him emotionally engaged with Yitzchak. This in contrast, by the way, with the deep feelings that Avraham expresses when Yishmael is banished from the house (Genesis 21:11).

We simply do not find Avraham emotionally engaged with Yitzchak, which is probably why we never find Yitzchak emotionally engaged with his father either.

None of this is intended as a criticism of Avraham. It is obvious that Avraham cared for Yitzchak, and always ensured that he had all his needs attended to. Nor is it my intention, even remotely, to suggest that father and son never spoke. Rather, I’m suggesting that the Torah is subtly but unmistakably painting a story of a father, a great man, who could not get past the feeling that he had been thrust into a script that wasn’t of his own design, resulting in a relationship that lacked the magic of true and spontaneous love. 

The story, looked at this way, is about your life and mine in numerous ways. It’s about the conscious, and sometimes almost superhuman effort it takes to be emotionally present for people, be they family members or acquaintances, when we don’t feel an innate emotional connection to their story. We of course only add more pain to painful situations when we appear to be (and actually are) emotionally detached. And although our difficulty in engaging may be understandable in objective terms, it is often a terrible blow to the one who seeks our caring and empathy.

The story of Avraham and Yitzchak is also about those occasions when we find ourselves, completely unexpectedly, in the middle of situations that call for our response, but about which our first thought may be, “This has nothing to do with me.” The Torah often demands our engagement in situations such as these, such as when we stumble across a stranger’s lost ox or garment, or when we encounter somebody’s donkey that has fallen under its load. The mitzvah “to not stand idly by” presumes a situation that arises “off-script.” Comforting mourners, visiting the sick, tending to the needs of the poor all have a way of presenting themselves unplanned and outside of the narrative that we had written for ourselves. And we are asked to somehow arouse the emotional resources we will need to rise to the moment.  

None of us is a bottomless reservoir of emotional energy, and we have to know how to best utilize our resources. But we can all strive higher and learn a lesson from the life of the father of our people.


Rav Yosef Kanefsky is rabbi at B’nai David-Judea, a Modern Orthodox congregation.

Kindness connection: Parashat Chayei Sarah (Genesis 23:1-25:18) Read More »

Federation Parent and Me voucher program: As you sow, so shall you reap

Oak Park resident Dina Torgan, who attends a Mommy and Me program at Temple Etz Chaim in Thousand Oaks with her 9-month-old daughter, is confident that their participation will pay big dividends down the road, laying a strong foundation for a lifetime of Jewish learning.

“I know it is important to me and my family that when our daughter is ready for preschool, she attend a Jewish school to be exposed to Jewish life early on,” she said. “The Mommy and Me program has been invaluable, as a first-time mom. It is great to connect with other moms and just be a part of the Jewish community in general.”

That’s one reason Torgan was thrilled to learn about a new incentive from The Jewish Federation of Greater Los Angeles and BJE-Builders of Jewish Education to help more parents get involved with such classes filled with music, play, traditions and other Jews.

Funded by an initial allocation from Federation of $45,000, the Federation Parent and Me voucher program began in September and is being run by BJE. The pilot program — which reduces a parent’s cost by 70 percent for an initial session of classes — is available at certain synagogues in the West San Fernando and Conejo valleys. 

“We want to make Jewish programs more affordable and accessible to families,” said Jay Sanderson, president and CEO of Federation. He said there will be “additional significant funding once the program gets going.” 

“The program is designed to ease the pathway into participation in organized Jewish life for families by offering a financial incentive to try a Jewish program that competes well with similar non-Jewish programs in the marketplace,” said Phil Liff-Grieff, associate director of BJE. “Parent and Me classes were chosen because they are relatively inexpensive, and they come at a point in the life of a family when directions are set for future connections and involvement.” 

The voucher program works like this: It pays half of the tuition for an eight-to-12-week Parent and Me session with a participating temple that can normally cost between $140 and $180. The congregation agrees to pay an additional 20 percent — and is reimbursed by Federation for every voucher it receives — leaving the participating family with only 30 percent of the cost. Once a participant completes the online application at bjela.org/parentandme — no financial need is necessary — families receive a voucher that is presented when enrolling. 

“In order to qualify, one parent must be Jewish, or identify as Jewish, and this must be the first time a family has availed themselves of a Jewish experience for a child,” Liff-Grieff said. “The goal is to sway families who are looking for comparable programs in a variety of places.” 

So far, 33 vouchers have been given out. Organizers would like to distribute another 125 vouchers over the next few months. 

Cheryl Cohen, Parent and Me coordinator at Temple Aliyah, a participating Conservative congregation in Woodland Hills, thinks the vouchers help in recruiting and encourage families to maintain a connection to the Jewish community.

“We have maybe received five new participants, and a few newly enrolled that already knew about Temple Aliyah,” she said. “While that might not seem like a lot, our classes fill up at 12 families so the addition is almost half a class.” 

The other participating valley congregations are Temple Etz Chaim, Kol Tikvah in Woodland Hills, Shomrei Torah Synagogue in West Hills and Temple Adat Elohim in Thousand Oaks.

“Because the funds for this pilot project were limited, it was decided to focus on a clearly delineated geographic area that contained a selection of good Jewish Parent and Me programs and a significant population of families with young children,” Liff-Grieff said. 

Donna Becker, Temple Adat Elohim’s early childhood education director, has seen an increase in the families participating in the program and created an evening Parent and Me class for working parents. 

“I love the idea of being supported by BJE and Federation, and I think these kinds of programs and outreach are great,” she said.

For those families who take part in the voucher program and then decide to re-enroll in a Parent and Me series, Federation will cover 25 percent of the second session, with families paying the full amount for future sessions. 

“I can’t wait to tell the parents that next session has an additional discount as well,” Becker said. “This is the entry to our temple family, and it needs to be affordable, convenient and a wonderful experience.”

Debbie Blumenthal, director of early childhood education at Etz Chaim, said these sorts of programs can be the start of something great. It’s common for Parent and Me friends to want to join preschool together, she said.

“We hope that as they are building relationships and becoming attached not only to each other, but to our temple family … that it will be only natural that they will stay, become members and send their children here for preschool.”

Federation Parent and Me voucher program: As you sow, so shall you reap Read More »

Adam Greenberg recalls big league dreams come true

They came to be inspired by a man with precisely two Major League at bats.

The Oct. 6 crowd at Temple Ahavat Shalom (TAS) in Northridge resembled that of a Little League game, as 200 parents and children — many dressed in baseball uniforms — gathered to hear the story of perseverance behind Adam Greenberg, the Jewish professional baseball player who stepped into the batter’s box only twice, seven years apart. 

Dressed casually but sharply in dark blue jeans and a white button-down shirt, Greenberg, a 32-year-old Connecticut native, sat down with the Jewish Journal at TAS prior to his speech about how persistence got him from his first Major League at bat in 2005 to his second one in 2012.

After excelling at baseball in high school and in college at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Greenberg found himself sitting in his parents’ New Jersey home in early June 2002, waiting for a call to hear if he had been selected in that year’s Major League Baseball draft.

When he got the call, it was thrilling — and surprising — news. The Chicago Cubs selected him in the ninth round to play centerfield. 

“It was a dream-come-true moment for me to get the call,” Greenberg said. “And then it shocked me because the Cubs were a specific team that my agent had said was not a good fit.”

For three years, he worked his way through the Cubs’ Minor League system — $20 a day for meals, $850 a month for salary, and lots of long bus rides and shoddy hotels. Then he and a teammate, Matt Murton, got a call one night from his manager that they would be meeting the Cubs in Miami.

That, Greenberg said, “was the coolest experience of my life.”

Two nights later, friends and relatives were in the stands as he prepared to play against the Florida Marlins. Greenberg, a left-handed batter, said he wasn’t nervous as he stepped into the batter’s box in the ninth inning, as a pinch hitter, to face lefty pitcher Valerio de los Santos. 

As the now-viral video of the at bat shows, Greenberg prepared for the pitch by going through his regular motions in the batter’s box, bending his knees and shifting the bat and his hips until he settled into a comfortable stance. The boyish-looking, curly-haired Greenberg was ready.

As the catcher set up on the outside half of the plate, away from Greenberg, the rookie awaited his first ever Major League pitch. De los Santos began his delivery toward what was supposed to be a fastball away from Greenberg. 

But there was one problem: De los Santos released the ball at the wrong point, sending a 92 mph fastball too high and inside. He stood there, frozen, as the ball found the one spot on the side of his head unprotected by his helmet, just under his right ear. 

If it had hit him somewhere else, he said, pointing a few inches above the point of impact, the helmet would have protected his head and he would have been fine. Instead, the impact knocked off his helmet and Greenberg bent over, stumbled and fell backward, grabbing the back of his head with both hands as he hit the ground. 

Greenberg still remembers: “As soon as it happened, all I kept saying was, ‘Stay alive. Stay alive. Stay alive.’ ”

He didn’t lose consciousness or awareness, but he lost control of his eyes as they rolled into the back of his head. 

Still, Greenberg wasn’t much worried about his budding professional baseball career. A three-day break in the schedule for the approaching All-Star Game had him thinking, “I’ll be back after the All-Star Break, and I’ll be good to go.”

But he wasn’t. In the Miami airport, he almost fell down and blacked out. If he lay down or moved his head in a certain way, his eyes would move uncontrollably. The headaches, he said, were “unbearable,” and he was diagnosed with positional vertigo, a disorder arising in the inner ear.

Even so, an optimistic Greenberg said he had “no hunch that baseball would be derailed.”

He was sent back to the minors and hopped from ball club to ball club — including the Los Angeles Dodgers and Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim — for the next six years. Instead of despairing that “all the batting cages, all the games, all the travel hours” only led to one painfully quick plate appearance in Florida, Greenberg said he maintained the attitude, “I’m still going to get back there.”

And he did get back — seven years after his first at bat, thanks to filmmaker Matt Liston, a diehard Cubs fan and Los Angeles resident who followed Greenberg’s career from the time he was a Minor Leaguer. In a telephone interview with the Journal, Liston described how he helped Greenberg get that second chance. 

“What if he doesn’t get back up?” he remembered thinking when the Cubs, in September 2005, didn’t recall Greenberg after they were eliminated from play-off contention. “He was always in the back of my head.”

In 2012, Liston lobbied Major League teams to give Greenberg one more shot. And in September of that year, he created a petition on Change.org for Adam Greenberg recalls big league dreams come true Read More »

Judea Pearl reaches out to young Jews

“I look at young Jewish boys as the army of the future, the elite force of the army of decency.”

With these strong words, Judea Pearl — activist, scholar and father of slain Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl — used an Oct. 17 lecture to a group of Millennials to emphasize how important it is that proud Jews be a force of good in the world.

“This is what I feel about them, and that is what I want them to feel about themselves,” Pearl said.

He appeared before a group of about 30 people as part of an event organized by the American Jewish Committee’s (AJC) regional chapter of ACCESS, the young professionals initiative of the global Jewish advocacy organization that trains professionals in their 20s and 30s to represent AJC on the local, national and international levels. 

It took place in the Encino home of philanthropists Richard and Marcia Volpert, and drew ACCESS members who work in law, medicine, government relations and other fields. It was open to the public, but offered at a discount to ACCESS members. 

The talk on young American Jewry could be considered commentary on the recent and much-publicized study by the Pew Research Center, “A Portrait of Jewish Americans.” Released last month, the report showed Jewish affiliation, particularly among young Jews, on the decline.

Without mentioning the study by name, Pearl, a UCLA professor emeritus and president of the Daniel Pearl Foundation, suggested that the way one achieves Jewish pride is by absorbing the history of the Jewish people and by placing Israel at the center of identity.

“By saying we are proud of the story, we are building the future together in the same shape, same mold,” he said during remarks that lasted about one hour and included a
Q-and-A.

Cole Ettman, one of the evening’s attendees, agreed that the history of the Jewish people — which spans thousands of years, from times living in disparate tribes to modern society with Jews acting as leaders in art, science, business and technology — can be an effective bait to grab the attention of the unaffiliated.

An ACCESS member who works as chief operating officer of the law firm Levine and Blit, Ettman used his soapbox during the Q-and-A to suggest that Pearl’s philosophy should be embraced by larger outreach efforts. While other organizations may promote Judaism by getting young Jews to wrap tefillin or keep Shabbat, identifying with the Jewish story is what’s essential, he suggested.

“You’ve got the right path, and it is enough,” Ettman said.

Pearl’s appearance followed a brief rendition of Bach’s “Sonata No. 1 in G Minor,” performed by 20-year-old violinist Stephen Tavani — the event doubled as one of the many concerts taking place worldwide this month as part of Daniel Pearl World Music Days. 

An initiative of the Daniel Pearl Foundation, World Music Days is an international network of live music performances during the month of Daniel Pearl’s birthday. This is the 12th consecutive year of concerts to honor Pearl and his love of music.

Founded by Daniel Pearl’s family and friends, the Daniel Pearl Foundation is a nonprofit that works for peace by supporting programs and fellowships around music, journalism and cross-cultural dialogue.

Judea Pearl reaches out to young Jews Read More »

Why there is still no ‘Entourage’ movie

It seems the “Entourage” cast members could use some help from someone like superagent Ari Gold.

The movie version of the HBO comedy has been in the works forever, but lots of drama has delayed it from getting off the ground. The latest hold up is due to more heated negotiations, according to The Hollywood Reporter.

It turns out Jeremy Piven, who plays Gold, is getting paid a lot more than the rest of the guys, and they’re not happy about it.

So when will this thing happen already?

“As soon as them guys stop being so greedy,” producer Mark Wahlberg told TMZ last week.

Co-star Adrian Grenier had this to say via Instagram a couple of days later.

To all Entourage fans. I owe it to you to make a couple things clear. I take my role as Vince on the show & off very seriously. All decisions I make personally & for business are for the principle of friendship and brotherhood. It has, & never will be about the money for me. I promise. I will always stand up for the boys (that includes you) & do what I can to make sure they are treated fairly, and not be taken advantage of by anybody. The spirit of Entourage is about sharing the opportunities given to us and I will sign any deal that gives ALL the boys an opportunity to share in the upside of success EQUALLY. I assure you, despite the perception, there is no greed in my heart. Remember, it will all work out in the end. It always does. —— I will try to answer questions with hashtag #entourageboysshare

It’s been a while since the show’s finale, but, wow, it looks like someone’s really stayed in character.

Why there is still no ‘Entourage’ movie Read More »